University of Waterloo

Leaping labia of lunacy

Some days I think that Southern Ontario has got to be filled with bottom of the barrel of Acme Fem & co activists.  I’ve seen some rather bizarre shit roll across various MHRM / MRM sites wading through the webpages but this recent one is well, out there.

This current case of crazy involves a polyester pussy posse censoring free speech and open discourse by screaming down an invited speaker. And they are from, yup, you guessed it, Ontario.

On Wednesday, Conservative Member of Parliament for Kitchener Centre Stephen Woodworth was scheduled to give a talk at the University of Waterloo. The campus group that invited him, “Waterloo Students for Life,” a pro-life organization.

Woodworth has been making the news for sometime. The introduction of his Bill 312, which seeks to define when life begins, already has the rank and file of feminists frothing at their shopworn mouths.

Right now in Canada, until a baby leaves the mother’s birth canal it is not considered human. It has been that way for about 400 years according to his website. While abortion laws changed in Canada around January of 1988, the codifying of when a human begins to have rights or becomes human is antiquated and little out of date.

Personally I think a little debate on the topic is in order.

Now before some feminist / fatboy white knight does a drive by quote mining expedition, let me be perfectly clear on this. I am open for debate on when life begins, not whether abortion should be legal.

Seems like the perfect spot to discuss ideas revolving around this subject would be a university, young minds meeting learned ones and all that. However feminists don’t share this idea, in fact they are providing the citizens of Canada and abroad with some fine examples of gestapo-like censorship, coupled with some embarrassing, self demeaning comedy.

Wednesday’s example at the University of Waterloo provides us with case study 569,932,021, 471, or, as I like to call it, The Leaping Labia Lunatic.

See, not only did the femistasi manage to stop freedom of speech, a protected right under Section 2 of The Charter of Rights and Freedoms, but they were able to do this, AGAIN, on a University campus to an elected member of the federal government.

Their modus operandi was to shout, scream act like petulant little children and as well as hold up banners clearly designed to intimidate. One of them read “If You Cut My Repro Choice I will Cut Off Yours.” It was accented with a pair of scissors drawn in the middle of the six lines of feminist rabidness.

Some of the other protesters had hoods over their heads which reminded me of pictures of a KKK rally, but the hoods were smartly colored. At least the ‘Ku Kunt Klan’  kept true to their cowardly form, uttering phrases of idiocy out loud while hiding their identity.

Where was I? Oh yeah, one member of the clitty commandos that had me almost rolling out of my chair with laughter was Mr, yup, that’s right MR Leaping Labia Lunatic.

See this knight of the ku kunt klan actually thought it was a good idea first to censor free speech, and secondly do this while dressed up as a gal’s vertical smile. And hey, if you want to call me sexist for the ‘Ku Kunt Klan’ and other pussy-centric remarks, save it. I am not the one dressed up like a giant vagina.

This shit is straight out of a Monty Python movie. The title “The life of brain dead Brian” comes to mind. They have succeeded in their search for the Holy Fail.

Mr. Leaping Labia Lunatic only makes his presence on the youtube video of this recent prime example of femistasi speech stomping for a short period of time. Ah, parting is bitter sweet Mr Lunatic, but there are more deluded people than you to examine at this display of femistasi gender dictated insanity.

I am left with a question about this “did they ever stop to consider that perhaps some of the pro lifers are not holy rollers?” I mean like whats the odds Acme Fem & co.?

At the end of this coven of crazy video one of the protesters asks the question,”Why are you concerned for his safety and not the safety of our uteruses?”

The ranting anti-religious advocate adds “How about all the people that aren’t women that have uteruses?”

See what these two members of Acme Fem & co. inadvertently did was broach the topic of reproductive rights for people who don’t have female plumbing, aka males.

The regular readers of any men’s human rights website will tell you men don’t have any reproductive rights. Men have responsibilities. That’s all we have. Feminists have set up the current laws, policies and government entities throughout first world nations to enforce it.

No say in the matter for boys. You donated 50% of the genetic material that started the “innocent” woman’s pregnancy.  We know it, or at least we claim to know it. Don’t you dare do any paternity testing in some first world nations. That would be illegal. Although its not like getting money out of somebody under false pretenses, or as some in the legal world would call it, fraud.

Remember that part I mentioned about whether abortion should be legal, brownskirts™ and when life begins? I think its high time men had reproductive rights to abort his responsibilities to a possible child. I also think a healthy, and by that I mean open discussion of when life begins is in order.

That day is coming, but we aren’t exactly speeding things along by allowing clowns in cuntsuits to shut down the discussion.

About Dan Perrins

Dan "Dannyboy" Perrins, up until a few years ago, was blissfully ignorant of what was going on. Then a series of events demanded he either grab his ankles and let a corrupt "just-us" system have its way with him or take action. He chose the latter.

