Julie Borowski Flickr

Julie Borowski on Women Against Feminism

The Women Against Feminism campaign has exploded in recent weeks. Many feminists have responded by calling these women ignorant. They claim that they aren’t aware of the definition of feminism. Is this true? Julie Borowski gives her opinion.

About AVfM Video Source

AVfM Video Source is a group dedicated to finding and presenting to you the best videos from the internet that help illustrate the growing and evolving Men's Human Rights Movement, or that indicate society's changing attitudes toward the sexes. AVfM does not necessarily agree with or endorse everything in every video.

Main Website
View All Posts
  • PlainOldTruth

    Julie Borowski is not bossy. She is honest, rational and articulate. Feminists (of both sexes) are pathologically BOSSY and that’s why they condescend to their superiors, such as Julie Borowski.

    • DukeLax

      Julie is truly liberated and “Speaks her mind”…and its her “Why do you keep harassing my brother”…sort of language that gender-feminist hysterics are defensive about.

  • Draigo Luther

    Julie, You an awesome human being..

  • Mike Buchanan

    Big fan of Julie’s videos, they slay me. Another JB. All JBs slay me. Both my ex-wives were JBs, now I think of it.

    • Bane

      JB=jailbait?

      • driversuz

        JB=jailbait?

        “JudgyBitch?”

        • Johnny Poxville

          Their initials. :-D

        • Frodo

          Are you saying Janet is a Bitch? lol

  • jbantifem

    Good video and I like her mindset.

    She mentioned that only 23% of American women identify themselves as feminists. If that’s the case then all 23% are consistently surfing the net looking for MRM and MRA articles to troll because their comments outweigh ours, from what I’ve seen anyway.

    23% of women may call themselves feminists, but I think the number of men who do is probably about the same. That makes for a dangerous enough number of people. It’s still too high in my strong opinion. And in some ways male feminists do more damage than the female variety. They’re more dangerous when it comes to violence because they’ll jump on any man who hurts a woman’s feelings by simply tell her the truth. Those guys need to be locked up.

    Way to go Julie and thank you for seeing the light. I hope you continue to the spread the word the best you can so we can completely annihilate feminism. It has to go.

    • PlainOldTruth

      “Consider such slogans, circulating in the early 1990s on [women’s] bathroom walls:

      “Dead men tell no lies,”
      “Dead men don’t rape!”
      “The way to a man’s heart is through his chest.”
      ”So many men, so little ammunition.”

      The individual man is not relevant; all men serve as symbolic targets. And this is true along a wide continuum, prom permissively sexist jokes about men to the applause garnered by women who kill. The message being conveyed is that women, being blameless, are entitled to victimize without consequence. It was in that context that Aileen Wuoprnos killed, and in that climate of sanctimonious wrath that she gained her sympathizers.” [Patricia Pearson, When She Was Bad: violent women and the myth of innocence, 1997, Viking Books, p. 232]

      • klaatu

        Same mindset Hitler used with the Jewish folks. If you can get people to perceive them as less than human it become acceptable to eradicate them.

        • Scatmaster

          Our friend Angry Harry says it this way

          Hermann Goering … “The people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.”

          Feminists … “The people can always be brought to the bidding of the feminist leaders. All you have to do is tell them that women and children are being attacked (by men) and denounce those who protest as ‘supporters of abuse’ and for exposing women and children to danger. It works the same way in any country.”

          Feminism. Nazism.

          Nazism. Feminism.

          • klaatu

            And in the end the megalomaniacs bite the very hands that led them to power. Feminists and Nazi’s have all the qualities of a dog except for loyalty.

          • ComradePrescott

            No need to insult dogs!

          • klaatu

            Yeah, at least you can train a dog to fetch you your slippers.

          • itdarestospeak

            I would up vote that twice if I could. As I can’t, have one

          • Scatmaster

            Txs. Feel free to use it and attribute it to yourself if you want.
            Angry Harry has stated on his website that you may use any of his postings and state it is your own if you wish. Harry is more interested in getting the word out than taking any credit. A wonderful man that Harry.

          • CSM-1000

            Goering would have been correct today were it not for the rise of the internet. Oh, wait, we have the internet for over 15 years now and you still see plenty of deluded patriots volunteering to sacrifice themselves for King and County in order to keep us “free” (yeah right, like the Taliban are going to debarcate en masse on the shores of New England any day of the week now, thanks to their massive secret armada. Do you realize how absolutely retarded you appear when you can’t even read a map. Seriously, nowadays, in 2014??? Come on!).

            -It really is hopeless guys.

      • CSM-1000

        I really don’t understand how society let it get that bad. It may have seemed like little more than a harmless (if rather disturbing) joke at the beginning, but this garbage has finally gone all out commando on us. Naive activist chicks posting such nonsense on bathroom walls is one thing. Having this mental illness fully institutionalized and codified into the very fabric of our country is quite another. We are certainly reaping the rewards here of our great social experiment.

