To attempt to silence a man is to pay him homage, for it is an acknowledgement that his arguments are both impossible to answer and impossible to ignore. ~ JBR Yant
If you have been around AVfM or other men’s rights websites for very long, you have likely seen feminism referred to as an ideology of hate, with violent leanings. It is a charge quickly pooh-poohed, and often openly ridiculed by gender ideologues who would prefer that you view the men’s movement as the real source of hate and potential violence.
This is their stated position, despite a long history of violence and hateful rhetoric stretching back for more than a century of activism “on behalf of women.”
As recently reported in an outstanding article here by Andyman, we discover that the Women’s Suffrage Movement, long touted as a righteous push for across the board equality by fair minded women, was actually a matter of highly organized and systematic violence including arson and physical assault. We also learned that their platform was not one universal suffrage, but of preserving the right to vote for the elite and affluent land owners, much in keeping with the traditions of the system, against which they claimed to be rebelling.
A general understanding of history also compels us to understand that women like Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger was not so much an advocate for women’s reproductive autonomy as she was a genocidal racist intent on wiping African Americans and other “inferior undesirables” from the American landscape.
She was, in effect, a predecessor to the now emergent Radfem community of women who openly advocate for the extermination of half the population, eugenics and male enslavement to a system of feminist governance.
In more recent times we know of the struggles of Erin Pizzey, the founder of the world’s first shelter for abused women, and how, when her research came into conflict with the modern feminist narrative of women only victims and male only perpetrators of domestic violence, she was stalked, received multiple death threats and even changed the continent on which she resided to escape harassment and threats.
Similarly, when world renowned domestic violence academicians and researchers Richard Gelles, Murray Straus and Suzanne Steinmetz conducted research concluding sexual symmetry in the incidence of intimate partner violence, each of them received death threats. Bomb threats were phoned in to the schools at which they were scheduled to present their findings.
This is the track record of gender ideologues who call themselves feminists and who claim to represent a peaceful movement for the empowerment of all human beings.
This does not include the proxy violence of state functionaries that feminists have inspired through biased, sexist legislation, but their own direct violent actions targeting individuals whose only threat to them is expressing views that do not meet their approval.
With the exception of the Suffragettes, most of their violence has taken the form of threat, rather than the actual acting out of physical hostilities. We do have exceptions like Valerie Solanas, the much revered murderess of “Scum Manifesto” fame. Also, we have to note the box cutter wielding members of Atheism+ and their public display of destruction of property and intimidation in order to silence the idea that men are human beings who deserve equal rights.
But these have been the exception rather than the rule, which has been to either make threats or to enlist others to conduct violence on their behalf.
However, any ideology predicated on the justified use of violence to attain goals that are considered essential will always devolve into violence as a preferred method of expression.
And this has begun to manifest in 2012.
Last Friday, Warren Farrell, author of the seminal book on men’s issues, “The Myth of Male Power,” spoke at the University of Toronto. His subject matter was concerns over the deteriorating state of men and boys in education, male suicide rates and the phenomena of young men’s “failure to launch,” or, more accurately concerns over why young men are remaining in the home of their parents far past the time they would be normally expected to move out and take ownership of their lives.
While these are very, very important subjects, they pale in comparison to many of the subjects covered on this website. The reaction of campus feminists at the University of Toronto was violent.
I will speculate at this time that there is a reason why Warren Farrell’s appearance on a major university two years ago would not have resulted in this near riot. It is because of A Voice for Men and other sites like it.
More accurately, perhaps, it is because we have been so successful in getting the MRM message on the public table and the reaction of feminist bloggers like Amanda Marcotte, Jessica Valenti, PZ Myers, Matt Dillahunty and David Futrelle has been to encourage violence against it. It has been because websites like Jezebel.com, The Good Men Project, and organizations like the SPLC have done the same.
By feeding the already violence prone ideologues that further feminist doctrine a steady diet of histrionic distortions, irrational fear and calculated misrepresentations of the men’s movement, they are inspiring many of these people (most of which are naïve and impressionable young people) to react, even to the presence of the very tame and soft spoken Farrell, as though he were a Grand Dragon of the KKK.
Since none of the afore mentioned bloggers, nor the management teams of those websites (e.g. Lisa Hickey and Tom Matlack) and organizations like the SPLC (Arthur Goldwag), have any moral compass directing them to correct their own actions, this will undoubtedly worsen in the future.
