• Home
  • Forum
  • Reference Wiki
  • About
    • Mission Statement
    • Writer’s Guidelines
      • Publishing terms and conditions
    • Editorial & Commenting Policy
    • Terms of Service
      • Privacy
    • Contact Us
  • Log in

A Voice for Men

Humanist Counter-Theory in the Age of Misandry

An Ear for Men
You are here: Home / Featured / Never mind disease. Guess who wants to talk gender as a preexisting condition?

Never mind disease. Guess who wants to talk gender as a preexisting condition?

May 26, 2017 By Zach Janssen 15 Comments

“Is rape considered a preexisting condition under your amendment? Yes or no?” Cheers erupt in response to the question, which is directed by a seventeen-year-old girl named Daisy to Republican House Representative Tom MacArthur.[1] The two are standing in the center of a town hall meeting, surrounded by a crowd of seated onlookers and a ring of video cameras. The amendment Daisy refers to had been added by MacArthur to the Republican Obamacare replacement bill, helping it secure enough votes to pass in the House of Representatives days before.

As Representative MacArthur begins his answer, Daisy interrupts, “Yes or no! Yes or no! One word! One word!”

Unwilling to accept the “one word” rule, MacArthur explains, “Folks, you get to ask the questions, and I get to answer them.”

“Yes or no!” Daisy interrupts again, bringing echoes from the crowd. “Yes or no! Yes or no!”

Minutes pass as MacArthur endures the outburst before he is finally able to answer without interruption. “You cannot be denied [health coverage] or charged more because of having been raped,” he says.

Daisy won viral acclaim for the encounter, the video of which was circulated widely on Facebook and Twitter. In an article on www.bustle.com, Katherine Speller gushed: “in a time when we so desperately need heroes to stand firm with politicians, act up, and speak truth to power, Daisy’s promise to MacArthur might be the most inspiring part of this story: She told him that she’ll absolutely be at the polls next year, as a voter at 18, to cast a ballot against him.  Performing civic duties has never been more bad-ass.” [2] The website thinkprogress.org also lauded Daisy, and took umbrage on her behalf that MacArthur called focusing on the law’s affect on rape survivors overblown “hysteria,” noting that the word derives from the Greek term for womb and “was once used as bogus medical disorder levied at women.” How triggering.

But is it hysteria? Apparently so. The fact-checking website www.snopes.com evaluated the issue and came out in agreement with MacArthur’s answer, stating that under the bill’s provisions, “Rape and sexual assault are legally not allowed to be used as pre‐existing conditions for health insurance.”[3] Even bustle.com’s Speller admits that the “answer to [Daisy’s] question is broadly ‘no’—as most states already ban providers from factoring a history of abuse into premium costs and there’s no explicit mention of assault survivors in the bill’s language.”[4]

Daisy seems to be a child of her times, raised to expect female victimization around every corner, and taught that every Rorschach ink blot depicts a rape. National Public Radio, which also covered the Daisy confrontation, explained that she is far from alone, noting that “the idea that a rape victim could be denied health care,” whether truthful or not, is “a notion that has caught fire nationwide through social media.”[5]

Health care policy is a perverse place to try line-skipping to the head of the victim queue. The list of ways a person could suffer is as numerous as the entries in a medical encyclopedia. To barely scratch the surface, the condition could be cancer, or a heart or brain defect, or a crippling infectious disease. The person could have been born with it, or had it emerge in childhood. Daisy’s outburst pulled attention away from legitimate debate. 

Instead of talking about cancer survivors who might be denied coverage, the media talked about rape survivors who would not be. The liberal think tank Center for American Progress lists the most common preexisting conditions as, “high blood pressure, behavioral health disorders, high cholesterol, asthma and chronic lung disease, and osteoarthritis and other joint disorders.”[6] Gender is not where focus belongs in this debate.

Disproportionate attention to women’s health is a habit constantly reinforced by a society that elevates women to the point of holiness. Placing women first is ingrained in our etiquette, and goes far beyond Emily Post trivialities like holding a door or pulling out a chair. In this case, it includes ignoring men’s health to prioritize women. In his February 2017 address to a joint session of Congress, President Trump promised “to invest in women’s health,”[7] with no similar mention of men.  Obamacare had already created “at least 7 new agencies and departments devoted solely to women while there is not one office for men or male specific ailments.”[8]

This disparity of concern is illustrated perfectly by cancers of the breast (a female condition) and prostate (male). As Warren Farrell has pointed out, both diseases have “almost the same level of death,” yet “prostate cancer is funded at one seventh the level of breast cancer.”[9] The Obamacare statute contained “over 40 mentions of [the word] ‘breast,’” but “not one mention of ‘prostate.’”[8]  October has been popularly dubbed, “Breast Cancer Awareness Month,” with tremendous social, corporate, and media promotion, while nothing similar exists for men.[10] All of this is happening while women are already significantly healthier and better cared for than men. Women live an average of over 5 years longer, are more likely to have health insurance, and are more likely to receive regular medical care.[8]

It remains unclear whether the Republican health-care proposal will ever become law, and my purpose here is not to take a position on the bill. The proposal would relax Obamacare’s prohibition against insurance companies charging higher rates to individuals with preexisting medical conditions.  Consequently, people with challenging medical histories could be priced out of health care through no fault of their own. Supporters and opponents of the bill agree on this point, even though they may disagree over what role government should play in healthcare.