        And to think this occurred in the countries where women literally have the least to fear from their menfolk. Imagine such bathroom graffiti in Afghanistan for a change..

        • Paul Johnson

          It’s weapons-grade bullshit. These aren’t used car salesmen, they are educated in indoctrination, sociology, and psychology.

          • CSM-1000

            I know. I am simply astonished that those educated enough who did see it for what it was at the beginning simply sat back and twiddled their thumbs as if it was just a dumb passing fad. What, did they think it would simply go away all on it’s own? Then again, so much nonsense has come to pass over the course of human history that I really shouldn’t be surprised at this point. But still (in my best George Taylor voice from Planet of the Apes):

            You Maniacs! You blew it up! Ah, damn you! God damn you all to hell!

          • jbantifem

            They probably benefited career-wise from the feminist ideology. Which means more $$ and not many human beings will turn that down. Regardless of how dirty and underhanded their superiors were/are.

        • PlainOldTruth

          I pose this challenge:

          What if a general in a war were to say: “I don’t understand why the enemy wants to invade our territory and kill all of us who refuse to obey their belief system (become their slaves). I do not understand how their weapons work. I do not understand how they built them. I do not understand their command structure”?

          What would be your response if you were under his orders?

          The MHRM needs to turn over a new leaf and stop “not understanding” the opponent. Period. We must commit — as a large collection of industrious individuals working for an important single aim — to MASTERING the opponent’s discourse (and the history of the past 50 years or so of the institutional takeover — in detail). (Note: “mastery” means mastery, not dilettantish, if industrious, guessing and “trying to figure out”).

          We must humble ourselves and seek the assistance of those in the know (the academics who have been working away within the belly of this ghoulish ravenous whorish beast for decades — and have valuable specific and detailed understanding of the opponent).

          We must end the “not understanding” as immediately as is possible.

          • Frodo

            You volunteer to help? :)

          • fidelbogen

            We understand it perfectly well. Have for years. But I admit there is always room for more intell.

          • CSM-1000

            Indeed. Once you boil it all down it is not that terribly complicated actually. People get distracted by all the surrounding chaff being sent off intended to keep their attention away from the central core of this ideology. However, once that core is exposed and its wiring fully analysed and understood, a relative small EMP is all that’s really needed to fry it for good. The problem is not at the level of the required weaponry to do the job – most of us already have that in stock – the problem resides at the level of the white-knight manginas who willingly utilize their bodies in order to form a veritable “lead meat shield” around the core to simultaneously protect it from attack and also to keep it away from the gaze of the sheep-like majority. They are the ones needing to be tossed aside for the revolution to succeed and for society to finally restabilize itself once again.

          • fidelbogen

            Yes, welcome to the non-feminist revolution.

          • jbantifem

            Your goals are ideal. Indeed. However, those who have been working with these ghouls are more than likely playing in the same ball field. THAT is the problem.

            I completely understand what these people are about. They’re gaining financially from destroying the family unit and society. They’re not concerned with the future – which is absolutely retarded from my perspective – they just want to be rich and powerful now and they don’t care who they take down in the process.

      • jbantifem

        Good points and to a certain extent I agree.

        However, I also believe that men make up their own minds in how they behave. Or they should, anyway. I always have. While feminism is the root of all this evil I cannot personally always blame the women for it. If men choose to behave in a misandric way for their own sexual, financial and/or inter-relational gains then they’re simply scum personified. To put it mildly. I’ve seen through the smoke screen of feminist rhetoric my whole life. Even when I was quite young. I was born with the knack to see through bullshit immediately.

        I am definitely an anti-feminist and people have taken my comments on the net out of context and seen me as misogynist too many times to count. Which is fine because we can’t get along with everyone. But I am far from such. I don’t hate and blame all women for the ills of feminism. 99% of the world is ruled by men and they made the decisions to allow radical feminist misandry into their political platforms. And unless they had a literal handgun pointed at their heads while creating their platforms, they made their personal decisions to rule in such a way. Some with their penises and some with their pocket books. Most with both, I would imagine.

  • http://batman-news.com MGTOW-man

    This video displays the obliviousness of women like them. The things they say prove they are out of touch—full of exaggeration, paranoia, and misunderstanding. No wonder the WAF began. The thing is, these media women don’t like it when other women don’t parrot the expectations.

  • Patrick DiSandro

    I’ve said many times before:
    The definition of Feminism is ‘Equality’, much the way the definition of Communism is ‘Sharing.’

    But clearly, in practice, neither show that to be the case.

    • ComradePrescott

      Excellent comparison. I will try to remember it.

