Danielle Sandhu

Danielle Sandhu: Lies and violence at U of T

From the mission statement of A Voice for Men:

To promote the legal and nonviolent antagonism of all agents of misandry, from members of academe, to holders of public office, to law enforcement and other state functionaries, to popular bloggers and to corporate agents who promote misandry for profit.

As we have demonstrated over the years here, we take this specific part of our mission very seriously. There are many good reasons for this, primary among them is the fact that many of these hate driven ideologues think better of their activities when their true identities are put on display for the public to see.

We found this to be true with Simon and Schuster author Pamela O’Shaughnessy, who penned diatribes on targeted male eugenics at Radfem Hub under the pseudonym Vliet Tiptree. That nom de plume has all but disappeared from online writing as O’Shaughnessy was forced to assume other identities to keep her actions covert.

Another example was some of the women involved in a Swedish Production Company that was promoting the male targeted violence advocated by feminist murderess Valerie Solanas. We have reports that at least one of them became fearful of the public exposure and has changed her path away from the promotion of hatred and violence.

Another case involved Christine Armstrong, who works, or perhaps worked, for a battered women’s shelter, The Lighthouse, in Robertsdale, Alabama. Armstrong, under a pseudonym, used to post at David Futrelle’s blog, included the inference that yours truly fit the profile of a rapist. We tracked down her identity and posted it here are AVfM. She quickly disappeared from Futrelle’s site. Futrelle himself forbid his readers to discuss her, and an examination of The Lighthouse’s website no longer contains her name.

There have been other examples, like Creepy Bittergirl, exposed as Sasha Wiley by first Mykeru, and subsequently this website, who is now making the Watsonesque claims of internet bullying, seeking sympathy and support, like a damsel in distress, from other hate mongers.

I am sure you are getting the point. There are two general reactions to putting the light of public exposure on to these ideologues. I wish I had better clichés than light switches and cockroaches, but better to be clichéd than inaccurate.

But we cannot always count on the typical response. There are occasional examples of Periplaneta Americana that are light tolerant, and even seem to enjoy it, as well as the opportunity it presents to make them the recipient of male protection and coddling. One such specimen may be Danielle Sandhu, President of the University of Toronto Students’ Union, who was promoting a violent, illegal protest against a presentation at that university by author Dr. Warren Farrell, claiming that he defends rape, incest and violence against children.

On her Tumblr page, she claims that she “has worked to lobby municipal, provincial and federal governments for access to high-quality, public services including education, transit, healthcare, and childcare for all members of the community.”

Well, all except half. All, except men and boys. And when that half of the population dares to assert needs and areas in need of amelioration, she launches a campaign of violence and false accusation in order to demonize that half of the population back to the sidelines, where she clearly thinks we belong.

This is the kind of bigot representing the students at the University of Toronto.

John the Other provides a treatment of her activity in this video.

Also, Dr. Warren Farrell addresses the protest in his own words in this interview.

As for what we do here, things have not changed. Another Marxist feminist bigot, Danielle Sandhu, has been identified and presented to the world in the light that most accurately shows her true colors. And henceforth her actions will be monitored and reported here, as well as to the growing numbers of MRAs that reside in the Toronto area.

Unlike the ideologues we expose on this site, we need not advocate or endorse violence. What is important here is to maintain record of these individuals the same way any concerned community would with pedophiles and other violent offenders. Tis better to have these individuals in a place where they can be watched, especially by young men who attend the University of Toronto, a school that has obviously lost its way on the meaning and spirit of equality.

About Paul Elam

Paul Elam is the founder and publisher of A Voice for Men, the founder of A Voice for Men Radio, the AVfM YouTube Channel, and appears weekly on AVFM Intelligence Report, Going Mental with Dr. Tara Palmatier and monthly on MANstream Media with Warren Farrell and Tom Golden.

Main Website
View All Posts
  • Roger O Thornhill

    The personification of Princess Cupcake!

    • Roger O Thornhill

      I understand the reason why her face is up here. But Christ, do I have to keep seeing it? It makes me want to vomit!!!
      An utterly vile creature!

      • http://www.avoiceformen.com/activism-page/karma/ KARMA MRA MGTOW

        Trigger warning!

        Haha!

        We have to go on a poster run soon.

        • Roger O Thornhill

          Hi Karma,

          With everything I have on my plate, I barely have enough time to do posters etc. I’ll have to take a raincheck.

          Keep up the good work, it’s ballsy!

          • http://www.avoiceformen.com/activism-page/karma/ KARMA MRA MGTOW

            Raincheck taken. :)

  • Howard Gordan

    I don’t recall any new inductees into the Featured Offender hall of shame in quite some time. I think this person would make a welcome addition. This way all who visit this site can see her in all her glory right on the front page. This can placate her apparent desire for attention.

    • scatmaster

      I have sent a few through the register-her website but they have not been posted. I suspect my grammar and spelling have turned them off or I am doing it wrong.

  • Brigadon

    I’d like to see hitler barbie on the wall of shame.

    • scatmaster

      Barbara Streisand?

  • Howard Gordan

    By the way, here is a rather interesting video of our bigot Du Jour. In it you can hear her say she wishes to fight for a safe and inclusive campus for all. (I guess unless you are a man wanting to discuss issues affecting men and boys.)
    She also advocates for a human rights office on campus so that all students can combat discrimination and hatred. “No one should have to face discrimination and oppression” she says. (I guess she wants to show the need for such an office by displaying her own brand of discrimination and hatred.)
    Her final lie shows her desire to “build a campus that’s inclusive for all members of our community.” (Except those that don’t succumb to the feminist mantra of men/bad, women/good it seems.)

    • http://gloriusbastard.com/ JJ

      For those looking to do social activism? What the hell was Warren Ferral doing then?

      Also, her verbiage. For the love of God, I hate it when you get one of these stupid knuckleheads. Seemingly highly articulate, but a wanna be intellectual. Stringing a bunch of words together, no matter how intelligent they sound, does not make one intelligent. Some farmers from way back when may not have been abe to quote a whole women’s studies thesaurus; but they seemed intelligent when you understood what they were referring to. It depends on your character, and what youwant out of life. She can’t see that what she wants is a life devoid of compassion. Merely a cheap veneer of kindness; in reality it is nothing but fascism.

      No thanks.

