• Home
  • Forum
  • Wiki 4 Men
  • About
    • Mission Statement
    • Writer’s Guidelines
      • Publishing terms and conditions
    • Editorial & Commenting Policy
    • Terms of Service
      • Privacy
    • Contact Us
  • Log in

A Voice for Men

Humanist Counter-Theory in the Age of Misandry

Coyote Gear2
You are here: Home / Featured / Love in Chains – 1952

Love in Chains – 1952

November 18, 2013 By Robert St. Estephe 2 Comments

Robert St. Estephe–Gonzo Historian–is dedicated to uncovering the forgotten past of marginalizing men. “Gonzo journalism” is characterized as tending “to favor style over fact to achieve accuracy.” Yet history – especially “social history” – is written by ideologues who distort and bury facts in order to achieve an agenda. “Gonzo” writing is seen as unorthodox and surprising. Yet, in the 21st century subjectivity, distortion and outright lying in non-fiction writing is the norm. Fraud is the new orthodoxy. Consequently, integrity is the new “transgressive.”

Welcome to the disruptive world of facts, the world of Gonzo History.

•?•

Philip Chain is the earliest known example of a father who used picketing to attract attention to his plight as a parent who had been denied access to his child by a malicious mother. It was not until the 1970s that fathers’ rights groups were formed and started doing group pickets, usually in front of courthouses. Chain, however, took his signs to his own home which he was legally barred from. Gender ideologues have for decades claimed fathers only try to “see” their children (as if “seeing” were enough) in order to manipulate the “intrinsic victim of patriarchy,” the mother.

The true history of child custody proves otherwise. Despite the fashionable social constructivist theories that are dogmatically spewed and sold by professors, claiming that the further back in history we go the less parents (of both sexes) loved their children, history is on the contrary rich with tales of fathers who made great sacrifices to try to retrieve children that ex’s, the courts and other entities. A particularly poignant example is that of US Civil War veteran John McCray, featured in the AVfM article “A Father’s Undying Love.” After the war McCray devoted his life to trying to find the children his wife had hidden away from him.

The story of James Welch, “the father who would not give up,” has a happier ending. Two decades before Mr. Chain’s modest protest efforts shown here, Welch, an aggrieved Louisiana  father of a child held in Venezuela, came to perfect the art of activism, garnering national publicity with dramatic demonstrations in front of the White House in Washington D.C., issuing a newsletter and getting his case into the official government Congressional Record.

The beginning of organized group father’s rights protests an be traced back to 1966 in California, where members of U.S. Divorce Reform Inc. and American Marriage and Divorce Reform, Inc. joined forces to picket the court house in Pasadena.

•?•

avfm-chain-picket

PHOTO CAPTION (Article 1 of 4):

PLEADS TO SEE CHILD – Policeman talks with Philip Chain, 38, who is picketing his former wife in Hollywood, Cal., with a sign pleading he be permitted to see the couple’s child, Darlene, 3.  He told police their divorce decree gave him visiting rights, but the former wife, Esther, refused to let him see Darlene, saying the girl is sick. Police said the picketing broke no law.

[“Pleads To See Child,” syndicated (AP), The Chillicothe Constitution-Tribune (Mo.), Nov. 5, 1952, p. 5]

•?•

FULL TEXT (Article 2 of 4): “Esther please let me see my baby.”

Carrying a placard on which these words were printed, Philip Chain, 38, of 3200 San Fernando Blvd., Burbank, yesterday walked back and forth in the 800 block of N. Edinburgh St. his wife lives in the neighborhood.

Chain alleged that his former wife, Esther, 30 refused to allow him to see the couple’s baby Darlene, 3, telling him the youngster was ill.

Chain said that he and his wife were married on June 20, 1948, separated last January and that she had obtained an interlocutory decree in September. He said that he was granted weekly visiting privileges by the court.

Mrs. Chain could not be reached for a statement.

Police called to the scene tried to discourage Chain from his picketing but he refused. Officers allowed him to continue, saying he was breaking no law.

[“Man pickets in Plea to See Child,” Los Angeles Times (CA.), Nov. 3, 1952, part 2, p. 1]

•?•

avfm-chain-1953

PHOTO CAPTION (Article 3 of 4):

PICKETS FOR PATER RIGHTS — For the second time since being divorced in 1952, Philip Chain, 38, above, picketed the Los Angeles home of his former wife, Mrs. Esther Critichfield Chain, because she was not at home when he came to visit their 4-year-old daughter, Darlene. According to a court order, Mr. Chain explains, he can visit the child on Sundays and holidays, but this Sunday when he arrived there was a sign on the door reading “Not at home,” so he put up the placards and started picketing the house.