Recently Girl Writes What informed us that there are now some colleges and high schools starting to use her videos in classrooms. It is a great move forward because it means that the real MRA message, not some watered down version of it, is starting to make its way into the academic world. It may not be long before she is asked to speak, and woman or not, her message will not be near as palatable as Farrell’s. Which is to say that her message is the one that needs to be heard in those places.
Physical violence against the MRM on the streets is on the way.
And all of this is happening because websites like A Voice for Men have put men’s issues on the map.
While we are not going to stop (in fact, we take this as a cue to ramp up our operations) I do want to say on behalf of the management team here, that this is also the time to more tightly embrace our views of non-violence and peaceful protest. As you saw in the video, it is better to let them prove their hatred and tendency toward violence completely on their own.
If they are to be cracked on the head, let it be with a police baton, and not because any of us took action against them. Let them sit in jail cells together, and not alongside MRAs. They will do the dirty work of taking themselves down, as long as we are smart enough, and principled enough, to allow it to happen. And it appears at this point all we have to do to ensure that is to keep doing what we are doing.
After all, we don’t have to use dishonest propaganda to paint them as violent bigots. All we have to do is point at their actions.
667 Posts in Total
donations either one-time or on a monthly subscription basis.
If you don't have paypal, check out the other options.
If you want to get some merchandise and sponsor us at the same time, consider the AVfM store.
August Løvenskiolds:
Robert Crayle:
Primal:
tallwheel:
Diana Davison:
Yep this is why I target the young with my offline work.
The 15 – 25 age group of single males are our biggest hope.
The more young men pull back from women the more power they have over their lives.
Less is more…
Where it concerned women he (Lennon) was an absolute pussy. But he had the the right ideas about taunting the powers that be (well, the ones without a vagina)
I was thinking of this video as I typed!
John Lennon explains “Woman Is the Nigger of the World”
I remember first watching this video a few years back, Lennon was permanently sullied in my memory bank forever.
I think that you are fundamentally correct that the violent and, yes, hysterical reaction to such a mild-mannered, reasonable and (I hate to say it because I respect and admire him) milquetoast like Warren Farrell can only indicate a general fear and hostility of absolutely epic proportions by privileged, powerful people who perceive that their privileged status is under threat and they might actually have to live with equality under the law instead of pretend they want it and fight against it instead.
Will this get more ugly before it gets better? Or will it instead be a wakeup call for sensible people and even a few of the people getting violent and hysterical–in other words, will at least most of these people develop a conscience and some sense of shame at their current behavior and seek to modify it to be better human beings who actually do respect human rights for all?
I guess we’ll see.
My Dearest Beloveds,
This febrile estrogen rage is a storm that undaunted men can weather and conquer.
It won’t be easy and the young of heart will take this challenge into deep struggle, but if the vagina is the trump card, then the iron will of male agency is the joker.
That is why feminists are becoming increasingly agitated and indeed, hysterical at even our modest efforts – we are calling them on their shit in ways they cannot answer well; their male slaves are revolting (in more ways than one); and as we men regain our power and fortitude we restore all men to a vision of meaningful achievement even as we drain the feminist’s resolve like a low tide drains the ocean.
Our peaceful vision and gentle truths are ripping through the feminists’ falsehoods, their toxic feelings and their rapacious lust for male destruction as a warm Spring sun melts the bitter failing snow.
Not one step backwards, brothers. We will not be unscathed, but in the end we will save civil, nurturing human community as we have done before, again and again.
And that is what the Bibo Sez.
Bless you!
That video was beautiful. They are showing their true character. A noteworthy aside, if they keep that crap up, they’re going to alienate the police, heretofore powerful allies. They NEED the police on their side. This can not end well for them.
Suz, I respect your opinion but remain suspicious.
Did you see how the police quickly arrested one of the “sacrificial beta orbiters,” had a “media professional” on hand; and then after they had exclusive interviews with no counter point or opposing view the police cordoned off the event with possibly no body allowed to attend?
Strikes me as…………oddly coincidental?
It won’t happen overnight, and the broads might wise up (but I doubt it.) Over the past decade or so, cops have grown more and more accustomed to treating violent females as the thugs they are. The primary thing protecting these women is their nominal status as “educated” and “civilized.” That veneer will wear thin if they continue to act like drug addled slum-dwellers.
