promoting domestic violence with the duluth model

J4MB presents a Toady award to NOMAS (National Organisation for Men Against Sexism)

There’s a group of people who live even deeper in the gender feminism sewer than female feminists – male feminists. The Denver-based National Organisation for Men Against Sexism (NOMAS) is awash with these men, and claims roots going back to the mid-1970s. The organisation’s strapline:

Pro-feminist, gay-affirmative, anti-racist, enhancing men’s lives.

A pro-feminist organisation “enhancing men’s lives.” You couldn’t make it up, could you?

It would be inadvisable to look through their website http://nomas.org soon after eating a meal, but the thread that runs through it is that men have to change in order that women may become yet more advantaged than they are already – although of course that’s not the spin the website puts on it. The Reading List contains 21 books and papers by Michael Kimmel alone – an internationally infamous feminist poodle. Here’s a taster of what these geniuses believe (from ‘Tenets’):

Whatever psychological burden men have to overcome, women are still the most universal and direct victims of our patriarchy. Our organization must take a highly visible and energetic position in support of women’s struggle for equality. Our movement was born directly out of and continually nourished by feminism. Even if we could not see any pragmatic ways in which we as men could benefit from an end to traditional patriarchy (and we can see many), most of us would strongly support women’s struggle, simply because it is so unquestionably just and right. Our support for women’s rights and specific women’s issues must be vigorous and unmistakable.

Needless to say there aren’t just vile men in NOMAS, there are vile women too, presumably there to stamp hard on any early signs of independent thought amongst the men. Here’s NOMAS’s piece on male victims of domestic abuse http://www.nomas.org/node/220:

Not a Two-Way street: Men are NOT the victims of what is meant by Domestic Violence and Abuse

Just as some mental problems are more prevalent among women (e.g. depression) or men (e.g. alcoholism); many crimes are very, very highly correlated with gender. Men commit near 100% of forcible rapes, 90% of murders, etc. It is a simple fact that men are usually larger and physically stronger than their female partners. It is true that men are far more often raised to enjoy and practice fighting, boxing and wrestling skills. Far more significantly, we live in a world where men globally have dominated women, physically, politically and economically, a stubbornly-held patriarchal domination which is deeply rooted in history and pre-history. So it is hardly surprising that men are the perpetrators of controlling or violent partner abuse.

But there is an adage in journalism that “When a dog bites a man, that’s not News; but when a man bites a dog, that’s News!” So perhaps on that impulse, the national press has always had a seeming fascination with the lurid possibility of “battered husbands” and frequently run articles with quotes and citations suggesting that this is a real but hidden problem. Many of these originate from so-called “Men’s Rights” groups, which proclaim that there are just as many battered husbands as battered wives. (The problem is not seen they say because the battered husbands are always just too embarrassed to tell anyone. As if women aren’t!)

Incredibly, in response to these claims, some funding for battered women’s programs has been reduced, on the grounds that equal funding should go to battered men. More indirectly, some authors and agencies and legislators have sought to linguistically de-gender the crime, describe it in phrases like “family violence,” and obfuscate the reality that this is a crime that men commit against women. (Domestic abuse among Lesbian and Gay male couples does also occur of course.)

Are there instances in which men are physically dominated and assaulted by their female partners? This does occur, often when a man has become weakened by a factor such as illness, injury, or old age. Even in these circumstances abuse by a woman is unusual and when it does occur, it is most often motivated by self defense, fighting back and other protections. Even in these instances, the language “battered husbands” is not useful especially in light of the thousands and even millions of women known to have suffered or been murdered at the hands of a male abuser.

Anyone familiar with the statistics on domestic abuse will know most of the piece is feminist-inspired nonsense. Let’s just concentrate on this element:

Are there instances in which men are physically dominated and assaulted by their female partners? This does occur, often when a man has become weakened by a factor such as illness, injury, or old age. Even in these circumstances abuse by a woman is unusual and when it does occur, it is most often motivated by self defense, fighting back and other protections.

As we’ve repeated many times, official statistics (in the UK) show 70% of the perpetrators of uni-directional domestic violence (the victim ‘takes it’ or exits the situation) are women. Only 4% of women who’ve abused their intimate partners report self-defence as a motivation. There’s also the issue that around 300 studies have shown that compared with men, women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, towards their intimate partners.

