Sponsored links

A Voice for Men

Humanist Counter-Theory in the Age of Misandry

SocFreeSpeech
You are here: Home / News / Feminist hate explodes on Twitter with #killallmen

Feminist hate explodes on Twitter with #killallmen

By 99 Comments

On Monday the popular alternative news source infowars.com reported on a Twitter hashtag called #killallmen, in which feminists openly expressed their hatred of men.  Some even called for violence.

The hashtag exploded on twitter Sunday and was still very active on Monday when Info Wars reported on it.  Most comments were simple displays of bigotry which ranged from common misandry such as these:

“My housemate changed supermarkets because the security man wouldn’t stop asking for her number. #killallmen.”

“A guy I barely know tried to hit on me with Smiths lyrics. Then another guy I barely know basically gave me a friendzone rant. #killallmen.”

“Oh, so, worse than are men’s rights activists. Go away and die, all of you. I wish the cold which currently afflicts me upon U.”

To the more extreme tweets advocating violence and mass murder:

“TBQH, is a BIT misleading. We’re not going to kill them all, just the majority. A few will be sent to underground sperm farms.”

“Stabbing is not my preferred method for #killallmen, TBH. Too messy.”

“Archery early tomorrow morning. Preparing for when it’s time to #killallmen.”

“Not endorsing that we #killallmen, (some of my best friends, etc), but reducing men to 1 in 4 would solve many of Society’s problems.”

Many MRAs were quick to weigh in on twitter and point out the feminist bigotry and hate.  “The women who are tweeting on look like men. Ironic isn’t it??”  Said one tweet by The Anti Feminist.

Lucian Vâlsan, Director of Multisite Operations of A Voice for Men, was quick to point out the double standards applied to hate speech touted by feminists.

“If a group of men – or worse, a group of MRAs – would’ve done something like that, the entire society would have demanded their heads on the sticks. Yet feminists can get away with virtually anything – from making a mockery out of genital mutilation to outright calling for the extermination of the male sex” he said.  “Some countries put people in jail for even saying something positive about the genocide of Jews – yet when it’s men as a sex, anything goes. If this is not cultural misandry, I don’t know what it is”

Sources:

www.infowars.com/twitter-feminists-campaign-to-killallmen/

http://www.examiner.com/article/feminist-hatemongers-on-twitter-push-campaign-to-kill-all-men

https://twitter.com/search?q=%23killallmen&src=hash

 

 

 

About Robert O'Hara

Bob O'Hara is the U.S. News Director for A Voice for Men. He is a men's rights activist living in the Washington, D. C. area who has done work with S.A.V.E. and is the host of a weekly radio show with news and analysis on men's and boys' issues.

View All Posts

Sponsored link

Support us by becoming a member

AVFM depends on readers like you to help us pay expenses related to operations and activism. If you support our mission, please subscribe today.

Join or donate

Sponsored links

Erin

Elsewhere on AVfM

  • Kimski

    It is indeed sooo heartbreaking to see how “oppressed” the snowflakes and princesses are in society in general. I almost feel sorry for them, seeing how many options they have to express their insane hatred, while the free speech of their “violent oppressors and rapists” are being removed by law at the same time.
    Twose pwoor wittle dwarlings… *snif*

    • Daniel Qian

      @Kimski: “Edit: How about a #DontKillAllWomen-response from the MHRA, just to emphasize the difference?”

      Ew. No. “Don’t kill all” sounds like “Kill most.” I would just say #DontKillPeople (and maybe add #MenArePeopleToo for the particularly slow-witted).

      • Kimski

        Agreed. Better.

      • mensrights reddits

        #Respectbothsexes has been suggested, and it’s something to get behind, unless someone becomes offended at the exclusion of intersexed / transgendered persons.

        • Daniel Qian

          That’s the idea behind the “too” in #MenArePeopleToo. “Men are people” attacks the violent rhetoric at its weakest point, which is the rather obvious ethical flaw of normalizing violence against people. Adding “too” keeps the punch while implying that yeah we already know that women are people, everyone knows it and has always known it, there isn’t anything “radical” about it, and in fact *we* apparently have to remind *you* of *our* personhood.

