DISCLAIMER: I DISCOURAGE DOXXING. PLEASE DO NOT DOXX PEOPLE.
Do not imitate psychos by doxxing them. Let’s instead dispassionately gather evidence against those who doxx & then make threats or encourage others to make threats. Then let’s help the authorities find them and put them in jail.
“Doxxing” gets thrown around pretty easily these days, when most of the time what we really mean is identifying a person who’s made it clear they wish to remain anonymous, and then, using that information to threaten to harm them. Revealing information that’s already out there and easily available isn’t the problem; it’s the harassment, the threat to career, to family, and to one’s own safety that is the problem. It’s not acceptable.
Unfortunately, this has also become all too common online:
“You disagree with me!? You are a terrorist! Worse than Hitler!” Therefore you deserve whatever you get!
To be honest, Godwin’s law is a constant while debating feminists on social media, be it on Twitter, Facebook or all the other outlets. It’s only a matter of time before someone impulsive enough calls the other a terrorist for daring to agree/disagree with feminism.
But when hyperbole becomes action in the real world, where innocent people are put in harm’s way, then we can talk about actual acts of terror. This logic (or logic as a whole) tends to be rejected by feminists on Twitter because what they feel defines reality and facts do not matter. Even within pro-Gamergate groups, there are feminists who claim to support the movement but they snap at you as soon as you state feminism is directly related and woven into Gamergate. Their favorite talking point goes:
“GamerGate is only about ethics in journalism please do not touch feminism”
Let’s analyze this impulsive demand: you are actually asking people to criticize the lack of ethics exercised by feminists in journalism but you demand we do not to talk about feminists themselves because feminism has “nothing to do” with their motives for dishonesty? That is a spectacular act of dishonesty in and of itself.
Congrats feminists, you have hit a new low of willful leftist-feminist retardation even within GamerGater feminist circles. By your flimsy logic, Anita Sarkeesian, Zoe Quinn, Rebecca Watson, Brianna Wu and every other present and future anti-GamerGate feminist is not a “true feminist,” a logical fallacy known as “No true Scotsman”.
What is #GamerGate?
Mountains of pixels have been typed on the subject but to make a short analogy, imagine MSNBC had been involved in a case of blatant corrupt journalism and kept denying all evidence of its wrongdoing. It would read as follows:
“#MSNBCGate started when a sector of the leftist leaning media (the one in charge of TV journalism) was caught red handed exchanging sexual favors for positive reviews of products which led to them being exposed colluding to push or reject products not based on quality but all kinds of bribes (besides the sexual ones). Detractors of MSNBC started a campaign named #MSNBCGate on social media. #MSNBCGate is still going to this day because those corrupt TV journalists still reject all evidence of their corruption. “
Imagine after all the damning evidence MSNBC still denied all of their involvement with corrupt practices. If that analogy is clear then this is GamerGate in a nutshell:
#GamerGate started when a small sector of the leftist leaning media (the one in charge of video game journalism) was caught red handed exchanging sexual favors for positive reviews of video games which led to them being exposed colluding to push or reject games not based on quality but all kinds of bribes (besides the sexual ones) detractors of corrupt game journalists started a campaign named GamerGate on social media. GamerGate is still going to this day because those corrupt Game journalists still reject their collusion despite all the damning evidence. Yes, to this day they still deny all of their involvement with corrupt practices.
With that in mind, watch this video #GamerGate in 1 minute
Who is @Lizzyf620?
Let’s say you support a movement that rejects journalistic corruption but also feminist lies. Let’s say that movement is called GamerGate therefore you must be a fedora-wearing, big, fat, hairy, celibate, reclusive and butt-ugly male gamer, right? Let’s say you are the opposite, an attractive young woman and you openly mock these assumptions about gamers on Twitter. Let’s say you take no prisoners and your level of gifted satire & snark are only rivaled by your very feminine, above average physical looks. The feminists say you are just a male posing as a female, so you take selfies with clear hand-written text showing them you actually are a real woman.
The feminists say you are just “photoshopped,” so you record yourself on video sarcastically apologizing for “being a man”. The feminists say you are one “isolated case” so you start recruiting dozens of women like you and on video, sarcastically apologize for being a “male posing as a woman” along with dozens of people representative of gamer diversity The reaction from feminists towards you? Harassment and threats.
Let’s say that despite all the blow back and the very real harassment you experience, you never play the damsel and instead intelligently mock those who harass you. Then you, the attractive young woman also dare to write and defend GamerGate on a “little” website called Buzzfeed which feminists successfully take down and censor only to have your community protest until Buzzfeed puts it back.
Let’s say that both you and your defense of GamerGate go semi-viral. That was the moment when it became clear feminists had put a price on your head. Yes, you the attractive young female gamer. Let’s say you also are a mother of two. Let’s say that shortly after the Buzzfeed article, those anti-GamerGate feminists released all your personal information on you & your family, including your two toddlers.
How feminist media defends THEIR “decent” women
Imagine this: Anita Sarkeesian has two toddlers and all of her personal information was leaked: real name, address, place of work, list of family members and to top it off, photos of her two toddlers. It would be all over the news.
“Misogynist males have threaten the children of feminist Anita Sarkeesian!
Is there no limit to these monsters!?”
That headline would make for a great Jezebel headline right? Guess what? None of that media circus will happen to Lizzy. Why? Because she does not “deserve” it. Let’s not forget that according to feminist dogma, it is only harassment if men and non-feminists do it. Lizzy is not a feminist, therefore she is fair game to doxx and hunt down.