      Feminism=Sexist Dummies with a thesaurus who memorize lots of words without the icky part of memorizing their meaning. sic: Indoctrination

      Fact of the matter is: using lots of big words in conjunction may make you sound smart to the uninitiated. Yet, this is the very reason the “challenge of edmonton” limits their use of verbiage. If I argued one of these “creatures:”

      Me: Sexism is wrong no matter who you are.
      Her: The inclusivity of sexist rants are epidemic in the epideral of the college’s diversity; thereby reducing women’s inclusivity in the community by threats of violence.
      Me: I think I speak for most people here (crowd cheering for her unintelligently) when I say I HAVE NO F****** clue what you are talking about?
      Her: Patiarchy is against queer theory, ablelism(?), sexism………I mean it is for sexism, hates old people, handicapped people, kittens, puppies, and makes men refuse to walk old ladies across the street or bu women 30k engagement rings.
      Me: Huh? I represent males of all ages that I feel are targeted by women like you because of the current PC culture that allows you to treat the…
      Her: As a feminist we represent all members in the communities thereby reducing the patriarchy in these communities, we respect every community, we value community between lgbt, women, children, minorities, and all members of the campus. Men are benefitted by feminism as they “suffer” under patriarchy to.
      Me: What about men? The facts are they are …..
      Her: Men have been the oppressors forever, specifically white men, they have kept women down and kept minorities down. They are islamaphobiasts, hate gay people, the disabled………..
      Me: Hold on, stop interupting me. Men have died for their families since forever; it is statistically impossible for men of any demographic to totally oppress everyone. Men have been oppressed by other men, women……….
      Her: You wait a second; it is white men who oppress black and latino men. This is why oppression of women is so important to feminism because men have been holding us down since…….
      Me: Wait a minute, you started saying I somehow oppress men of other colors? Then go off on a tangent about female oppression.
      Her: You see this is why we need an office for Human Rights so I can ensure that all students have a safe environment for them to drink beer and “not rape eachother.”

      Honestly, I doubt the debate would go anything like this. The fact is, a woman like this is a product of years of feminist indoctrination. Looking at her picture up top her smile seems very forced. As if she spends so much of her time “fighting patriarchy” that she can’t see anything else. Her movement in this video seems like this is who she is all the time. She can’t turn it off.

      If you debate someone like this; a word, a phrase, a statistic she does not approve of; and off to the races with a toddleresque temper tantrum about how terrible we are.

      She is going to make a male feminist a real happy cuckold one day!

      • Otter

        “It depends on your character, and what youwant out of life. She can’t see that what she wants is a life devoid of compassion.”

        You know what? This made me think about what it is these rabid neo-feminazis REALLY want…. and I think it’s revenge. Misplaced revenge for an imagined injury.

    • knightrunner

      Typical politician. Say one thing. Do the exact opposite.

    • TigerMan

      I’ll take your word for what she talked about because if I succumbed and watched one more second of her vomit inducing garbage I would end up slapping myself so hard I might not think its funny!
      Believe me I would rather lose my sense of outrage than my sense of humour ;)

    • keyster

      I had work lined up at a wedding a few weeks ago. Suddenly they didn’t need my services. I got the inside scoop and was told it was a Lesbian Wedding and they specifically demanded NO MALES be present.

      In the Liberal Campus Feminist’s mind “inclusive” means to include only people that agree with your world view. It’s classic Double-Speak.

    • the Tired Low Social

      i swear i’ve seen this before, has it popped up elsewhere on the site? if that isn’t the case then i think it’s when a speaker from the art institutes played

    • http://www.avoiceformen.com/activism-page/karma/ KARMA MRA MGTOW

      Check this out http://thevarsity.ca/2011/08/18/five-colleges-opt-out-of-utsu-frosh-kits/

      The students union blogs are open to all! Spam time people!

  • rper1959

    Danielle Sandhu’s public comments apart from being false and hateful, are in a legal sense slander and libel. She is lucky that Warren Farrell is a true gentleman unlikely to sue her as she clearly deserves, rather he supports her right to free speech, even if she has no respect for the rights of others. She is a disgrace to the University of Toronto, and the students who elected her to represent them.

    I would encourage a deluge of letters to the Union and University pointing out her misconduct which is not befitting her office, let alone the actions of any reasonable person and demand her removal from the position of president.

    Student Union contact details http://utsu.ca/section/1102

    The university presidents contact details http://www.president.utoronto.ca/contact

    • scatmaster

      Looks to me by that list that the bigot didn’t win the office of “equity”
      However, I have sent off an email to them with a link to this article and a screen cap of Mzzzzz Sandhu and the title of this article with a few choice words of course.

    • Astrokid

      demand her removal from the position of president.
      I am opposed to this. It reminds me of all the times people have gone after the livelihood of others for having said something offensive.. most recently Rush Limbaugh for the ‘slut’ remark. I can understand shining a bright light on the bigotry for everyone to know.. so that they themselves can vote her out of power next time. We can fight hate speech with free speech. I have seen the response letters below, but can you explain how going after her position is justified?

  • Booyah

    this woman wouldn’t know equality if someone painted it in fluorescent paint and handed it to her for Christmas.

    The mind boggles at how she cant see the fallacies and hypocrisy in her own words and actions. Smile little hatemonger smile.

  • Codebuster

    I must say that as much as I respect Warren Farrell for his pioneering work in men’s rights, I take issue with his kinder, more conciliatory view of feminism. Let me explain.

    In the clip, Warren makes reference to before feminism, when women, as nurturers, typically raised children (rowing on the left side of the boat), while men, as providers, typically raised the money (rowing on the right side of the boat). Thanks to feminism, says Warren, we now have women knowing how to row on both the left and the right sides of the boat, while men only know how to row on the right side of the boat. I take serious issue with this. Women do NOT know how to row on the right side of the boat. To this day women continue to rely on affirmative action in the pursuit of their “careers”. If one needs affirmative action in order to “accomplish” anything, then there is no accomplishment… there is only a farce and a mockery of everything that our dumb cultures stand for.

    Furthermore, women’s work is not “intellectually” oriented but service oriented. Under the feminist agenda, women’s work is an inspiration only of artificial markets and artificial, state-inspired job-creation programs that bear zero relationship to real productivity. And women’s purported supremacy in academia? How can realistic comparisons be made, for example, between women’s studies courses and STEM courses?

    To be fair, competent, responsible women do exist, but because of affirmative action, there is no way of identifying them. Affirmative action dumbs everyone down, rendering women’s real accomplishments, wheresoever they might exist, invisible.