[“Pickets For Pater Rights,” syndicated (NEA), The Sandusky Register-News (Oh.), Dec. 23, 1953, p. 7]

•?•

avfm-chain-ph3

FULL TEXT (Article 4 of 4): Philip Chain, 38, who charges that his ex-wife will not permit him to see their daughter, Darlene, 4, was back “picketing” yesterday in front of 853 N. Edinburgh Ave.

He said he came to the house to take the youngster out to dinner but was greeted by a “Not at Home” sign on the front door. His former wife, Esther, 31, had taken the child away to a party, he learned.

Her refusal to allow the child to visit her father from 1 to 6 p. m. on Sundays and holidays is a violation of the court order, Chain said, which granted Mrs. Chain an interlocutory degree in September, 1952, and granted him visiting privileges. [sic: a “privilege,” not a right!]

~ Fifth Refusal ~ 

“This is the fifth time she has refused to let me see my daughter,” Chain said. “The last time I saw her she said unless I paid $13 a week support for the girl I couldn’t see Darlene.”

He explained that he is out of work now and has not been able to pay that amount. He lives with his parents at 2426-A N. Buena Vista St., Burbank.

Legends on the signs he exhibited and some which he taped to window screens of the Edinburgh house read:

“Waiting to see my baby”; “Why can’t a father see his child?” and “I plead for justice.”

The Chains were married on June 20, 1948, and were separated in January, 1952. He said their divorce was not yet final.

[“Man Pickets Ex-Wife; Wants to See Daughter – ‘I Plead for Justice,’ Reads One Legend as Husband Resumes His Sidewalk Parade,” Los Angeles Times (Ca.), Dec. 21, 1953, part 3, p. 4]

avfm-chain-ph4

Share this:

  • Print
  • Reddit
  • Pocket
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Tumblr

Filed Under: Featured, Forgotten History Tagged With: Child Custody, Fatherhood, Fathers, fathers rights, Parental Kidnapping, Picketing

Sponsored link

Support us by becoming a member

AVFM depends on readers like you to help us pay expenses related to operations and activism. If you support our mission, please subscribe today.

Join or donate

Erin

Support AVFM!


Other options
Bitcoin

Become a Patron!

Masculine Development

Now Available on Amazon

Bloodstained Men

Lillibolero

NEW FROM MOIRET ALLEGIERE

Signed Copies of Paul’s New Book

Report False Accusers

Wiki 4 Men – Editors welcome

▪▪ Male Suicide Toll Worldwide ▪▪ ▪▪▪(Cumulative since 2009)▪▪▪

■ Suicide Hotlines ■ Support Services

More videos about male suicide

The International Conference on Men’s Issues’ Series




Select Video Playlists



Also available from Amazon.com


Find out what psychology without misandry looks like

Bulletins

  • The Voice of Europe – Episode 170 – Women can’t choose non-feminism 2 years ago
  • SocFreeSpeech.com decommissioned 2 years ago
  • The Voice of Europe – Episode 169 – Welcome to the current Year+3 2 years ago
  • The Voice of Europe – Episode 168 – The current year ends tumultuously 2 years ago
  • The Voice of Europe – Episode 167 – The puncturing of the bubble 2 years ago
  • The Voice of Europe – Episode 166 – Question ALL of #MeToo 2 years ago

All Bulletins>>

Advertise at AVFM

You want to know about the real toxic masculinity?

An Ear for Men

Authoring your own life

Paul Elam and Peter Wright examine a new mythology for men, and perhaps a new model providing men with mental health services.

Men’s Rights

A Dream of Fecunda (part two)

Editor’s Note: Below is an extract from the book, The Vast and the Spurious: 25 Problems for … [Keep Reading...]

Activism

Micro activism: The social support system

Introduction As Men’s Rights Activists, we attempt to help men using “macro activism”. We try … [Keep Reading...]

Women

Aggrieved Entitlement – women’s reaction to temporary loss of chivalry

It's no secret that women feel entitled to special treatments from men based on the European culture … [Keep Reading...]

Misandry

Writing Misogyny

"How to Destroy A Man Now (DAMN)" has been taken down from Amazon. My book, "How to Destroy A … [Keep Reading...]

Sexual Politics

MGTOW is Forever

The internet has enabled hundreds of thousands of males around the world to have a unique … [Keep Reading...]

Men

How Thomas Oaster started International Men’s Day – and how feminists tried to stop him

The following is a republished article from 2016 showing how International Men's Day was started by … [Keep Reading...]

The Globe

Blogroll

  • Can-Fap
  • The Illustrated Empathy Gap
  • Aaron Sleazy
  • Owning Your Shit

Videoroll

  • Sage Gerard
  • Typhon Blue
  • MRA Greatest Hits
  • Paul Elam

© Copyright 2017 A Voice for Men • Log in

A Voices of Men Network site Network Terms of Service Network Privacy Policy Network DMCA Policy