Also Suz, as these CRIMINALS feel “empowered”, and entitled to be violent (just observe any TV show,movie, TV commercial), one of them will eventually hurt, perminantly disable, or even (God forbid) kill a cop during a protest . When this happens,does anyone think that the police will still view these “women” as harmless little victims?
Dont expect the “Blue Wall” to be THAT tolerant.
Unfortunatly, thats what it will take for the prosecutor’s office(s), the media, and law-makers to take notice.
I think it isn’t meant to end well for them.
Historically, one of the problems with scapegoats is that most of the crimes they are accused of are flubs, twists and distortions of facts to outright lie’s.
Enter the concept of the “Perfect Scapegoat”. A scapegoat that is actually guilty of all the things they will be scapegoated for.
Note the lack of a pillow case for Margaret Sanger in the photo – as a women she knows he can get away with it.
That’s actually because she was never a klan member, she only gave one talk at a KKK rally according to wikipedia.
Man Paul, the more I see, the more I love you guys. I love the style you use too. In their face, begging them to do something.
The thing is, and you know this; you are not alone. However, the work your group has built up here is something that has to be saved many times over; because the internet does not care about anything. The men’s movement, nr it’s detractors. We have them merely laughing at us up until now; it looks like violence is now a real threat. Also, with the current regime in charge you have to understand that since 9/11 it is so easy for them to label even our own citizens as terrorists.
That label is not new; but the ridiculously unconstitutional force with which they can wield it these past ten years certainly is.
Up until now, I did not see us as a threat in their eyes. If and when it does happen they are going to play hardball to break the movement.
I imagine you got several people with back ups of all your files you trust. I read how JTO had a crew with him for security in case things went bad; I know you know what you are doing. Many of these knuckleheads are college students. All it takes is one smart beta male with a laptop and an axe to grind of his nearest female “planet” he now currently orbits to commit BS by proxy.
Unless of course sites like this really do start to take down public figures? I have to assume that with all the businesses which donate to DV causes; they know which gender the bread is buttered. They are not going to let us get our grip back on our own money anytime soon! We won’t foolishly give it to them for useless crap. Can’t have that now can we? So off to war, the grave, family court, and cancer with us.
All the others things which ail us are merely more collateral damage they don’t care if we endure. This is only when they don’t have to concentrate on us. When the Men’s movement makes them afraid; I agree with you they will strike. My question is where, when, with what, and how much?
Just read your “Mighty Mo” piece on your blog. Very rousing. You should consider posting it on the AVFM. It is glorious.
Thanks, nice to hear. My experience with blogging has shown me how hard it is.. On top of everything else I have my fingers in; it really makes me have more respect for what Paul, JTO, Dean, an others do on this blog.
It requires a lot of work to balance everything. I imagine that PE and crew have lives; but m experience tells me they may not do much else? LOL
I first thought that writing would be simple. Yet I discovered a natural emotion of fear when I started (I am personally very picky, and quasi judgemental; so I feared writing a bad article being read by someone like myself ). This has to do wih the fact that everything you write could be viewed by anyone.
So you have to have a proper balance of content. Pithy writing, maybe some videos, a few links, but not too ridiculously long for some; yet a novel for others. Sometimes it makes me want to go Prophet of old an live in a commune. I wonder if Ramath is still around? LOL
Thanks again for the kind words.
Not being a “gamer?,” nor throwing stones at such, I used to date using a couple of the more well known sites. By choice I have not dated in a couple of years. in fact I don’t forsee a relationship in my near future. I know their are decent women out there but just the idea of what they can do as govt power proxys disgusts me enough to just stay out of the game. Now…:-). …finally to my point. I still look at these sights and i find myself very, very sad for many of these women. Many of them I see over and over again. Good looking, employed, run of the mill avg profiles, but unable to find a suitable long term relationship. Although many of them “…live, love, laugh…” I wonder if under the surface they are as angry as the young, angry, uber-programmed fembots in this video? I’m looking in my age group on these sites…45-50yo. How will this groups anger manifest as they recycle over and over on these dating sites? I mean I stay away from them by choice; i have too much to lose. Plus i’ve so constrained my choice criteria that it doesnt leave much of a choice. If the woman is a teacher-no; living in her ex-husband house or recieving alimony or ex wife support meant for the child that is at guideline-no. Social worker or Related field-no. government worker…nope. Cop or lawyer…nope…not much left. I think a farmers daughter…who owns the farm..and has 3x the net worth of me…so If the relationship doesnt work, she’ll be more inclined to walk away no harm..no foul. its a g’damn mess out there…God help our children
There are fake pics of Sanger at KKK rallies. Look at the square dark frame around her feet. This one is fake too IMO.