    To put this complex topic another way, again in the context of Warren’s wording… “freeing women up to pursue careers” (whatever that means) impacts neither on women’s hypergamy nor on women’s primal proclivity for thugs. Women will continue to be hypergamous and/or thug-fawning, irrespective of whatever pretense of career incentives are foisted upon them. About the only freedom that women’s access to careers have provided them is the freedom to divorce should their existing provider become too boring. And “freeing women up to pursue careers”… is that the same as “freeing men up to be nurturers”, or “freeing men up to be provided for”? There’s no comparison. Women’s automatic, culturally-sanctioned freedom to be provided for, on the premise of women’s role as primary nurturer, controls the market. Any man who “frees himself up to be provided for” will be laughed into oblivion and ultimately, extinction. To put it another way… women are implicitly the desired sex and men are implicitly the motivated sex… any attempt to force men to be “desirable”, and thus having access to women’s entitlements, will have the same effect as putting lipstick, ear-rings and makeup on plough-bearing oxen.

    And just as contemporary, feminist-inspired markets are artificial, so too, boys’ and men’s underperformance in academia, I believe, is artificial… a product of motherhood “participatory” practises designed to favor girls and women at the expense of the more competitive inclinations of boys and men.

    Even as I once supported feminism (in my blue-pill days), the simple reality is that feminism never had a case. It’s just good old chivalry, plain and simple… in fact feminism is chivalry on steroids because it grants women all the same old privileges, and then some, but minus the responsibilities.

    I was thrilled to purchase the Myth of Male Power when it first came out, and proudly counted myself among Warren’s following, but as I now revisit Warren’s narrative, this shtick is getting kinda old. And this dingbat, Danielle Sandhu, thinks that Warren’s style is hate speech? What an idiot.

    • TigerMan

      “…as I now revisit Warren’s narrative, this shtick is getting kinda old. And this dingbat, Danielle Sandhu, thinks that Warren’s style is hate speech? What an idiot.”
      But in my view that is exactly why the attack on Warryn will not past even a superficial scrutiny – he is so Fkn NICE that it may well annoy the living shit out of those of us who know how low and myndacious feminists can be but to those not so familiar what they see is nastiness, beligerance and a bullying attitude compared to a composed mild mannered gyntle myn. :)
      * the odd use of the letter “y” instead of “e” is a semi-private joke as some of you may already know.

  • scatmaster

    the University of Toronto, a school that has obviously lost its way on the meaning and spirit of equality.

    They lost it along time ago along with all the other universities here in Canucklehead land.

  • http://www.deanesmay.com Dean Esmay

    Attacking the Mister Rogers of the Men’s Movement, Warren Farrell (which we’ll be talking about tonight on our radio show) and using violence just to stop people from hearing him shows just how twisted the gender ideologues have become.

    Anyone calling themselves a feminist who does not look at this sickening behavior and say “I actively and adamantly oppose this, this is sick garbage, I wish to fight this” should not get a pass with the “not all feminists are like that” mewling bullshit. They aren’t all like this? OK, DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT, otherwise you ARE part of the problem.

    • knightrunner

      ” They aren’t all like this? OK, DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT, otherwise you ARE part of the problem.”

      I would say ” They aren’t all like this? OK, DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT, otherwise you ARE like that.”

      Silence is agreement.

      But Im not as nice of a guy as you are. You eat kittens. I eat kittens with hot sauce.

      • http://www.deanesmay.com Dean Esmay

        “Silence is agreement” is generally something I find hard to put on someone (I’m silent about a lot of things I don’t agree with because the number of things I disagree with outnumbers the minutes of my day to a considerable degree) but at some point the NAFALTs need to be called out, they really do.

        Well, just having an acronym already does call them out. But you know what I mean.

        By the way, I have yet to either confirm or deny eating kittens, however, I am given to understand that their livers are particularly delectable.

  • scatmaster

    Dean:

    Perhaps you could invite a member of the U of T’s student council to be interviewed specifically their current VP of Equity. Of course they will not respond but you will have given them the option to.

    • http://www.deanesmay.com Dean Esmay

      Ohhhh God. You had to go and do that didn’t you?

      Fuck. Fuck fuck fuck.

      OK. If someone will dredge up the appropriate contacts, I will try. (Did I just passive-aggressively put it on someone else to look up something I could Google in five minutes? Yes I did. I’m tired. If you really think it’s worth it, you do some of the work for me, and I’ll see if I can get an on-camera Skype interview.)

      • scatmaster

        Damn: Just saw your response now.
        I will send an email to you with the contact info and perhaps at a later date and show they can respond if they so desire.

        Update: Turns out MZZZZZZZ. Sandhu is now the president of the students union. U of T has not updated their website. See Sasha’s comments below.
        What a clusterfu**.

  • malcolm

    This, unfortunately, is typical of the atmosphere in Canadian Universities. I experienced this in the 1980′s in universtity in Ottawa. A bunch of immature, overpriveledged, condescending (mostly white) young women who lack any sort of perspective on life, buoyed up by a sea of mealy-mouthed wooly toque-wearing, sloganeering men desperate for their approval. The lunatics run the asylum, all with the tacit approval of the education system itself, mostly run by indoctrinated feminists who have lost their last grip on reality.

    • scatmaster

      Ottawa and the surrounding area not withstanding.

      The University of Ottawa aided by the police banned Ann Coulter from speaking a few years ago. Say what you want about Ms. Coulter these bastions of socialist hate just cannot help themselves. Another local university Carleton University (Cartoon U) proposed by their Student Council to stop supporting the Cystic Fibrosis campaign because it was not inclusive enough. They believed it was a male “centric” disease. I kid you not. These people are really sick.

      Queens university has a language police targeting white males. Unbelievable!!!

      http://oncampus.macleans.ca/education/2010/03/23/coulters-u-of-o-event-canceled/

      http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/story/2008/11/25/ot-081125-shinerama.html

      http://rabble.ca/babble/national-news/queens-university-creates-language-police

      • http://www.avoiceformen.com/activism-page/karma/ KARMA MRA MGTOW

        Like to see them target a poster run of 400 posters!

        Actually I would like to see 1000 posters go up in one night I believe it can be done I need 4 others.

        See what got media attention was not just the message on the posters but the number of them.

        Sure two posters where torn down, at Deakin UNI I simply went back and fixed it up.

        400 posters takes me about 3 hours.

        Think of it as AvFM poster D-Day landing in Melbourne.

        Before people start nay-saying I request you look at the the two links below for inspiration.

        http://www.youtube.com/user/ilovevideo1080?feature=mhee

        https://www.facebook.com/KARMA.MRA.MGTOW/photos_stream

    • http://gloriusbastard.com/ JJ

      Since the eighties? You know, if men in Canada have been dealing with women like her since the sixties; then there is no way a guy like Lepine could have been part of the men’s movement. Literally no way. He could not have known about it; or at least it is unlikely he did. He would not have resorted to murder. He would have gotten help.

