A recent article by Amartya Talukdar raised the topic of marital rape. David King asks what it is – a real thing, or the product of a febrile mind?
The following gives an account of false sexual assault and rape allegations, and the reasons women manufactured them, that were commonplace 120 years ago when the below article was written by E. Belfort Bax. Were the methods of evidence-gathering 120 years ago faulty? Definitely. Were some genuine victims of sexual assault disbelieved? Unfortunately, yes. Were […]
Men, those crazed and out of control beasts must be trained to override the violent instinct to rape women – so says the feminist narrative of “rape culture.” As wider culture begins to reject this feminist stereotype, John Hembling warns that biographies of those who perpetuated it will be eternally stained with the conclusion ‘there lived a bigot’.
Imagine you are accused of a terrible crime you didn’t commit. Jon Gunnarsson recounts the story of school teacher Horst Arnold who was falsely accused of rape and imprisoned without a shred of evidence. Despite being eventually found innocent, the corrupt judiciary who placed him there have never been held to account.
The current FBI definition of rape refers to the penetration of the vagina or anus without the consent of the victim. Clearly this erases all victims of rape who are forced to penetrate, generally men or boys forced to have sex with women. To help correct this definition we urge you to join us in writing to key organisations, starting with RAINN on March 15.