One of the cornerstones of conventional domestic violence dogma is that the victim is never, ever, responsible for violence perpetrated against them. Rather perpetrators must accept responsibility and be held accountable for their violence. Statements along these lines are enshrined in the White Ribbon Campaign and Australia’s “Time for Action” Plan to reduce violence against women and their children.
A White Ribbon Campaign fact sheet states:
Myth 4 Some people deserve to be beaten by provoking the violence. Fact : Responsibility for violence must rest solely with the abuser.[1]
As a young intern during one of my first night sifts in the casualty department (ER) I received notification that a young man was being brought in by ambulance after being punched in the head outside one of the local nightclubs. He was said to be unconscious but stable, however on arrival he was in complete cardio respiratory arrest and after almost an hour of vigorous resuscitation attempts could not be revived. Post mortem examination subsequently showed that he had suffered a massive cerebral hemorrhage as a result of a single blow to the head. The story from bystanders was that another male had walked up behind him and punched him once in the back of the head; there was no apparent provocation.
I learned several lessons that night including, the potential for a single well placed blow to be fatal, the dangers of alcohol fuelled violence on the nightclub strip – and never trust the paramedics radio alert to be accurate. In those days most of the brawling was male on male. But trends in more recent times show mixed violence and female on female violence becoming more common.
In 2010 the New South Wales Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research released a paper “Female Offending: Has their been an increase” [2] found that
Using police person of interest (POI) data, this brief considers trends in offending by females and juvenile females over the 10 years to June 2009. Over this period, the number of females proceeded against by police increased by 15 per cent, whereas the number of male offenders remained stable.
They also noted a much greater rise in the rate of female juvenile offenders 1/3-increase verses a 1/10 increase for male juvenile offenders.
There are thousands of video clips on Youtube showing drunken violent women to which I recently added this one: http://youtu.be/7qq8Z3L6UwE It’s a recording from a popular Australian evening show called A Current Affair.
Three young women, two of them mothers of young children, were recorded on a mobile phone drunk, violent and out of control outside a nightclub after closing time. The general community attitude to this was one of disgust at their behavior. However the girls wanted to “give their side of the story,” and appeared on national television to tell us “they were provoked by a group of drunken men.”
One of the girls explains “I remember crossing the road, and some guy yelled out you’re a fat s(Beeped out – presumably “slut”), and then I walked over and started yelling at him and stuff, and I think that’s when it started, all the troubles.”
It’s not quite clear what she means by “and stuff” but presumably it means a physical element added to “yelling at him.” Suffice it to say she could have simply walked away rather than crossing a road to confront a group of men and start a fight.
The girls claim “They hit us, they spat on us, they called us names.” Yet whilst there is lots of shouting and name calling to be heard during the video there is no sign of any male hitting any of the girls, only their relentless aggressive attacks. Despite being dragged away by security these girls continued to run back into the fray on the attack.
One even walked up behind a male who was facing away from her and posing no threat and viciously wacked him on the back of the head with her high heeled shoe. That scene sent a shiver down my spine and reminding me of the case I encountered as an intern. She said in the interview that perhaps he did not deserve a heel in the head but “he did deserve a punch in the head.”
When quizzed by the interviewer if this was indicative of their usual behavior the girls admitted, “We’ve been in fights but nothing like this,” so this was not their first involvement in violence. Further the girls admitted to consuming a large amount of alcohol, and feeling “very angry.”
We just wanted to hurt someone because they were hurting us.
When asked if they were sorry for their behavior all agreed they were “embarrassed” but it would appear that they were more embarrassed about being recorded and exposed then by their actual violence, which they claim their victims deserved. “I’m not sorry, I’m not sorry to those guys, I’m sorry to my family but not to the guys.”
One of the girls has no hesitation in stating for the camera “No guy should hit a girl, I think it’s disgusting,” yet their recorded behavior show they clearly believe it is ok for women to be violent toward men.
One of the girls offered this gem “what if their mothers saw them behaving like that towards girls?” which had me bemused. Surely she meant what if their fathers saw them behaving like this toward girls? But then it hit me; apparently single motherhood and fatherlessness are now common enough to considered the norm.
I don’t like being judged as a mother. They don’t know the full story about everything, like we were provoked and they wont know till they watch this.
If this is the view of young mothers it does not bode well for the chances of our current generation of children to become civil, non-violent members of society.
Another recent trend of concern is that of mothers encouraging their daughters to fight in the schoolyard or similar circumstances. There have been several well-publicized cases in Australia and the US including this one where the mother was charged with child abuse. http://youtu.be/G9chmFG50E4
So what is the message from all this? Abusers must always be accountable for their violence except if the abuser is a woman and they were provoked to violence by a man. There is an increasing trend for women to be physically violent and encourage such violence in their offspring, a trend that can only worsen, as the mother headed household becomes a social norm.
US Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan commented in the mid sixties “A community that allows large numbers of young men to grow up in broken homes, dominated by women, never acquiring any stable relationship to male authority, never acquiring any rational expectations about the future – that community asks for and gets chaos.”
We should add to this that girls who lack the guiding influences of a father and who are encouraged by mothers (who don’t seem to understand all violence is wrong) are adding to that chaos.
[2] http://www.bocsar.nsw.gov.au/lawlink/bocsar/ll_bocsar.nsf/vwFiles/BB46.pdf/$file/BB46.pdf
25 Posts in Total
donations either one-time or on a monthly subscription basis.
If you don't have paypal, check out the other options.
If you want to get some merchandise and sponsor us at the same time, consider the AVfM store.
TheSandreGuy:
Peter Wright (Tawil):
Bewildered:
feeriker:
Paul Elam:
Nice article. I’ve noticed for a long time that women feel it’s not only okay, but their god given right to do whatever they feel like doing.
In fact, one night I went to Steak and Shake to get a burger and while I was waiting for my food, I noticed a group of people eating at a booth. On one side was a guy and a girl. On the other side was two girls. All of them looked like they were in their mid 20s. No one was arguing as far as I could tell, but out of nowhere one of the girls threw her drink on the guy. Some of it even got on innocent by standers.
The two girls left immediately followed by the third girl. The guy just sat there (possibly embarrassed). The people who were splashed left and aside from a brief moment of disbelief everyone went back to what they were doing as if it didn’t even happen. It’s become socially acceptable for women to act like bitches.
I’ll never forget thinking to myself, “She needs someone to throw a drink in her fucking face.”
It’s beyond ridiculous the amount of shit women get away with. I remember as a child, asking my grandmother if it’s okay to hit a girl (after being hit by one). She looked me right in the eye and said, “Only if she hits you first. Anyone who’s big enough to hit, is big enough to get hit.”
Unfortunately the law doesn’t see it that way, but it shows a fundamental difference between the older generations of women to the one’s of today.
You’re grandma rocks!
Hell yeah she does. 90 years old and still kicking.
“Anyone who’s big enough to hit, is big enough to get hit.”
It cannot be said better than that.
If only the law were written that way, then women would keep their hands to themselves.
I watched this show, and I noted that the only physical violence done was by the girls attacking the men. The men were very restrained. At times the men, had to restrain the women…..security I think. If these women had of been men they would have got their arses kicked good and proper and been arrested.
The woman’s attitude when she says a man should never hit a woman is typical, but it’s ok for her to hit him in the head from behind with a weapon while he is doing nothing to her. As usual, the reason for the never hit a girl attitude is because they want to be able to do all the violence they want, and receive none in return…..and that isn’t even good enough…..they must say that the violence they do……is the mans fault.
Never blame the victim is just code speak for never blame the female, because if a woman hits a man, it’s still the woman that is the victim, not the man.
You got that right Stu. I found out at an early age that’s what they mean. As a woman they can kick you ass all day but you better not defend yourself.
Growing up around girls who could fist fight like men, I learned real fast that chivalry will get your ass kicked.
Spin hamster, spin!
Over twenty years ago I worked as an orderly in the emergency department of a hospital.
I worked all shifts and on all days and saw much drama and over time patterns emerged.
When there was a full moon there would be more activity in that there were more male on male violence fueled by alcohol. On those nights you were run right off your feet trying to catch up.
A full moon brought out the worst of female violence as it did the worst of male violence but there were two general differences.
1/ Women’s violence against another was more intense.
2/ Woman’s violence against another was more evenly spread out over the calendar compared to Men’s violence against another.
On those same nights you’d also get the “cream of the crop” of women on male violence. These were nearly always instigated by the woman and were nearly always done with a weapon. Knives were common as were other kitchen implements but the worst ones were done with blunt force instruments, cricket bats, golf clubs, crow bars and so on.
These instruments you can be sure were not weapons of opportunity. They were not things laying about close by and used at the flash of insanity. These were the tools of the truly vicious used from behind or at those while they slept.
The numbers of men that were bludgeoned to pulp by women I cannot count.
They were wheeled in one after the other after the other screaming in pain, whimpering in drug addled confusion or unconscious before death.
Of course there were women brought in after being attacked by men or other women, but the most terrible examples to my senses were in a stratosphere all of their own. They were nearly always the ones instigated, planned and delivered by women in homes that had one witness that counted – the women herself.
Sad to say Dr. F, I’ve witnessed this type of violence first hand. And because I’m trained in martial arts and boxing, I know for a fact that there is a spot on the back of the head that will kill you if it’s hit.
