Jennifer Hansen is a feminist writer who recently produced a list of six reasons to keep poisonous insects as house pets, why to drive without a seat-belt, motorcycle without a helmet, why to acquire heroin addiction, and why you should place your infant in a pen amongst unfed crocodiles. Also, why look for gas leaks using a lit match, and why to wipe your ass with poison ivy after shitting in the woods.
Actually, Hansen argued for none of these things, rather she recently wrote a list of six reasons for men to date feminists[1]. Several of these are good and compelling reasons to not date a feminist, such as the flatly moronic idea that dating your future employer is a good plan, and the rest are simple lies.
Hansen’s first reason is the claim, made without apparent irony that: “Feminists are, by definition, educated women.”
To address this, it’s necessary to define a few terms, notably: “educated”, and “feminism”.
Educated, in it’s colloquial meaning generally implies some handful of years at a university or college, and the attainment of an academic credential. Pretty obviously, almost all universities and colleges are highly feminized environments, but there is a qualitative difference between acquiring proficiency in a body of expert knowledge, skill in business methodology or mathematics, or engineering, and the mere acculturation into an ideology. In contrast with academic subjects such as biology, physics, philosophy, political science or systems analysis, Feminism is an ideology. Many usefully educated graduates of other fields also become acculturated to feminist ideology during their education, but acculturation and education shouldn’t be confused as the same thing.
And what is the ideology of feminism? This is sometimes hard to answer, as adherents to the ideology indulge in almost never-ending obfuscation of what feminism actually is. “The radical notion that women are people” still gets tossed out as a pat-answer, but women being people is not now, and never was a radical notion.
Cutting through the fluff, feminism is a doctrine built on the pre-supposition of victimhood of women by men as a foundation of female identity. In it’s goals is always the utilization of the state to forcibly redress this claimed victimization. In other words, the proxy use of violence and wealth appropriation. In whatever flavor, and variation, these two basic features are common to every doctrine using the label feminism. Feminism is therefore, a doctrine of class hatred, and violence.
According to Hansen, feminists also “read, travel, play golf, and hold interesting jobs”. And nobody else does any of those things, reading, having interesting jobs, feminism has the monopoly. Seriously, this is satire right? Oh yeah, you might end up dating your future boss. Checking the article, this is reasons to date a feminist, not reasons to run far and fast in the other direction. Oooookay.
Hansen’s next reason to date a feminist is that “There is no presumption that you should pay”. Obviously I have no presumption that I will pay, but what has this to do with feminism? Having dated self described feminists in the past, I know the cultural onus on me, the man to pay remains present regardless of whether a woman declared herself feminist and therefore liberated from all gendered expectations. Unfortunately, this self actualization seems strangely transient, taking effect when advantage can be had, and returning when traditional female advantage is up for grabs, like the man pays. Cue knee jerk protestations of no-true-scotswoman in three, two, one…
The fact is that in social settings, almost all women, feminist or otherwise continue to expect financial gallantry from men, which is identical to prostitution, simply less honest. As a man with self respect, I do not pay women for the privilege of entertaining them. Feminism or it’s absence has nothing to do with that. Hansen bludgeons her readers with a re-iteration of the claim that “Remember, feminists are educated women.” Which betrays her continued confusion between the concepts of education and ideological indoctrination.
Reason number three to stick your head in a deep-fryer: “You might get laid on the first date”.
Because after all, everybody knows men are sex-obsessed, hormone driven subhumans who are always horny, and and desperate to fuck everything with a hole in it. I know this is true because my TV tells me so, quack quack quack quack! And don’t forget, feminists are educated, so says Jennifer Hansen for the third time in a row, and by golly, now I believe her. Educated, that’s what feminist means – an educated woman, and a non feminist is an uneducated simpleton. If only i’d known sooner, I could have saved myself so much trouble. Woof woof!
Setting aside the asinine cultural dogma that men are foolish sex-obsessed simpletons, claiming I fuck on the first date isn’t much motivation to spend an evening with somebody, sex is easy enough to come by, that dating the town bike doesn’t hold much appeal to an adult with a developed sense of self.
Hansen’s forth reason is that when dating a feminist, it is “unlikely [that a] shotgun wedding scenario [is] in your future.” The feminist dating apologist continues to bang the drum that “feminists are educated women” apparently unaware that the ideology is equally subscribed by men. However, the fact that feminist women-folk are so well educated they’re safe as sexual partners. “Safe sex is part of the package.”
Apparently, Hansen believes her male readers are stupid. Apparently, she – and they, have no awareness of the fact that in western societies, reproductive rights are owned entirely by women. That men, in spite of the legal onus to finance any women’a exercised reproductive choice, in spite of the state’s enthusiasm for garnisheeing wages, or imprisoning men, or treating them as breeding and paying livestock – sex with a feminist is totally safe. Because as we know, in addition to being educated, feminism endows women with superior ethics, and the legal right to accidentally-on-purpose get pregnant and then force a man, under colour of law – to make a man pay, while excluding him from the life of his child – no feminist would ever do that. They’re too ethical, as well as too educated. For that matter, no feminist would ever turn a willing sexual encounter into a criminal accusation – because the next morning that guy didn’t look so good, or she’s been caught cheating. Or any other trivial reason hundreds of women every year file false charges of rape. But oh yeah, lets fuck on the first date, its not like feminism is an ideology of hatred in which casual destruction of a man’s life is fodder for comedy.
Hansen’s reason number 5: “Not only is there no crying in baseball, but there [is] also no crying in feminism.”
It may be that Jennifer Hansen has lived a life in which she has never been challenged on any assertion, no matter how silly, how false, or cross-wise to reality that assertion might be. Perhaps in an environment free from differing opinion, she now simply believes any self-flattering dribble which spills from her keyboard. “..there [is] also no crying in feminism.”
Crying, whether using actual salty tears, or in the form of repeated histrionic complaint over trivial issues and imaginary oppression is foundational to feminism. To claim there is no crying in feminism is to claim there are no baseball bats, or balls, or bases, in baseball. women are oppressed, therefore, the government much change the laws, re-distribute wealth, and use force to redress that oppression. That is feminism in a nutshell, feminist crying to motivate the proxy violence of others.
Hansen’s sixth and final reason why men should date feminists is a repetition of her fifth reason, rephrased. “no drama”.
Words fail me in trying to address this, except to wonder possibly if Hansen is satirizing feminism. A strange possibility, if true. A woman with the same name, who may be the same person teaches at St Lawrence University, including a course called: Feminist Philosophy.
Notable that ideologies, of which feminism is one are distinguished by starting from a pre-supposition, and then selecting and crafting evidence to support that doctrinal truth. Philosophies, by contrast, start with evidence and observation, and formulate a view of reality based on evidence and observation. Feminism – which starts from the doctrinal truth of female oppression is an ideology, and not a philosophy.
The absurdist claim of “no drama” isn’t even a clever attempt at spin, it’s simply the polar opposite of reality so obvious even dyed-in-the-wool inductees to that ideology must roll their eyes.