          But I don’t use Twitter, so my reasoning was entirely theoretical. Sometimes I think about joining; then I stop and think about something else.

          • earth one

            I would recommend #StopFeministHate 🙂 if I might add my two cents…

          • Daniel Qian

            I command you, don’t think of an elephant. Stop thinking of elephants! You’re doing the not thinking of elephants all wrong!! Why are you thinking of elephants, when I told you not to?!

            I think it’s much more powerful to say what you want than what you don’t, because it gets people thinking about it. Brain space is a scarce resource, precious real estate, to be treasured and used carefully.

            Which means that I did it wrong above. The most effective response to hatred might be to promote a frame of mind that is incompatible with it — like gratitude. Maybe a Twitter campaign to look for one man every day that you see doing some dirty, dangerous and/or soul-crushing work that keeps the gears of our civilization spinning, and say thank you.

            It’s easy to see how #ThankAMan or something like that could be used snarkily by the usual suspects, but I think that the hardcore misandrists are actually a small minority. Even most feminists just don’t really know what all is done in their name. I picture the sarcastic uses being swamped by sincere ones.

      • ihateyourguts 25

        Actually, #KillMostWomen sounds good to me.

        • Daniel Qian

          I saw your pre-edit comment and don’t really want your approval. If you go to the top row of your comment and move the cursor to the right-hand side, you’ll see a dash, a pipe, and a down-arrow. If you click on the down-arrow, one of the options will be to delete your comment. Thanks.

  • So much for feminism being a benign positive movement, so oppressed indeed. Clearly this is the “equality” they want.

    • earth one

      Agreed – this is what it has come to. The beauty of this is that it’s documented – killing men went from an underground hate movement (RadFems) to a mainstream Twitter explosion. Anyone who seeks to minimize or excuse this is a #HateApologist.

  • mensrights reddits

    I’ve been suspended & reinstated at least twice by twitter fighting this. I just sat on #killallmen and #killmostmen for a few days, finally getting prison planet’s attention. (though that wasn’t what I’d set out to do).

    It’s great (imo) to have my profile on the screen – some at reddit less than thrilled to be associated with infowars, but press is press, imo – especially since the images used of @mensrightsrdt are of fighting the hashtag & linking argued opinions. Even the less favorable articles didn’t go rooting through my account for me sending a bad joke or something. Stories also went out on The Wire, Yahoo and DcClothesline (maybe others).

    I was able to push NerdyDancing’s “the New N word” [1] essay, as well as the “a cloud called feminism” argument [2] and a reddit post noting that the DOJ has been censoring data on domestic violence. [3] A lot of data there will mostly be ignored, by 99% of Alex Jone’s audience, but he also tweeted it twice out to 270K people, and Paul Joseph Watson tweeted it twice to his 50k followers, plus the article above. I’ll take those numbers.

    Additionally, Infowars is also putting “the war on men” on their March magazine cover.

    [1]http://www.avoiceformen.com/misandry/the-new-nigger-2/

    [2] http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/txl8o/a_cloud_called_feminism/

    [3] http://www.reddit.com/r/MRRef/comments/15mnbw/2006_us_doj_refused_to_fund_vawa_studies_focusing/

    • Ohone

      Why fight it, its like fighting against 4chan hi-jinx. It only exists to troll and laugh at us.

      • MensRightsCanada

        Fight not to win the war, but fight for those bystanders watching from the outside. They will make their own choices and know the correct path.

        • earth one

          Wisdom. I might add, their hatred is even greater cause to be a peaceful Warrior. Peaceful, rational, intelligent and creative counter-theory will destroy their hate by exposing it and enlightening decent people to oppose it.

          • ihateyourguts 25

            You don’t appear to understand what kind of “people” we are talking about. Feminists are as rational and sane as moslem extremists. Mere suggestion of peaceful, rational, intelligent and creative counter-theory, targeted at the feminazis, is laughable.

            Would you have an conversation with a moslem fanatic about to cut your head off? Or a Nazi? I doubt it.

            Same goes with feminists, and women in general. Women are the enemy of, not only men, but society, civilisation and human race itself.

            Naive people like you don’t yet understand the true extent of the danger women and feminazis pose. But you will (hopefully) learn.