      I think that women like this Sandhu character stupidly validate that sissified murderer more than condemn him. He probably did get shot down alot, and started out as an innoccent man looking for a woman to love? Granted, he must not have had a modicum of game. If he did, the Sandhu’s of the Canadian universities would have gladly “polished” his patriarchy to the shine of metal and brasso.

      No, I think he was just a weak man, and women like Sandhu bullied him into a corner and he came out swinging. They then branded him a part of the fledgling men’s movement, a tactical mistake of arrogance it seems, in order to dissuade the microscope of public opinion away from their cruelty of men like Lepine as a matter of routine.

      Sadly, I would not blame PE or JTO or Dean for deleting this comment. I suppose it could be abused?

      Yet Sandhu is living, walking proof that Lepine was not just an isolated incident; but a cruelly isolated man. He lived in a time where he literally had no voice, and stupidly used violence to go after women in general in a terrible and uneccessary way. I DO NOT CONDONE WHAT HE DID!

      However, it might be worth looking into whether or not he was falsely accused of something? I can’t find anything on it, but I see alot of things briefly mentioning growing up in a single mother home post divorce. I don’t believe most of what else I have read yet because I have seen this sort of post-mortem feminist themed narration before. It is highly probable that his broken upbringing, coupled with an extremely feminist indoctrinated liberal college experience has been an investigative lead largely uninvestigated? His story not the truth, but a cleverly designed smear campaign. I have read articles that he did not write the letters attributed to him?

      However, the fact is women like Sandhu run anonymously all over college campuses the world over replete with their knowledge they can do whatever they want, and lay the consequnces at any man’s feet. Fully expecting that if he does not take it of his own volition; she can enlist the state to “encourage” his chivalry. They have their way with these college campuses completely unchecked. Like the women’s study professor fired from Boston College who taught only women for thirty years. Imagine dealing with women like that your whole life coming from a possible Muslim background? When you are trying to go make somethhing of yourself; and find a campanion to care about, a woman like Sandhu can throw a wrench in your plans. Eventually reclaiming said metaphorical wrench; and giving it to the state to beat you to death with. I bet she will be a wonderful “human rights” offce coordinator.

      Sadly, for feminists, men now have a voice; it is imperative for them to deny men access to that voice. Hence the violence in asinine behavior of Sanhu and others. I think on a hindbrain level; Sandhu and company understand that their priviledge is threatened. Although upon observation of their technique and articulation of the “facts” as they perceived them: this is purely an animal’s instinctual reaction. They do not appear to really be using their cerebellum much.

      Of course, after a “goddess worshipper” fills your brain with so much useless chatter, and an ocasional “romp” for “women’s rights:” what is a poor, poor girl to do?

      Apparently, go after everyone with an opposing opinion.

      My impression from all this in Canada, including the crazy chick who threatened JTO with boxcutters by proxy now has me questioning the whole narrative of Canadian feminists; and feminsts in general. They accuse us of Lepine; yet in a moments notice can get 30 beta-orbiter douches with box cutters to rabble rouse against peaceful protest and police?

      I suspect that as the mens movement grows steam; we can expect more atrocities of the English language like the SPLC release on Thomas Ball, and Marc Lepine being prominent members of the Men’s Movement. Sadly, their tactics work; fortunately, they have not changed them in over thirty years.

      Batten down the hatches boys, it looks like our situation is going to get worse soon; but I think both our camp and the feminist camp know it is also going to get better.

      That obviously scares the hell outta them.

      Good.

    • TigerMan

      “buoyed up by a sea of mealy-mouthed wooly toque-wearing, sloganeering men desperate for their approval. ”
      Very true otherwise they would all be like the geeks in the comic book store in Big Bang Theory(stop that sniggering at the back – it makes ME laugh dammit!) i.e. petrified of and no access to pussy to put it crudely.

  • Tim Legere

    It appears that Ms. Sandhu is not the current President of the University of Toronto Student Union. See the link below.

    http://utsu.ca/section/27

    Also, below is an interview with Ms. Sandhu during the event.

    • http://gloriusbastard.com/ JJ

      Good grief; Sndhu did not even come up with her wn argument in the other video. The actual Equity president is a muslim woman wo quotes Sandhu’s very argument:

      UofT is one of the most diverse universities in the country. We are students from all over the world, from all walks of life, from all backgrounds. We must unite and stand strong to ensure equity for students everywhere. If you are concerned about ableism, ageism, classism, racism, sexism, queerphobia, transphobia, islamophobia, anti-semitism or any other form of oppression. I invite you to join us in building inclusivity and challenging discrimination in all its forms.

      This leads me to believe that all of these “top notch” students at UofT are actually just reiterating what the have heard?

      Reminds me of this from American Carol:

      [youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QgEli5zAi0U&w=560&h=315

      • knightrunner

        Sorry about the down vote. It was an accident. Help a.brother out. Don’t put links so close to the down vote button. Lol

        • http://gloriusbastard.com/ JJ

          I’ll take the two downvotes considering I need to retrain again on typing from the looks of my spelling errors. I look at the keyboard, since I am developing bad habits again.

          No worries man, I thought that video highly appropiate; I’m not even a Rebooblicon!

    • https://www.facebook.com/pages/A-Voice-for-Men/102001393188684 Paul Elam

      She has not updated her Tumblr page. It still says she is the POUTSU.

      • Sasha

        Ms Sandhu IS the President of the UofT students union, and has been the subject of criticism for paying herself and her cronies inflated salaries, and allegedly slandering critics through the use of fake Twitter accounts.

        “At times during the meeting, UTSU President Danielle Sandhu and chair of the meeting Ashkon Hashemi appeared to grow irritated, repeatedly calling for order and ruling many speakers out of order in mid-speech. “It was disappointing to see at a time where students need to be united that a few members disingenuously disrupted the meeting,” said Sandhu in a statement issued to The Varsity after the meeting. “It was clear that these members were unfortunately aiming to create controversy at the meeting.”

        Hashemi didn’t permit any questions on specifics of the union’s finances. Member inquiries concerning a $200,000 increase in staffing costs and an $80,000 expenditure on office inventory were not allowed. Also unaddressed was the union’s operating deficit from last year.

        Asked for the specific cost of union-led advocacy during the provincial election, Sandhu declined to provide any specific figures and referred the student to another committee.”

        http://thevarsity.ca/2011/11/22/tempers-run-high-at-utsu-agm/

        Fake Twitter Handle Used to discredit opponent:

        http://www.thestrand.ca/opinions/fake-twitter-handle-leads-to-utsu-election-scandal-1.2806853

        • rper1959

          Thanks Sasha for this info, all the more reason we should flood the university administration with complaints about her behaviour here. She should already be on their radar and it reflects on the Universities reputation.