And it doesn’t have to be multiple times. Just once will render you unconscious or kill you.
That’s why it’s very disturbing that one of the girls hit a innocent guy in the back of the head with her high heel shoe. She could have easily killed him.
When I was in college I had a part time job as a bouncer at a local club. Man did I hate breaking up women fighting each other, they would always try to kick you in the testicles (we had to wear cups per the coolers policy). I saw many women attack men out of the blue fueled by booze and any number of controlled substances. The video in the article is indicative of women feeling perfectly fine attacking men and them blaming men for their behavior. That is what a 4 year old does.
The sick notion that women can attack anyone and be blameless is a direct result of parents not instilling basic virtues in these women. Add to that the faux empowerment women get from feminism and you get girls acting like animals, demanding that they be held blameless because it’s always the man’s fault.
The big problem is that these violent girls will sooner or later try that crap on someone who will fight back with an incredible amount of violence.
I don’t think women like the ones in the video will ever learn to be normal human beings.
Men have had enough of female entitlement. There wasn’t a white knight to be found in a crowd of 100. No one was there to step up and take the physical punishment for them. Violence by proxy anyone? Anyone? I think they were a little miffed about that. This is the second video I’ve seen in the last couple of month where a female aggressor on the street gets clocked by a guy defending himself. Violence is not a male problem, it’s a human problem. Link these videos to anyone who thinks otherwise.
Great article Greg.
The doublethink required to read the white ribbon campaign is something else.
Check out this link.
http://www.australian-news.com.au/domestic_violence_Susan_Falls.htm
One woman lies in hiding in camouflage with a high power rifle and shoots her husband 6 times, killing him.
Another woman, drugs her husband’s dinner, gives it to him, shoots him in the head, waits a couple of hours, then shoots him in the head again. Then gets two male friends to dump the body, and then tells the cops her husband is missing.
What do these women have in common? Myth 4, justified violence – other wise known as the “battered wife syndrome”.
If a wife has been battered before then she can kill her husband by which ever devious means she can contrive. Let’s not call it revenge. Let’s not call it murder. It’s self-defense.
She can get two male friends to buy her a gun and dispose of the body, but no one (including the police) to help her leave him?
Where does the white ribbon campaign stand on that I wonder? Nowhere.
Yes, it is typical for a woman to claim that she was abused after committing a heinous crime even when there is zero evidence of abuse. It is also typical for her to be automatically believed. “But she WAS abused”, you’ll hear the women say. “She said so herself.” Society’s company line is: Only men are capable of revenge, cruelty, and sociopathic behavior.
So true, that’s why white knights need to be held under as much scrutiny as feminist.
They enable much of the behavior and promote the idea that a woman’s word is unimpeachable truth while a man’s is worthless.
With the Susan Falls case, she also dragged her kids into the plot to kill her husband. She sent her 16yo daughter out to meet a criminal and buy a gun from him. What does that fact alone, without anything else, tell you about this woman.
She got off scot free by the way….battered wife sydrome, with not one shred of evidence that she had ever had a hand laid on her…..unless you count what she says after she’s murdered him and disposed of the body as evidence. I can’t understand this crap. For a start, she killed him……planned it in advance……recruited others in the plan….including her minor daughter…..after she gets caught…..she comes out with……..I suffered abuse for years. But it’s a fact that she killed him…..proven……versus her story that she was abused for years……not proven….and not one shred of evidence to support that……..but…….even if true…..what fucking gives her more power then the highest court in the country to impose penalties and carry them out…..penalties that are illegal even for serial killers…..proven in the court of law….to have imposed on them…….and…..even if the death penalty was reinstated and imposed……they would have to be proven beyond reasonable doubt…..and lose appeals……and be of the worst of the worst to not be given clemancy and reduced to life in prison……but this woman…….any woman…..has more power then that granted to the highest court…..and doesn’t even have to prove her evidence. They are literally like the war lords and royality of old……just handing out whatever they want to call justice as they see fit.
And….it’s a man’s world….always remember that……you privleged bastards
‘He was calling me names, so I hit him’.
Yeah, you stay classy. Women seem to think that anytime they are violent, or generally act the fool, they shouldn’t be held accountable. Gee, I wonder where they could have gotten that impression.
I have 2 cat twins, Lucy and Charles. Both brought up exactly the same. When they were kittens and would get into scraps with each other (about every 2 minutes; I also noticed, not for the first time, that the female cat will go for the immature male’s balls), I would simply separate them (…every 2 minutes). But from the time Charles became larger and stronger, I began to yell “Charles!” by default, if I didn’t see who started it first. Charles *always* listens. It’s just built in. A male faces real consequences.
But I began to notice Lucy will often sneak up and attack Charles. But when I yell “Lucy!” I have to do it 2 or 3 times, and even then, she sometimes doesn’t listen.