          • MensRightsCanada

            Muslim? Is this what you were trying to say?

          • MensRightsCanada

            Indeed. Thank you for adding in. Letting emotions take control of our words is one of the most damaging things to be aware of. It’s not easy, and we all make mistakes sometimes.

  • ExpatMatt

    And here I was thinking *we* were supposed to be the violent, brutish gender…

    • Daniel Qian

      Projection isn’t just a phenomenon; it’s a strategy. Accuse someone of being like you, and then when they point out what you’re really like, they’re late to the party and wearing the same dress.

      • Paul Johnson

        I’ve been looking for an eloquent way to say this for a long time. This is quite good!

        • Daniel Qian

          Thank you. I read about the “projection strategy” years ago, and it took me this long to distill it down to that. I want to say what’s catchy; that’s *my* strategy.

          • Sulla

            Can I steal that line?

            Yes, projection is a form of gaslighting. For example marriage was a construct designed to benefit women. Saying that marriage was used to oppress women when it is a trap for men is a classic obfuscation tactic.

          • snoochieboochies

            I believe feminism has re-written a lot of historical facts by using this tactic. It only becomes glaringly obvious after swallowing a big huge red pill. I wouldn’t believe anything a feminist says anymore without quadruple checking the facts. Everything they say seems to be filled with half truths.

          • Daniel Qian

            @Sulla: “Can I steal that line?”

            Please do. 🙂

          • ExpatMatt

            It worked. You took my throw-away snarkasm and keyboard-judo’d it into something true, profound, and thought-provoking.

            Nice to meet you, Daniel. And it’s nice to meet the many other people here who appreciate the power of a well-turned phrase. 🙂

          • ExpatMatt

            Dammit, didn’t mean to upvote myself. Any way I can undo that? Oh, so vain… 🙂

  • The #KillAllMen Twitticide is a revival of a dead RadFem meme from last year https://twitter.com/ImNotMraBut/status/332802587977998337

    Are the RadFems and the Brennan Bug spoofing twitter to get some publicity for RadFem2014? … and does anyone know what that bag of horrors is upto?

    • Kimski

      I don’t know..I can’t tell the difference between the moderates and the radicals anymore..sad, but true.

      • Lucian Vâlsan

        Quite frankly, I don’t think there ever was a substantive difference between the moderates and the radicals to begin with.

        Let’s not forget that the “moderates” of the suffragettes were sharing white ribbons and then whilst men were dying with millions on the battlefields they were demanding voting privileges (not rights – because they never wanted the responsibilities that came with the vote) for white women only – while most men dying on the battlefields didn’t have the franchise either. And those were the moderates!

        A “moderate feminist” is to me in the same level as a “moderate National-Socialist” is -> which amounts to just petty insignificant differences as they pertain to a huge level of mental fucked-upness.

        • Sulla

          How can feminism be moderate when females have never been oppressed in the west?

          There was never a moderate fair feminism, fighting to correct genuine grievances. Feminism is about silencing men, and securing women more privilege, that is what is has always been about.

          To even claim that men used to oppress and abuse women is hateful.

          • Aimee McGee

            Self determination by rights should include universal suffrage and equality of opportunity. My ancestress fought both battles. I’m struggling to get details on her later life but by inference I believe she was working on reproductive control and I suspect would have prescribed as many condoms as diaphragms and sponges as a doctor in the 1920s and 1930s

        • Aimee McGee

          Suffragists in the UK broke away from the suffragette movement because could not condone the violence, saw the white ribbon campaign as hypocrisy and wanted universal suffrage regardless of gender or race.
          My namesake ancestress was a suffragist. Getting any historical data on her has been an interesting challenge because of this and her refusal of census participation without the right to vote

      • Does this mean that Poe’s Law is at an end and being swallowed by a Feminist Singularity P¬0

        • Kimski

          I don’t think hate pertains to parody in the first place, but something is definitely sucking in intelligence.

    • Dagda Mór
      • Kimski

        If you look at the rate of male serial killers raised by single dysfunctinal mom’s, that poster might just hold the single most important clue to how to fix things in the world in general.
        Extend the message to both genders, and we might actually get there someday..