But those are Jennifer’s reasons for men to date a feminist.
However, as dangerously unsound as that advice is, a simple rebuttal of Hansen’s six blatant lies is insufficient. Not only should men not date feminists, they should be considerably more pro-active in opposing that ideology of hatred and violence.
No man should date any woman who is not avowedly anti feminist. Remembering, in all of the various flavors and brands of that doctrine common to all is the doctrine of universal male oppression of women, and the endless grasping after the power of legal violence and legal financial appropriation through the state. If you are a man, you are an oppressor, and the only way out from that blanket definition is to renounce and denounce other men, allowing that you’re provisionally “one of the good ones”. Feminism’s endless claim of female oppression takes no note of the millions of men throughout history who died defending women, and the expectation of male protection of women. No historical mountain of female corpses balances the male dead on which civilization is built. Female favouring changes to education, in the past 4 decades have created a system with 65% female graduates – and rather than acting to correct this, modern feminists celebrate and gloat over male marginalization in education. Feminism is a doctrine of the hatred of men, and it is the practice of violence against them through the financial instruments of the modern state, as well as legalized force against men through police, and through war.
Obama, the self declared feminist president of the United States just re-classified foreign civilian men as “combatants”[3][4]. Thus, the male civilian casualties of American military adventure will not be counted, although female civilians continue to matter as humans. Feminism is absolutely a doctrine of hatred and violence. It is therefore necessary to recognize it’s adherents, and not only not date them, but to exclude them from your life if you have any concept of yourself as a man being a human of human value.
This is not to say exclude women from your life as a man, as feminism and women are two separate things. Women are human beings, as worthy of human consideration, affection and love as everybody else. Feminism however is a thing built from ideas, and feminists are it’s adherents. Dating them, or allowing them into your car, apartment, or life, is ultimately a bad plan.
[1] http://www.howaboutwe.com/date-report/dating-feminist/
[2] http://fabiusmaximus.wordpress.com/2009/07/07/women/
[3] http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/29/world/obamas-leadership-in-war-on-al-qaeda.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1
[4] http://www.salon.com/2012/05/29/militants_media_propaganda/singleton/
247 Posts in Total
donations either one-time or on a monthly subscription basis.
If you don't have paypal, check out the other options.
If you want to get some merchandise and sponsor us at the same time, consider the AVfM store.
Near Earth Object:
Peter Wright (Tawil):
yinyangbalance:
Suzanne McCarley:
Turbo:
If I’m making time with a woman and she lets it slip that she’s a feminist…I politely and expediently disengage.
Drama I don’t need. False accusations I don’t need. Histrionics I don’t need. Sexual politics I don’t need.
I’m looking for an adult female of sound character, a humorous disposition, kindness and warmth of heart, a charitable nature, a love of children and animals (and men…no, duh!), and a few other human qualities.
In a feminist? I’m too old to put money on that pony.
If a dog is foaming at the mouth, you call the police. If a woman identifies herself as a feminist…
Eye in the Sky – “If a dog is foaming at the mouth, you call the police. If a woman identifies herself as a feminist…”
Run forest run!
You date the rabid dog instead.
You owe me a monitor and one cup of French roast.
There is likely no one you could date that would have more ridiculous notions of who you are and who you ought to be. And you know right from the start that she’s not too familiar with the ways of logic. I wouldn’t recommend it…
If only they could invent a vibrator that would pay all their bills…
Isn’t that called a webcam
that’s pretty kinky
Yeah, Poester. It’s kinky, and it only makes her money if she is pretty.
As I’ve mentioned before, I dated two of them. They weren’t nice. They were among the most narcissistic bullies I’ve ever met. As we educated people know, the they’re not really about equality, they’re sexist as hell.
There is one conclusion that I immediately arrived at when I noted the title of Jennifer Hansen’s article : She’s getting lonely and desperate.
Have fun with those cats waiting for you at home, grrrlfriend. They really are your future.
Totally agree. It’s really funny that a feminist is putting articles out there that say that. I thought their lives were supposed to be more ‘complete’ and ‘fulfilled’ as feminists. After all, they love to say that they don’t NEED men.
That’s what I thought, too. Maybe the marriage strike is working.
While I understand the reasoning behind the idea ‘Jennifer wrote this because she can’t get a date,’ this is starting to sound a bit eerily similar to feminist mocking of MRA’s: ‘MRA’s are guys who can’t get laid’.
I always thought the MRM was better than that.
Perhaps there is a difference, but, just sayin’ is all…
I’m on you guys’ side, though. Really, I am.
You’ll find the downvote button below for your convenience.
I dont think there is any problem with your post here tallwheel, you may get the odd downvote, but that does not mean your post is not relevant. You have expressed your opinion, that is relevant. I will upvote you here, even though I tend to disagree with you.
See, I thought the exact same thing when I read this article, a feminist telling us why we should date them when we in fact, we realize that the craziest thing a man could do is date a feminist. It smacks of desperation, which I think is a brilliant thing. The wheel is turning, and men are saying, Fuck that.
I think the difference is that this is not an article from a MRA telling women that they should date MRA’s. This is the point.
We do not see that, get what I mean?
Actually, I wasn’t referring to the article, I was referring to the commenters who are saying that Jennifer wrote her article because she can’t get a date. I didn’t see JTO suggest that in the article.
I think personal attacks on feminists which equate to “she’s unattractive” or “no man will have her” sound a bit too much like reversed tactics from the “Anti-male Shaming Tactics Catalogue”. When you consider the amount of facts and hard data the MRM has at its disposal against feminists, MRA’s can really do better than resorting to low personal attacks. From an outsider’s perspective, MRA’s will look no better than feminists, regardless of how right the MRM may be.
To be fair, though, the idea that this is symptomatic of a larger rejection by men of the current system – as suggested by The Real Peterman – is a compelling one. And, as you pointed out, I haven’t seen any articles by MRA’s about why women should date MRA’s.
To be clear, I think JTO’s article is right on the money.
MRA dating article: I am not sure we are a large-enough demographic right now for something like that. Besides, I am not sure how the ‘pay-off’s’ of dating an MRA would entice women in the first instance. Imagine: date an MRA and expect full accountability for your actions at all times; no fully-paid-for restaurant bills or extra ‘baubles,’ etc.
I am not so sure that such criteria would get the average entitlement princess ‘to tingle’ as it were.
Moreover, an article about women attempting to date a MGTOW would be a incredible short one (like, he never turned up in the first place…)
Fighting fire with fire is the name of the game. People don’t get swayed just by cold, hard facts: We must also win the propaganda war.
