Men at Work

Pray men never take a day off

What would happen if no men showed up for work today?

Yesterday’s post got me thinking about what would happen if no men showed up to work today.  For certain, the trains would stop running.  But before we get into that, I want to tell you a bit about how I came to be – how I came to think the way I do.

I credit my father, first and foremost.

My father failed in so many ways, but one thing he did perfectly was provide. He could coax food out of the barest patch of earth; he could collect a swarm of wild bees and turn them into gallons and gallons of honey; he could take a bush and make it flower; he could take a cow or a goat or a chicken and make the foolish creature love him. My childhood was blighted by religious-based violence centered on the concept of breaking a child’s will so they might better accept the will of God, but that is not the reason I am atheist. If God had been presented to me in a better light, someone who wasn’t keen on beating children unconscious, I still don’t believe I would be one of the faithful. God makes no rational sense to me.

http://judgybitch.com/2013/06/16/first-i-feared-him-then-i-loathed-him-then-i-forgave-him-and-now-i-take-care-of-him-the-story-of-my-father-and-me/

And if I am one thing, it is rational.

What my father did was instill indelibly in my mind that his role was to provide. I never thought of that in terms of love. Only in terms of material goods, which amounted to food and shelter and clothing in our sparse, dirt farm existence, and my Dad was a genius at providing those things. My mother and I turned the goods of his labor into “value-added” products, to be certain, but we would have had no flour to mill, no butter to churn, no eggs to collect, no firewood to burn, no cookies and cakes and breads and loaves to sell without him.

My most basic understanding of men is that they keep you from starving or freezing to death.

My three brothers played a key role in that they made me appreciate my chores were so much easier. At no point would I have ever traded churning butter or kneading bread with pitching out stalls or baling hay.

From my brothers I learned that men do the hard, shitty work, and tedious is nothing compared to physically brutal.

My husband’s grandmother played a curiously central role in who I am, too. The Queen was the sort of woman who showed up for Sunday dinner dressed in elegant suits with her hair perfectly coiffed and pantyhose and heels and lipstick exquisitely applied, and I really, honestly, expected her to hate me with my worn denim and flannel shirt and practical flat shoes and penchant for the saltier forms of the English language.

But she didn’t.

While Mr. JB and I were still dating, she gave me two pieces of advice that are with me to this day.

Friends of the family were expecting and everyone was all excitement and anticipation, which is utterly lovely. A discussion about the mother and working and how to get the baby sleeping through the corporate night ensued, and the Queen blessed me with two morsels of wisdom.

On the subject of maternal guilt, she said, “People hardly ever feel guilty about doing the right thing, now do they? Let guilt be your compass, letting know you are headed in the wrong direction”.

And gazing upon a sturdy tome of Popular Childcare Manual, she said, “Honey, the baby IS the book. If 50 000 years of evolution isn’t good enough for you, then I don’t know what is. You do what the baby tells you to do and you can’t go wrong. It’s important to have an open mind about scientific advances, but not so open your brains fall out onto the sidewalk.”

The Queen passed away before our first child was born, and I will never forget the look on her face when we left her in the hospital, after a devastating stroke left her immobile and uncommunicative. She was tied to a bed with her hair disheveled, wearing one of those awful gaping hospital robes, and the look in her eyes was so very clear:

No. Please no. Please kill me. I do not want to live like this.

And I knew then I loved her. The Queen was gone, although her body was present. I would have killed her, had the law permitted it.

Obviously, I didn’t.

It made me realize that even though the Dowager, the Queen’s Daughter and Mr. JB’s mother has been no peach to deal with, I will never let her spend her last years in a home with messy hair and crinkled clothes. I won’t kill her, obviously, but she will spend her last moments looking like herself, surrounded by the people she loves and no “career” in the world will make her comfort and care irrelevant to me.

And obviously, the same goes for Mr. JB’s father, and my own. They will end their days in the company of those they nurtured into love, no matter how clumsily they effected the emotion.

Mr. JB’s mother and grandmother made me realize that the single most important thing I can contribute to the world is love. If every family made loving one another a priority, then the bonds of family would become the single most important “wealth” we can pursue. It used to be that way. It can be that way again. But families aren’t families without men.

And that is where we have gone off the rails.

The birth of my son is what brought that home to me forcefully. Our first child was a fearful, cautious child by nature. She was born clinging to me and it took more than a year before she stopped freaking out every time the phone rang. Her baby brain took any sudden sound to mean the world was surely coming to an end, and she responded appropriately: by screaming her head off.

LittleDude is so totally different. He was born calm and curious and totally open to anything the world had to throw at him. It took a long time before Pinky would let Grandma hold her for any length of time, but LittleDude was happy as long as there were warm arms around him.

As a toddler, he would go up to any man in the park, and ask to be picked up when he got tired.

“Daddy, pick me up”. He called them all “Daddy”.

I used to joke with my husband that I was the “single mom whose kid got no male attention” at the park, because LittleDude just loved men and he showed no fear of them whatsoever. He would happily snuggle up with the homeless guy with the puppy, which forced me to face some uncomfortable truths.