  • John Narayan

    #killallmen the longer version being #killallmen_expect_the_ones_we_need_to_design_bulid_and_maintain_everything_we_need
    _for_this_entitled_spoiled_lifestyle hashtag

  • Steve Wickenden

    “Deprivation of the Child is Odious” Contact PM Tony Abbott for Children Everywhere.
    Our Children, our culture, our future under attack from within, organised crime graft profiting from crime and ambush war against Australian Children and Families, antisocial socialist feminist treachery, bigotry and treasons under the Australian constitution we can not receive fair justice from this judiciary, FCA has been overrun by this foreign political violent power sociopathic pac, EMILY’s List is a political action committee (Super PAC) “More women in parliament, on corporate boards and in our courts“. Feminist or any other PAC’s have no place in the ‘Australian Commonwealth’ courts, by way of constitutional separation of power, it is treason. They exploit children and families in their ambitions of power to create a socialist feminist republic, money through children via the courts. “Early Money Is Like Yeast” (i.e., it raises dough), feminism is a KGB construct.http://fathersunionaustralia.com/wp/

  • Mike

    First time posting on AVFM, been reading articles here for a long time though. I’m somewhat of a pessimist, which in dynamics like these tend to reduce me to a ‘lurker’, but this actually made me furious. I think this is the first time we’ve seen feminism advocate hate against men without even so much as a pretext, just an open movement calling for hate expression. Anyway, not that I have a big social circle on FB, and I don’t even have a twitter account, but I did post that #RespectBothGenders, as well as #VanityIsACarousel. Mainly I wanted to come here to say thanks to mensrights reddits, because my first instinct after reading this article was to post something along the lines of #RapeAllRadFemmes, (yeah, I don’t hit soft), but it was in reading that #RespectBothSexes comment someone had suggested that I realized I would just be going to the proverbial dark side. I don’t hate all, or even most women, and what I hate about these women has nothing to do with them being women at all. Sometimes you can get swept up in the rage, like I’m sure a lot of these women have as well. (Note: I’m not defending them, it’s each and every one persons decision as to whether they forgive them.) The realization of this made me realize that, well, vanity is a carousel. Round and round and round it goes, where it stops nobody knows. Nobody on the carousel ever gets closer to each other. (Though they can certainly grow further apart, so, analogy broken lol. Just bare with me anyway). When you’re on it it seems to take up so much of your senses that it’s distracting to the point of being almost entirely engaging, and when you’re off it it just seems absurd. Hence, the carousel analogy, which is meant to apply as much to my own initial reaction as theirs. Anyway, while I’m here, and even if only a few people read this, I might as well say thanks to A Voice For Men and their very fine minds, as well as it’s regulars and commenters. I find this is consistently one of the sites that houses articles which take the reader off of the carousel so to speak, and that the commenters are often quick to chime in with similar sentiments. Good luck and keep up the good work guys!

    • ExpatMatt

      I’m brand new here myself, but welcome. Liked your post, and I know how you feel about reflexive rage.

      • MensRightsCanada

        Welcome both of you.

        • Mike

          Thanks very much, to both of you. I’ll try to chime in a bit more in the future.

  • Daniel

    how could committing mass murder, solve social ills? surely genocide/mass murder/murder is a social ill?… it’s like murdering to fight violence.

    • Aimee McGee

      Tell that to every perpetrator of genocide

      • Daniel

        they just wanted to wipe people out they saw as sub human…. oh ye, that’s what they think of men. lol but to accuse men of violence and causing war, then say the solution is genocide is just farcical.

        • Aimee McGee

          Yep…but didn’t you know FEELINGS ARE FACTS

  • Daniel

    there are no genuine feminists working on legitimate women’s issues. Feminism it’s self, is illegitimate.

    • DukeLax

      Modern gender-feminism gives broken males ( the mangina ) all the rhetoric they need to seek “condescending pats on the head”, and be a good little boy, ….from the women they work with in these massive pork -ocracies.

      • DukeLax

        These “mangina” are not the harmless eunuchs that they seem, these guys are in fact the wheels and cogs moving the machinery that persecutes our sons.

        • ihateyourguts 25

          And many of those wretched manginas are in the very high circles of power, such as international bankers and presidents.