I think it’s not so much a case that Jennifer Hansen can ( or can’t ) get a date, but that for the general public, for blue-pill guys, feminism is beginning to stink. This is becoming obvious enough that feminists Jen H. are noticing, so we may soon see more articles like this “6 reasons to date a feminist”. It’s a sign of desperation there’s a necessity to convince men “hey guys, come back, we feminists are a really great thing for you” with absurd rationalization such as “you might have a chance at dating your future boss”. The feminist brand-name is increasingly toxic, even in blue kool-aid land, and the desperate flapping by fem-bots like Jennifer Hansen to portray an alternate view is increasingly funny.
Looks like you posted this just as I was typing my reply to Turbo above-
Yeah. That I can agree with entirely.
And it’s ironic that MRA’s are so quickly accused of being guys who are angry because they can’t get any female attention, when it has always been the feminists and other women complaining that they can’t find a ‘good’ man, and that they can’t get married. If MRA’s are just sexually frustrated guys, then where are all the desperate “Reasons to Date an MRA” and “Where have all the good women gone?” articles? Rather than begging for the women to change, men just say “no thanks” to the whole deal.
All women are equal in family court. Men, not so much. Every non-femminist I ever encountered turned feminist when it was ending.
Her articles will fail, as similar articles (pleas) over the years have, while non marriage rates for men climb higher and higher.
Any guy that has even one wiff of the red pill, would have to be nuts to involve himself with feminists romantically. If they don’t intend on making use of all that misandric family law legislation and dv legislation, why did they lobby gov for.
Yeah, my son is going go out and find himself a feminist to date, and marry, after seeing first hand what laws created by feminists have done to marriage and relationships.
I agree, Stu.
The amount of boys who have been personally affected by witnessing the destruction of their dads in divorce courts, have reached critical mass.
@ Kimski
I agree, but has it reached critical mass yet. I wish, but I think we have a way to go yet.
@Turbo
Your right, we have a way to go. But it’s a perpetual motion machine now. You see, the older a guy is, the more likely he will be chivalric. The older guys will be dying off, the younger guys that are coming up to voting age replacing them in the male voting demographic.
And it’s not just what the young guys have seen happen to their dads, step dads, uncles, and most guys they know older then 40. It’s whats happening to them too. Most young guys have been through a feminist male hating school system that thinks girls are divine,and boys are dog shit. They also face the most spoilt, entitled bitchy generation of young girls ever to walk the earth. Any chivalry and deference to girls that has been forcibly pumped into them will quickly evaporate once they are no longer under the jurisdiction of female run home, female run school. If you ask me, the current crop of teenage boys is going to be the most misogynistic generation of men to have ever existed. Give them time.
The other thing of course, is that in general, young guys now are an apathetic lot. There wont be enough of them to keep the wheels turning. More of them then ever are just opting for a life of drinking, partying, playing video games, and just bumming around, sitting on the dole, and being anti socialist. The future is looking bleak, for society, and that means for feminists too
Critical mass, 2020. Along with an energy crisis, a perpetually shrinking economy, a dire need for society to strip the fat, lose dead weight, get rid of unproductive jobs, all of this will see ALL parasitical blood suckers in society get told to suck eggs
The difference is, an MRA wouldn’t spend decades saying he doesn’t need women at all, then turn right around and try to convince women to date him. That is what Jennifer is doing here, so people are ragging on her.
Fight fire with fire? Yeah, sure, why not???
This is spot-on. The simple existence of the article suggests that feminists have become aware of the fact that men avoid dating them.
MRA Handbook of Femmo Engagement:
If found in car:
Pull over and extract with tongs.
If found in home:
Chuck it’s mobile phone out door and bolt it when it grabs it.
If found behind counter:
Stand back and spray with disinfectant. Tell it you will to speak to another.
If found on footpath coming towards you:
Cross street immediately.
If found on phone:
Hang up immediately.
If found in park:
Scurry up tree, hide in foliage.
If found in dustbin:
Clamp lid down firmly.
If found on lawn:
Spray it with hose.
If found in chat room online:
Flip main switch in fuse box.
If it follows you home:
Open umbrella with big eyes painted on it to scare it off.
If found in bed next morning:
Chew arm off. Run to backyard and pull rip cord of Jet-pack.
LOL
Hey Doc,
You know what, I am on the wrong side of 30, so I am old, and do not think that you can suck me into telling you how old I am, because it is no ones business that I am over 50. Hang on, I meant 40, OK 40, did I say 40.
Now, I see that our country is being infested with three distinct pests. All of which are destroying our environment.
They are as follows
Cane toads
Cockroaches
Feminists
Now this is interesting, because I believe that we can control some of these pests, at least I think.
Now, This is not in order of danger, because I think we may be able to control two of the three rodents.
When i was a kid, i never saw a cockroach, a cane toad or a feminist. But by the time I was 18, i still had not seen a cockroach, or a cane toad, but I had certainly seen a feminist.
Now it seems that Australian Tarantulas, birds and other predators are slowing the march of the cane toad, that is great news.
As for the cockroach, well, we have been unable to stop them, but we have poison sprays to kill these vermin
This leaves us us with the disgusting species of rodents, that we have to put up with, called feminists. What can be done to eradicate this rodent, there is surely a spray, NO?`
Turbo,
Ta for your list of pests and a bit of a biology walk.
If there is nowhere to run and it’s got you cornered (against the fridge at a crowded party or in a stuck elevator for example) just imagine it as a tree and you as the dog that it sees you as.
That’s right, lift up that leg and spray away matey.
LMAO
Spot on, doc!!!
PDF, printer and off to the masses!!!
I suggest we all hand these out to unsuspecting blue pill-head Men…
Dating Feminists? NOW they want us to DATE them?!?
AAARRRRGH!!!! My brain! So much fuck!
So….Much…FUCK!!!!
Sorry, folks. Had to be done.
who’s true name is in fact your alias
k, knew all that comic reading in my yout would come in handy!
Like I said, had to do it. It was the only thing I could think of to truly express my reaction to such a thing. I mean, come on. Dating Feminists? Fucking seriously?!?
Yes. Perhaps she’s lonely? Or maybe she’s looking for a cash dispenser? In any case, her feminism is scaring men away from her so she figured she’d write some nonsense about how men should date feminists so that a man would take her out to dinner.
What really confuses me: WTF did I just watch?
Nic Cage turning into Ghost Rider. Sorry, I liked the film, the first one too. Got me interested into the actual comic book character. Needless to say I picked the vid because I felt it best reflected my thoughts on this newest batch of feminist mindfuckery.
No apology necessary. Actually, I have seen the last half of the first movie. I should get to watching the whole thing. Apparently I missed some good stuff.
She’ll find someone with limited self respect and a bit of game, looking for either a hook up or a sugar mama (I’m almost certain she’s well off). Which will further add to her bitterness and misandry
You got it. She sounds like a used car salesman trying to talk up the biggest bomb in the yard
While I have to agree with you Zarathos22, I’m down voting for the cage video.
No prob. Figured I’d probably catch shit for it from some people.
At a guess, its probably not “us” (MRAs) she’s trying to convince. We’re all woman-hating, get-back-to-the-kitchen misogynists, by their definition. The average blue pill guys tho, even for them, feminism is starting to stink, so we get propaganda pieces like Jen Hansen’s comedy routine.
