The Unknown History of MISANDRY blog (which, as you will see isn’t really a blog) seldom, if ever has attracted the attention, in writing at least, of misandric bloggers. It has a misandrist-provoking name, has over 700 posts and every one them – almost every one of them, at least – is directed against the ideology of that very large segment of the global authoritarian cultural marxism social engineering project we all know by the cute little nickname “feminism.”
Why the silence? I cannot be sure, but I have an idea. You see, UHoM contains only about 1% opinion, analysis and interpretation; the other 99% being simply historical documentation – hard facts of history. Opinion is the energizing element in online feminist blogging. Thus when faced with inconvenient facts it is much more difficult to muster up a criticism when one is accustomed to indulging in often creative, consciously subjective and emotive, theoretical (dogmatic theory being the basis), often proudly anti-rational, verbiage.
I would hope that MRAs, as well as other writers who strive to diminish authoritarian power, might take note of the significance of this point. If my surmising is accurate, or even generally accurate, then we can observe that the misandric community is, quite uncharacteristically, tongue-tied, or, more precisely, keyboard-crippled, in the face of freshly proffered facts which contradict their ideology, facts which undermine their (fictional, mythological, academically fraudulent) “herstory.”
These self-silenced cyber-propagandists of scapegoatism, we can be sure, are taking the correct approach, when we look at this behavior in terms of strategy and tactics. The orthodoxy of cultural marxism, collectivism, “feminism” have the power, they have a near monopoly on the largest media venues. When mainstream media – or the dominant orthodox, supposedly “alternative,” media – leave out information then the information is invisible to the vast majority of the populace. The readership is thus kept on the reservation, kept from wandering from the “true path,” blissfully ignorant of the complexities and nuances of the issues at hand.
When such information takes the form of plain old historical documents (old forgotten newspaper articles, in our case) it is impossible for the busy-bee wordsmiths of world womanism to make use of their characteristic obfuscating rhetorical techniques. Plain old un-theoretical facts are the monkey wrench thrown into the misandric works.
The standard method of the victim-viragos of cyberspace: deployment of dismissive opinions (devoid of substance) coupled with ad hominem attacks (likewise devoid) simply won’t work with this material. Any direct attack on UHoM will, in actuality, risk the frightening possibility that the misandrist blogger’s ordinarily drone-like reader might actually take the dangerous path of going to the horrid UHoM site and start spending the time to check out the evidence first-hand and interpreting it for themselves. – Gaia forbid!
The deathly silence is a clue to the perceived dangerousness of the newly unearthed factual data.
Recently I posted an omnibus collection of significant historical quotations from female judges, lawyers, legislators and writers (1904-1956?) under the heading of “A Woman’s Voice.” This post is, in my view, one of the very most informative and useful posts to have yet appeared on UHoM. But informativeness is not my priority – or more properly, informativeness is but the first of a several-step process that my work seeks to instigate, and thus is not worth much apart from the other steps. My aim, in a nutshell, is: a) inform, b) change the reader’s view of the historical narrative, c) influence the reader to disseminate new information and, in writing or in video, interpret the information publicly in a manner that will engage others, and, d) eventually, after having reached a large number of people and gotten them discussing the contrary-to-“herstory” historical facts, undermine the very foundation of the opposition’s mendacious discourse – permanently.
“A Woman’s Voice” has gotten pretty decent, but not astronomical, traffic. And it has garnered a brief comment of interest I would like to share with you.
The comment: “These are gold! My favorite is from the Superior Court judge in Seattle. It says quite a lot in a very few words.”
“Gold” is an apt choice of word. Indeed the quotes are much like valued nuggets culled from a mountain of base material from which, with pained labor, they have been lovingly extracted.
Yet, despite this expression of appreciation, I am only a quarter pleased with the compliment though. What would fully please me would have been to see such additional words as these: “And I’ve posted this “Superior Court judge” quote in a slut-load of places.” Or “I’ve linked the post everywhere.” Or even better, “I’m writing an article about what this new information means to me and how it changes my view on how to proceed in countering misandry.”
Perhaps the commenter has indeed done some of these things or, in the future, will set about to do so. I surely hope so.
