Professional victim Ophelia Benson, along with professional liar Futrelle–hey those of you who are fans of his? He’s bilking you by lying to you regularly by distortion and omission, just so you know–is busy spewing bullshit again, not only by lying about Paul Elam but, lo and behold, quote-mining YouTube commenters no one seems to have even heard of–and apparently on a video where the owner, St37One, says here, and I quote:
St37One 1 hour ago
The first one by “Jeff V” is actually a fabrication. It was never even posted on my video.
The other two are real troll posts, which also appeared on Futrelles Scaredy Cat blog only a few minuites after they showed up on my video (I had a hunch so I paid a visit to Manboobz once the comments appeared). Either Futrelle was steadily monitoring my video somehow, or he had a freind post the comments, or he did it himself.
I can’t find the original troll posts from these people. Has anyone else even heard of these so-called MRAs? Why do I suspect that they’re all named Dave Futrelle? Anyway, you can find YouTuber St37One’s channel right here.
174 Posts in Total
donations either one-time or on a monthly subscription basis.
If you don't have paypal, check out the other options.
If you want to get some merchandise and sponsor us at the same time, consider the AVfM store.
Lucian Vâlsan:
Booyah:
ali:
malcolm:
DavidM:
B Rex:
Aw, would Boobzie do a thing like that? Manufacture a straw man, then beat the stuffing out of it?
Fucktard.
(Pardon my French.)
He’d be beating the stuffing outta something…
Actually, the more I think about it, he’d be trying to eat the stuffing NOM, NOM, NOM!
Maybe I’ve had too much celebratory wine, but eeeewwwww!
That is when he’s not picking up all those hotties that flock to him! LOL
He better not beat it too hard- it might require a crate to brace it whilst it heals.
Booberz could even beat his own strawman. Seriously, his argument was so fallacious he couldn’t even form any coherency. It’s like he just starts typing on his keyboard and hopes words magically appear out of the nonsense.
Seems totally legit. Like, these are not the droids we’re looking for legit.
New fave insult… Booger…booger…booger!
How did this get turned into a conversation about magic nose goblins?
Terry Pratchett introduced goblins in his recent discworld novel “Snuff”.
Part of the goblins’ “religion” involves saving their boogers.
Wooley Bumblebee doesn’t give a shit.
Go get ‘em, WB!!
I want to facepalm at these clowns, but my head hurts too much from their stupidity.
You do see comments like that around youtube. However they are in no way associated with the MRM as any half aware person would know. Comments like that work very much against mens rights and I doubt any MRA would make them. To say such stupid things and think you were advancing the cause of areas where men are disadvantaged you would have to be pretty delusional. Personally I dislike seeing them they dont help things at all. If anything I believe they are more likely due to the feminist rape hysteria and fabricated statistics and men actually starting to believe the dangerous unreality they peddle. I see this a lot on the net these days. It makes me very sad for these men. (not in this case but similar ones where they think they are just inherently evil due to being male. In this case they are actually advocating it and disgraceful) Its even worse when they feel they can speak for all men and make ridiculous calls from the propaganda they’ve been spoon fed, often from birth and project it on their whole gender.
These are most likely the work of trolls for shock value. Or even possibly outraged everyday men. Which kind of highlights the need for the MRM really. However it in no way reflects on its principles. To say it does is closely akin to saying a child running round with a plastic light sabre is one of Darth Vaders generals.
If AVfM actually stood for that, even for a day I expect its membership would half in that day. I would be out and I dont think I would be the only one.
Great vid anyhow WB
Seems like planted comments to me. I’ve never heard an MRA say “these feminist types”. Seriously, has anyone here ever used that phrase to depict feminists?
It surely comes from someone trying to imitate an MRA. Someone who doesn’t have the actual mentality of an MRA, and it shows.
ROFL.
Do any of these idiots actually read what the girls are writing, or hear what they’re saying?
Man, she has such a scientific way of going about this. Suddenly she’s incredibly attractive.
I note the use by the misandrist of the term “dislike” in reference to the reporters’ campaign to identify public hate-propaganda promoters. Personally, I don’t dislike the Toronto misandrists. I see them as people who have been abused by Skinnerian social conditioning in authoritarian school systems. Victims. They are indoctrinated. They are victims of control-freak cult leaders (utopian social engineering professors). The fact is that children have in the past been conditioned in the same way by The Gang of Four, National Socialists, Khymer Rouge, Aryan Nation, New Black Panthers, Children of God, and countless other anti-civilization hate-based cults to become young adults obsessed with hating the scapegoats they were conditioned to loathe. The issue is not to identify and discuss severe misandrists out of our “feelings.” It is a matter of reporting on influential and harmful cults. The specific misandrists discussed here are examples of the harm done to these people by the incessant indoctrination in cult literature and anti-social inbred cult communities that produce these wild-eyed imbalanced fanatics. Why should we ever focus on “disliking” these victims of cult indoctrination when the reality is that these unfortunate subjects of operative conditioning need extensive healing and need to have their damaging influence (“training” in sociopathic hate-ideology) on younger persons aborted so as to prevent further harm? I do not “dislike” them. That would be shallow emotiveness. Rather I merely them to be discussed openly as representative “cautionary tales,” documented for the historical record and analyzed from a criminological perspective.
On “gender ideologues”: Many AVfM writers, including myself, give zero credence to the projective social engineering concept termed “gender.” I cannot possibly be an ideologue of “gender” when I know that it does not exist outside of grammar.
People are indeed influenced by peers, coercive governments and NGOs for sure, but they also have free will, which they have to muster the courage to implement in the face of the control-freak criminals, change agents, bureaucrats and indoctrinators.
But that does not mean that humans are born with a male “gender” or a female “gender.” They are born with a male sex and a female sex. Biology is not grammar.