    • snoochieboochies

      Feminism gets millions in funding. They have to keep re-inventing new ways of claiming oppression in order to sustain this funding. The money would quickly dry up if feminists were ever to be percieved as being on an equal footing to men which is why i think they find it so hard to acknowledge their own priviledges in society.

  • Attila_L_Vinczer

    This is a clear indication of where, the feminist mind is. More importantly where the tolerance level for women sits within the general public who by remaining silent, condone this deplorable propaganda wishing death on men.

    • Ohone

      Women challenging male power in advertising propaganda is a marketing gimmick invented by a man called Edward Barneys.

  • Ohone

    That mainly exists to laugh at us when we take it at face value.

  • DukeLax

    The owner and editors of “Info Wars”, are sitting on a gold mine.
    As the American “big 5 media” tumble further and further, circling the drain of irrelevance, people are looking toward other more trust-able news sources ( Sources without an agenda).
    Now i don’t agree with all the articles he posts, but the tag line ….” There is a war for youre mind” …Is true, its catchy, and its a winner!!!

    • Sulla

      Info wars is compete crap.

      Alex Jones was waffling on about conspiracy crap while staying silent on the family courts. (Biggest instrument of oppression in the USA.) Alex Jones mixes in truth, with complete crap. The man is a big joke. He even sells his own line of fluoride filters.

      Alex Jones has seen the men’s rights movement grow and will try and co’opt it.

      • earth one

        I agree 100% – conspiracy nutter – I cringed when I saw the source of this story, but in fact, mainstream media does not cover this stuff, and sometimes, the truth comes out in unexpected places. I used to be fascinated by Alex Jones but I’ve come to realize he’s basically nuts. But even conspiracy nuts can hit the nail on the head once in a while.

        • ExpatMatt

          “But even conspiracy nuts can hit the nail on the head once in a while.”

          Not going to get into specifics, because this isn’t the place. But thanks for including at least this. I try to examine (almost) everything from a mindset of “show me the evidence,” which has led me to question a lot of commonly-held views.

          Like Feminism. To most of us, we–us, right here, on AVfM–are conspiracy nutters. The worst kind, at that.

          That said, having examined a fair amount of what Alex Jones has said, I do think he’s just going to poison the well if he fixates on the MHRM.

          • earth one

            Absolutely. “The truth is out there.” I agree, commonly-held beliefs are often great smokescreens behind which there are complex, disturbing truths. And I’m in agreement that Jones could easily try to use the MHRM to focus attention on himself.

            Edit – I didn’t mean to upvote myself … oops…

  • Riku

    Oh my…is this a joke? No wait, I’m not surprised.

    As suspected, mainstream feminists defend those genocide supporters by saying that
    a) they’re never listened to or allowed to speak up and things like that happen to the female gender all the time (without proof) or
    b) that it’s satire.

    If this is satire, then Mein Kampf is also satire and what happened after that has absolutely nothing to do with it.
    Feminazis.

    • ihateyourguts 25

      I’m not surprised that many european women, even radfems, support Islam in increasingly large numbers. They have much in common with islam, which, as has been pointed out before, is very misandric religion.

  • We’ll stop putting down feminism when feminists stop putting down men, MHRAs and men’s issues. Deal? Didn’t think so.

    • earth one

      Touche!

    • Kimski

      I won’t. I want to see this abomination dead and buried, permanently.
      I don’t want to see the next generation of men having to do it all over again.
      Just sayin’..

    • Screw_Globalism

      Feminists want to put down all men……literally !!

  • earth one

    I’m glad the Femi-fascists are now on the record. I would recommend anyone and everyone take screen shots and otherwise record these tweets.

    Predictably, this is NOT being covered in mainstream media.

    One article in Salon in which the author attempts to blame Twitter rather than the hate-mongers fomenting this campaign – characterizing this open hate as “unfunny” and “misbehavior” – because it’s always just “girls behaving badly” when women do it. In other words, women are no more responsible for their actions than children:

    http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/twitters_latest_unfunny_trend_killallmen/

    Why do feminists always, always, always deflect blame and run from accountability when people call them on their hate? It’s enough to make a person hate feminists…

    • Sardonicus13

      Bloody hell! That Salon article is almost as rage-inducing as the Feminazi tweets themselves.