My point in discussing this comment is to use it to underscore what I see as the mission of historical research on misandry (and anti-misandry). My mission is not to produce data and writing that may be consumed by the reader. Informing (or entertaining) MRAs or general readers is, in itself, an enterprise that accomplishes little of real value. Such a result (informing, entertaining the reader) fails to justify the labor which has been put into this research and publishing endeavor.
The UHoM mission is to provide, through the device of a large (if somewhat difficult to navigate) database of source materials which will be used to good effect as defensive weapons in the brutal war against liberty, against boys and men, against women of good character, and above all against the family itself, that is waged by the corporatist state and the useful idiots who, in their utopian delusions serve the burgeoning authoritarian tyranny. UHoM is an arsenal of weapons of mass instruction which, if looked upon passively, if consumed for mere personal edification or distraction, will in the end serve no important purpose. UHoM, the arsenal stocked with informational weaponry, must be used as a defensive – as well as offensive – cache from which to renew supplies needed for present and upcoming battles, and utilized to its full potential up until the parasitical occupier is defeated.
Not really a blog.
I said earlier that UHoM is not really a blog. Let me explain.
UHoM is really a database of source texts which, in the majority of cases, are not quite self-explanatory and are seldom of great value individually. It is a resource collection, a research source, a tool box, a pantry full of staples. It takes a while to become familiar with and, I confess, is not, because of its linear blog format, structured very conveniently. It has so much material is a bit forbidding at first. I have attempted to give it more structure by creating special subject-specific catalog posts, such as “Chivalry Justice Checklist & Links” – which will appear at the top – or near the top – of the queue when you select the sidebar label links.
A database is a necessity for the facilitation of individuals without official power (such as the countless salaried misandrists within every institution of our society) because only the internet can overcome the censorship-through-omission that is the tactic so successfully exploited by cultural marxists over the past half-century. The internet allows us to introduce new information – overriding the gatekeepers of universities, NGOs and governments – and take this fresh information, fashion it into a new counter-argument, and repeat it and repeat and repeat it – and yes, repeat it – until our ceaseless efforts cause it to take effective hold.
Christine Hoff Summers, that great “recovered feminist,” has pointed out in her lectures that the fully discredited hoax of the “rule of thumb” (the infamous wife-beating law that never actually existed) continues to be taught as fact in the universities despite her rebuffed efforts to get the “error” corrected in the textbooks. The social engineers, the opposers-of-fact, have the bully pulpit. And bully the public they will – until the cows come home. They now control the vast share of public discourse and almost the entire education industry. They will not stop telling lies, for telling lies is the whole point of “reconstructing” society along utopian collectivist lines.
The currently dominant, nay domineering, brand of social engineering, cultural marxism, with its truth-wrecking tool of “critical theory,” is specifically designed to pulverize veracity in order that the way will be open for reconstructing society along its utopian ideals, despite the down-to-earth fact that human nature is not susceptible to the malleability imagined by the control freaks standing at the helm, of the progressive project and their zombie-like indoctrinated minions who incessantly drone their vague mantra of “social justice” (whose actual meaning is that the collectivist State must obliterate individual rights).
No, our society’s deliberately corrupted institutions – courts, education, publishing, journalism, churches, oversized government, law enforcement, social services, corporations – all of which are now infused with social engineering agenda designed by cultural marxists, will never, ever voluntarily embrace truth over expediency and authoritarian power.
I should also briefly explain why so much of the material on UHoM has to do with female-perpetrated violence. One might guess that I am a true crime buff or that I focus on gruesome acts of the fair sex in order to express “rage” at womanhood. Not at all. The choice is tactical. At the core of the assault on males (most tragically on little boys) is the fallacy that women are inherently non-violent. Violence is ascribed to one sex and not the other (and when shown to be perpetuated by the female sex is explained away with one of several pat “the patriarchy really did it” rationalizations). It is absolutely necessary to meet this propaganda assault with direct, compelling and previously unexploited counter-evidence, of which there is now available copious documentation on UHoM, of female acts of wanton sadism, exploitation, oppression, sometimes of the most shocking kind, through out history, across cultures and geographies. But use the record of violent actions coolly, thoughtfully, articulately, as a tool of truth-seeking, not as a venting device.