Main Website
View All Posts
  • malcolm

    These people are becoming unhinged. I truly fear for people’s safety around these idiots.

  • Kristina Hansen

    Man, I miss all the fun. There aren’t any loonies like this in QC :( Oh wait… We have the PQ… Carry on. ;P

  • Pappy

    Why was protesting allowed in the room itself? Protesters and hecklers that disrupt the actual proceedings of a talk should be removed and protesting allowed outside the room or out on the street. Try protesting and disrupting inside the room during a G20 speech…see where that goes…

  • Kimski

    I’m almost sorry for having to point this out, but dressing up like assholes would have been a much more fitting choice.

    Has anyone contemplated a Valium donation rally in that area, before they actually hurt someone or themselves?

  • ImNotMraBut…

    “How about all the people that aren’t women that have uteruses?”

    How much does it cost to not waste money on people with that level of education to allow then to gain yet a higher level of ignorance?

    I do wonder at the future of humanity when I hear supposedly educated children screaming about rights and defending the right to have a pool boy clean out the gene pool. The sooner that someone invents an automatic idiot tester that prevents such people gaining access to or representation on the net the safer they will be, cos presently they are the best advert I have ever seen for reproductive rights and the need for termination upto 240 months.

    I can’t stop laughing and the inane stupidity of such people. I would love to have an opportunity to actually interview them on camera and see just how many times they can fall over their own feet whilst still crawling on the floor! They are a whole world of comedy that just keeps being overlooked.

    • Falcor

      I don’t even entirely understand that statement. Are they talking about asexual/genderqueer people? “All the” seems like a slight exaggeration of their numbers, if so.

      • Correctrix

        You’re mixing up your terminology there. ‘Asexual’ means what you might call ‘frigid’, i.e. not having a sexuality. The other term, ‘genderqueer’, is closer to the mark.

        I think the main group that activist was talking about is pre-op transmen. I don’t have the context of the conversation, of course, but I suspect that the person was trying to show off their politically-correct credentials by remembering the transsexual guys in a context where they are not particularly relevant.

  • KeanoReeves

    Under the current dispensation, reproductive rights for men may be difficult to enforce as the “woman does the task of creating the baby”. What we need, IMHO, is an artificial womb and a male pill. The combination will change the game.


      AND, add to these future necessary RR developments; easier single male adoption, and ready surrogacy for (genetic) childbirth for single males… NOW.

  • Suzanne McCarley

    I feel so sorry for that deeply damaged boy, but I wouldn’t dream of sparing him the consequence of ridicule. If by chance he is educable, it will teach him far better that his professors do.

    Danny, you’re killin’ me with your turns of phrase! You write with a razor sharp wit and we need even more of it!

    • August Løvenskiolds

      I hope that bastard can prove that the vagina costume gave enthusiastic consent before he entered it, or else he’s got some serious mansplainin’ yet to do.

    • JJ

      What has always amazed me, is how these people can defend abortion and say I am an idiot for not supporting it since forever; yet, when one of their “coven of crazy” gets pregnant and wants the child I have no say. Or, if she gives the kid up for adoption, gets paid for it, and never gets called for CPS collection if the adopting couple claims TANF.

      We all see it, these idiots desire the “right” for women to “terminate” their pregnancy if it suits them. Yet if a man wants to walk because he was trapped; “Oh, that’s unforgivable!” Off to prison with that one.

  • Codebuster

    leaping labia of lunacy… and these fucknuckles are a threat to our democracy? What have we become?

    Sorry Dan, I need to revisit this after a good night’s sleep. I can’t stop laughing.

  • TheSandreGuy

    Crazy c*nts have never been as good of a description of these lunatics as now. Literally!

  • Imdefender

    “If You Cut My Repro Choice I will Cut Off Yours.”
    …. if he had any Repro Choice …at all that would make a small amount on sense

  • Robert O’Hara

    Fucking brilliant Danny!


    You write very well Dan, thank you.
    Something tells me that you could write a pretty nasty limerick for tomorrow, posting, it being St. Paddy’s Day.
    “There once was a gal from Nantucket,

    or ‘similar’… and make it so funny it would be hard to breath… oh, go ahead… let ‘er rip!
    :-) :-) :-) :-)
    BTW, there is a whole line of vagina dresses… see


    • Fredrik

      There once was a Waterloo twat
      Who thought that his schtick was all that.
      Dressed up like a snatch
      He put the kibosh on Steve’s klatch,
      While looking like a total asshat.

  • donzaloog

    That’s one cranky vagina. Has it been to the beach recently?

  • Robert St. Estephe

    They don’t care when like begins. That does involve egotistical choice. But they do care when life ends. That is where all the fun is. The CHOICE.

    Isn’t that what all the Madison Avenue TV advertisers have been telling them all along? Everything they could possibly want can be purchased (preferably with money earned from someone else’s hard and conscientious labor). Life is just a series of egotistical shopping choices.