Yes it does look fake come to mention it. That said we do know she spoke at a KKK meeting because she wrote about it in her autobiography.
Yep, that’s fake alright. It’s not even been shopped, it’s crop copy & paste.
It may be. I don’t know. It is one of many that come back from a google search. What I do know is that Sanger was a dyed in the wool racist and proponent of eugenics and genocide.
That is not in dispute, as far as I know.
http://blackquillandink.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/margaret-sanger-quotes.pdf
Just the same I replaced the image with one more appropriate.
Nice replacement. Thanks.
I think your analysis is spot on as well as your points on non-violence. Let them continue to reveal their true colours – they don’t need any help from us.
Fyi all. -O…M…G…
HiMY SYeD — Protest in front of Medical Science Building UofT Toronto Friday Night November 16 2012
Yes saw that video last night and sent my observations to the feminists censoring commentary on it in youtube. Totally one sided smear video with no attempt to seek rebutal or opinion from those attending the actual talk.
She didn’t even know who was giving the fucking talk. Holy shit!! LOL!!
HA!
From:
http://www.ryersonian.ca/article/25226/
“Melanie P. writes:
11/17/2012
I was at this talk. I’m a woman social worker who works primarily with people at-risk of and coping with addiction, violence, etc. Most of my clients are boys and young men.
I was there with two other women and one male colleague to learn about how our society boys fall into the traps of violence more often, why they don’t address negative emotions properly, why they drop out of school more, etc.
The man in our group was is also a social worker and very passionate about helping people. He was called a rape apologist, accused of being a misogynist, told he was supporting rape culture, etc.
He was there for the same reason we were and was subjected to some incredibly disgusting vitriol from these people. The audience was roughly 50/50 men and women and nothing even remotely sexist was said.
The only sexists I encountered were the ones outside protesting.”
Hmmm, non-MRA female attendees are even noticing that the protesters were the only sexists in the area.
What fucking fools.
Sha-a-a-dup already.
No, wait. Keep talking, keep talking. They now have a bigger more critical audience then ever.
Horse and bicycle ‘blockades’. The university apparently were prepared for the Comedy Central censorship crowd.
Thanks, whoever he was, for posting this on YouTube. Your tax dollars at work and on display.
“Community” is repeated over and over again. This woman is a trained Saul Alinsky “community organizer.”
I love how she keeps claiming that her people were “attacked” because of men’s rights activists and then admits that uh yea they were “attacked” (forcibly removed) by police…
It makes me sick; I bet this guy wins an award for journalism.
Keep talking ladies; eventually more people will check. When they see who is, and who is not reasonable; it will be a different story. Both of those women interviewed will probably find some expedient, albeit intellectually dishonest way to justify joining us.
Femnists sure do love to co-opt movements! Why they hate us so bad; they cannot co-opt us. So they strategically silence us instead with a mock drama coordinated with the police who eventually “block people” from entering. All those police needed was dreads and Black Panther logos and its a rap! LOL
I kept a copy, might need it in the future.
Check out the fear on her face and her voice infliction, she is a liar and she knows it.She pretty much tells the same lies the Monash girl did when Dr F make his prank call.
Its like I always tell my son about so called christians. “Give them a chance to show you who they truly are and they will never fail to dissapoint.
With feminists, just give em enough rope and stand back and watch as they hang themselves.
Might be a bit of a lesson to learn here too. I keep hearing from everybody how soft spoken and polite and how much of a Mr Nice Guy Warren Farrell is……..well……they still treat him like he is Adolf Hitler coming to to speak at the Convention for Holocaust Survivors.
Great quote by John Lennon. Reminded me of another:
“Violence is the last resort of the incompetent.” -Isaac Asimov
He wasn’t referring to feminism but hey, let’s quote the truth wherever we find it.
“Violence is the last resort of the incompetent.” -Isaac Asimov
Ineffectual, scared little pussies like Aasimov ALWAYS say dumb shit like this. Isaac couldn’t have punched his way out of a wet paper bag…OF COURSE he ‘eschews violence’….much in the same way I ‘eschew’ skydiving. And like the fat chick ‘eschewing’ “traditional beauty”, Aasimov and his ilk make me nearly as sick as Andrea Dworkin does.