The cohort of people with the highest reported levels of domestic violence are lesbians. What do the geniuses at NOMAS have to say on this?

Domestic abuse among Lesbian and Gay male couples does also occur of course.

It “does also occur of course.” Wow.

From time to time we present “Toady” awards to male collaborators with gender feminists. David Cameron won the award in 2012 and 2013, and the bookmakers are giving short odds on him winning again in 2014. We haven’t given a Toady award to an organisation before, but NOMAS is clearly a very worthy winner. Here’s their certificate:

Toady award presented to NOMAS

I’ll send NOMAS a link to this post and invite them to engage with J4MB if they want to learn the truth about domestic abuse or any of the other areas where their analysis is demonstrably ridiculous. We won’t hold our breath waiting for a response.

About Mike Buchanan

Mike Buchanan is a British men's human rights advocate who leads the political party he launched in 2013, Justice for men & boys (and the women who love them). He was a business executive for 30 years before taking early retirement in 2010. He's written nine books and is also a publisher. His last three books have being concerned with gender and gender politics, the most recent being 'Feminism: the ugly truth' (2012).
In 2012 he launched The Anti-Feminism League and Campaign for Merit in Business. He runs a blog demonstrating that men and boys suffer far more grievously from sexism than women and girls, The Alternative Sexism Project.
In 2009 his book 'The Marriage Delusion: the fraud of the rings?' was published. In 2014 he launched a campaign aimed at raising the awareness of unmarried men about the serious risks they would be facing if they married Men shouldn't marry.

Main Website
View All Posts
  • aecgh

    It has long been my belief that “Male feminists” – white knights, manginas, are the greatest enemy of men. Imagine a feminist movement without a single male to support them. Just imagine it. See how rapidly it crumbles?

    Without these white knight turncoats, feminism wouldn’t last even a few years. Therefore, this, calling out, exposing, shaming and ridiculing these white knights one by one, is the most essential imperative.

    Mr. Buchanan, being the veritable pioneer that he is, has once again, as usual, done something that we all shall follow. All I can say is – Well done and thank you sir!

    • captive
    • http://manamongoaks.com/index.html Ray

      “Gender based violence” is the term that taxpayer funded VAWA (and its toadies) love to throw around, when they try to label males as the overwhelming perpetrators of violence, but those liars and hypocrites overlook, and completely ignore all the child abuse committed by women.

      According to the U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services and DOJ statistics, more kids are killed by neglect and abuse in a year (1,460 in 2005), than all the female intimate partner homicides in in a year (1,181 in 2005). And mothers are the single largest group of kid killers. They have a rate twice that of fathers. http://manamongoaks.com/lumber.html

      Taxpayer funded programs like VAWA (and it toadies),, that try to use the term “gender based violence” to falsely accuse all men of all violence are nothing more than vile hate movements as shown in Witch-Hunting Males at Youtube. http://tinyurl.com/65dpzwu

  • Spoonwood

    Well done. NOMAS is probably long overdue for such a Toady award, as this video suggests:

    • x86asm

      The response from the audience reminds me of something from my childhood- sitting in a room with my peers (whom at this time were young children, just like I).

      Why is it that these women behave like young children? Cheering, pre-judging the speakes based on their affiliation before hearing any arguments from them (the Pickup Arist, MRA, and Feminist) booing, whining, yelling, and interrupting each other; whereas the men are respectful of others and dare not interrupt another speaker?

      • MGTOW-man

        Allow me to hazard a guess. Many women act, think, feel, and are like children because of two things that stand out in my mind:

        1) They have brains that are feelings-dominated, oft-irrational, highly-subjective, and oblivious to actual reality NOT being defined by how they feel about it, and
        2) They have had this difference in their brain wiring reinforced by societal competition for their good graces, ie, men who think women are the key to manhood so they lose their bearings making them look like fools, having “more” (?) sex and more female admiration but ultimately hurting all men and boys in this traitorous process.

        As equal humans, women possess the capacity for agency, but they historically have not had to use it so they lose it. It is dormant and apparently likes to stay that way too.

        Change men, change the world. Make women see that their feelings are not the center of it all, change the world.

  • Kimski

    These self-flagellating caricatures conveniently overlook the fact that boys, and thereby per definition men, are taught violence by their primary nurturer, women.
    With women also leading the statistics on violence against boys, it’s no wonder that a certain percentage of men grow up with the learned behavior, that violence against the weaker is okay.
    In other words, -you reap what you sow.

