One thing for sure, what male feminists have a lot of is rules.
These guys are very astute, in some cases spending their entire lives learning what women want to hear, and figuring out how to say it within earshot of as many women as possible.
And they don’t even allow themselves to be distracted by the pain they feel from being on their knees all the time.
Uncle Bern gives us the rundown, and runs those guys down good and proper while he does it.


































Feminism is narcissism. These people have nothing to offer humanity. Only women would construct a cult which worships the holy vagina. They have no useful skills whatsoever. I doubt any of them have the ability to pound a nail into a piece of wood or screw in a lightbulb. I hope people realize feminists think people like Marilyn Monroe and Madonna have contributed more to society than people like Albert Einstein and Thomas Edison. Women have this obsession with their feelings. Can anyone tell me why? Also, would it be possible for one feminist to give me a clear and logical explanation as to what feminism hopes to accomplish? No, throwing terms at me like “equality” aren’t acceptable because no feminist has ever elaborated on “equality”. I am aware that when a feminist says “equality with men”, she means “superiority over men”, but I just want them to drop the charade and admit it. Most feminists think feminism is a fad they need to follow, just like the latest fashion trend. They wear those cheesy feminist buttons just so people will pay attention to them and when they open their mouths the only things that come out are the feminist slogans they hear from other feminists. Don’t any of you feminists have the ability to insert logic into your discussions?
This is off topic…..but
I want to take this time to shake the hands of Ryen Russillo and Skip Bayless of ESPN. They had the guts to criticize the American women’s soccer team for choking during the World Cup Final and they also went as far to say the women’s team is getting a free pass from the country because they are women.
Thanks, to the both of you, for not falling in line with the other manginas in the media and for telling the truth.
I’d go one further by saying that their performance in the World Cup was so terrible that they may have deliberately thrown the game on purpose. I know the media would never investigate the women’s team for illegal gambling but they lost to a team that didn’t field anyone over 5’7.
That the whole game came down to a “shoot-out” exchange is why soccer is unappealing to Americans. I watched it thinking “WTF?!”.
“…they lost to a team that didn’t field anyone over 5’7.”
Perhaps it was the coaching?
“…investigate the women’s team for illegal gambling…”
Women don’t gamble, except for maybe slot machines. They don’t understand things like odds and they lack the connections to sports bet illegally. They stood to gain much more by winning, endorsements, etc.
Watching women compete in sports is a novelty to most people, not because they’re any good, but because it’s women doing it. It’s a curiosity, a freak show of sorts. As if watching a game of something men are playing, but with one arm tide behind their backs. “Let’s see how they do!”
You watch men to see the human mind and body at it’s peak performance and talent levels. You watch women because they’re so darn cute when they’re trying to do something men excel at.
I was secretly rooting for Japan all the way, because their coach was a stern, disciplined male, obsessed with technique.
Logic would lead to introspection, which leads awareness, which could lead to some degree of accountability. Women generally don’t have the emotional and ethical intellect and maturity to connect the dots as it is and feminists have their heads so far up their asses that they get their hair tangled around their stomachs. “What I feel is what is so” is the truth of the Universe to them. The aims are supremacy and moral, legal, and ethical selectism rather than equality. Equality is worse than a Trojan Horse in their minds, it’s a jackass.
OT
Wanna nail Dr.Phil for perjury?: http://mensrightsboard.blogspot.com/2011/07/more-info-on-vawa-reauthorization.html
Here is my take / version (which others have written more eloquently).
Feminists are much like the petulant adolescent who was spoiled rotten as a child.
They lash out against the perceived “oppression” of their parents to assert their rightful independence as they approach the age of emancipation.
They fail to appreciate the reality that were it not for their parents they would likely be living on the street, or dead.
And yet they scream obscenities about their rights and freedoms while their loving parents ask what they did wrong to be treated in such a manner.
The nasty, overgrown children know that they can get away with this horrific behavior because they always have and so it escalates to grotesque levels.
The government has usurped the disciplinary role of the parents (the male in this example) and the culture (comprised of other spoiled adolescents) fills the void.
Feminists are adult (chronologically speaking) children with a loaded gun.
They are wandering, hopelessly lost, in the woods without a map, compass, or rational plan while deluding themselves that they are survivalists.
“Feminists are adult (chronologically speaking) children with a loaded gun. They are wandering, hopelessly lost, in the woods without a map, compass, or rational plan while deluding themselves that they are survivalists.”
Top stuff, love it
I posted a response to the feminist article, and it was deleted for violating appropriate language usage — which is strange, because there was no language at all. My post was just a table of numbers, comparing how men and women fare in such areas as homelessness, assault victim, suicide, disease, mortality, morbidity, dispossession, etc.
Only a feminist can think that facts and numbers, with no words attached at all, can consist of “inappropriate language.” After all the only language that is appropriate for a feminist is rote regurgitation of their religion.
Antz i was posting on there for hours yesterday , it was a waste of time they are nuts .
Arguing with a fool is like spitting on a fish. It’s wise to do neither.
With enough leisure and protection, I guess virtually any level of self-indulgence is possible.
After all the only language that is appropriate for a feminist is rote regurgitation of their religion.
Bingo
I always thought the three main tennets of feminazism were:
1) she’s always right.
2) He’s always wrong.
3) STFU!!!!!!
NOT OT:
Check out Dr Phil’s show on “Bullying Dads” if you have’nt seen it yet. I don’t kn ow how to post two videos, but look at all the “likes” on this one where Dr Phil berates the man for being a bullying father. Then look at the bullying moms. It is clear that the bully dads are losers…and with the bullying moms, the dads are losers for not doing anything.