          • Sasha

            Yeah. And also so much for her saying ‘we demand an explanation’ on the video outside the protest, the hypocrite isn’t so willing when she’s asked to explain where her own union’s money’s going…

          • Sasha

            Thanks. And also so much for her saying ‘we demand an explanation’ on the video outside the protest, the hypocrite isn’t so willing when she’s asked to explain where her own union’s money’s going…

        • http://gloriusbastard.com/ JJ

          Typical of so called unions. I think most people who head unions nowadays are corrupt. Maybe they always were? At least the real men (corrupt or otherwise) who started unions had the balls to face real persecution for the right to work. Many actually died for what they believed in. Calling the Pinkertons anyone?

          The fact is; ever since WW2 we have been so spoiled; pretty soon we are going to be left fighting over resources. This chick is going to be a riot to watch!

          “Your ableism, and the thuggery of you patriarchal brutes need to stop harrassin……urrrrrrrghghhhh?”

          Of course, she may twilight as a hypergamous debutante when not running her college into the ground through “activism,” I don’t know. So maybe she can do more “activism” with the new thugs in her life?

          It is easy to run her mouth when we have money; if ever we become embroiled in Hoovervilles again I doubt she will run her mouth. When times are tough she is not a golden anything; just another chick clinging like a parasite to any man that will have her.

          I pity her then really; she has been brainwashed to thinking she has rights. When no man is standing there to guarantee it; if and when that happens then she will truly understand the plight of real victims around the world. Those women have no one to defend them; they have to get buy as best they can. That excuse is just a cheap cover for women here who try finding creative ways to spend men’s money. Hey, at least they are honest; unlike Sandhu.

          Just another noble cause invaded by the League of Unextraordinary Vaginas! Maybe the LUV is looking for a new President? Calling all Sandhus in the area, come in please………………..

        • https://www.facebook.com/pages/A-Voice-for-Men/102001393188684 Paul Elam

          Sasha. If you could put this down in a little more detail. I would love to run it as an article.

          If interested, just feed me a basic outline and I will take it from there.

          • Kimski

            I would do my very best to make sure that such an article was the first thing you stumbled upon, if you did a Google search on her name.

            I think she deserves that much.
            I hope you’ll extend that to finding her a nice little home on register-her.com.

        • http://www.avoiceformen.com/activism-page/karma/ KARMA MRA MGTOW

          http://www.thestrand.ca/opinions/fake-twitter-handle-leads-to-utsu-election-scandal-1.2806853

          Blog invasion time!

          FIRE AT WILL!

          Note you can’t post links in the comments but you can post them as your Handle!

  • Kimski

    With every new one of these brainwashed bigots, the media attention they get, and their quite apparent lack of understanding the words they so eloquently throw about, the need to withdraw from “civilization” and go off and live on an remote deserted island just grows stronger every day.

    Even a close relationship with a volleyball is starting to make sense. At least it won’t speak, unless it has something valuable to contribute with.

    • TigerMan

      We all need moments like that to remind us and make us aware of so much we take for granted and therefore fail to savour and appreciate, our loss – beautiful clip – I forgot all else :)

      • Kimski

        I’ve watched that clip many times by now.
        The need to see him succeed with something so basic really becomes quite overwhelming, I agree.

  • Aaron T

    Just a small thing, above JohntheOther’s embedded video, there is University of Ontario instead of University of Toronto. I must admit, I hope if I organize something similar that crap won’t happen here (University of Windsor). I’ll gauge the community’s opinion when I get my posters up this weekend.

    • https://www.facebook.com/pages/A-Voice-for-Men/102001393188684 Paul Elam

      Ontario, Toronto, Tonto, Lone Ranger, whatever. All Canada to me.

      LOL, kidding. Fixed. And thanks!

  • Fr Bob

    I think she would make a good addition to RegisterHer.com under the title of Bigot.

  • OneHundredPercentCotton

    So, here is a Youtube featuring Manju Rajendran complaining of the sexism and racism SHE suffers as a “LGBT woman of color”.

    Manju Rajendran, you may know, was the principal organizer of the CASTRATION PROMOTING Pot Bangers protest in front of the DUKE LACROSSE PLAYERS home.

    More bigots, please!

    Shine a light…!

    • keyster

      A woman….
      who’s “of colour”….
      ….and gay.

      That there’s a trifecta of diversity, which would have every Fortune 500 company in America tripping over themselves to hire her. Qualifications? They’ll find something for her to do. Director of Diversity Outreach. Nice corner office with big windows, right by the lobby.

  • OneHundredPercentCotton

  • keyster

    The Whitehouse Council on Men and Boys is a noble cause and all, but imagine if you will a group of caucasians trying to form The National Organization for White People. You’d have SPLC lawyers on them like flies on shit.

    Men and boys don’t need representation because as members of the Hetero-normative Privilaged White Male Class, they’re already advantaged over everyone else. Look around you. Who has all the money and power? Donald Trump, Mitt Romney, Rupert Murdoch, Clint Eastwood, Dick Cheney, etc.

    Yeah I understand the point, but reverse discrimination is hard to sell when you’re an extremist hateful hater who hates racist/sexist by politically correct default.

  • shmiggen

    Equality Canada has just posted Farrell’s lecture:

    • Otter

      That guy rocks. Unbelievable that anyone would ever try to accuse him of being a supporter of rape, but then again if feminists like Sandhu have shown us anything it’s that they will attack and slander ANYONE who disagrees with their ideology.

      The one part I took issue with was when he mentioned that we should be helping our boys to become men “who our daughters would be proud to love.” I know he threw it in there to give some appeal to the women present but to be honest I cringed when I heard it. Because at the end of the day we should be helping our boys to become men who are proud of themselves regardless of whether or not women love them, not setting them up to work for female approval all over again. That’s what this is all about… right?

    • http://www.youtube.com/user/MRAGreatestHits MRA Greatest Hits

      Can’t believe he’s an Obama supporter!?

  • Robert St. Estephe

    The regurgitation of Marxist feminist lies by such “change agents” as this enables the abuse, kidnapping, maiming, drugging, murder by women of women, men, girls, boys and babies. It promotes the increase in domestic violence and child abuse. There is no moral high road represented by this highly trained woman’s Alinsky-worded dogma. The preaching of this agitatator is mere Engels/Frankfurt School “end the family” “fatherhood is the source of all oppression” theory — augmented by the ubiquitous cash-hungry and power hungry “community organizer” opportunism exhibited by highly educated Marxists.