I’m getting really tired of the ‘get-back-to-the-kitchen’-claim.
First of all, I don’t want any of them in my kitchen, ’cause cooking is below them, and it shows in what they dish out.
And secondly, I want them out there and working as hard as possible. Preferably in rock quarries, on scaffolds or oil rigs, in women only teams.
Either way, JtO, the idea of asking men to date feminists after all the bullshit they’ve had them live under for either fifty or sixty years is utterly fucking repulsive.
Say, would there be any chance of making this into a youtube video, JtO?
I dunno man, wouldn’t the laugh track required to do the very idea justice be a little excessive?
holy sh*t! Great photo!
What is really hilarious about this article is that it basically comes out and admits that self-professed feminists are having trouble finding dates.
Geee…… I wonder why???
Also, note the author not only lies bald-faced to her audience, but also authoritatively presumes to determine what we are looking for in a mate.
Clearly, just another fish in search of a bicycle, TMG.
Nailed it, JtO.
It’s clear from Hansen’s ravings that she considers feminist women not only educated women but superior women.
This is entirely consistent with a devotee of an ideology, which Hansen clearly is.
Also I loved her introduction about the date with a feminist lawyer. That’s really sticking your nuts in the vice.
Yep. Instead of sex on the first date, Ms Hansen, why not put up a non-refundable six-figure deposit to cover the potential legal nightmare if it all goes to shit?
Then the risk on the relationship would be equal.
Date a feminist lawyer? Sure, why not, I like being broke and homeless!
The sarcasm is strong in this one.
When I was a college instructor I would always tell my students that there was a difference between being educated and being intelligent, that there were plenty of educated idiots walking around, and that if they didn’t believe me they should get a job in education.
Jesus McJoseph McGod, yes!
I spent the last third of my career as an instructor in the training center of my agency, teaching new employees with college degrees how to do the job they’were hired to do. Trouble was, all too many of them had less common sense than God gave a doorknob.
A jackass with a college diploma is still a jackass, or at best, a smart ass.
Dating a feminist is like putting razor blades in your underwear. Don’t do it.
Okay, so I decide to see this shit for myself. Then I took a gander at the comments section and there were at least TWO people who commented on the article that didn’t buy that shit for a minute. It’s starting to make me think that there is at least some kind of benevolent cosmic entity out there.
Feminists should date feminists. The end.
they deserve each other.
Hell man, that’s harsh LMAO
Sounds like a recipe for a never ending struggle to prove who is the biggest victim, and bizarrely the ‘winner’ is the biggest victim – WTF?
No man should partner up with a feminist, who needs to hang around with losers that won’t stop whining about how bad they have it? – and prefer whining to doing something about it.
Kinda lame… 6 reasons or 600 they amount to squat. Bare fact is that nobody likes feminists and people don’t date who they don’t like for any reason. Enumerating a set of hygiene factors does nothing to make them likeable. Pitiful display.
“Feminism is absolutely a doctrine of hatred and violence. It is therefore necessary to recognize it’s adherents, and not only not date them, but to exclude them from your life if you have any concept of yourself as a man being a human of human value.”
Best advice ever JTO, and applicable to self respecting non feminist lesbian women as well. Indeed the only people who should date feminist women are feminist men (or women) the 2 groups deserve each other. Go for it manboobz! you would be in with a chance here, ya could chat about cats and chocolate in between more serious conversations about rigidly patriarchal society, female oppression and victimhood.
and uncle Bern’s take http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGm8Iot0O8Q
Hansen gives six reasons why men should date feminist.
Dr T tells us to run from women with personality disorders.
Hansen or Dr T?
Hhhmmmm. That’s a tough one.
600 Reasons to not date a feminist:
The same 600 reasons why a Jewish person wouldn’t want to date an anti-Semite.
I’d rather date Erin Pizzey than any feminist. She’d have more chance of getting me up too.
The woman has a huge heart! How can anyone possibly not love a human being like that? Totally agree.
3. You might get laid on the first date.
As in “you get the ‘priviledge’ of sleeping with the town slut, and walk away as a poster warning for STD”.
Related: In defense of being a “cat lady”.
Priceless.
Nah. The opposite. After you have pushed through the cobwebs your dick gets bitten by the spiders that set up a nice safe never disturbed home in there.
On the plus side feminists don’t get crabs but, they do get fruit flies. Something about an attraction to rotten cherries.
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Quit hounding Raven. I come here to read what my brothers have to say. I or anyone here, do not want to read the incessant ramblings of an obvious obsessive borderline, Internet (and possibly irl) stalker.
Add something to this site Adam or fuck off then.
Paul, turf this guy.
Like I have any say, I just play a judge on the net
-Or you meet a platoon of pussy whipped soldiers, looking for their M113 armored personnel carrier.
The picture at the top says it perfectly – anyone who thinks a feminist is offering them a rye bagel had better take a closer look.
I just googled “men don’t want to marry” and “men don’t want to live with women” lol
The results showed a host of articles dating way back. From what I can gather, the rate of men not marrying has risen heaps in the last 20 years, and as usual, the women are offering reasons like……it’s cause us women don’t need men anymore…….cause we got our own money and all. And us girls want to marry our equals and most men are such losers that there aren’t enough good ones around. In short, they make it all seem to be because “they” don’t want marriage…at least not with “less then them” men.
Then you get these feminists raving on about the advantages of them…..feminists. blah blah blah….mostly bullshit….but the educated part..which translates into…..I can make lots of money….with my bogus qualifications in my majors full of subjective subjects and affirmative action and female bias working in my favor…..you should really want me.
What these women don’t realize is that they are projecting their wants on to men. Men don’t want marriage because it sucks for us guys……it’s what you want you fucking liars. Why else would the subject be coming up again and again in women’s mags and sites over and over again, year after year……but men aren’t bringing it up….always women. Do you ever, hear men bitching on about women not be willing to marry lol. I got news for you bitches, we would much rather you started a movement…….a very successful movement……that got women feverishly following the idea that women who marry or live with guys are losers….make it the most popular movement in the world.
Also…..men could not give a fuck how much money you can make. That is projection too. That is what you value…..not us. So you wrongly assume that your financial position makes you attractive to men…….it doesn’t. For one……it matters not to us how much you make, or have…..because we will not benefit from it…….not in marriage…and not after you have divorced us. For all the good press about women being less superficial and materialistic then men, it’s actually the opposite. The average women puts things like money and assets first……the average guy couldn’t give a toss about that.
This is why you feminists are worrying about getting a date. Because the men are even giving up on dating you. lol. You are too stupid to even see that being a man hater is a turn off to men.
I recommend the following advertisement on whatever dating site you prefer….for feminists…it’s the truth..so I doubt any of you will follow my advice.