I used to love Aasimov’s SF. Then I started seeing the supplication, even outright WORSHIP of women in his books, coupled with the ‘necessary evil’ of violence ONLY when used to defend women as acceptable.
So…a bit OT sure…but Aasimov was anything BUT a worthy role model.
“Violence is the last resort of the incompetent.” -Isaac Asimov
No, Violence is the ultimate answer to the question ‘Or else what?’ – Jack Donovan (paraphrased)
http://www.jack-donovan.com/axis/2011/03/violence-is-golden/
You can put Martha Burk (the ex president of NOW) in the same frame as Margaret Sanger. Check here. Admittedly this is a pro life site but the facts here are interesting.
http://www.catholicity.com/commentary/coyne/00270.html
The protesters here have exposed themselves to the world as hateful bigoted and ignorant ideologues, who simply have no idea of who Warren Farrell is , what he has done , or the enormous contribution his well researched and referenced writings make to the discourse around gender.
To misquote out of context 2 statements from his entire works as the basis for conflating and misrepresenting him as a rape apologist and pedophile, confirms they listened in Feminism 101 class, whilst demonstrating their lack of intellectual integrity, or ability to come up with anything more substantive.
Their resort to violence and obstruction of others constitutional rights to freedom of association and freedom of speech, whilst hypocritically claiming the moral high ground demonstrates conclusively that they subscribe to an illogical, dangerous and violent ideology.
I hope the full presentation of Farrell’s has been recorded and will be posted, the snippets I have seen simply http://www.ryersonian.ca/article/25226 show an intelligent and learned man trying to describe research and draw conclusions regarding issues of concern to men and society.
Congratulations to all those moving and keeping peaceful, and also taking measures to assure that we have freedom of assembly and to discuss men’s and boys’ issues! Great work, great post. And happy International Men’s Day to all!
Spot as usual Paul.
I am disappointed I missed this event, However as soon as the opportunity presents itself the U of T can expect some posters hung up.
Dannyboy, please be careful and poster in pairs. Those folk look spoiling for a lynching
Stickers on the way. You should have them this week (barring the ineptitude of the US Postal system).
Good vid footage of near mob frenzy.
Pushing and shoving campus police preceding a lecture arranged for the public to witness at a post secondary facility. At an institute once known for higher learning and open inquiry.
A lecture by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad? No, a by-invitation public address featuring Wa…huh,… Warren Farrell? A known domestic equalitist scholar? Not a state figure threatening the Isreali population with extermination?
Keep the cams ready and rollin’ for social media. Let the public see for themselves as they observe the fruits of their tax dollars being spent for idealogues trying to uphold the militantly insular but factually questionable ‘women’s studies’ social programming found at a campus near them. Programming that preaches social equality but actively practices suppression, anywhere. Led by, and I hesitate to use the word within its proper designation – women. Unruly adolescent mentality sharing similar shaming tactics as the British suffragist Mrs. Emmeline Pankhurst who directed subtle hatred with the white feather coward campaign toward vote less young men of early 20th century pre-war Britian. This time the hatred from Toronto Canada is manifest in more overt tones toward just one gentleman who’s seen and taught equality form both sides of the ‘gender’ spectrum.
A deserving public come-uppance is due and looming on the horizon.
Interesting video but no suprises here. We’ve seen this sort of “Shout-the-fuck-up” tripe in Australia.
I remember witnessing it when conservative politician Pauline Hanson wanted to talk at a campus. Now I do not like that woman’s platform at all. In fact, she was quite a repugnant and a dull witted puppet for other players, however, consider this.
If we tolerate a society preventing unpopular opinions from airing then we do us all poorly. It’s dangerous to relax with tolerating such a thing because we’ve seen terrible ideas flourish without dissent. History tells of Germany’s past as it does with other places in other times. “Bad people” telling “Bad opinions” in public must be in place as a normal part of the process. In any case, that process is to have all ideas dissected to die of their own volition, or be tested for later review. Let the chips fall where they fall and it’s our responsibility to sort it out.
Anyway, back to Pauline Hanson. When she tried to talk, the crowd shouted her down and it was impossible for her to be heard. It was as though I was at a creepy Beatles concert.
Jean Antoine Petit-Senn the Swiss poet once said this: “Loud indignation against vice often stands for virtue in the eyes of bigots.” and I reckon he was on the money. Bang on, and he said it over a hundred and fifty years ago.