    • Civilisationftw

      Wrong!
      Most dictionaries define feminism as advocacy of WOMENS rights on the basis of gender equality.
      That is very different than just gender equality.
      Because with that definition feminism automatically becomes a sexist movement as soon as women are privileged on average.

      • Lorenzo Benito

        Dictionaries don’t provide definitions; they report on common usage. Though, in the case of Feminism, they don’t even do that much.

  • ComradePrescott

    I think there are more people who identify as feminists who need to get educated than there are people against feminism that need to get educated.

  • Myopia

    I’m getting a lounge chair. Women are now finding out how hard it is to please women.

  • sputnik

    I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again… And it’s as true of feminism, as a matter of definition versus reality, as it is of one’s intimate conduct, as a matter of verbal consent versus nonverbal consent:

    Actions speak louder than words. Thanx, Julie!

  • John Smith

    It’s a little late now. We’re done and we’re not going back.

  • DukeLax

    From my observation, Most of the women in “WAF” movement seem to be younger women, the new generation.
    They are the ones that are looking around American campuses, and seeing that nearly 2 out of every 3 college students are female, and out of the (nearly 1 out of 3) that are males…A growing number of these males don’t dare to be portrayed as one of those nasty , violent, wife beating, rapist, hetero-patriarchy males…lest the gender-feminist mob comes after him too!!

    • DukeLax

      Many folks don’t fully understand the campus “lynching powers”…that have been given to the gender community. They can Inflame a lynch, basically at will….and its only recently that some of these campus lynchings are being interrupted. Google Meg Lankers.

      • TefExpat

        Its ‘campus venting.’ Feminists cant get their way in larger society so they ply their trade on campus…with claws-out vindictive anger. Men are cornered. So why aren’t they being advised to only ‘date’ off-campus with non-college women, drunk or not? The media would be all over such a feminist bitch slappin.

        • Frodo

          i tell men all the time that a few seconds of pleasure is not worth the risk.

  • TefExpat

    Breathe deep…here is more ‘sinking ship’ stench of desperation:

    “reminding us why feminist is a label worth adopting”

    “underscore why feminism is worth supporting”

    “reframe the conversation to reflect the movement’s true goals: Equality”

    “misconceptions run deep and wide, and we’re a long way from overcoming them”

    http://www.chicagotribune.com/lifestyles/ct-twitter-feminism-parody-balancing-20140815-column.html

  • DukeLax

    The gender-feminist community does in fact enjoy a monopoly over Main stream American media…google “the media lace curtain”. You take this monopoly, and mix it with the perversions and “manufactured statistics Alliances” that have cancer-ised American law enforcement, and youre results are that hetero-relationships in the US become a dangerous legal liability.

  • Susie Parker
  • driversuz

    Wow, people say feminists are ‘shrill’, yet I couldn’t watch this assclown for more than 30 seconds before my brain almost imploded from the screechy sounds emanating from her mouth. If you’re going to be a paid shill for the GOP or Libertarian party, do everyone a favor and rachet the higher frequencies of your voice the f**k down several hundred orders of magnitude. Oh wait, I only now realized that’s what the menz like about this one. That high-pitched little girl voice, Gives ‘em a hard on every time.

    Hey, I know! Instead of whining about her voice and her possible political party affiliations, not to mention making assumptions about why other people may like her, how about you comment on her actual content?

  • jbantifem

    This video takes a good look at Women Against Feminism. They’ve apparently made some pretty typical derogatory comments about men themselves.

    I am in no way discounting the good things Julie has said here or putting down her character. She seems quite legitimate from what I know of her. I’m referring to the bad apples amid the ranks of Women Against Feminism.

    Like I’ve said before, we have to be careful guys. Take good care who and what you believe.

    • Astrokid

      No it doesnt take a good look at WAF. While I like JTOs oratory and general arguments, he falls really short in presenting evidence for his claims. No Naming Names.
      And no evidence has been presented that WAF have made derogatory remarks against men.

      • jbantifem

        A collective of women and they make NO derogatory remarks about men? While your points are valid and yes, someone has to find evidence of this, I fail to believe that a bunch of women getting together to talk about feminism and men don’t ever make negative remarks about the opposite sex. That’s something I’ve yet not to see in my entire 46 years of existence.

        I will look around though. I’m sure we’re bound to find something. Call me paranoid but I really don’t see this group doing anything to combat the issues that plague boys and men. They talk the talk perhaps, but do they walk the walk?

        Thanks for pointing this out Astrokid. We all need to be held accountable. Isn’t that what all this is about in the first place?