So now, I just let Lucy face the consequences of her actions.
So it will be with women. “Back off, lady…” [no change in behavior]…”Back OFF, bitch!” [still nothing]…”Ok…(I’m gonna be the one gets arrested, anyway)”: POW.
And he has, as John Doe of “7″ said, “their undivided attention”.
They won’t learn in a civilized way? Life will teach them. Maybe “listening because the consequences of *not* listening are too nasty” will “inborn” itself into the female of the species, someday, too?…
…Are you listening, all you Lucys?
Cool story Jinn.
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
The principles of positive and negative reinforcement are the same for humans, dogs, cats and any mammal known.
The basis of behaviorism is based on Pavlov’s experiments with dog conditioning.
Specifically about positive and negative conditioning and reinforcement as used in relationships, see this:
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-attraction-doctor/201106/how-give-your-date-cookie
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqkKC9hcLcE&w=420&h=315
[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2iqYznDU1gY&w=420&h=315
I’m shaking.
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Can everyone see who the real violent dangerous sexists are here? Manboobz? SPLC?
This feminist wants to be demeaning toward men and shoot them in the head because of your side’s imaginary patriarchy. Because she got jilted at the altar or because her father didn’t give her everything she wanted as a child or because some man won’t just shut up and die without leaving her a fat paycheck first, she wants to come here and take it out on all men.
You’re scared of people trying to get healthcare and education and rights to their children, while these people,feminists, are ready to carry out real violence in the name of an imaginary concept over sour fucking grapes. These are the motherfuckers you should be scared of,if being a perpetual pantswetter is your thing,which it seems to be.
By the way,HeyYou, I don’t think you watched my videos. If you had, you’d see why telling men a woman is going to get them by shooting them is like telling them the Keystone Kops are coming to arrest them.
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
IF they start it they deserve to get it back.
We do, for the same crimes they go to jail longer, and are convicted more often just because of their sex.
Only women can get off just because of what kind of genitals they have.
No, these are not violent crimes. Where is your evidence?
Executives are in a league all their own. These particular ones only happen to be “men”. Women executives can be just as ruthless.
No you don’t, but you sure can judge.
This fembot needs to get a grip on some history. A few percent of the population has made a vast majority of MEN fight wars, on pain of death or imprisonment. How often do we have to repeat this? Where were all those women dying in coal mines? Where are those women doing roofing or working in waste disposal? That’s because that demographic is practically nonexistent.
How about we call you women to account, who perpetrate twice as much child abuse, and are just as violent in relationships? How about the women who so often get away with murdering their children or allowing them to die due to incredible stupidity? Crimes against innocent children are considered universally the most heinous in practically all cultures, and yet these days so many white women can just get a free pass to get away with murder by copping some incredibly inane excuse!
Yes, it is tough being a man, but since you’re a woman, you wouldn’t know, and you don’t seem to care what the vast majority of men endure since you’re so focused on your Straw Alpha Male. Those men are a very slim margin in the population, and you’ll find absolutely no love for them on this forum.
Arguing with Feminists is like trying to teach a pig to sing. It can’t be done, it annoys the pig and even if you do succeed, nobody wants to hear a pig sing anyway.
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Well tell your toothless junkie girlfriend to move her greasy obese hairy arse off your laptop ya dumb twit.
8) having a bad day… squirt?
Recommendation: get rid of this misandric piece of shit named ‘HeyYouOverThere’ (and delete her demeaning hate-filled posts while you are at it).
PS. I also suspect that ‘HeyYouOverThere’ is one of the three girls caught perpetrating public violence re Greg’s article, and has arrived here after scanning the www looking for some notoriety about her violence.. In essence proving that they are in fact extremely aggressive females, despite excuses.
“PS. I also suspect that ‘HeyYouOverThere’ is one of the three girls caught perpetrating public violence re Greg’s article. In essence proving that they are in fact extremely aggressive females, despite excuses.”
Nope,HeyYouOverThere,a.k.a. Kathy, is a sour old cat lady who gets off sexually on provoking men into responding angrily to her. She is just a female with normal female desires for male dominance.
The only problem is,like a lot of other females, she really doesn’t give a shit about what men want, and would much rather undermine our work here while rubbing one out than support us quietly and then have LOTS of natural masculine men to choose from to sate her annoyance fetish.
Respond dispassionately to her, try not to be too provoking because that’s just giving her tingles,or talk around or over her. Ever seen a sex-starved woman? Kathy here will be threatening mass male castration before it’s over. Leaving one or two of these types around at all times tells the people who wander in here that we are NOT “bitter losers who can’t get laid” but are responding to some very bitter female losers who stink of cat pee and cannot arrange a date somewhere more appropriate than a forum for men’s rights.
