“In a way, this dummy is greatly symbolic of the institution of routine infant circumcision as a practice without a human connection; no eyes, no voice, no compassion for the individual. As such, it is an abomination.”
Lesson to be learned: defending or practicing MGM is not what to do when running for office, practicing medicine, or being a decent parent and human being.
The baby will feel pain, despite the above lie, and the alternative to this is no circumcision , with no risks, unlike this procedure that results in scarring, loss of sensitivity, loss of foreskin function, sometimes lifetime complications needing further surgery, and death.
The circumcisor, aided and abetted by ignorant parents and a self-serving medical industry consider this ‘good touching’ and ‘good trauma’, while in reality the victim is equally traumatized by both the pedophile’s ‘bad’ and the doctor’s ‘good’ sexual abuse.
He knows this amputation of healthy tissue is unnecessary, unethical, and risky, yet he continues to perform it and/or force others to perform it, under threat of termination.
SickKids of Toronto, Ontario has a “clinic” that encourages and performs infant genital mutilation on UnSickKids, ironically a symptom of a sick society that lacks medical ethics and devalues boys, men, and male sexuality.
She knows this amputation of healthy tissue is unnecessary, unethical, and risky, yet she continues to perform it and/or force others to perform it, under threat of termination.
It doesn’t get any better than this: enlightened Red-Pill filmmaker interviews longtime MRA and intactivist attorney J Steven Svoboda, discussing every aspect of circumcision and the movement to end it.
Yes, you read that right. People who strap down innocent, unconsenting babies and sexually and physically assault them with a knife want you to believe they are civil rights champions and are against sexual assault.
Narvaez points out that everyone has a right to bodily autonomy and self-determination, and that the only person qualified to make the medical decision is “the owner of the penis, as he is the one going to have to live with the results, not his parents.”
…from the ‘isn’t it obvious’ department, we see the heading “What Adult Patients and Parents Say About Us…”
“Brilliant customer service. I would definitely recommend this service to family and friends.”
What’s obvious is that the infant patients involved can’t give their say about being strapped down and permanently mutilated, and I suspect they wouldn’t be so welcoming and grateful.
Leaving him intact is so much easier, safer, cheaper, humane, logical, ethical, and better for his future sex life and health. And, after all, he can choose circumcision for himself at some point – although you’ll say he probably won’t – and I say, EXACTLY.