“I am a man hating bitch. I don’t like men, but I do want to meet a sucker, who will wine and dine me, buy me stuff…..then marry me so I can have a big wonderful white wedding. I will then crap out a couple of womb turds….probably not yours……and shortly afterwards file for divorce, siting years of abuse in order to gain all assets and remove you from the kids lives…who arent yours anyway. I will then squeeze you for every cent of child support I can get, and alimony.
I also earn lots of money…..which means I don’t need men for anything…..so I am every mans dream boat.
Lots of good points, but this is the one that needs to written on the blackboard 1000 times:
“Also…..men could not give a fuck how much money you can make. That is projection too. That is what you value…..not us.”
Guys nearly always seek wealth and/or power to improve their access to pussy.
Don’t forget guys, whenever an “educated” woman is over 30 and single it’s because men are “intimidated” by her! It absolutely does not have anything to do with her own choices.
Bitches, womb turds, fucking liars… you are on fire tonight Stu. someone steal your wallet or something?
But seriously it all made sense, particularly the marraige part- its all they live for 24/7, talking about it, reading about it, watching movies about it, daydreaming about it. But never, ever do guys dream about it.
What guys want from a women for the long haul, if you’ll allow me to hazard a guess, is companionship. Women don’t ‘get’ that because thier minds are all clogged up with the notion that people want to wear wedding dresses and steal each others’ money.
How many dating ads by women put companionship first? None. Its all “i love to travel’ “I love a man who can entertain me and make me laugh” “I want a generous man” “a self sufficient man” etc etc etc…. all blatent code-speak for wanting to sponge off the guy. Now, if you were a psychopath it would be easy to milk this lot…. for the rest of the guys its a desert.
Oh guys dream about it, it’s called a nightmare.
When it comes to the dating ads, go have a look at a site for those seeking relationships and marriage. You will see that most women’s ads read like a laundry list of code language, which translates to…..I want a guy with money. Also….they project this desire onto men….assuming what they want in a guy……is what a guy wants in a woman…..and waffle on about themselves being tertiary educated, professionally employed etc etc.
Correct Stu, when a guy meets a woman that he really likes, and gets to know her more, most guys do not care if she cleans toilets or is a brain surgeon. Not so much with women, if you are a man that collects garbage, the options are a bit more limited.
And you know what, I do not think it is that women do not want to date a guy that collects garbage, it is that they do not want to tell their girlfriends that they are dating a garbage man.
That is the crux of it to me, women care what other people think more than their own happiness, and I think this is the problem. Men do not care, generally, what a man does to earn money, we just have a beer and go home
For me, it’s all in the heart. I don’t even care about intelligence that much….as long as someone isn’t like……dumb….really dumb. Education is over rated, I’ve known dumb people with high education, especially women, and especially social sciences and soft subjects. I’ve known smart people with bugger all education, and I’ve known dumb people with multiple degrees.
I couldn’t give a fuck about any of it, not for friendship, or for relationship. It’s all about a persons heart, and their personal characteristics. All the press on women says this is what they are like, but it’s not, it’s what most men are like, and a minority of women.
Yes, a poor guy has disadvantages for a women, but only if she intends on benefiting financially from her relationships. If she really is so fucking good, and so financially well healed, why does it matter……because no matter how much they have….they want more.
Btw, I love that pic on top. Is that dog shit? Whatever.
That’s only part of the picture though. Maybe it should have a slide show, showing the feminist defecation cycle.
The system works something like this. The system is started with the input of a feminist seed turd. That is fed into the system, consumed by a feminist, processed within the feminist for enrichment, and excreted as a more highly concentrated feminist turd. This is then fed from the output, back to the input stage, in which the feminist buys into her own enriched feminist shit.
The process continues with feminists consuming their gradually increasingly toxic shit, until feminism, and feminists produce nothing but the most highly enriched and toxic shit in the universe. This shit is then force fed to non feminists who then become toxic shit producers in breeder reactor sort of arrangement.
There is no feminine in feminism: Don’t date feminists.
Great article JTO, but that feminist sexist is not worthy of your time or your effort.
Here is how I responded:
1) Feminists are educated: No, they are indoctrinated into a religious dogma.
2) No pay presumption: Lie. Feminists may “split” the bill on a $20 lunch date, but they will be the first to cash out of a marriage and “split” with your home, your income, and your children.
3) Might get laid: On Monday, and your buddy Jake on Tuesday, and Jake’s wife Jane on Wednesday. But Saturday and Sunday will be reserved for the old slob at the country club, who has more money.
4) No shotgun wedding: Feminists fight incessantly to retain 100% of reproductive rights in the hands of women, and 100% of reproductive responsibilities in the hands of men. Does cupcake know what a shotgun wedding is?
5) No crying: Crying is the operational heat of the feminist religion. Persuade women to cry incessantly over nothing, in order to rain state violence and repression onto all men, boys, and fathers.
6) No drama: Drama is crying over nothing. See 5 above. The feminist religion is summarized as follows:
crying + drama = privilege
No crying, and no drama??? hahahahahah
How could she even type that with a straight face? Crying and drama are part of their standard operating procedures.
Hi Scented Nectar,
OT, but very nice job on recent article on the Femtheist witch hunt. It got favorable feedback from some of my friends who usually don’t even discuss gender issues.
Just between you and me, those Femtheists are a bunch of drama queens. I have a list….
Don’t date a feminist eh ?
I typed the word “feminist” into a search engine on a dating site. Check out these adverts that came back.
————————————————————————
“FOR THE GUYS ..
Please try and avoid the following ..
[1] Bringing your pet on the date.
[2] Having your mobile switched on whilst in my company .. unless you are waiting for an organ.
[3] Don’t try and tell me that it is your pacemaker playing “Good old Collingwood Forever” !!
[4] Do not tell me I remind you of your “Ex” or your MOTHER !!
[5] If you have no stamps then you have … NO HOPE !! ( Stamps are a currency of “approval” from other members on the site itself )
[6] Do not tell me that if I send the first email then you will buy me dinner .. and mean a “McHappy meal ” !!
[7] It shows a certain lack of class to just pay for ONE coffee !!
[8] You are not going to grab my attention if your PRIMARY photo is of you at the Ocktoberfest .. at closing time !!
[9] Nor is it going to do it for me if your nom de plume reads anything referring to how “BIG” you are .. or you inform me that you have never done it with a
Nana before .. because chances are .. you won’t !!
[10] Dont tell me you have “moved on” .. when you still live with your wife !!
Maybe you should tell her first !!
AND NOW TO THE “SISTERHOOD” I SAY THIS ..
Some of you girls are making it hard for those of us who are independent and free thinking and emancipated individuals who just HAPPEN to like a man that knows how to treat a lady !!
I LIKE BEING TREATED WELL !!
Good Luck ..”
——-
* My reaction: – I feel lucky. I can’t wait to meet you to learn more about how to do the right things and not the wrong things. Is chundering all over your manners out of form ?