  • Robert St. Estephe

    Always watch for the word “community.”

    It is an extremely valuable tool in the arsenal of “change agents.” (Neuro-linguistic programming.)

    I try to always undermine the rhetorical use of “community,” whether in writing or in conversation. Sometimes I use it with irony. Example: “I support the rights of “members of the heteronormative victim community who have been harassed by predatory members of the anti-heteronarmative community.”

  • http://none universe

    Love this site.
    The best.

  • http://www.avoiceformen.com Dr. F

    Danielle Sandhu needs a roll of toilet paper strapped under her chin.

  • tallwheel

    Awww. She looks like such a nice person. How cruel of AVfM to… oh crap there go my white knight instincts again. Sorry about that, people.

    The things she claimed are provably false, and are clearly slander. Where does she get off making this stuff up? (I think her constantly glancing back and forth in the video are an exaggerated version of the eyes darting back and forth that people tend to do when they lie.)

    I hope that she will recognize her “mistake” and apologize, but I wouldn’t hold my breath. Otherwise, she ought to be removed from her position. She’s a worse liar than most politicians.

  • scatmaster

    http://video.money.canoe.ca/video/business/latest-videos/1742330108001/our-sons-failure-to-launch/1978872778001

    I will just leave this here.

    Question: How come Menzoid has not interviewed JTO, Paul Elam, GWW, Typhon Blue, etc.

  • http://www.avoiceformen.com/activism-page/karma/ KARMA MRA MGTOW

    Kind of OT:

    Two examples of aussie women,bulling, shaming and proxy by violence.

    http://youtu.be/MpZBUZkiISI

    • Booyah

      I saw this video a couple of weeks ago and it paints a very vivid picture. So glad you had the initiative to share it. Shame on me for not doing so myself.

      • http://www.avoiceformen.com/activism-page/karma/ KARMA MRA MGTOW

        I was very impressed with the way the young men handled her.

        • Booyah

          Yes amazing how feminist dogma contrasts reality in real world situations. It is impressive but not particularly surprising for those of us grounded in the real world I think. Kudos to you again for posting it mate :)

  • tyciol

    Men’s Rights means defending rape and harming children?

    ಠ_ಠ

    Dear Dani how do you find your opinions?

  • chris3337

    This woman or her ilk have organised this meeting on campus. This was posted on the facebook of York University (in Torornto) Men’s Issues awareness group.

    Obviously they are worried about Men’s Rights

    https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/395082_10152243388980401_411830502_n.jpg

    • chris3337

      They have organised a meeting of minds on this , with a facebook page here (AVfM is even linked , great ! )

      https://www.facebook.com/events/513609371996944/

      the arguements against MRA issues are pathetic as highlighted here “why mens rights groups are wrong”
      The comments rip the article to pieces which is refreshing to see. People are no longer putting up with this BS rhetoric.

      http://socialistworkercanada.com/2012/11/07/why-mens-rights-groups-are-wrong/

      • Sting Chameleon

        Reading that article (and some of the comments) almost made me lose my breakfast. The amount of stupidity is sickening, and the fact that they feel threatened by facts and logic is nothing but projection from their part.

      • scatmaster

        Well what do you know socialistworkercanada.com.
        Not surprising see my comment below on MZZZZZZ. Sandhu running for the NDP in the future. Sign up for Google alerts on this one.

  • Mr. XY

    Another fugly loud mouth who is going to spend the rest of her life regretting what she is saying and doing now. The times are changing. Hey Dani, this shit will haunt you for the remainer of your life. By the time you are 40, your brand of hate and violence is not going to be so trendy nor will it be tolerated, and you will spend the rest of your fugly life explaining yourself and telling people what you really meant and how it wasn’t like that. You are fucked….but you don’t believe me do you? LOL!

    • scatmaster

      We will be watching for Mzzzzz Sandhu when she runs for political office be it municipal, provincial, or federal under the socialist banner of the NDP.

      It will be fun to send a copy of her YouTube video to perspective employers or her opponent in any election she enters.

      • harrywoodape

        This one likes power more than she cares or believes in feminism. She is power hungry. I think she would go Liberal party – which is being put together for a resurgence.

  • scatmaster

    Did we expect anything less

    Perhaps you would like to ask their comment editor why.
    In light of the fact that after a quick perusal no other comment threads have been shut down in the past month save the comment thread in question.

    comment@thevarsity.ca

    • TigerMan

      Well I haven’t had time to check how busy those other comment threads were but I did see a tweet by a Varsity editor that the thread was being closed because of concern that arguments were getting a little overheated.
      I am not naive though as to think that Varsity is being strictly impartial. I think it most likely that most of it’s staff support campus feminism and are poisoned to a greater or lesser degree by the toxic packages that this ideology harbours.
      Direct attacks against them for this are unlikely to be very productive.
      I have had some productive dialogue with the editor who closed the thread after an initial tetchy start, amazingly tho it was HE who first offered an olive branch. We have agreed to meet up to discuss these issues amicably over coffee should I ever return to Toronto (there is a possibility I may go on another short trip there in 2013).
      That is not the important thing so much as his admission that he shares our concerns over the major issues facing men. He claims he is only put off AV4M etc is because he thinks we are too “sexist” perhaps in our approach. As he himself stated though – Twitters restrictions do not make it easy to express nuanced thinking. If Paul is willing it is hypothetically possible to create a format to express his views and argue his point in moderated discussion that accords each respect and equal space to argue their corner amicably or as amicably as such things can be discussed.
      Of course I would have to consult this guy if Paul would like to explore this but if willing I would be more than happy to pass on his details and help hook him up. :)
      Otherwise back burner job for the next time im sipping skinny lattes or my fav. ice green teas in some cafe in Toronto ;)

  • scatmaster

    I received a response from the provost at the U of T
    Make of it what you will.

    Dear Mr. D*****,

    The President has asked me to respond to your letter dated November 21, 2012. We do not have sufficient information to comment on the specifics of this incident, nor, obviously, do we take any institutional position on the merits of the arguments presented by this or any other group that airs its ideas on our campuses. What we can assert is our general view of free speech on our campuses. We believe a university campus is a place where difficult questions are asked and controversial discussions are conducted. It is also a place where freedom of speech, within the bounds of the law, must be respected. There are often significant challenges when speech is perceived to be offensive. On these occasions, the role of the administration is both to remind organizers of events that they must be mindful of the impact on others of the exercise of their freedom of speech, and to remind those who are offended by the content of that speech for the need for civility and respect in these discussions. We deplore disruption of events by protesters and physical intimidation of presenters and their audiences. The vast majority of the University of Toronto community understands that freedom of expression is vital to the mission of universities and cannot be reserved for those with whom one agrees. Indeed, it is heartening to see that much of the commentary around the event to which you refer seeks to engage the issues themselves, while recognizing the right to freedom of expression. We will continue to work with all members of our community to promote this way of approaching controversial issues and events.