Ahh, I see, another sex starved lonely female. She deserves the boot for her disruptive ‘mating ritual’ nonetheless, but I’ll take your good advice and not indulge her erotic fantasies any more than I have. Lol.
Paul knows what he’s doing. He left a sampling of her posts here deliberately. There’s another one she wrote that is in the site’s trash and the last line reads:
“If a guy ever tries to “teach” me to behave, a physical therapist is going to have to teach him to walk again after I put a bullet in his spine.”
Her stupidity and violence is typical of the more aggressive feminists and it’s not going anywhere soon.
Why hide it when it stands right here as a flash card into the mind of something very nasty that needs to be exposed ? For those coming here and are unsure about what we are pushing against merely have to clap eyes on her posts here to get a bloody good idea.
Nah, better it stays I reckon, and especially on a thread titled, “Girls Behaving Badly” doncha think ?
I get your point- showcase the sick mentality we are dealing with. However I’m not convinced there is much benefit in showcasing her particular form of misandry because -unlike your typical feminist- her’s is devoid of ideology and is 100% disruptive. Its an example of venting hate, and nothing more. The articles here do a fine job on thier own of showcasing feminist inspired misandry IMO without need to showcase her emotional drivel.
Anyways I trust the management here knows exactly what they are doing and I’m not questioning that for a second (I didn’t know if her posts had yet been noticed, as even site managers need to sleep for a few hours each night)… just giving an opinion on what appears to be a worthless poster.
Ah, it always feels good when my Comment squeezes a feminist’s head to the point where s/he’s threatening me with violence.
Happy aneurism, asswhipe.
I have a similar situation but both cats stalk and attack each other, cause that’s how cats are normally when they’re going for prey… sneaky.
A very sad state of affairs exists in Australia, to be sure. But there are beacons of light against the coming night. Here’s an excellent fisk of the White Ribbon Day violence against women
statistical frauddogma by Men’s Health Australia. Read the full response for a classic game of let’s-you-and-him-fight where the black knight eviscerates the white.They do love to fudge the number, don’t they? Here’s another example of that:
http://www.nij.gov/topics/crime/intimate-partner-violence/measuring.htm
Though, to be fair, this is more about admitting that statistics on domestic violence change with however the hell someone feels like collecting and interpreting the data at the time.
Aaaand, if you go to page 17 of the PDF, you’ll see why the statistics are unreliable:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/181867.pdf
According to those survey questions, I have been the repeated victim of physical assault and possibly of stalking and never knew it.
Aaaaaand if you go to page 6 of the same pdf, you’ll see that if a woman puts a gun to a man’s head and forces him to have sex with her….. it won’t be detected as rape in their screening.
Neither does a man being tied up, having his penis manipulated into an erection, and then having his penis inserted anywhere count as rape. Apparently it was not even worth asking the question.
And of course, rape by your cell mate is not counted as domestic violence.
What a crock!!!
I notice the 3 Stoogettes have what looks like 50something minutes to “tell their side of the story”. Sorry, bigmouths, but I only have time to listen to the audio. Tell it to yo mamas.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4i2kVDD61fw&feature=youtu.be
I posted this over on the AVFM radio post but I think it’s more appropriate here. This video is disgusting. This guys GF hits, kicks, spits, and chastises him continually for over 5 minutes and NO ONE does anything to help. The worst part of it was when the cops finally do show up, one of the witnesses says the guy didn’t do anything and the cop responds with “I hope so”. No bias there.
Unbelievable video! Would a carriage full of travellers watch on if the sexes were reversed and it was a man punching and kicking his partner in the head ?
The white ribbon oath, “i swear never to commit excuse or remain silent about violence against women this is my oath” nope will never swear that one,
but to All forms of family violence I will join other Australians in saying NO
and
” I swear to never remain silent about women’s violence, never to minimise it or excuse it and to expose it for all the world to see”
http://drbettybigot.blogspot.com.au/
Love that blog!!!
http://www.sunshinecoastdaily.com.au/story/2012/01/10/a-mothers-betrayal-abuse-daughter-sex-court/
Might be of interest to you.
The woman has a partner with 4 children. She starts a cybersex relationship with some other guy, and sends him videos of her raping her 11 year old daughter.
thanks for the link , will add it to the growing collection !
Yep and women are “into” all sorts of violence including “sexual violence” even against their own children!
” I swear to never remain silent about women’s violence, never to minimise it or excuse it and to expose it for all the world to see”
That’s a really good mantra.
I’ll pass it on…
The video was removed for “shocking and disgusting content”. Censorship would be my guess. Cowards.
Girls are caught on camera being violent but the big story is about ”what the footage does not show, which happened moments earlier”. Of course, we are looking at women being violent but that is not important; what supposedly happened before the video tape (which we do not see) is important, while what we see with our own two eyes is not important. The media is total mind control.