————————————————————————
“I’m not a massive bogan, but I do own a very comfortable pair of worn in trackpants
I’m the kind of gal who is easy going, loves a laugh, and a beer down at the pub, Nothing gets me going like some good feminist theory. If you’re a man and a man-hater step to the front of the queue. I’m a serial fag hag.”
——-
* My reaction: – I despise men. I think we will hit it off because we all stink big time. Your hatred of my gender attracts me to you and being in your company will have ripples of joy running over my repulsive male body. Can I bring my mates over for a gang bang please as we all hate each others guts.
————————————————————————
(in part)
“I do like big hairy man beasts that like to do ‘man’ things like digging holes and starting fires. I’m capable of doing these things myself, I just like it when a guy can do it.”
——-
* My reaction: – You can do unpleasant jobs but tell me you are going to sit on your ass watching me do them. Oh baby you light my fire… I mean I have to chop the wood for it and place it in the hearth…but you can strike the match when the hard stuff is done.
————————————————————————
(in part)
“I am very impatient and short tempered but I think i’m quite controlled now. I’m independent and a feminist .. and don’t worry, You’ll NEVER have to hold my hand bag!”
——-
* My reaction: – and you’ll never have to hold my wallet.
————————————————————————
”
“Looking for” – Friendly and open-minded – someone who will quietly listen to the problems of a feminist trying to deal with a frustrating world. Nerds who can listen are hot.
——-
* My reaction: – Is that right ? Well that makes me cool,… no wait. In your case that makes me frozen.
————————————————————————
(in part)
“I am currently a “long-haired, radical, feminist, commie, rat-bag Art student” and it’s fantastic.”
——-
* My reaction: –
(in full)
I am always a short haired radical, anti-feminist, commie hatin’, rat-bag artist and it’s fantastic that we will never met forever.
————————————————————————
(in part)
“I have a lot of guys friends, so Whoever I date won’t get jealous of who I hang out with. I will never cheat on someone, I hate cheaters, If you cheat on me, you are most likely to get punched by me! And I also hate people who harress (sic) me or hurt me!”
——-
* My reaction: –
1/ You have male friends ready to wallop me if I get out of line.
2/ You will wallop me if I get out of line.
3/ I would be foolish to reciprocate (because you have male friends ready to wallop me if I get out of line.)
4/ You hate violence imparted on you, but don’t mind imparting to others.
5/ You are a cunt.
————————————————————————
(in part)
“I’m verbal, pushy, warmhearted, intellectual, feminist, and moral. ”
——-
* My translation: –
“I am loud mouthed and crude, boastfully obnoxious, snobby and in-sightless with my narcissism, amoral and tautologically a feminist.”
————————————————————————
Summary -
I tell you, if you like a feisty no nonsense chick, with a mean sucker punch and a swagger that would have J.Wayne clasp his dud clusters in fear, then do as I did. Type the F-word into a date site and you’ll have it by the spleen full… I mean spoon full.
Feminists say that if you are anti-feminist, you are anti-woman. Feminists say that men should date “feminists” rather than “other women.”
What is wrong with these two sentences when used in tandem with one another? Can someone please help me out? I can understand the first sentence and I can understand the second sentence. But, when I say them together, something just seems awry.
Because…logic is a patriarchal conspiracy, you misogynist!
Date me!
Date a feminist and then you can tell them that they are now officially “dated”.
Ah haa! Now, I get it
See, the first sentence only makes sense if women and feminism are the same. The second sentence only makes sense if they are different.
But, we must hold these two diametrically opposed concepts in our heads at the same time, while suspending our temptations to use “logic”, as an effort to avoid patriarchal oppression of women.
Boy, I can’t wait to date a feminist! I don’t have to think for myself; I can merely “obey!” This is going to be great!!!
Does anyone have Jessica Valenti’s number?
Yes, I think it’s just all sixes.
Thanks, guys.
From Ben’s tandem question and down, you had me crying with hysterical laughter.
I needed that.
Feminism has a lot in common with the book 1984.
When I look back at it, it’s almost a warning about feminism. The dept of truth, who deal in lies. History is revisable, because it doesn’t exist except in peoples minds. No sex. Women are the most fanatical supporters of the party. The meaning of words is altered to suit. And of course……double think……believing two mutually exclusive things at the same time. The police state, no privacy etc. Constant war.
I reckon 1984 was the writing on the wall, and a warning.
1984 was written about communism, sound familiar?
logic is mansplaining. bad logic… bad!
The older you get the more Feminists you encounter in your age range – - for obvious reasons. Most single women are Feminists, most married women are not.
Feminists are going to be Ball-Busting shrews that feel compelled to challenge everything you say or do, because you are a Man and deemed to be the competition that MUST be proven incorrect. She will constantly strive to validate her Fem-Cred in almost every interaction you have with her.
It’s exhausting and unpleasant to date a Feminist.
I speak from experience.
Agreed Keyster.
I went out with one for a time and it was like dragging a comatosed horse through sand.
No, actually it was more like a rotten black and white European film. It was very intense and complex and the story went nowhere.
I did though. As the end credits rolled, I looked for the nearest horizon and kept running.
Been there too, Keyster.
She did nothing but correct me and challenge every single little thing I said. Even minor observations.
After consuming a bottle of wine in record time, she started telling me how much she hated kids. So I asked to be excused and left the restaurant, along with the bill for the meal behind me. When she saw me walking away through the window, I swear her jaw was lying on the table, and she was doing guppy impersonations.
I still consider leaving her with the bill a fair trade, for what I had to listen to that evening.
You are my new hero, what a heart warming story with a happy ending (for everyone I care about)
That’s just too fucking awesome for words! Made my day. I wish I had the gall to walk out like that on a few dates, that’s for sure.
You sir, are a god among men.
/Cringes.
I bet she thought she was going to save the evening with the “hate kids” line.
Feminists indeed know fuck all about men, almost everything they spew and believe about the other sex, comes from looking in a mirror.
Hey I offered to do satire for this site awhile ago and now you’re doing it what the shit man?
Well, I dated a feminist……I mean a true blue hardcore feminist for a while. Not just some woman who loosely describes herself as a feminist……I’m talking radfemhub, card carrying member of the secret underground SCUM type of feminist. I didn’t know what she was at first. Didn’t become obvious until after I had sex with her. That must be what loosened her up and she started talking about shit. What really freaked me, was her sexual fetishes, and believe me you have to be really weird and way over the top to bother me lol
She was into blood letting and drinking mens blood. Yep…..I swear. She wanted to stick needles into my dick and suck blood out from it. I said, mmmmm…..can’t we just stick to vanilla stuff…..like anal fisting or something…..nope….had to have her blood. I told her I had a headache tonight, and that was the last time I seen her lol
Mate is this a porky pie ? You’re having a lend of us yeah ?
No, 100% for real. She started talking about her life more and more each time I seen her. She used to bring up crap about “patriarchy” and waffle on about shit like that. Used to argue like cat and dog. Then she used to say, so we gonna fuck now Stu.