  • Dean Esmay

    I would have gone for “Ku Klux Klam,” myself. 😉

    • Bombay

      LOL. First there are Feminazis and now the “Ku Klux Klam”.

    • Kimski

      Effing brilliant, sir.
      I’m saving that one for later use, if you don’t mind.

      Edit: Btw, ‘Klam’ translates to ‘icky’ in danish, which just adds immensely to the snark.

    • Carlos

      LOL… the first pun had me lmao…

      This ones good too…

      You could also combine them as in Ku Kunt Klam, but I think it’s best to leave the “Klan” in since it’s the only part that sounds like a real word (ie “clan”) and implies a group.

  • Suburban Fieldsman

    I would like to wrest that costume from that boy in a swashbuckling manner and then wear it proudly on Franklin Street next halloween, …the symbolism alone would be pregnant with, well, me. FYI Franklin St. is the main drag in front of UNC. A small bullhorn might… ah well only a pipe dream.

  • knightrunner

    Awesome article. “Ku Kunt Klan” priceless. May start using that one myself.

  • Mr. XY

    Am I the only one who thinks there seems to be a major problem with the Canadian Police? Both here and at the University of Toronto they just stand there looking stupid and doing virtually nothing. The crazies are allowed to run the asylum and do whatever they want.
    Maybe this is why it’s not quite as bad in US (or am I wrong)? If these crazies pulled this crap in US they would get tazered, punched, and maybe shot by one of our Officer Friendlys. Some would be arrested and charged with disorderly conduct, trespassing, and even with assault.
    Just a suggestion, but maybe we should all call out the Canadian police who are refusing to control these situations to keep peace and order.

  • SolitaryMan

    On the plus side, if he’s dressed like that, he has absolutely no right to object to being called a silly twat.

  • chrixthegreat

    well, this brings new meaning to the word mangina.

  • Reed

    How did he get in dressed like that? Must have had a pussy pass.

    I hope refreshments were available afterwards…

  • Near Earth Object

    An analysis of what happened and is happening…

    • Carlos

      Awesome video and analysis, thanks for sharing. The headline for the first segment, “The Vagina Monologue” was inspired.

  • Robert Sides

    > “reproductive rights for men may be difficult to enforce as the ‘woman does the task of creating the baby’.”

    That task is equal to creating a turd. Or breathing. It happens automatically, despite them. Birth can happen to brain-dead women.

    Why give vaginates kudos for doing what cows can?

    A proposition:

    You and I will co-create a company. Then operations will continue in my house for 9 months, you having no say in daily proceedings.

    I reserve the right to terminate the company without consulting you during that time.

    If the company lasts 9 months, you are responsible for all bills, including during the next 18 years.

    Any time after the first 9 months I can dismiss you as co-owner for no reason, take half your investment up to that time, and force you to pay company bills for 23 years thereafter…while denying you any profits.

    At will I can file lawsuits against you that cost me nothing, but drain you emotionally and fiscally.

    Will you sign the contract…?

    • MGTOW-man

      Perfect analogy! But it is their feelings that skew their perceptions away from reality—aka, realizing how right you are with the analogy. That is what we are fighting here: many/most women’s inability to separate their feelings from reality. They think the two are one in the same.

  • Bombay

    Leaping Labia Batman!

  • MGTOW-man

    [1] “I think its high time men had reproductive rights to abort his responsibilities to a possible child.” [2] “I also think a healthy, and by that I mean open discussion of when life begins is in order.”
    —1. first, we have to find a man/men who are willing to do all the legal battling and who are fixing to have to be a parent (even if only financially), to get it to the supreme court, at least here in the USA.

    They will be shame-covered in messages like “sorry man”, “man-up”, “woman-hater”, “deadbeat” , “louse” etc.
    —2. I differ a bit here. I think the only way to find the real truth (that isn’t and can’t be “relevant”) is to be objective— which leaves out all opinions, even mine.

    The only way to find objective truth is for there to be no subjectivity inserted into the picture. Thus, nature, before it was subjectively manipulated by modern gynocentric opinions, before it was ever tampered with at all, is the only truth that exists. If wrong, else, whose truth do we accept as standard; there can’t be 7 billion some-odd truths running around.

    Thus, when searching for the truth we have to ask, what would nature “say”. Nature would have it as it is: life begins at conception. A life is human the moment sperm meets egg. In fact, we all have proven it by our very lives indeed. If wrong, what species were we before the threshold was passed that subjectively-derived conventional modern, feminist definitions of human life came into enlightened being?

    There is no possible way human life begins at any other point than conception–the full compliment of DNA.

    Furthermore, distinguishing between a human being and a person is pointless. We have seen this angle hijacked by feminists in their attempt to place more importance of a woman’s plans over the life of children. So much for best interest of the children! All they have to do is say the globs of flesh aren’t children(people) yet, then presto!….