Amen brother.
Interesting that despite their aggression against an intoxicated group of men, none of these girls suffered any injuries, how can one of them claim that she was hit including “jumping on her head” and no injuries?
Two explanations 1. they are not telling the truth or 2. the men even when intoxicated were controlled enough NOT to cause the sort of serious injuries of which they would be capable. Probably a combination of both which just paints these skanks as liars as well as violent , and the men as restrained.
Speaking of girls behaving badly and media/government propaganda, look what I found linked on Antimisandry: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHNF1r2AIes&feature=plcp&context=C447fc82VDvjVQa1PpcFOVvqnVN23oieK37_EZyvlnCyY5l2QgNFA=. Propaganda to make the marines look glamorous to women, or something a little more insidious? Interestingly, feminst, Naomi Wolf has criticized the video as military propaganda; but I think she may be only partly right. Watch the symbolism closely. Interesting, considering the lax attitude the system is taking towards female violence against men; as well as what we have been hearing from radfem’s for quite some time now.
I usually don’t follow Alex Jones, but I found this intriguing. It’s certainly a, “rabbit hole”, consideration but; look at the vacuous responses from Katy Perry fans,(at the A.J. link and the original video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uuwfgXD8qV8&feature=related), and consider how the gullible, feminism inspired, masses of women might respond. Is this video encouraging female supremacy and perhaps, something more?
What do you guys think, am I reading too much into this or is it a very strange video indeed?
Is there anything in the US mass media that is not a vehicle for propaganda?
True enough, the scary thing is how oblivious so many people are to it and the almost gleeful way in which many women accept excuses, to become hostile towards men and boys. Mob mentality in the making?
I can see the pattern by which biological biases become open attacks, unfolding at the behest of our supposed leaders; irrespective of ideological polarity.
The pattern by which German citizens went from being suspicious of the Jews, to smashing the windows of their stores and beating them in the streets, at the behest of the state, while the police watched, for example.
Apparently, Obama has provisions in a current bill for a civilian security force and he panders to feminist women constantly. Will it be some kind of feminist security force with a “carte blanche”, to exact it’s will against men and boys. Is this video, incitement? Dare they go that far?
What about all the private for profit prisons being built and the fact that prisoner labor is being farmed out to corporations for chicken feed; which is often then applied against the cost of imprisoning them. Which means virtual slave labor. They need strong young men for that don’t they? All the more reason to find excuses to oppress and imprison men; and all hallmarks of fascism.
I shut it off at “record numbers of rapes” but yeah-strange video.
Yep, that is annoying, (probably throwing a bone to female supporters), afterwords though, there are a few interesting historical examples of how women were used to keep men controlled and how they reacted to their positions, over time. It’s kind of interesting.
Good article on the rising tide of female violence.
About four years ago I placed an email alert with google for articles about the rising abuse of alcohol by females. For a year I received daily news alerts revealing rapidly rising alcohol abuse among females in India, USA, Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom. There were literally hundreds of articles generated, and the upward statistical trend among women was staggering.
Many of these articles mentioned crime statistics saying that female crime, especially public nuisance and public violence convictions, were rising in tandem with the alcohol abuse.There is a need for more articles highlighting alcohol abuse and crime among women, and yours gets the ball rolling.
I hope some of these women realise that there are men out there like me who wont take their shit. Some of us realise that we’re in the shit if she SAYS we did something. If we’re going to do the time, may as well get some back and do the crime as well.
ANY person who initiates physical violence against me is going to get an arse kicking. If it’s a man, then he started it and it is self defense. If its a woman, then I was going to get the punishment anyway, no loss.
Perhaps if enough people start thinking like this, more people will realise that their actions have consequences and they should make damned sure that its worth it before they start a fight.
I already have that mindset and took Krav Maga classes to deal with the inevitable white knights. When people realize you won’t be fucked with and are more than capable of severely hurt them, they leave you the fuck alone.
Some exerpts from the following paper:
Juveniles in detention
in Australia, 1981–2008
Kelly Richards
Mathew LynehamR
“The rate of detention for all juveniles showed
a steady decline between 1981 and 2002,
decreasing from 65 juveniles detained per
100,000 population in 1981, to an all-time low of
25 per 100,000 in 2002. Over the past six years,
there have been modest yearly increases to a rate
of 37 per 100,000 in 2008.”
“• There has been a 31 percent decline in the
number of male juveniles detained since 1981
and a 70 percent decline in the number of female
juveniles detained over the same period.”
“However, there has been an increase in the number and rate of both male and female juveniles in detention
since 2004″
This statement is interesting.