Some of the stuff she used to say I didn’t connect the dots until later. She had belonged to this group, Wikens. She also said that she “used” to be a lesbian lol. She had made a “choice” to be a compete lesbian some years before lol. She’d had a couple of live in lesbian relationships. They had been less then satisfactory for her, in the last one, she got beat up real bad. After that she made the “choice” to be bi-sexual, and started seeing guys again lol
The only friends of hers I met was a guy who was so gay that I burst out laughing right in front of him at the sound of his voice. The biggest ferry queen I’ve ever met in my life. The other one was a complete bull dyke. She used to talk about other friends of hers and I asked her when I was going to meet some of them……she said….they wouldn’t like me……I said why not……she said “cause you’re a pig Stu” lol
Most of the time she actually seemed normal. Then it would be like…..some little comment….or some other little thing would set her off….and she’d start waffling on about female oppression, patriarchy……..like a robot that just had it’s feminist program started. She seemed like somebody who was exiting a cult……..sort of half in…..half out.
The first woman I dated after my second marriage break up actually. Two days before final settlement on my house lol. Very quickly worked out that she was nuttier then a fruit cake stopped seeing her.
My ex-girlfriend had this weird fetish.
She used to dress up as herself and then act like a fucking bitch all the time.
Scatters,
This is a wonderful post. Very funny.
Did the dress make her ass look fat, or was it her ass that did the trick?
I aim to please my good Dr.
I think we know the answer to that Mr Kimski
8 lanes wide.
http://i.imgur.com/A8ARs.jpg
I did too. She was physically and emotionally abusive and a horrendous hypocrite.
Everything I did was judged by the standard that I am supposed to be a stoic mind-reader sex machine who can also provide life-coaching and motivational speaking services at the drop of a hat.
Yeah, but how could you tell she was a feminist?
sounds like a standard wimminz – LMAO
So true.
But she was a hardcore feminist. Had a bachelor’s degree in women’s studies from a private school and everything.
I was lucky she didn’t want a serious relationship. She owned a house, all paid off, and she was convinced if she got to serious with a guy, and it ended up being living together……that he would rip her off for half her house. LOL. She had no experience of this ever happening, but she was convinced that guys were the ones that had all the advantages in relationships. Totally deluded. That part of her delusion suited me fine…..I didn’t want anything to do with commitment.
…you are kidding, right?
No, serious. Know what’s really scarey. She was a hot blonde, great bod, big tits, bunns to die for, baby face, and her name…..was Lee LOL
ROFL
Oh heck, that’s just ridiculous…
Her favorite sports, in fact the only sports she seemed interested watching, were kick boxing, boxing, and other full contact martial arts stuff. She had her other blood letting fetishes as well as the needle dick thing. All this, and she made the statement that men love violence, and get off on it sexually one day.
She probably progressed to bathing in bathtubs full of blood using severed penises for rubber duckies by now.
That reminds me, I really must learn to control my visual imagination…
Going out to get milk… and not coming back.
My ex mother in law used to joke about that all the time. I should have taken the hint about what her daughter was like a little sooner.
I dated one who insisted on being tied up spread-eagled in bed and “taken by force”.
I didn’t like it very much.
Ironically her ” sexual liberation” was actually bondage and submission.
Out of curiosity, did she see that as her sexual liberation? She certainly was telling you what to do, wasn’t she. BDSM is a strange animal.
Sorry for OT,
Here is an article by a feminist idiot slut shaming the Lingerie League.
http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/society-and-culture/frills-and-spills-of-lingerie-football-tackle-all-women-hard-20120605-1zu5y.html
This whole attitude that we have to stop these things like lingerie football, women’s volleyball, short sexy skirts on female tennis players etc is rubbish. We have stop the woman from showing some skin…and force people to pay to go to see them play for their athletic ability. If not enough people can be bothered rushing off to watch women play sports, just how do you change that. Taking away the skin isnt going to make people suddenly appreciate them for their abilities. And taking away the skin won’t increase their abilities.
How about, if women are so concerned about the status of women’s sports….YOU…you pay to go to every women’s sports event and subscribe to every womens sports mag etc….and prop them up with your financial contributions.
You might have to stop buying so many celebrity gossip mags and fashion mags and cosmetics, hairdressers, fashion, thus make yourself less appealing to the male gaze…..which is what your saying these women should do. Put your money where your mouth is. As long as men are the ones that are paying to see it, increasing their viewing pleasure will be what increases the cash flow.
Something feminists wont get through their heads. Men are not interested in seeing women do masculine things. And nothing you can do, or say, or change laws is going to change that. Why the hell would anybody pay to watch women play grid iron. If your going to pay, you want to see the best spectacle and most amazing action you can, men can provide that, women can’t….at least not with the clothes on
You come out with rif after rif and most of it rings like a church bell, rings like a voice of experience. So I’m going to nickname you ‘Preacher Man’.
On another note, [Stu] “Men are not interested in seeing women do masculine things.” True… and we need to say why. Sport aint just a way of having fun, its also a gladiatorial showcasing of male struggle and stoicism for boys to aspire to and for the girls to want those boys… “look at me, I’m a footy player, I can break a collar-bone and pretend it doesnt hurt”. The message this behaviour is “yeah… I’m stoic, I’m tough, I’ll take your shit and I’ll take the shit from all the world…. so i make for good marriage material”.
If you have women playing these gladiatorial roles it defeats (one of) the original purposes- the purpose of being attractive to women. Women rugby players sure as hell aren’t going to be attractive to males, unless they do it in jello. We don’t want stoic self-abusing women because that’s the part of our own lives that we hate.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again just in case Hansen or any of her cronies are reading this.
I wouldn’t fuck a feminist with Andrea Dworkin’s dick.
You’ve got nothing I want.
To even date a feminist would be like a black person wanting to date someone in the KKK or a Jew wanting to have coffee with a Neo Nazi. It doesn’t make sense.
Feminists believe in an ideology of hatred where all men are to blame for everything bad in the world and all the good things in the world were only created by men because women were denied the opportunity to do it themselves.
Sorry “ladies”, your belief in the inferiority of my gender, your insistence that even the grandsons of 2nd wave feminists have patriarchal privilege and must be denied opportunity and have their educations limited make you unsuitable for any kind of relationship with a man.
I’m sure if you keep offering up that cunny to every Internet stranger you might get some offers but don’t think you’ll ever be capable of real love or be deserving of it.
Of course you will though. Delusion is a hallmark of feminism.
I’m sorry to hijack this thread, but I feel this needs to be pointed out: https://boards.4chan.org/r9k/res/2679701
I know, it’s 4chan, and most of the userbase is teenagers and early 20s males, but there’s been a lot of discussion in that place regarding feminism and men’s rights: Most of it is basically trolls shitting up everything, and a whole lot of people asking for the ‘misogyny’ to be shut down with massive calls to ‘man up’. However, there’s also plenty of people who get the gist of the Red Pill, yet are unable to properly articulate their concerns so they get bludgeoned to death by the feminist trolls. Shall we lend them a hand?