Much like petite porn stars who get beat up and put in hospital by their partner, mass media will barely report on those “undeserving” women and instead focus on leftist hypocrites like Anita Sarkeesian and her fabricated “suffering” (which almost always gets primetime). Mass media will even bring her in person to blatantly display her apocryphal victimhood on the Colbert Report and MSNBC. But Lizzy? She will be ignored, simply because she does not comply. She does not need to be a porn star, she does not even need to be the wrong kind of “whore” all she needs to do is not comply with feminism.
Lizzy, a single mother of two working as a photographer, will likely not benefit from the usual white-glove treatment of “pedestalized” martyrdom leftist media reserves for the like of Anita Sarkeesian. No, the threats against Lizzy and her family do not constitute “real” harassment because for the leftist media, she is an apostate to feminism, one that refuses to comply with the pink, fascist thought mafia. Just like a fascist-theocratic state, feminism and its “Social Justice Warriors” hounds will threaten to harm those who abandon and publicly question feminism. They will hunt you down simply because you “dared” offend feminism almost as if you had directly offended them.
But what moves these SJW hounds? The reality is that “SJW” is an overrated term. What truly moves a “SJW” is not “social” but their own narcissism. It is not “justice” they seek either. They seek retribution. Lastly, they are far from being “warriors.” They are cowards looking for a stone to hide under. No, they are not “Social Justice Warriors” they are Narcissistic Retribution Cowards (or NRCs for short) willing to bend their already warped sense of justice for the sake of pleasing their thinly veiled narcissism. They get so deeply offended because they are devoid of a sense of self. Deep down they are just a husk for “feminism” and feminism is their religion. Hence, if you offend feminism, you offend them directly. The very real problem with their narcissism is when it spills into the real world.
SJWs/NRCs will do anything for feminism including threatening to harm little children.
Just let that sink in. Think about the level to which these people are willing to stoop for the sake of feminism. Imagine their flawed thought process led by their deformed, metastasized sense of justice.
“I hate this Lizzy whore…There must be a way we can get her to shut up…mmmhhh…Should I threaten her livelihood and get her fired? Threaten her? Threaten her loved ones?
Yes…threatening her loved ones sounds fair…She deserves to suffer…Let’s see…Who is the most vulnerable, most innocent human being she is related to? Yes her two toddlers! I am willing to threaten her two innocent toddlers in the name of feminism…because she offended feminism…and offended me”
In life, we judge people by their ideas and actions not their appearance or ethnicity. Make no mistake: for the sake of feminism, adherents will threaten little children because it does not matter what happens in the world. Feminism must claim the moral high ground, even if that means threatening innocent little toddlers.
Is this what it comes down to you SJWs/NRCs?
You crossed the line. Children are untouchable.
Against Doxxing Them Back
The predictable reaction for moral human beings is to protect children first. It does not take that much to warp that outrage into doxxing those who doxxed Lizzy and threatened her children but that escalation would be a mistake. Our legal system is designed to prevent these escalations because they usually result in worse crimes. As flawed as the legal system is, it is better than the original lynch mobs because lynch mobs tend to get their targets murdered and very often without evidence. The reality is that we all want revenge when children are put in harm’s way, but in a lynch mob? Mobs are all to easy to abuse. Mobs create a social diffusion of responsibility or, in other words, you get others to do your dirty work while getting away with murder (by proxy). If anything, our legal system is a process for measured, controlled revenge aimed at preventing said mobs. The SJWs that doxxed Lizzy are a lynch mob and imitating them just makes GamerGate a mob of a different color.
Do not imitate psychos by doxxing them. Let’s gather evidence and put them in jail instead.
Let’s look closely at the actions that led to Lizzy being doxxed.
- Feminists dislike Lizzy and her free speech.
- Feminists tell Lizzy to shut up or else…
- Feminists organize a lynch mob of SJWs to put Lizzy’s info on the table in the hopes for a psycho to do the dirty work. Still ongoing.
Sound familiar? Look at past international events where fascist-theological groups have attempted to suppress free speech, first by “outing” dissenters of their dictatorship to make them publicly known, then by facilitating their execution by a mob/group. Compare, and you will soon realize that do/xxing is the new lynch mob. Doxxing is putting a price on the head of that formerly anonymous person.
Welcome To Feminism: The Pink Theocratic-Fascism
When it comes to free speech, we are all journalists receiving death threats. As long as it is not authentically illegal, all “offensive” speech should be allowed. Unfortunately, we already live in a theocratic-fascist state where saying something “offensive” may warrant doxxing and death threats from feminists. Paint a fascist-theocracy in pink and see the parallels. We live in a pervasive theocracy called feminism and if you dare to openly disagree with feminists, you will be doxxed, in the hopes that a psycho will make good on the threats. Unlike a fascist-theocratic state, which actually publicly executes those whose free speech is “too offensive”, feminism delegates the dirty work to “someone” who can doxx those who do not conform with their pink dogma. While feminism mimics a religion, it does not yet openly define itself as one. Here are some of the most blatant similarities feminism has with religion:
- It is based on emotion
- Dismisses evidence while asking you to “listen and believe”
- Does not pay taxes
- Seeks intellectual immunity
- Opposes all criticism by doxxing those who disagree
It would be hard not to see the similarities of an fascist-theocratic state calling for the head of an “atheist” to be served on a platter versus feminism doxxing people like Lizzy “just to scare them” while getting their personal info served on a platter.
Notice that last subtlety: “just to scare them.” As if feminists had control over the actions of a random psycho after putting Lizzy’s info on the table. Of course, for those leftists defenders of feminism, the comparison with a fascist-theocratic state would be “unfair” because “we do not actually kill people, we only threaten to kill them and their toddlers for disrespecting feminism.”
What will it take for actions to become words? Doxxing Lizzy is intended to cause her and her family harm. We cannot allow this to continue. We need doxxers held legally accountable.
Taunting people is one thing. But Mob justice is no justice at all.