    Perhaps an appropriate label on the Toady-award should be:
    “Beaten Into Submission – and proud of it”??

    “Pro-feminist, gay-affirmative, anti-racist, enhancing men’s lives.”

    How you can claim to be gay-affirmative and anti-racist, while at the same time consistently falling back on accusations of “being gay” and “a white, priviledged male”, whenever someone else refuse to toe the ideological party line?
    “Enhancing men’s lives” is just so outright disconnected from reality, that I’m not even going to denigrate myself by commenting on that one.

    My deepest respect for standing up against these obviously self-hating dimwits, Mr. Buchanan.

  • Duke

    Many of the loudest gender-feminist males in the US do not attack all “genders” equally, they are in fact, only targeting the hetero-male “gender”.
    .
    At what point will the perversions and manufactured statistics Alliances between US gender-feminists and American law enforcement become so powerful and effective, that hetero-sexual relationships in the US become a legal liability for guys???

    • DavidicLineage

      Roughly three decades ago? lol

  • Robert Crayle

    One wonders if we could have one of the radio shows such as the Honey Badgers *hint hint* do a show purely about male feminists…I don’t think any of them give a fig about anyone’s rights or problems. They are the most self-adoring and arselicking parasites I have seen ever.

  • http://victorzen.wordpress.com/ Victor Zen (Sage Gerard)

    NOMAS is no más.

    • DavidicLineage

      Too bad girls don’t want any gnome ass huh?

      • Robert Crayle

        FOR GNOMREGARR!!!!

  • http://unknownmisandry.blogspot.com Robert St. Estephe

    It is time to break the SILENCE! The feminist narrative of the past is a a boldfaced FRAUD.

    Domestic Violence: Non-Lethal Female-on-Male
    http://unknownmisandry.blogspot.com/2013/09/domestic-violence-non-lethal-female-on.html

    Until society begins to stop lying to itself about VbW there will be continued license given that will encourage unilateral (violent women) and bilateral (mutually violent male-female scenarios) violence. If we leave out the violence against men, as some weak-minded people seem to wish to do, we still need to address the ubiquitous, but still whitewashed, exceedingly common phenomenon VbW (Violence by Women) directed against babies, girls, boys and other women.

    Break the SILENCE about VbW!

    • Duke

      “Break the silence….about women violence!!
      Stop all the perverse federal pork bloating Alliances that are serving to enable womens violence!!!

  • oldfart

    “only targeting the hetero-male “gender”.
    .
    At what point will the perversions and manufactured statistics Alliances between US gender-feminists and American law enforcement become so powerful and effective, that hetero-sexual relationships in the US become a legal liability for guys???”

    Exactly,it has been a real money and power maker destroying the nuclear family.

    Apparently the billions of dollars in Federal funding for misandry is enough to make lawyers,judges,and cops forget all about what constitutes a single moral or ethical principle,not to mention the will predmeditated denial or process,subversion of justice,and fraudulent statistic manufacturing.

    Keep preaching that truth,brother.

    “Your money or your freedom,nothing personal.”

    • Duke

      Will do sir!!!

    • captive

      “At what point” does it become a liability?

      Somewhere between 1950 and 1965.

  • Wylie2

    As the father of a daughter who’s now a teenager it’s interesting to watch the contortions people go through to deny women’s abuse.

    My daughter was the target of bullying this year for the first time, but throughout her short academic career, the bullying and abuse among the girls was so bad that in elementary school, the principal had to have a social worker come in TWICE to talk to all the girls about bullying and abuse. Now this year in middle school they brought someone in to do a special day-long seminar on bullying and abuse among the girls.

    And when my daughter was the target, the mom of the alpha girl even got involved down on their level.

    But when a woman gets involved with a man, suddenly it’s completely out of character for a woman to be abusive.

    Ultimately there’s really nothing you can do to change the minds of people who deny the evidence they see with their own eyes. That’s how effective enculturation and propaganda can be.

    Ironic, too, that one of the “improvements” they always point out that could be made to “toxic masculinity” is for men to have more empathy. Where in any of this is any empathy apparent? Also, men need to ask for help more – but please ignore that we’re going to dismiss a request for help on any opportunity.