I was blue pill all the way then, but I still remember this as an indicator that something dark and mischievous had settled on those lawns. I was disturbed by it and I won’t forget the hypocrisy and the glaze eyed turd-mentality of those there.
After that day It made me think about how I thought.
“I remember witnessing it when conservative politician Pauline Hanson wanted to talk at a campus. Now I do not like that woman’s platform at all. In fact, she was quite a repugnant and a dull witted puppet for other players, however, consider this.”
No time for One Nation myself either.
During the 98 federal campaign I organised a forum on unemployment at which ten local candidates spoke. The One Nation candidate put in the best performance of the lot. The bloke who eventually won the seat was the worst performed on that evening. He’s still the local member but has actually turned into a really good MP over that time. The One Nation bloke is now a local city councilor. Strange game politics.
“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” -Mahatma Ghandi
“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”
There is no record of Gandhi saying this. A close variant of the quotation first appears in a 1918 US trade union address by Nicholas Klein:
And, my friends, in this story you have a history of this entire movement. First they ignore you. Then they ridicule you. And then they attack you and want to burn you. And then they build monuments to you. And that, is what is going to happen to the Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America.
Proceedings of the Third Biennial Convention of the Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America (1918),
Like I’ve mentioned before, I’m just waiting for the armbands to come out any day now. I think it is a cause for celebration to watch that video, considering how easily predictable their behavior is. It’s like playing chess with a blindfolded retard, and I think it is safe to say, that none of us are the least surprised by the violent response.
With this kind of malignant herding behavior, they are proving everything the MRM/MRA has ever said about feminism being a hate ideology, hell bend on eradicating basic human rights for the male half of the population, more effectively than we could ever hope to accomplish ourselves.
I have to confess that I am really looking forward to seeing more of this, in the high hopes that critical mass will be obtained that much sooner, and the average person, who do not identify as a feminist, will see this ideology for what it really is:
A repetition of every political -ism that has ever surfaced, both in times of prosperity and depression, during the last couple of hundred years of human history.
These feminist ideologues are indeed a generation that has lost track of their history, and the lessons to learn from it, which is by no means a surprise, considering how they have rewritten everything to support their bigotry. You’re bound to miss the big picture, when you focus too much on a single detail.
“I have to confess that I am really looking forward to seeing more of this, in the high hopes that critical mass will be obtained that much sooner”
It will happen, perhaps not quite as you imagine. We must remember that feminists (those with power and influence) are in positions where real suppression can be brought to bear (proxy violence) by authorities. This is putting feminism on show yes but the big guns have not come into play yet. We can get a hint from the Filler case and others highlighted here what power can be wielded. Believe me it will be used to the point of blood in the street. I welcome the fight but am under no illusion as to what it entails.
“I welcome the fight but am under no illusion as to what it entails.”
Seeing how history has a tendency to repeat itself in a circular motion, there’s much comfort in knowing that no government has ever survived for very long, when a large enough percentage of it’s citizens has finally been stripped from all assets, and has nothing left to lose.
I don’t want to see the world burn. I just want feminism to walk the path of the dodo bird, so we can start concentrating on obtaining true equality.
Hell, we might even put an end to wars, if men are finally recognised as human beings with rights, and not cannon fodder for the snakes in suits.
http://books.google.co.uk/books/about/Snakes_in_Suits.html?id=J9mvHW1eA14C
New post on The Unknown History of MISANDRY which answers the question, “What does a serial killer look like?” These 46 pictures will show you something you are not supposed to know.
“Female Serial Killers of the 21st Century: A Photo Gallery”
http://unknownmisandry.blogspot.com/2012/11/female-serial-killers-of-21st-century.html
— “Herstory” is collapsing (under the weight of its own abundant lies).
Fantastic Robert, bookmarked for quick access in retaliating to feminist women good men bad dogma.
Add another,
http://www.smh.com.au/world/coldblooded-ice-cream-lady-admits-murders-20121120-29msd.html
Okay, she only a 2 victim try-hard, but she was on to bigger and better things. Apparently bigger and stronger men can’t defend themselves against weak women when they get shot in their sleep. Oh, and you would never have guessed it, she claimed that they abused her first.