Anyone who would be charged more for coverage due to a preexisting condition deserves sympathy. But to many people, women matter more; their suffering matters more. They shamelessly insist on placing women first, while the list of other innocent victims is so tragically long. Women are half the story, not all of it. They do have important and differentiated health care concerns, such as pregnancy and more involved reproductive health. Men do also, including generally poorer health and early death. The healthcare debate should not center on either gender, but on a much more relevant and disadvantaged demographic: the sick.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8yNumzQFlc

[2] https://www.bustle.com/p/young-woman-confronts-congressman-about-rape-as-a-pre-existing-condition-57162

[3] http://www.snopes.com/sexual-assault-pre-existing/

[4] https://www.bustle.com/p/young-woman-confronts-congressman-about-rape-as-a-pre-existing-condition-57162

[5] http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2017/05/11/527938951/is-rape-a-pre-existing-condition-not-exactly

[6] https://www.romper.com/p/what-are-the-most-common-types-of-pre-existing-conditions-the-ahca-could-impact-millions-57101 (quoting the CAP)

[7] https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/02/28/remarks-president-trump-joint-address-congress

[8] https://notehub.org/hpp2i#lifeexpectancy, quoting, with link, “The Daily Caller”

[9] http://www.menweb.org/svofarre.htm

[10] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breast_cancer_awarenes

Share this:

  • Print
  • Reddit
  • Google
  • Pocket
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Tumblr

Filed Under: Featured, Feminist Bullying, Gynocentrism

Sponsored link

Support us by becoming a member

AVFM depends on readers like you to help us pay expenses related to operations and activism. If you support our mission, please subscribe today.

Join or donate

Gynocentrism.com

Support AVFM!

Subscribe now!
Other options
Bitcoin
</p>
</div>
		</div></section>
<section id=

Register Her!

Boys Matter

New From Warren Farrell

“This is Warren Farrell’s greatest gift to the men’s movement; an arsenal of facts on the lives of boys everywhere.” Paul Elam

▪▪ Male Suicide Toll Worldwide ▪▪ ▪▪▪(Cumulative since 2009)▪▪▪

■ Suicide Hotlines ■ Support Services

More videos about male suicide

The International Conference on Men’s Issues’ Series



Select Video Playlists



Also available from Amazon.com

Find out what psychology without misandry looks like

Say Goodbye to Crazy

Bulletins

  • Documenting recent history of the MRM 1 week ago
  • The Voice of Europe – Episode 170 – Women can’t choose non-feminism 3 months ago
  • SocFreeSpeech.com decommissioned 3 months ago
  • The Voice of Europe – Episode 169 – Welcome to the current Year+3 4 months ago
  • The Voice of Europe – Episode 168 – The current year ends tumultuously 5 months ago
  • The Voice of Europe – Episode 167 – The puncturing of the bubble 5 months ago

All Bulletins>>

Advertise at AVFM

The movie that blew the lid off feminism

Available on
Amazon.com
ITunes
Vimeo
Google Play

An Ear for Men

Authoring your own life

Paul Elam and Peter Wright examine a new mythology for men, and perhaps a new model providing men with mental health services.

Men’s Rights

Twitter censors reference to Souad Faress’ #FalseRape accusation

Imagine one night you are accosted by strangers, bound, stuffed into the back of a car and driven to … [Keep Reading...]

Activism

Men who sit at the screens

In his four volume series Masks of God, mythologist Joseph Campbell documented the transformations … [Keep Reading...]

Women

Women! Can’t live with ‘em you say? Sure we can

The modern MHRM that I entered back in 2011 has had an absorbing transition over the years … [Keep Reading...]

Misandry

Single fathers have alarmingly high mortality rates

For better or for worse, the traditional family unit has changed a lot since the 1960s. Once a … [Keep Reading...]

Sexual Politics

Judge allows men to challenge male-only draft

HOUSTON (CN) — The National Coalition for Men can proceed with its class action lawsuit challenging … [Keep Reading...]

Men

The virtue-signalling men allowing women into Men’s Sheds

Bettina believes people involved in the Men's Shed movement need to take action to protect these … [Keep Reading...]

The Globe

Blogroll

  • A Voice for Male Students
  • Owning Your Shit
  • Aaron Sleazy
  • COTWA

Videoroll

  • Typhon Blue
  • Paul Elam
  • MRA Greatest Hits
  • Jonathan Taylor

© Copyright 2017 A Voice for Men • Log in

A Voices of Men Network site Network Terms of Service Network Privacy Policy Network DMCA Policy