    • captive

      Women like their controlling matriarchal social structures. The point is all males are to be subordinate regardless. Women bullying other women (or girls other girls) isn’t a feminist issue for the most part (there’s some feminist theory that states that men collaborated to turn women against one another to cause them to compete for the male’s affections and hence dis-unify them in order to maintain oppression – I.E. it’s your fault for having those sexy biceps and wearing those slightly too tight jeans).

      To be fair, you can’t really compare elementary girls with adult women. Adult women are much, much smarter and much more vindictive.

      Don’t worry, if the women involved with the bullies knew enough feminist theory – they’d find a way to blame the girls’ bullying on the Patriarchy.

      “Internalized male domination rape culture” or something.

  • roeboat72

    Being a former white night, I figure eventually what opened my eyes will eventually hit them. I was finally enlightened when I saw how my ex acted during our relationship. How she could be emotionally abusive while her sister was emotionally abusive to her own children. I saw how these women could easily abuse the system and there were no consequences, and men were disposable to them. They used them until they no longer could milk any more resources and then they would dump and move on.

    I got to see her sister parade her own children around fishing for compliments but at home she offered little love and support for them. She would scream at them for the littlest of infractions and them became utterly shocked when her oldest tried to take his own life. Yet even that episode didn’t change her actions.

    I am glad I didn’t have children with my ex, because I am convinced she would have done the same thing too to our children. Once white knights see that, there is no turning back.

    • Robert Crayle

      “White Night?”

      We should actually all start using that instead.

    • tamerlame

      My mother used to emotionally discharge at me all the time.

      I consider a female who is socially hostile to be feral. Society needs to socalize girls so they don’t grow up insane.

      Glad you didn’t breed with crazy mate.

  • Catweasel

    The “women are as physically aggressive” link at the bottom of the article is broken.

  • http://fightingfeminism.wordpress.com Mike Buchanan

    Thanks you all for your comments. Just back from a very interesting debate with Julie Bindel (Guardian journalist, prominent lesbian gender feminist) at Durham University, I’ll be doing a post on it in the next few days, hopefully with associated video. Julie’s written a lot about domestic abuse, so in my 15-minute piece I raised issues like 40% of the people reporting abuse in the British Crime Survey were men, most of the protagonists of one-way abuse are women, etc. She had the nerve to respond that the men who were reporting abuse were reporting ‘nagging’ partners. It all got a little heated at one point…

    • Cam

      “Julie’s written a lot about domestic abuse, so in my 15-minute piece I raised issues like 40% of the people reporting abuse in the British Crime Survey were men, most of the protagonists of one-way abuse are women, etc. She had the nerve to respond that the men who were reporting abuse were reporting ‘nagging’ partners.”
      ===================================================================================================================

      Interesting Mike. If in fact this was true (and it obviously is not) how about if it was just men doing the incessant nagging?

      I can tell you. The feminists would class this as domestic violence, as it would be seen as “emotional or verbal violence” that no woman should have to bear or tolerate and they would make a very big deal out of it. But if it is the woman dishing it out it is all OK.

      I never cease to be be amazed how these people like to twist things to suit themselves. It shows their complete stupidity but it also demonstrates how dangerous these types are to our society because rather than have us all live in harmony they are doing their level best to manufacture social disharmony and destruction of the family unit – which they detest. They do not care who they damage in the process.

      Thankfully more men are wising up but not those in power who should be calling out the crap when it is advocated by these destructive people.

      Looking forward to your article.

    • MonkeyBrane

      Kudos to you Mike. I don’t think I’d have had the courage to enter ‘The Lions Den’. I’m not surprised it got heated though, modern Universities are hotbeds of Feminist/ Far Left ideology.
      Male Feminist – that’s like being a Jewish Nazi.

      • http://fightingfeminism.wordpress.com Mike Buchanan

        In an ideal world I’d enter “The Lions’ Den” daily. Very invigorating. I have it on good authority that members of the Durham Union Feminist Society (better known as ‘duffers’, I imagine) were planning a demonstration outside the debating venue on Friday night, and were considering forming a picket line to discourage people from entering the building. But they called off their action because… er.. it was raining!

    • Itdarestospeak

      Well so what if they are reporting nagging? The feministas have made it quite clear that all sorts of non-violent behaviour is “abuse” when it suits them even it appears the “use of logic”

      So why doesn’t it count the other way round?

      oh yeah, I remember now…….