        Peace

        • Astrokid

          but I really don’t see this group doing anything to combat the issues that plague boys and men. They talk the talk perhaps, but do they walk the walk?

          http://newbossoldboss.blogspot.com/2014/07/how-much-of-women-against-feminism-is.html

          Prima Facie Motivations of women against feminism
          I took a sample of N(=100) consecutive images (From Aug 2 to July 24) from http://womenagainstfeminism.tumblr.com/, and categorized them. Here are the results.
          Traditional conservatism: 6%
          Feminist Movement Nastiness: 12%
          Femininity/Masculinity-loving gender roles: 17%
          Genuine Equality/Humanism oriented: 46%
          Mens Issues: 19%

          (Mens issues:
          Mentions damage done to men, such as family courts or false allegations or Domestic Violence or Sexual abuse
          OR mothers mentioning damage done to boys
          OR Mentions crimes of women.)

          Think of it as just a start for these young women. What they do further is up to them, they have already shamed feminism (and bloody white knights I hope) a good deal, and its just a serendipitious happening for the MRM. We didnt invest anything in it, did we?

          I fail to believe that a bunch of women getting together to talk about feminism and men don’t ever make negative remarks about the opposite sex

          Sure some of them could have, but did enough of them do it to fairly make this generalization? The folks at ReturnOfKings did a very unfair characterization, and I called them out. By those standards, people are justified in calling AVFM misogynists, because surely some of the ranty comments here were of that nature.
          https://twitter.com/AstrokidNJ/status/499245937127337984

  • Astrokid M57

    Strike 1: This is a friendly warning that you may need to re-read our Comment Policy, in particular the bits about ad hominem and general contempt for the work AVfM does.

    Additional remarks:

    I will ban your ass if you dont behave better, esp with respect to the Mods

  • Frodo

    Nope you dont get to tell people what to do around here.

  • Astrokid

    I suspect that your comments are getting stuck in the Mod queue because your Disqus account is unverified (read about verification here https://www.avoiceformen.com/allbulletins/introducing-disqus-comments/ ). Verify it and you will save us some labor.

  • Frodo

    unearned sense of entitlement to what?

    Take a hint you have already been warned

    • What

      The comment above was written BEFORE the moderator issued the warning, genius. And why in holy hell would the phrase ‘unearned sense of entitlement’ violate the Comment Policy?

      • driversuz

        We are always happy to entertain challenges that are intellectually honest, and that don’t violate policy. Angry rants based in ignorance of what is right in front of one’s nose, dodging & feinting, moving the goal posts, and hollering at straw men, impress nobody.

        • What

          “based in ignorance of what is right in front of one’s nose”

          Great. More vague, cryptic references. WHAT is right in front of one’s nose? Can you be more specific? Where is this dodging and feinting you talk about? Seems to me that it’s you who is doing some dodging and feinting by failing to respond to what I actually wrote. And who, for the love of god, is moving the goal post? More importantly, what does the goal post signify? The goal of feeling good about yourself in a world gone mad with unprecedented hate between the genders?

          While there are some smart, rational people in this forum, the vast majority are, like you and the mouth-breathing Frodo — intellectually lazy bullies barely capable of rational thought. There are many fine websites where thoughtful men and women can debate these issues with each other. Sadly, avoiceformen.com has a well-deserved reputation for not being one of them. I’m shocked that you haven’t banned me yet, but my guess is that this post will finally send you spinning over the edge. Because, again, you don’t seem able to form disciplined responses to arguments from people who challenge you in any way. Even with regard to something as innocuous as Comment Policy.

          • driversuz

            “based in ignorance of what is right in front of one’s nose”

            Great. More vague, cryptic references. WHAT is right in front of one’s nose? Can you be more specific? Where is this dodging and feinting you talk about? Seems to me that it’s you who is doing some dodging and feinting by failing to respond to what I actually wrote. And who, for the love of god, is moving the goal post? More importantly, what does the goal post signify? The goal of feeling good about yourself in a world gone mad with unprecedented hate between the genders?

            While there are some smart, rational people in this forum, the vast majority are, like you and the mouth-breathing Frodo — intellectually lazy bullies barely capable of rational thought. There are many fine websites where thoughtful men and women can debate these issues with each other. Sadly, avoiceformen.com has a well-deserved reputation for not being one of them. I’m shocked that you haven’t banned me yet, but my guess is that this post will finally send you spinning over the edge. Because, again, you don’t seem able to form disciplined responses to arguments from people who challenge you in any way. Instead, you lash out with random, out-of-context invective, like a small child. Even with regard to something as innocuous as Comment Policy.

            I already gave you an example; now you’re just pitching a hissy fit.

  • driversuz

    She uses the Wikipedia definition because that’s the one WAFs have to rebut most often – it’s the one feminists use. correct me if I’m wrong – the title of her video is “Women Against Feminism.” Oddly enough, that is also the subject of her video.

  • Peter Wright
  • Lorenzo Benito

    You know, even Creationists will attempt to argue their points. They suck at it, but they give it a shot. Feminists never do: it’s all insults, always. No wonder nobody is entirely clear about just what Feminists believe; they never have to time to say anything apart from insults!