    Best Regards,
    Cheryl Misak

    Cheryl Misak
    Vice-President and Provost
    Simcoe Hall, 27 King’s College Circle, Room 225
    Toronto, ON M5S 1A1 Canada
    Tel: +1 416 978 2122 * Fax: +1 416 978 3939
    http://www.provost.utoronto.ca

    This email may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited unless explicitly specified in the text above. If you have received this email in error, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

    • rper1959

      looks like a form letter sent to everyone who complained, ( I got exactly the same letter!) question is if they believe UT is “is also a place where freedom of speech, within the bounds of the law, must be respected.” what exactly do they intend to do to uphold that belief? Answers : sweet fuck all because they are gutless where opposing feminist bigots is concerned.

  • harrywoodape

    Standard boilerplate response. “We are uninformed but concerned :)”

  • TigerMan

    Well to be fair she the Varsity have the existing comments up there intact. I don’t know if it usual practice to stop accepting comments after a certain time on very busy threads but certainly this is satandard practice at most mainstream online newspapers that have comment sections. Newspapers have a vested interest in engaging their readers in new content. I think we should beware of looking for sinister motives where a more mundane explanation is likely.
    Just my 2 pence,.

  • Kukla

    These feminasties and the self-castrated male goons that support them likely KNOW that the mens movement isn’t hateful or bigoted. The reason why they oppose it so harshly is because if people started talking about men’s issues and the failure of feminism their ideas and ideologies would crumble, and they can’t have that.

    So, they have to “poison the well” so to speak, by saying that it’s a hate movement that supports pedophilia, incest(which is probably how many of them were conceived in the first place), etc. to make people afraid of it. Sandhu is a prime example of a dog with its tail between its legs, she’s afraid about what will happen if people truly find out about her precious feminism.

    Feminism: “Free speech is okay…as long as we agree with what you’re saying.”

    • harrywoodape

      I believe you are right Kukla. I don’t think many of them believe what they say. I wish they did because then it would be at least an honest argument. But it is not an honest argument because they repeatedly try to stifle opposing speech and engage in other tactics of control and intimidation. It is more about maintaining power and control. They aren’t so much as – hot-blooded but more like icy cold.
      My local university is no different from just about any university in the world. They all have a feminist branch. They all interconnect and work hard at influencing and exporting their poison into the communities that they reside in in terms of domestic violence, reproductive rights, family law. They have a lot of interest in PR and putting on the right face on their message to get the public to swallow it.
      The changes all take rights away from men and give the women all the power in society. I don’t think they do it because they hate men as much as they like being in control of those things and there are economic and job opportunities for these women. Also, young men in university see this and so they are also encouraged to be “feminist friendly” in order for them to maximize their chances of getting a job.
      You give somebody a $50K debt on their head after school and many will go along with anything to get a chance to get a good job.
      Unfortunately economic coercion also plays a big role in maintaining the feminist racket.

  • Neapals

    I have seen them quote this several times… “If a man ignoring a woman’s verbal ‘no’ is committing date rape, then a woman who says `no’ with her verbal language but ‘yes’ with her body language is committing date fraud. And a woman who continues to be sexual even after she says ‘no’ is committing date lying… “We have forgotten that before we began calling this date rape and date fraud, we called it exciting.”… I know this is supposedly out of ~myth of male power~ I haven’t read the book. It screams of quote mining to me but I can’t seem to find anything other than the quote it self.

    • https://www.facebook.com/pages/A-Voice-for-Men/102001393188684 Paul Elam

      I have not read it in so long that I forget that particular passage. If that is the case, and it is in the book exactly as stated, then we just have another case of feminists looking the truth straight in the eye and turning it inside out like a pair of socks. I have had plenty of sex with women that were saying no, giggling half the time they said it, while dry humping me and sticking their tongues down my throat. It WAS exciting, for both of us. Very hot, intense sex. Exciting sex, and it was all done under conditions that these morons now call a heinous act on my part.

      Call it what they will, it was still hot sex, enjoyed by both of us with consent that was delivered in a way to satisfy both of is.

      Sandhu and others like her just so offended by actual human nature that they concoct a fantasy of what humans are like and attempt to shove that down the throats of men, while encouraging women to exploit it for all it is worth.

    • Astrokid

      Full quote posted on reddit.
      If a man ignoring a woman’s verbal ‘no’ is committing date rape, then a woman who says `no’ with her verbal language but ‘yes’ with her body language is committing date fraud. And a woman who continues to be sexual even after she says ‘no’ is committing date lying. “Do women still do this? Two feminists found the answer is yes. Nearly 40 percent of college women acknowledged they had said “no” to sex even “when they meant yes.” In my own work with over 150,000 men and women – about half of whom are single – the answer is also yes. Almost all single women acknowledge they have agreed to go back to a guy’s place “just to talk” but were nevertheless responsive to his first kiss. Almost all acknowledge they’ve recently said something like “That’s far enough for now,” even as her lips are still kissing and her tongue is still touching his. “We have forgotten that before we called this date rape and date fraud, we called it exciting. Somehow, women’s romance novels are not titled He Stopped When I Said “No”. They are, though, titled Sweet Savage Love, in which the woman rejects the hand of her gentler lover who saves her from the rapist and marries the man who repeatedly and savagely rapes her. It is this “marry the rapist” theme that not only turned Sweet Savage Love into a best-seller but also into one of women’s most enduring romance novels. And it is Rhett Butler, carrying the kicking and screaming Scarlett O’Hara to bed, who is a hero to females – not to males – in Gone With the Wind (the best selling romance novel of all time – to women). It is important that a woman’s “noes” be respected and her “yeses” be respected. And it is also important when her nonverbal “yeses” (tongues still touching) conflict with those verbal “noes” that the man not be put in jail for choosing the “yes” over the “no.”

      This new vid has interviews with the protesters.

  • Lovekraft

    The Canadian media is so far up feminist/PC butt that it sees the world through its brown-stained lens.

    No point in thinking things will get easier in terms of the Progs backing off or moderating their campaign.

    Recent poll of Canadians of Chinese ethnicity showed an overwhelming support of Obama. This would likely extend to other visible ethnic groups up here. Demographics and the power of violent, intimidating protest are making Feminists/Progressives even more brazen.