      • http://fightingfeminism.wordpress.com Mike Buchanan

        Julie Bindel’s depiction of men reporting domestic abuse, as reporting ‘nagging’ was laughable. I struggle to think any men would report low-level or occasional nagging as domestic abuse. That said, constant nagging is very painful for men – it’s why women do it. IT WORKS. It’s why we set up The Whine Club, with our ‘Whiny Woman of the Month’ competition. Whiny girls develop into whiny adolescents then whiny adults. Because IT WORKS. The solution is, of course, MGTOW. The more MGTOWs, the fewer men whiny women have to whine at.

        • Fredrik

          Yeah, I’m one of the MGTOW because I like myself and want to be happy. It isn’t rocket science.

    • captive

      Discrediting Guardian feminists is like shooting fish in a barrel: just start a campaign for them all to go spend a month in Pakistan so they can prove their “we’re not Islamophobic” cred – because they love to inform us on how much the feminist movement loves Islam. Honestly, I kind of feel bad for feminists who are in “The Guardian” camp. They’re either mentally deficient, willfully misguiding young women into a religion that makes the most blatantly anti-woman ideologies in western society that they call “misogynist” look like a serious advocacy of feminist ideology, or so politically correct they are probably incapable of walking in a straight line without assistance discerning their orientation.

      Though, to be fair, I’m kind of curious what’s going to happen when they spontaneously realize that Islam has only abortion in common with their cause and is deeply opposed to nearly every other aspect of feminism.

  • http://fightingfeminism.wordpress.com Mike Buchanan

    Our own link to the ‘women are as physically aggressive…’ piece.

    http://j4mb.wordpress.com/2013/05/08/women-are-as-physically-aggressive-or-more-aggressive-in-their-relationships-with-spouses-or-male-partners/

    I learned the other day that someone with the surname ‘Fiebert’ had collated 572 studies showing this by June 2012. The cohort reporting the most domestic abuse is lesbians, of course. Why, the damned patriarchy!!! No, hold on…

    • Duke

      Interesting mike, as i have read that perversions In American law enforcement are now hiding the fact that statistically the most violent relationships in America are lesbian relationships. In fact if one can cut through all the perversions and manufactured statistics alliances from American law enforcement, one would conclude that the the most dangerous place for women to be in a relationship……. is in fact a lesbian relationship!!! But perversions and pork bloating alliances keep this truth from the public, and are in fact putting women in danger because of it!!

    • Duke

      Interesting mike, as i have read that perversions In American law enforcement are now hiding the fact that statistically the most violent relationships in America are lesbian relationships. In fact if one can cut through all the perversions and manufactured statistics alliances from American law enforcement, one would conclude that the the most dangerous place for women to be in a relationship……. is in fact a lesbian relationship!!! But perversions and pork bloating alliances keep this truth from the public, and are in fact putting women in danger because of it!!

      • Duke

        Another interesting fact is that statistically the most non violent relationship in the US, is a relationship between two homosexual males.

  • OzzieMatt

    Great article. NOMAS, I can’t believe this organisation even exists.

    But I am reeling from the strength of Fiebert’s work.
    No one can ever say we don’t have evidence to back up what we already know.

    All I can say is: there is a very evil core group of Feminists who have a lot to answer for.

    • http://fightingfeminism.wordpress.com Mike Buchanan

      I’ll try to track down that figure, but hopefully it wasn;t a ‘senior moment’. From Wiki:

      Martin S. Fiebert of the Department of Psychology at California State University, Long Beach, has compiled an annotated bibliography of research relating to spousal abuse by women on men. This bibliography examines 275 scholarly investigations: 214 empirical studies and 61 reviews and/or analyses that appear to demonstrate that women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in their relationships with their spouses or male partners. The aggregate sample size in the reviewed studies exceeds 365,000.[26] In a Los Angeles Times article about male victims of domestic violence, Fiebert suggests that “…consensus in the field is that women are as likely as men to strike their partner but that—as expected—women are more likely to be injured than men.”[27] However, he noted, men are seriously injured in 38% of the cases in which “extreme aggression” is used. Fiebert additionally noted that his work was not meant to minimize the serious effects of men who abuse women.

  • http://menaregood.com Tom Golden

    Great stuff Mike. NOMAS is a deserving group. I would add that Div 51 for the study of men and masculinity of the APA should get an honorable mention. They have some connections as I remember.