Thx so much Robert! I had recently had a lot of articles about female criminals I’ve been collecting over the past 7 years or so (back then I was still a fresh faced university student
mysteriously disappear from one of my favourites folder (I called the folder Female Criminals). But your link here more than makes up for that loss! Favourited-ed-ed, or whatever 
There was a relevant article about free speech on university campuses on The Wall Street Journal last Friday.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323894704578115440209134854.html
And one more.
I counted about 50 feminazi protesters in the video, out of approximately 70K students it is one water molecule in the bucket.
General
1. Students
Undergraduate:
The University of Toronto is expecting 66,419 undergraduate students in 2012-2013
Domestic: 57,480
International: 8,939
St. George campus is expecting 43,141 undergraduate students
Scarborough campus is expecting 11,142 undergraduate students
Mississauga campus is expecting 12,136 undergraduate students
Toronto School of Theology is expecting 908 undergraduate students
Graduate:
The University of Toronto is expecting 15,803 graduate students in 2012 – 2013
Domestic: 13,833
International: 1,970
St. George campus is expecting 15,369 graduate students
Scarborough campus is expecting 100 graduate students
Mississauga campus is expecting 334 graduate students
Toronto School of Theology is expecting 342 graduate students
Most of our international students come from China, South Korea, United States, India and Hong Kong. We also have a significant number of students from Pakistan, Malaysia, Japan and the United Kingdom.
2. Faculty and Staff
The University of Toronto has 11,581* faculty members as of September 2011, including 5,553 full-time and 6,028 part-time.
The University of Toronto has 6,017** staff members as of September 2011, including 5,681 full-time and 336 part-time.
The University of Toronto has 161 librarians as of September 2011.
*The number inlcudes all active faculty members with teaching/research responsibilities but excludes Research Fellows and Teaching Assistants.
**The number includes both unionized and non-unionized employees. U of T also employs 4,528 Teaching Assistants and 839 Sessional Lecturers who are not included above.
3. Alumni
The University of Toronto has 496,236 alumni around the world as of Fall 2011.
*The number of individuals (both living and deceased) who have graduated from the University of Toronto is 581,079 as of Fall 2011.
From Wikipedia on mob behavior:
“Several historians also believe that Adolf Hitler used herd behavior and crowd psychology to his advantage, by placing a group of German officers disguised as civilians within a crowd attending one of his speeches. These officers would cheer and clap loudly for Hitler, and the rest of the crowd followed their example, making it appear that the entire crowd completely agreed with Hitler and his views. These speeches would then be broadcast, increasing the effect.”
Hmm I could add a laugh track to the video…
Brilliant idea, bro’. You might want to keep the laughter at the end, where the femmies go nuts.
10000 thumbs up.
The beast thrashes most violently just before it is subdued.
Apart from that I have nothing to say, other than the fact that the conduct shown on both sides here speaks volumes on the matter.
…” that women like Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger was not so much an advocate for women’s reproductive autonomy as she was a genocidal racist intent on wiping African Americans and other “inferior undesirables” from the American landscape.”.
Sounds like the GOP platform to me. Just sayin’…
I guess politics do make strange bedfellows, indeed.
I wonder if they would have protested so loudly if GirlWritesWhat was the speaker.
They might have tried to lynch her. Farrell is *supposed to* hate women because he has a penis. GWW is a traitor to their cause; she can’t be dismissed lightly.
One also has to take into account the difference between fear and contempt. Feminists hate men out of fear, and have nothing but contempt for other women. You can respect those you hate out of fear, but dispose easily of people you dismiss. I fear the first MHRA to be killed will actually be a vocal woman – their anger does not translate into respect, just grinding loathing.
She would be a great draw to any campus. She pulls no punches, and has an added advatage of having no penis for detractors to use for their ad hominem attacks.
She may want to talk to Hoff Sommers and Prizzey first.
Though I suspect she knows already what to expect if asked to speak. Chivalry aside I would volunteer to “escort” any MRA if required irrespective of gender to allow them unfettered access to speak.
Great post. I must admit I didn’t know this about the suffragette movement nor had I read about the threats made to those behind the violence symmetry research.
I saw this yesterday and wrote about it on my blog. I was so amazed to see the degree of rage displayed by these feminists.
I’m from Iceland and you could say that we have quite radical feminists. The boy’s crisis is pretty much not talked about here as Icelandic feminists claim that their ideology will benefit both girls and boys (rubbish).