Typical Dr. Phil. For every point he makes he misses at least two. Those fathers deserve blasting but the mothers need worse since children usually gravitate to them more and if they’ve got a fucking psychocunt for a mother, then watch out. Dishonorable mention goes to the fact that mothers generally teach women much of the Art of Fuckery in the first place. Things get worse when she’s got issues.
The Art of Fuckery LOL. Man that is gold. You sir, should write a few articles.
Who knows?
We can always rely on Uncle Bern for the latest in politically incorrect commentary.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ivamM7QWhs
Did I mention that it is now politically correct to for msm to air five female misandrists laughing at an innocent man being poisoned, chained up and mutilated by a woman. It’s politically incorrect to make adverse commentary on it though……yes…..we live in a patriarchy.
I am watching “The Matrix” on tv right now and I can’t believe how well that movie parallels our struggle for men’s rights. The Machines are the feminists/manginas, the Agents are the white knights, and there are the people who have taken the red pill and those who are still under the influence of the blue pill. When Neo first takes the red pill, he is weak. He eventually gains strength by gaining knowledge of the Matrix, which in our case would be the matriarchy. “The Matrix” is one of the rare movies that promotes male empowerment.
Try the film “Ironclad”…Just watched that recently, and there’s some serious male empowerment in that film.
Kinda blows the “Go Girl” theories out of the water, that they can compete on an equal basis with men in physical matters. I suggest to any woman who’s deluded by that attitude, that they watch this film and then tell us they can be just as physically strong…Dream on girls Lol
The film “The Horseman” actually has a small MRA part in it. This girl who has run away mentions to the main character about the lack of male reproductive rights. Only a sentence or two is spoken, but any acknowledgment of that is pretty rare (might actually be the first time I’ve seen it in a film).
I’m not sure how some of you would feel about the rest of the movie, though. It’s basically a guy taking revenge for some guys for drugging his daughter, raping her , filming it, and selling it as a porno. So, yeah…..it’s not really “pro-male” or anything.
Sorry this is off topic here, but the Washington Post website published a story about the jokes and comments on “The Talk” and the internet backlash they created.
“The ladies of “The Talk,” CBS’s answer to “The View,” have come under fire for laughing during a segment about Catherine Kieu, the California woman accused of cutting of her husband’s private part and disposing of it in a particularly gruesome way after he asked for a divorce.”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/celebritology/post/the-talk-ladies-under-fire-for-laughing-at-catherine-kieu-story-video/2011/07/18/gIQA3OjkLI_blog.html
It’ll likely get Kia Abdullah treatment and get a canned apology at best and no response at worst.
Nothing would be good enough except if they fired the lot of them straight away. I’m not holding my breath waiting for even the bitch that done the cock cutting to get any punishment, never mind the bitches that come on TV laughing about it and inciting more women to do the same.
In fact this is all part of the plan to normalize violence against Men, and make it acceptable as a commont mindset.
Shows like “The Talk” are simply more propaganda weapons in a vast arsenal, to be used at will, against Men, to the destruction of our very culture/civilization.
As any logical Man knows, the best way to destroy any culture/civilization is to pit its Men and women against each other. Looking around today, I’d have to state unequivocally: Mission Accomplished!!!
Because the powers that be are now and have for some time have been quite feminized, this rhetoric toes the party line perfectly. Any expectation of punishment in the form of public apologies or firings is purely pie in the sky until some very real, physical ramifications are felt by these evil succubi, across the board.
The wymyn of this cunt’ry and all weternized cunt’ries in fact, are perfectly A-okay with the status quo, and until they get their asses handed to them on a platter, en masse, by righteously indignant Men, nothing changes.
I’d like to point out that when a cop in canada suggested that women should not dress like sluts in public as a way to lower their risks of sexual assault…..it sparked outrage from feminists across the world with Slutwalks staged in dozens of cities. However, if a bunch of man hating harpies get on TV and cheer and laugh about a man being poisoned, chained and mutilated……everyone is trying to blame the victim. There is no outrage at these horrible women who are inciting hate and voilence against men……and laughing……laughing at a man who is a victim of far worse then rape. And they are doing it on national TV.
bollox, I missed the up-vote and hit the down vote by accident, sorry. The down-vote fairy hasn’t visited (yet), just the clumsy oaf…
I don’t believe you. It’s those downvoting feminazis isn’t it. Damn…..guess I’ll just have to leave forever and never say another unkind word about feminists again. Damn, damn
This downvote was NOT me, perhaps the red fairies are in attendance?
P.S. Should I accuse YOU of down voting me above? LOL
Rise for Pär Ström!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bixYDc_fNxk
AVE!
Chapin’s video is good, but the best part is his T-shirt, “I liked the OLD Millenium better!”
I totally agree.
Second millenium architecture (Chartres, 12th century): http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/cas/fnart/arch/gothic/chartres/chartres020.jpg
Second millenium music, Vivaldi: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGdFHJXciAQ
In contrast,
Third Millenium architecture: http://www.kunstler.com/eyesore_201010.html
Third Millenium music: No comment.
PS, my above clip of Vivaldi’s “Winter” has an MRA theme which I’ll call, “In Praise of Old Men.” Go to 5:30 and you’ll see the finale performed entirely by elder males, all middle-aged or elderly. To my mind, this is a symbol of the particular value of Old Men, whose talents and memories and wisdom from experience are THE bases of all civilisation!