    • http://fightingfeminism.wordpress.com Mike Buchanan

      Thanks Tom. Please excuse my ignorance, but Div 51 and so on rings no bells for me. Can you possibly link me to what that’s all about? Thanks.

      • The Real Peterman

        I think he is referring to the American Psychological Association,whose division 51 researches men and men’s issues.

        • http://menaregood.com Tom Golden

          Yes, Division 51 is the APA group that claims to study men and masculinity. I spent some time on their listserv before being tossed off due to my being “hostile”. The fact was that I had a very different view on issues and it was far from their feminist default and they simply didn’t know what to do with me so they falsely accused me of hostility and not answering questions. I should really take the time to write up the experience since it highlights the bigotry and blindness of today’s academes. I have considered publishing all 250 or so messages that I wrote to that list and give people a chance to find the hostility! LOL Where’s Waldo? Maybe someday I will do that.

          At any rate, div 51 is connected to NOMAS. They advertise their conferences on the list and I am sure there are mutual members of both. Paul did an article on one of their members a while back, I think you can find it here. It’s about Chris Kilmartin, a division 51 member who wrote an article for NOMAS about some men at a country club who created an ice sculpture in the image of a….naked woman! LOL You simply can’t make this stuff up. It’s a great article.

          The problem is that the div 51 types are exalted by the media, have a tight rein on academia and are entrenched in feminism so deeply that they throw out members of their listserv for holding non-feminist opinions. Hell, the guy before me got thrown out because he “mentioned male victims of domestic violence too often.” I am serious. It’s that bad.

          • http://fightingfeminism.wordpress.com Mike Buchanan

            Academics’ capitulation to gender feminism – globally – has been utterly shameful. But I guess for many it’s a choice between supporting gender feminist narratives, and unemployment? Why would a self-respecting academic not choose a more honest line of work?

          • Fredrik

            @Mike Buchanan: “Why would a self-respecting academic not choose a more honest line of work?”

            My best guess: the primal imperative to think of himself as The One Good Man. You’d think that maybe psychologists would be better than that, but no. They are just as vulnerable to ego-defending cognitive biases as anyone else, and they are actually more vulnerable to The One Good Man-ism than most, because of their elitism and pride of the intellect.

          • http://fightingfeminism.wordpress.com Mike Buchanan

            Frederik, that’s a very insightful point. It reminded me of a link we did to a New York Times piece in August 2012, concerning how very left-leaning psychologists are as a group (likewise sociologists and many other academics, of course):

            http://fightingfeminism.wordpress.com/2012/08/12/left-leaning-academics/

  • boston86

    I hate male feminists with a red hot passion. They are the lowest of the low.

    • http://fightingfeminism.wordpress.com Mike Buchanan

      Agreed. After last night’s debate at Durham Uni a young man gave an impassioned little speech about how ashamed he was to be a man. The predominantly female audience roared with delight, and judging by the look on his girlfriend’s face he was probably going to be rewarded later for his contribution.

      • boston86

        Mike-did you engage with the male loathing young man and ask him why he was ashamed? I hate the way these sick creatures are never held to account and it’s usually because they are surrounded by screeching sycophants…but tell me you said something!

        • http://fightingfeminism.wordpress.com Mike Buchanan

          Unfortunately, given the format, I wasn’t able to. But any balanced person watching the piece will think what he said utterly absurd.

      • scatmaster

        he was probably going to be rewarded later for his contribution.

        Probably with a strap on.

        Pardon my feeble attempt at gutter humor but I just could not help myself.

      • miketaurus

        by the look on his girlfriend’s face he was probably going to be rewarded later for his contribution. Very funny. Thank you for the light hearted comment :-)

    • The Real Peterman

      I totally understand, but don’t fall victim to hate. As Martin Luther King said, darkness can not drive out darkness and hate can not fight hate.

      • boston86

        I hate racists with the same passion. This hatred doesn’t manifest itself in violence or abuse. It is the fuel that drives me to write endless letters and to speak out when these bigots are on their soap boxes.

    • Duke

      They should be held accountable for “Inflaming the public” with perverse and manufactured statistics.

  • http://www.youtube.com/user/Correctrix/videos Correctrix

    These guys always make me want to vomit.

  • Andy Bob

    J4MB’s Toady Award goes to NOMAS?