A single example will suffice: the research behind UHoM has uncovered over 300 female serial killers not included in the most comprehensive list of such criminals. We find previously unknown or little-known cannibals, murderesses of hundreds of babies, women who sexually tortured girls in large numbers, women who murdered and robbed adult women in large numbers and an astonishing string of Black Widows who murdered two, three, four, five and even in one case ten, husbands. This history is not yet part of the public consciousness. Yet.
You will find a more elaborated argument, with copious specific examples of fake history countered by unknown true history, promoting the use of newly excavated historical facts as a counter to the fairy-tale of orthodox social constructionist history (of which feminist history is a large part) in the article on A Voice for Men titled “Setting the Record Straight.”
Perhaps the easiest place (along with “A Woman’s Voice”) for a writer to start making productive use of UHoM is the collection called “Misandric Fixation.”
All or most readers of AVfM are familiar with that inspirational philosopher of social justice named Valerie Solanas, as well as her present-day crack-pot counterparts in urologically activated Sweden and femi-divine parts of Minnesota. The collection gives you a glimpse to a diverse gallery of man-hating characters whose supremacist inclinations manifested itself in various malicious ways.
Read them all. (There aren’t that many.) Cogitate a bit. Don’t rush. Don’t write. Come back in a few days or a week and browse through those posts in the collection you found most engaging. Then set about to tell the world what you think about this new information, how it affects your views, why you think knowing about these malicious specimens matters to others. In other words, write and publish a blog or a long comment or something containing your own viewpoint so that this historical information enters the stream of discourse and stays permanently in it.
There is much more “gold in them thar’ hills,” but “Misandric Fixation” gives you ready nuggets arrayed easy for the plucking.
These are the means by which we may rewrite history, giving us the power to replace the fabricated narrative of orthodox “herstory” with a more complex, more human, fact-based record of reality. One instance of writing by one solitary writer will not, of course, be sufficient to get the job done. It will take multiple participants, but not necessarily so very many, to get the historical revisionist snowball rolling. And once the glowing ball of truth reaches critical mass then it is we who will be choosing the battles, no longer the tenured false historians, no longer the obfuscating cultural-constructioneering subjectivity-pimps.
Merely linking to a favorite UHoM post is useful, but ultimately will do little to further the cause until someone take the time to say something in writing or on video that is original, insightful or compelling about the contents. GirlWritesWhat has done so with regard to the myth of past social tolerance of domestic violence – and several bloggers have good made use of the post “Misandry The Word – Its Origin, “ such as Trigger Alert and Masculism.ca. Sometimes posting strong images with a link, but not saying that much, will be effective, such as on StandYourGround.com.
The posts on UHoM are not tied to current events and trends. They are evergreen: useful to you as teaching tools and writing aids at any moment you choose to take advantage of them
But promoting UHoM the website is not in itself of any great value to you, to the movement or even to your humble author/recommender. Rather it is successfully causing others (eventually hordes of others) to doubt orthodox history, to think very differently, to abandon and challenge “herstory,” and to develop an appetite for the facts which contradict what they have been taught is what really matters! And this matters a very great deal.
Eventually, your efforts will pay off when your writing is shown to contribute to the growth of the population of more and more people who were once blind but will, in greater numbers, start to shout out:
“Now I can see!”
The Unknown History of MISANDRY is yours. Take from it. Copy from it. Use it in your own way. Make it your own. Give it away to others. Over and over and over again.
And help cure the people of the plague of historical blindness.
NOTE: The header image shows John Bouchard, victim of an acid attack in 1901 by Elizabeth De L’Etoile which blinded him. The De L’Etoile acid throwing case is one of six cases of acid throwing attacks by women (upon members of both sexes) posted on UHoM. See “Acid Queens”
- Collective amnesia regarding violence by women / call for reform - November 20, 2015
- The lethal paternity fraud racket - February 24, 2014
- MEME – False accusation - February 23, 2014
- The dating racket and its “heartless robbers” - February 21, 2014
- Boycott Dartmouth – MEME - February 20, 2014