      However…Even if other media outlets similarly spin this story or flat out ignore it, these tweets will still serve to provide further evidence that feminism is a hate movement to all those fence-sitters out there.

      • earth one

        Agreed. Comments continue. I read over the comments on the Salon article, some of them are definitely push-back on the author, this is one of my favorites:

        By the end of this article you get the feeling men are bad and women are good for hating men. The problem of course is men and women don’t think the alike, we’re wired differently. Had this article been written by a man it would’ve been pragmatic and rational and discussed just the unseemly site itself.

        The author of this article rattled through a list of propaganda based on nothing because that’s her nature. She is simply wired to think emotionally. Unbiased pragmatism isn’t in her nature, she simply jotted down her feelings, nothing factual.

        It’s like the Jodi Arias case. If a man had done something like that, it’d be open and shut. But a Jodi is a woman so the trial dragged on forever to talk about how she felt at every point in time for the weeks preceding to afterwards. The crime itself spirals into irrelevancy and becomes about her feelings.

        This article is the same. The actual hashtag of “killallmen” is irrelevant, the authors feelings have become paramount.

    • Diotima

      We need to shift things so none of this kind of shit matters any more. Rather that whining about it – change the rules of the game. The notion that having feminists “on record” matters a fig is to entirely misunderstand the problem. A perfectly evidenced demonstration that feminists are liars, hateful, deceptive and hypocritical will not win the argument because the argument is not being conducted in a domain where truth matters. The argument that needs to be made is that truth does matter, and this argument needs to be made to men. Once this is accomplished feminism becomes an irrelevance – just so many women engaging in idle chatter, as they have always done.

  • Sulla

    Oh look another fence sitter. Yes why don’t you come in and tell us to be moderates and compromise with the other side?

    Females have equality, in fact they are privilege, feminists are spreading hatred against men/boys, because they have nothing else to do.

    You name one legal or social disadvantage women have that men don’t. you will not be able to name a single thing.

    • Bewildered

      Oh look another fence sitter…
      Just because someone gives the impression of being a fence sitter doesn’t mean he’s one !
      I see a partisan’s gambit here!
      If he is really a ‘ He’ then I guarantee he won’t be the kind of male that’s very popular here. 😆

  • Aimee McGee

    Bad move. Expect the black helicopters if you do. Things are not fair or equal but any hint of violence even as irony will tarnish the whole MHRM

  • YoungAngryMan

    Lol. It’s funny because it would never happen, but if a war between men and women ever did happen, it would end in about 1 day with the total annihilation of all women, because after all, we are just “Brutes” according to them.

  • snoochieboochies

    If infowars is picking up on a story like this i think there may be more to come out. It wouldn’t suprise me at all if eugenecists were pouring money into funding feminism. There’s a lot of social manipulation at play behind the feminist political front.

    • John Narayan

      Plus an endless supply of blank checks.

    • Screw_Globalism

      It’s part of Agenda 21 ,which is reducing human population levels quite dramatically. Look it up !!

  • ExpatMatt

    4 things I hope you will read, think about, and answer seriously, if you have the time. Squeaky wheels get the grease. Whining has served some feminist groups (and many others, to be sure) quite well, politically. Sometimes radicals (is that what we are?) have to be loud to move the Overton window enough to allow allied moderates to even be heard–you think that’s ever justified? Then once the public has all the facts, let them make up their minds.

    Second–you sure all of them are joking? Was RadFemHub a joke? I guess I just don’t find gendercidal jokes aimed at me and half the people I care about funny…unless they’re really, really well done, the people making them are clear they’re tasteless jokes, and the people making them can take criticism and turnabout in their stride. Then maybe anything could be funny, albeit offensive.

    Third–part of this is pointing out hypocrisy, even in potentia. Imagine the media frenzy if it were men, especially a Men’s Right’s Group, running the equivalent twitter feed. Would the opposite view get your presumption of innocence–that it’s a joke, and everyone should just chill?

    Fourth–why shouldn’t men criticize feminism? Shouldn’t the criticism be listened to, taken seriously, based on the arguments and evidence presented? Ditto the MHRM fighting to change things. Why is anything free from challenge or mere criticism in a free society?