“Although increasing levels of violence perpetrated
by young women has been identified as a key crime
trend (Carrington 2006), there has not been a
concomitant increase in female juveniles being
detained.”
Feminism at work?
Another interesting statement.
“It may also be the case that diversionary measures and other programs to reduce juveniles’ contact with the criminal justice system may have disproportionately impacted on females and been more successful in keeping female juveniles out of detention than male juveniles.”
There is more information I have looked at. It seems to point to the system being slanted to keep girls out of detention but the same diversion system would seem not to be working or applied to boys.
I am not surprised.
“he did deserve a punch in the head.”
four fingers, bitch
It seems that political correctness and wrong education increases women’s violence.
Women are told, falsely, that MEN are to blame for all their burdens and wrongs. Such as lower pay and less CEO positions. That makes them angry.
Then some girls grow up learning that they can hit boys and they don’t hit back. If a boy ever hits back, then some big mom or dad hits the boy.
So exactly this they expect police to do when they are grown ups.
Add to this that society and law teach women that their FEELING offended is a measure for criminal or civil prosecution. Like in harassment or in consensual sex rape accusations.
Here is the result.
Been trying to convince the blue pill pod people around me of this for years.
Always met with disdain and derision.
Surprise!
Women are NEVER abusive .
Ya right.
That was hardly much of a fight from my perspective. Rolling around on the ground and a couple of slaps? However, I’m sure female scuffles like this will continue and escalate so long as someone out there is paying attention. Attention whores love attention !!
A man beating the holy crap out of a woman is more common on TV drama shows, than real life.
Domestic violence is a scuffle (usually alcohol induced) at best, with bruises and a few scratches.
The issue is that women have weaponized it and use law enforcement as their proxy ammo in troubled relationships. I think most police officers are less apt to buy into the hysteria than they once were. They see the propaganda and their real world experience is completely different.
Great article Greg.
Once again it comes down to the fact that most women don’t want to take responsibility for their actions (unless of course they are being praised for something). There is always someone for them to get the blame-thrower out and start firing at.
If women continue to behave badly and without consequence, then the expectation is that it will get worse, as indicated by the statistics in this article.
And if they didn’t want to be judged, then they shouldn’t have acted in the way they did.
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
I found this comment in the trash for some reason. It may have been deleted by the user after posting.
We don’t tolerate violent statements here, but after banning this user I am allowing this one to stand. It is good that we leave examples of what so many women think “empowerment” really means. Superiority, bigotry, violence and destruction.
For the record, I get tons of women. Way more than my fair share. I grew up surrounded by women and I love women deeply.
But I love me too and someone’s gotta stick up for yours truly.
Hey you over there, I’m pretty sure you’ve already been banned from the site, so I’m leaving this comment for when you check back to see who responded to you.
How do I know you’ll be back? Well, that’s what self righteous-self entitled-wanna be bridezilla bitches do. They vy for attention.
And I guess this is the part where I refute your claim that I am incapable of getting a woman. Needless to say I don’t have to because as you can see by my Gravitar so prominently displayed, I am a very handsome man.
Which is more than I can say for you who felt the need to hide your identity behind a blank photo and some tough words. I must remember to nominate you as, “internet thug of the year.”
As angry and pathetic as your estrogen fueled rant was I actually wish one part of it was true. I wish I was unable to attract a female, because if that were true my life would be so much richer without the scars left from psychotic abusive bitches like yourself.
Just the fact that you think a man’s main source of happiness relies on the presence of a woman proves how stupid you really are.
And I won’t say that you’re some bald headed-obese-drama queen that can’t find a man and desperately looks for meaning in your useless existence by trying to prove to us men that you can work a full time job all by yourself.
No, I won’t do that because I’m pretty sure you were able to snag some poor bastard (when you were 1,000lbs lighter) that you probably beat and belittle every chance you get.
But what you don’t realize is that even though he’s too stupid to leave your hippo size ass, he more than likely watches a lot of porn and imagines what it would be like to have a woman that can actually give him an erection.
As far as you shooting someone who attempts to teach you how the rest of the civilized world behaves; I’m more than sure that you would expect that guy to stay with you after you shoot him because you think he owes you something for giving him a feel of your rotten crotch.
In actuality the only thing you deserve is to have him spit in your fucking face you wretched excuse for a human being.
The fact of the matter is, bitch, we are the ones less apt to put up with your bullshit. So run back to the feminist herd and tell them how Valdez just owned your ass.
And just in case you’re wondering; yes, I take great joy in the fact that you won’t be able to have the last word.
Bitch.
I just have to throw this in:
The only thing I can possibly add to this sublime badassitude is a badass soundtrack.
[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZmx-tZ8YW8&version=3&hl=en_US&rel=0
“Just remember that women nowadays aren’t as apt to put up with men’s self-righteous bullshit.”