Yes! But your link produces a 404 error.
“You might get laid on the first date”
And YOU might get turned down, Ms. Partypants.
Gleefully admitting that “sex is, well, just sex” is supposed to endear us to feminists? Wow.
And these are the same charlatans who have spent billions of dollars promoting the idea that all men are rapists. My head must be made of unbendable steel because it just refuses to wrap around such a hypocritical contradiction.
Yeah I don’t consider this a plus.
Hooray! I get to date an illogical bigot that has to beg for dates and has had 3 zillion penises inside her!
WHAT! !! DATE A FEMINIST? & A LAWYER FEMINIST TO BE PARTICULAR? ??
I rather put my head in a jaw vice & apply the full pressure.
I’m sure to get a rain of bullets for this, but isn’t it pretty obvious that western woman and feminist woman are pretty much the same thing anymore? I mean seriously, does she really have to be an avowed feminist to spout ridiculous, double-standard type bull shit at you?
I have met plenty of western females that insist they hate feminism and are as traditional as they come, only to turn right around and act like completely obnoxious, loud mouthed, over-entitled (empowered) twats, when “tradition” no longer suits their whims. Otherwise it’s “Hold the door for me, pull out my chair for me, pay for my drinks and dinner, and keep quiet about it, buddy!!!
Be a gentleman, FFS!!!”
These “traditional” “Non-feminist” females abound, though they use flimsy disguises (keep in mind that at the end of WW2, you could not find an avowed Nazi amongst the German people, neither for love nor money. So it is now with feminists amongst females) and as far as I have witnessed none of these so-called “traditional”, “anti-feminist”, western women, are able to quell or stifle their true upbringing, for very long.
A big mouth and a shitty, spoiled rotten attitude are almost factory standard, with American females anymore. Physical appearance no longer seems to be a factor in regards to this shitty attitude either. Even Ugly Betty has something to say (bitch about), now.
This depravity is now firmly ingrained in our society and though many western females may believe and openly protest that they are not and could never be “feminist”, they need to rethink this idea, every time a “gentleman” shows up to pull out their chair for them, after holding the door for them first, of course.
The western female’s universal yet silent enjoyment of chivalry/empowerment, tells me everything I need to know about them.
Sad as it may be to admit, all females now start out at least several feet in the hole with me. Common courtesy must be earned from me before any talk of respect for her can even begin.
Trust her? Yeah right.
Here’s a shovel, best get diggin’, lady.
Excellent. i doubt that could have been said better, or in fewer words.
May i quote you?
I’d sooner eat salted razorblades, swigging them down with a glass of vinegar.
“Why not date a feminist?”
– If only to hone up my debating skills. Opponents do not set the tone for amour. Better to spend one hour tantalizing her with her own fantasy. Better still, ‘date’ normal women.
“Feminists are, by definition, educated women.”
– I question “educated” and “women”, by definition.
“There is no presumption that you should pay”.
– Honeybuns. Where u bin?
Your entire zeitgeist has been paid for mostly off the backs of working men.
Educated my right barnacle.
Two of Hansen’s firstly stated reasons are reasons to be wary of the character of such individuals. She’s got the first two substantively wrong.
“You might get laid on the first date”.
– …might be an incentive for those inclined to furtively stick around long enough to overlook her two previous assertions, but…
{it’s} “unlikely [that a] shotgun wedding scenario [is] in your future.”
– …there’s no assurity that a shotgun visit to the county seat isn’t in the works after scoring debating points on the first two reasons.
Hansen’s promise of a “no drama” affair is to be regarded as dryer lint after the verbal tumbling and screening.
Be wary you younger guys, the crying might be your own resulting from tangling with the likes of the company Hansen prefers to keep. They’ve given the world enough warning already.
Alright, then. I guess it’s back to POF, the domain or ‘normal’ women, who’ve availed themselves to the goodies fraudulently procured by femnism. (groan)
Why would feminists need men? They are always attacking us,belittling us. I always thought feminists needed men like a fish needs a bicycle. After all a well known feminist said that.
feminists needed men like a fish needs a bicycle. After all a well known feminist said that.
and then the stupid bitch went and got married.
Figured out cycling was easier than swimming did she?
They do remind me of bitter, posturing children. Denying the want what they do not have the whole time.
Maybe Freud was closer to the truth than I thought. Feminism may be all about penis envy, either they want one in them or hanging off of them and are mad as wet hens that they don’t have it.
Date a feminist?….Nnnnnahhhh. But there are a whole shitload of people a feminist *can* date: Radical lesbian university…fellow FEMINISTS! Silly, they’ve been right beside you all along.
Now get the fuck out of here.
“Why not date a feminist?”
Why not drink some Drano?
Why not tee bag a bear trap?
Why not go outside naked during a blizzard?
Why not take a long walk off a short pier?
The answer to all the above: “IT’S BAD FOR YOUR FUCKING HEALTH!!!!”
>The fact is that in social settings, almost all women, feminist or otherwise continue to expect financial gallantry from men, which is identical to prostitution, simply less honest.
Actually, it’s even worse. At least with prostitution, you know you’re getting what you want. When paying for a date, not only is the woman not obligated to do anything in return, but I heard that recently feminists put up a poster with a statement stating that it was *rape* to expect any reciprocation, and judging from the phrasing, the status of rape does not apply exclusively to if the expected reciprocation is sex.
http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/v46s1/misandry_over_at_r2x/
“Feminists are, by definition, educated women.”
It’s worth noting that anything that is “by definition” true tells you nothing about the real world. Here Hansen lets the cat out of the bag: in her book, to be “educated” is to be educated pro feminism. By definition.
Similarly, Scientology is the most ethical organisation in existence. By definition: to a scientologist, “ethical” *means* “pro-scientology”.
Also, God is good. To do good is to do the will of God, and God does what he likes. QED.
Educated, huh? I wonder who picked up the tab for that dismal investment? Her Daddy? You want to bet a goodly portion, if not all, of her “education” costs were borne by some unwary guy?
What that fish should’ve received as a Graduation Present is a bicycle. After all, we guys have been told countless times these broads need us as much as a fish needs a bicycle…we are getting the message.
I took my bicycle to the local bike shop worried that it had never had any fish. Imagine my surprise when the bicycle mechanic told me “Your bicycle doesn’t need any rotten stinky fish…..”
Wow, i just had a ground-breaking epiphany: Why I was originally drawn to, & still love bicycling so much….
Peace n Joy to all my Brothers,
c
Don’t date a closet feminist either..
I recently went out on a few dates with a “non-feminist”.
I just just back from New York and was telling her that my friend and I get on well because we have so much to talk about. Her snide response was, “What do men talk about?”.
Needless to say she will still be wondering why I have not spoken to her since.
Most woman won’t say they are feminists because they know men won’ like them for it. But deep down inside there’s a man hater waiting to pounce on you when the time is right.
I am working on devising my own “feminazi” test for future dates.