    As Helen Hunt glumly remarked upon receiving her Oscar, “I am deeply thrilled.”

    There has never been a more cringe-worthy cohort of chronically weird sycophants than NOMAS. The self-negating drivel that characterizes their rhetoric demonstrates the logic-destroying effects of gender feminist dogma on the irreparably weak-minded. These folks suffer from terminal gynocentrism, which no amount of soul-searching in self-esteem workshops could ever cure.

    If Mr Buchanan’s generous award isn’t reward enough for their tireless contribution to mankind, NOMAS members can always be consoled by knowing that they receive the same kind appreciation and respect that lady feminist bestow on all persons bearing a penis – even if they’re only nominal.

    I’m referring to an incident during one of NOMAS’ 2013 conferences in which one of the organizers foolishly threw up his hands in delight upon seeing one of its guest speakers, a prominent Feminist Woman of Colour. The FWOC declared that the gesture had threateningly invaded her personal safe-space, and called security to give him the bum’s rush from the ballroom.

    Not satisfied from banning him from his own conference, the offended FWOC, who “felt raped” by the experience, recovered sufficiently to initiate a letter-writing campaign among her fellow FWOCs to have him drummed out of NOMAS altogether. She also demanded an immediate apology. I have no idea of the outcome, but I’m sure it involved an unseemly amount of groveling, penance and tears – and a jumbo box of soft-centred chocolates.

    It is anyone’s guess why any man would identify as a feminist, much less a card-carrying member of NOMAS. One thing is certain, they are well-punished for it. Feminists, more than most women, reserve their deepest contempt for spineless men who snivel apologies for existing. If they are hoping for some kind of approval, they’re in for a very long wait.

    Now they have a Toady Award to spit polish – as if Amanda Marcotte’s jack boots weren’t enough to be getting on with. A very deserving recipient, Mr Buchanan.

  • James Williams

    I think that Mike Buchanan and J4MB should themselves be given an award for having strong stomachs in being able to read NOMAS’s crass poodlism.

    NOMAS strapline: “Pro-feminist, gay-affirmative, anti-racist, enhancing men’s lives.”

    I think NOMAS is nauseating in different ways. 1) Pro-feminist and enhancing men’s lives – a glaring oxymororn if ever there was one.

    2) Gay-affirmative – if a gayman is sexually molested by a woman would NOMAS accept that this was rape? How about a gay boy? What about gay men who are victims of domestic violence. Because they are male are these creatures at NOMAS saying that it didn’t happen?

    3) Anti-racist? Do they include black males in this? Do they oppose black men being executed and given more serious penalties even if the alleged victim is female? Or black children missing out on their dads because the family injustice system is totally biased against black men?

    4) Are NOMAS opposed to men (only) going to their deaths or suffering serious harm in military conflicts whilst some of their spouses can shag who they like and then kick out their returning male spouse when he has done his duty?

    NOMAS is what it basically says on the tin – a bunch of maggots.

    • Iconoclast Dynamite

      That’s funny – I was actually going to suggest to Mike that he create a new “Slimy Maggot Award” for particularly vile misandrists, such as this self-loathing bunch of dirtbags.

  • MGTOW-man

    “I’ll send NOMAS a link to this post and invite them to engage with J4MB if they want to learn the truth about domestic abuse or any of the other areas where their analysis is demonstrably ridiculous. We won’t hold our breath waiting for a response.”

    —And please forward this to them as well:
    NOMAS is THE most shining example of men having lost their bearings, turned stupid, clinging to being duped-had-suckers who wouldn’t know what manhood is if it morphed into a mad dog and bit their noses off.

    Obedient puppetry, admiration-buying, lap-dogged, equality-mockery, chivalry-saturated, agency-robbing, and obliviousness are all characteristics of these poor men-suckers. Just wait until one or more of them are victims themselves of the very things they bleed out their hearts to foment.

    If I countered everything wrong with this picture, it would make a book!

    To those who do not like it that I shame men like this, sorry, but what I do is really them shaming themselves. If the shoe fits….

    Their actions are oblivious but not off the hook as despicably STUPID!

    Traitorous, undermining, sheer-bewilderingly asinine. Real men do THAT? Oh hell no they don’t!

    Boys, you deserve better examples of how real men are to behave. A real man has to, BY DEFAULT, protect his own sex. Clearly these goofy “men” haven’t.