Pot calls kettle black.
Welcome to the new dialectic here at AVfM, where a “sassy” defiant attitude clearly cuts both ways.
@HeyYouOverThere: As for you, femmie troll, I won’t even bother responding to your childish shaming insults and threats (the fact that you probably got booted off the site for them notwithstanding). Personally I think you, every other “woman” like you, and the so-called “equality movement” that supports harpies like you are a fucking joke. And do you know what I do when I hear a joke.
I laugh at it.
And if you hate Nic Cage, you’re just going to LOVE this…
I can only hope Valdez is right about you coming back to this site, so you can see this.
Have a great day, you shrieking harpy bitch from Hell.
From now on, whenever a troll (feminist or other wise) comes on to this site, a laughing vid will be my response to them. People like that are FUCKING JOKES to me. And I will laugh at them like the jokes they are.
I am so sorry I didn’t catch wind of this sooner.
“I actually feel sorry for you guys. I know you all are just sad, lonely men who hate women because you can’t attract one.”
ROFL!
That’s like saying you feel sorry for someone because they don’t take poison, or inhale cyanide gas.
Only an moron would let his masculinity be defined by the number of sluts he has pumped and dumped nowadays. The milk is for free, while the cows are as stupid as they can possibly get. It’s like stealing candy from kids, and it just gets easier day by day.
And any kind of approval from a modern day woman means even less to someone who wants to keep his selfrespect intact, in light of these facts.
You’re a relic from the past, trying to shame the new breed for not being a utility and a wallet to women.
Seriously, -I wish you good luck with that.
LOL. My dog is not a “real” dog because he can not attract flees.
I took the liberty of correcting your work. I think the reader will have a much better feel for where you’re coming from with the minor changes I made. No thanks are necessary. I would happily do it again.
As an entitled woman, I am offended by this site. I actually feel sorry for myself. I am a sad, lonely woman who hates men because I can’t attract one. That’s ok, I hope you understand. It sucks to go through life knowing I’m so repulsive that I will probably never find a mate. I suppose that would make anyone bitter and angry. Just remember that women nowadays put men through self-righteous bullshit. If a guy doesn’t do what he’s told, a physical therapist is going to have to teach him to walk again after I put a bullet in his spine.
“The issue is that women have weaponized it and use law enforcement as their proxy ammo in troubled relationships.”
Elegantly put.
I really can’t see from the video clips shown by Australian TV who provoked the fight. The footage was obviously edited to convey a story the programmers wanted the public to see. Just like our media here in the US, it’s slanted and biased.
What I see is a bunch of drunks including three out of control women who probably, since the show reveals they had been in fights previous to this, were as much if not more at fault for creating the milieu than the men they blame.
I believe these women are lying when they say the cops looked passively on. That opens the door for doubt about most everything they say here. I say they provoked the fight and the men got sucked in.
Never Give Up!
http://www.pa.uky.edu/~shlosman/anim/nevergiveup.jpg
APRIL 5–An Indiana man had his scrotum severely torn when his “on-again, off-again” girlfriend entered his home and pummeled him in an attack that resulted in the woman’s arrest on several criminal charges, including two felonies.
Christina Reber, 43, was freed from jail yesterday after posting $10,000 bond in connection with her bust for the alleged attack last Friday at the Muncie house of her ex-beau (who told cops he had ended the couple’s eight-month relationship days before the assault).
The victim, 57, told police that he was working at his computer when Reber, pictured in the adjacent mug shot, “walked into his house uninvited,” according to a Muncie Police Department report that will make every guy wince. The man said Reber screamed at him to “call the fucking police” before launching her assault.
Reber, the victim told cops, first struck him repeatedly in the head before latching onto his scrotum and “squeezing as hard as she could.” The man, interviewed by police at a hospital emergency room, said that he “was in incredible pain when Reber grabbed his scrotum and began digging in her fingers.”
The victim recalled that Reber “refused to let go of his scrotum,” but that he was “finally able to pry his scrotum from Reber’s hand” after they fell to the ground during the scuffle. The man then called an ambulance, which transported him to Ball Memorial Hospital.
Reber was charged with aggravated battery and illegally entering the victim’s home, both felonies. She was also charged with a misdemeanor domestic battery, according to an affidavit. Reber is next due in court on April 30
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/indiana-scrotum-horror-769123
“No guy should hit a girl, I think it’s disgusting…what if their mothers saw them behaving like that towards girls?”
Ah yes, there’s that shaming language again – they most often used tool of feminist hypocrites – and one which they refuse to acknowledge. It’s a very old tactic that pre-dates feminism: when the intellectually challenged are backed into a corner, they give up refuting their opponent’s arguments, and instead attack the opponent personally.