I view this event as a sort of culmination of denial of the boys crisis and hate speech code implementation. You guys seem to be far ahead of us with the hate speech codes. However, in 2008, the National Feminist Organization in Iceland actually lobbied for banning cross-gender “hate speech”.
Fortunately for now, this wasn’t implemented into law. This event sure makes me thankful for that.
the real issue was not the supposed “hate” but the “speech” itself
This really reinforces my want to be affiliated with the MRM and to identify myself as a MRA. I have been waiting for this to happen for a while now. At times, being an MRA seems some what abysmal, as you constantly see (poor) argument after argument on why men are bad and you start to feel very much like anything you say or do isn’t making a difference. But this (and believe this from the bottom of my heart, from my soul) is the start of appearance of the fruit of the MRM’s labors. I mean, GWW’s videos are being used in schools now! And not just colleges, but high schools! I’m elated for crying out loud! This is the start of a very good thing and I’m proud to be a part of it.
Compare and contrast:
No hate speech on campus!
vs.
The Intellectual Space to Be Anti-Male Is Necessary and Desirable
Precious.
I’m reminded of the members of a predominantly lesbian/feminist e-mail group I was a member of that personally promised another Columbine if prayer was ever let back in schools.
I was at the talk of Warren Farrell at UFT. I was arrived a bit early and was surprised to see the rather big and aggressive protest. When I was blocked by a line up young men from entering the doors, I became enraged and almost was about to get into a violent confrontation. Thank goodness one of the campus police pulled me away.
I wish I could have been there! But, dude, I’m really glad you didn’t get into a violent confrontation. The last thing MRA’s should do is resort to violence as it will only reinforce some people’s perception of us. Remaining peaceful while our opponents make fools of themselves is a far more effective strategy. John the Other really impressed me with how he stayed calm while his posters were being wrongfully torn down before his eyes. Should I ever find myself in a similar situation, I will try to channel JtO and remain calm and peaceful, even while being mocked and sneered at.
If you ever attend one of these events where there’s potential for violence or verbal attack against you, be sure to have your smartphone camera recording your experience.
Great article, Paul. It cuts to the quick, which is the greatest metric of what makes good journalism, and journalism good.
My biggest beef with feminism is and has always been this: You do NOT make a political “cause” of a sex. When you make a political “cause” of a race, bizarre stupid shit happens. When you do that to a sex, everything collapses. When races don’t get along, it’s really, really bad. When sexes don’t “get along,” the fucking shit hits the fan and it’s over, dude. The balloon goes up, the lights go out and everyone starts reciting the Lord’s prayer.
Hello, contemporary Western Civilization.
The video is strangely funny. “NO hate speech” they chant, hate and violence they practice.
It would be good to profoundly document feminist violence. Because feminism is not know as a violent movement, so much that the SPLC never declared them a hate movement.
All cases of violence, of hate, and of blatant falsification of truth ought to be collected and mercilessly documented
I missed the talk due to scheduling conflicts. But I wish I ‘d been there if not only to hand out AVfM cards to the cops and anyone else who would take one.
Now is a great time to poster around U of T with some minimally provocative but factually correct posters. That will really piss off some and gain other supporters while the iron is still hot
Great writing Paul. I connected with what you wrote.
Why is the MRM’s impact a greater threat than the political right’s anti-feminism over the years?
I was just reading through an article from 2002 You’ve Lost Your Way, Baby
How organized feminism has made itself irrelevant, as well as Tammy Bruce’s scathing critique of feminism and the Left in The New Thought Police. They had accomplished conservative scholars (Hoff Sommers, Kate O Bierne, etc), who could critique through radio, print, some university speaking etc avenues unavailable to us. They also elicited similar intimidation and suppression of speech.
Why are we any different? Is it because we are able to record it and publish on the internet for a wider audience to see?
Ignorance is bliss?
Not anymore, because it appears that we are being heard.
Congratulations GWW! After all of your hard work you deserved it!
Is there an MRA in the house that can translate this?
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=389049174502665
Also, this is a good bookmark to save for countering the “women are better parent/non-violent” type of horseshit argument we all come across.
At least the “Fourth Rietch”- (My term for feminists-BTW, I would be HONOURED if AVFM were to coin the phrase as their/our own. My small contribution, if you will…)- will not be able to file complaint w/ the Canadian Human (Liberal)Rights Commision, as The Feds have removed the “Section 13″ (the hate speech provision) out.
A great victory for free speech…
A MAJOR threat to the 4th Reitch!