  • Tawil

    Here is a commentary from the year 1913 analyzing the practice and type of violence displayed by the suffragettes, behaviour continued to this day by feminists like Danielle Sandhu:

    The Suffragettes’ Policy of Inane Violence

    by E. Belfort Bax

    [start quote] There is another falsehood we often hear by way of condoning the infamous outrages of the suffragettes. The excuse is often offered when the illogical pointlessness of the “militant” methods of the modern suffragette are in question: “Oh! men have also done the same things: men have used violence to attain political ends!” Now the fallacy involved in this retort is plain enough.

    It may be perfectly true that men have used violence to attain their ends on occasion. But to assert this fact in the connection in question is purely irrelevant. There is violence and violence. It is absolutely false to say that men have ever adopted purposeless and inane violence as a policy. The violence of men has always had an intelligible relation to the ends they had in view, either proximate or ultimate. They pulled down Hyde Park railings in 1866. Good! But why was this? Because they wanted to hold a meeting, and found the park closed against them, the destruction of the railings being the only means of gaining access to the park. Again, the Reform Bill riots of 1831 were at least all directed against Government property and governmental persons – that is, the enemy with whom they were at war. In most cases, as at Bristol and Nottingham, there was (as in that of the Hyde Park railings) a very definite and immediate object in the violence and destruction committed – namely, the release of persons imprisoned for the part they had taken in the Reform movement, by the destruction of the gaols where they were confined. What conceivable analogy have these things with a policy of destroying private property, setting fire to tea pavilions, burning boat-builders’ stock-in-trade, destroying private houses, poisoning pet dogs, upsetting jockeys, defacing people’s correspondence, including the postal orders of the poor, mutilating books in a college library, pictures in a public gallery, etc., etc.? And all these, bien entendu, not openly and in course of a riot, but furtively, in the pursuit of a deliberately premeditated policy! Have, I ask, men ever, in the course of the world’s history, committed mean, futile and dastardly crimes such as these in pursuit of any political or public end? There can be but one answer to this question. Every reader must know that there is no analogy whatever between suffragettes’ “militancy” and the violence and crimes of which men may have been guilty. Even the Terrorist Anarchist, however wrong-headed he may be, and however much his deeds may be deemed morally reprehensible, is at least logical in his actions, in so far as the latter have always had some definite bearing on his political ends and were not mere senseless “running amuck.” The utterly disconnected, meaningless and wanton character signalising the policy of the “militant” suffragettes would of itself suffice to furnish a conclusive argument for the incapacity of the female intellect to think logically or politically, and hence against the concession to women of public powers, political, judicial or otherwise. [end quote]

    Source book: ‘The Fraud of Feminism’ by E. Belfort Bax, Published 1913

  • http://pinterest.com/zetapersei/male-privilege/ Perseus

    Projectile vomit in Danielle Sandhu’s lying, duplicitous, smirking and all around filthy repugnant fucking face. Cockroach.

  • BrundleKev

    At the end of the day (and I’m going to get a lot of raised eyebrows for this without an explanation) Sandhu is the best thing that could ever happen to us since the formation of Femen or Watson. Watson was the catalyst that sparked a fire in the hearts of men and women who believe that feminist diatribe is not only factually inept and aims at the infantilization of women but is also down right hateful and violent to the extreme. Femen is self explanatory.

    Sandhu is that next push forward that we need. Her blatant misrepresentation of what the movement really is, what it supports and lack of any attempt to have open dialogue with Farrell is a good example of what feminism is like: Spouting verbal diarrhea at anyone who disagrees with her world view, which she constructed in an echo chamber.This woman is practically a boon from the gods (I personally credit Odin) because with people like her, Sasha Wylde and Watson and the plethora of other bigoted hate mongers, we now have a trifecta that can symbolize just what we are fighting against.

    And why do I sound glad, hell even happy? Because a switch was flipped and it suddenly made sense to me why John Laughs so much.

    This shit is ridiculous.

    Almost comical even. Its like if the crazy homeless guy that walks around with a sign that says “The End Is Near” received funding from the federal government. Do I have any intention of belittling the men who have had their lives destroyed by feminism and the institutions that it infects? No. Those men deserve every bit of compassion and support they can get, as much as Thomas Ball helped society notice men’s issues, I am averse to the idea of someone having to have their life annihilated literally and figuratively, in order for folks to wake up.

    But its like watching Daffy duck claiming that ducks and other water fowl are more egalitarian than rabbits. The problem when he starts talking about hunting the rabbits to extinction. My laughter ends where a message of violence and genocide begin.

    And this is why I am an MRA. We speak and practice non-violence. I have no doubt that many of the people here would say violence is only necessary in the face of being preyed upon, but I am proud of the fact that these individuals would back that attitude up by not stooping to the actions of the “Protesters” (Morans).

    • http://www.deanesmay.com Dean Esmay

      I would like to agree with you. Except those that didn’t ignore Ball’s suicide called him a terrorist. He was ignored. So far as I know we’re the only ones who gave him any notice at all.

    • Otter

      It was Loki. I sent him a thank-you note.

      • BrundleKev

        Ah thanks for that. How’s he doing? Last time I saw him he got tossed around by the hulk and embedded in concrete

        • Otter

          No prob. He’s good, handling vendettas and all that.

  • lugger2010

    Is it just me, or does D.S bear a striking resemblence to Debbie Wasserman-Schultz? With a different hair colour, but the same level of shit between her ears!

  • mongo

    It’s getting very hard to visit this site, greeted as I am with the full facial of Sandhu. She looks like a camel wearing a wig.

    I’m looking forward to the next story that has a replacement image. No matter how bad.

    • Bombay

      ” She looks like a camel wearing a wig.”

      That’s it! I knew something was not right, but could not put my finger on it. I bet there is a camel toe if the picture went down that far… LOL

  • scatmaster

    Agree with you about Sandhu but it makes my convictions even more rigid.

    Penis.

  • Robert St. Estephe

    AVfM Writers Alert:

    Check out this new post on The Unknown History of MISANDRY. It gives a link to an important article (pdf) written by a forensic psychologist and a criminal trial attorney and offers a superb overview of new research on psychopathy in violent women. If you are an MRA writer you cannot afford not to read and cite it.

    http://unknownmisandry.blogspot.com/2012/12/the-last-frontier-myths-female.html

    Have fun! — “Resistance is victory”

  • http://www.youtube.com/user/MRAGreatestHits MRA Greatest Hits

    I believe these claims would have stemmed from the old scum bag Liz Katz who launched these smear campaigns against Dr Farrell after a misprinted quote many years ago.

  • equalright

    Why wasn’t she arrested for hate crime?