    Always good to hear opposing views–but we agree on one thing: all I want is equality, too. Have a good one.

  • DEDC

    Yeah, this is why I kind of don’t like the policing of ourselves. We can call this stuff out all day long (and would have moral high ground in doing so), but so what? At the end of that day, it can and will be spun in the following manner: See, this is proof women aren’t taken seriously, because hey we were just kidding but you men, well you are never kidding.

  • earth one

    Many MRAs were quick to weigh in on twitter and point out the feminist bigotry and hate. “The women who are tweeting on #killallmen look like men. Ironic isn’t it??” Said one tweet by The Anti Feminist.

    There is definitely something going on there. Man-hating wimmin who look like men – whod’a thought?

    *Scratches head*

  • numbCruncher

    #killallmen
    Bring it

  • comslave

    This was entirely expected. Feminism has no end game. There’s no point in their theories where they can say they have achieved their goals. If fact, patriarchy theory has always hinted at the need for revenge for thousands of years of oppression.
    But there’s one thing they cannot do: Pick up the gun themselves. Feminism has always achieved its goals by getting men to do their bidding by giving up power and position. But they are not going to get men to randomly shoot each other just to reduce the male population.
    To get this done, they’re going to have to pick up the gun themselves and start shooting. An that, they cannot do.
    So I regard this as nothing but stupid internet trolling. It’s not even something I would complain about. Let them have their fun. Don’t ask twitter to suspend any accounts. Let it just go on. Laughing at them is a far better response.

  • Bedknobs_and_Boomsticks

    #tellallwomentheirshoesareugly is how you win this war. It’ll end in tears.

  • John Narayan

    OT:- Joe Rogan talks about the MRA

  • Politically Incorect

    Woaaaa. Its worse than we though . My naïve wife is finally convinced . Because she always says that I’m overacting . Yes , my ass overacting . Feminists want war . I think is Dick -Envy . But why would any American or Canadian men joint the Army and risks their life to defend the rights of those Man- haters ? Why ? I know a lot of men joint because of the money but ….

  • MRAAlternate

    Just remind society that mainstream feminists once helped invent a little government called “The Third Reich:”

    http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlg/vol311/211-236.pdf

    http://hnn.us/article/1796

  • FireBits

    Feminazi term is not a joke anymore, feminist have become real threat. Jews in pre nazi Germany was thought to be privileged oppressive group and what happened to them. It’s similar story.

  • Mark

    That’s part of the problem. They think it’s trivial and non-threatening because they’re convinced of their innocence and harmlessness; what they seem to be unaware of is men have been killed by women, boys are bullied by girls, men have had wives that pulled knives on them; there are women that have mutilated husbands. Female on male violence is a genuine threat that men have experienced, which means as a joke it’s a pretty bad taste one.

  • Maurice Adelmon

    I’m not opposed to this, once the killing starts, I’m confident men can win… Then we’ll rewrite the rule to ban feminism forever, making it a capital offense.

  • Words Don’t Come Easy

    Mass rape all feminists.

  • roiwnvfoem

    It doesn’t matter that it’s a joke. Calling for genocide is evil, joke or not. By defending this, you are implicated in it. You have been reported for hate speech.

    • Bryan Scandrett

      Modding 2yo comments is kinda lame.

      • roiwnvfoem

        Thanks for your valuable input.

  • Peter Aremone

    FemiNAZIS are for real. Please look up the Feminist “S.C.U.M Manifesto”.
    S.C.U.M = Society for Cutting Up Men.

  • Bah

    They say #killallmen is a joke, but they regularly quote the SCUM manifesto whose feminist writer shot 3 men with open intent to kill.

  • bloke

    It seems paradoxical to me, If feminists were successful in reducing the number of males significantly,
    the net ‘value ‘of each male would be far greater,leading to the very patriarchal society they eschew.
    Also, of the remaining males(particularly Alpha males),they would have a lot of choice of females,many deciding not to pair bond with frumpy feminazi’s. This would inhibit the feminist ‘species of stupid’ to breed,and even then,mainly to ‘species beta male’.
    It’s plausible my said example becomes testimony to the laws of natural selection. I’m a glass half full kind of guy.

Advertisment ad adsense adlogger