I would try to coax LittleDude away from these men, who never behaved in any way that alarmed me, other than simply being men. Who were they? I don’t know. War vets. Chronic alcoholics. Men whom society had discarded, and the confusion I could see in my son’s face when I would try to pull him away made me examine where I was getting my ideas from.

I’ve never been the hysterical “someone is gonna kidnap my child” sort of person. That happens so rarely, it’s not a rational belief. It would make more sense to worry that he might be struck by lightning or swept away by a tornado. I was afraid of those men because they were men.

And I didn’t want my son to grow up thinking that men are something bad. I lived through parental alienation and had the poison of feminist inspired man-hate poured into my soul every day, thanks to my mother, and I refused to let her anger and bitterness and venom affect my life.

So that is how I began.

Commenters have often mentioned that if men didn’t show up for work one day, the entire world would screech to a halt, and today, using data from the US Department of Labor, I want to take a look at just how true that is. Hearing about “male privilege” is so common in the media, but what is hardly ever mentioned is just how many of our own privileges are a direct result of the work that men do.

Perhaps the reason men have historically had the privileges they do is because they EARN THEM BY MAKING OUR LIFE POSSIBLE?

Just a thought.

And in the same breath, women have historically had the privileges they have because they CREATE LIFE.

Modern, feminist inspired liberal democracy has destroyed women’s role, by and large, with plunging birth rates across the developed world, but they cannot destroy men’s traditional work, or we all perish. What they want is for men to do the work silently. With no acknowledgement. For no reward.

There’s a word for that: slavery.

Let’s see what happens when the slaves revolt, shall we?

All information taken from Bureau of Labor Statistics, United States Department of Labor, 2013, except where noted.

http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.htm

First up, the entire power grid is down. 100% of power plant operators, distributors, and dispatchers are men. Now, it’s possible that there are a few women working in these occupations, but however many there are, they do not make up even 1% of the total workforce, so statistically, 100% of the workforce is male.

91% of the nation’s electrical engineers are men, and if they don’t show up for work, there is no one to monitor and manage the nation’s electrical supplies. Assuming some automation (designed by men, naturally) kicks in for the day, we had all better pray there are no problems. 97.6% of electrical power line installers and maintenance workers are men.

Lights out, ladies and gentlemen.

Don’t bother turning on your taps, either. Or flushing your toilets. 95.5% of water and liquid waste treatment plant and system operators are men.

Think you might be able to get out-of-town for the one day the men don’t show up?

Think again.

Planes are out.

95.9% of aircraft pilots and flight engineers are men. If you happen to find a plane with a female pilot, don’t get too excited. 98.4% of aircraft mechanics and service technicians are men. You can, however, be assured of your comfort as you sit on a pilotless aircraft that has no mechanic for pre-flight clearance, because 77.6% of flight attendants are female.

Should you be lucky enough to find a female pilot and a female technician to clear you for take-off, you still have some praying to do. Statistically, 0% of air traffic controllers and airfield operations specialists are women.

http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.htm

Of course, that doesn’t mean there are ZERO ladies working in air traffic control. There just aren’t enough to constitute even 1% of the workforce.

Trains, of course, are also out.

100% of locomotive engineers and operators are men, as are 100% of the workers who operate railroad brakes, signals and switches. 94.4% of railway yardmasters are men, but if you chance upon a female yardmaster, it won’t help you much. She can’t operate the trains.

You might have better luck with bus drivers, almost half of whom are women.

But the streets are likely to be chaos. And there won’t be anyone on hand to help you navigate that.

87.4% of police and sheriff’s patrol officers are men. 96.6% of firefighters are men. 68.8% of Emergency Medical Technicians and Paramedics are men, so if it all goes tits up and you get hurt, there’s a small chance you might make it to a hospital.

I hope you don’t get too badly hurt, though. 65.7% of all surgeons are men.

Maybe you should just work from home? In the dark, mind you. With no running water.

Uh-oh. Looks like that might be a problem, too.

For all computer and mathematical occupations combined, 74.4% of the workforce is male. Computer network architects, who design and implement all our computer based communications systems are 91.9% men. And 94.2% of radio and telecommunications equipment installers and repair technicians are men.

Looks like that plan is fucked.

Hope it doesn’t get too hot, or too cold the day men don’t show up for work. Even if you had power, which you don’t, you would be hard-pressed to get anyone in to take a look at your wonky air-conditioner or furnace.

98.4% of heating, air-conditioning and refrigeration mechanics and installers are men.

Oh well. Guess you’ll have to mosey on down to the local café, which has no power either, but what’s logic and consequence anyways? Be careful when you step over all that accumulating garbage! Remember that most EMTs are men, and they’ve taken the day off. Don’t want to get hurt now.

Most garbage collectors are men, too – 93.4%, to be exact.

You’ll need to stop at the ATM first, for a little cash injection.

Oops. Don’t bother.

The machine hasn’t been filled with money today. 81.5% of security guards and gaming surveillance officers are men. It’s unlikely the banks would be functioning anyways, with no men at work.  72.1% of all securities, commodities and financial services sales agents are men. 72.6% of the nation’s CEOs would be taking the day off, along with 70.9% of all the general and operations managers.

Don’t count on getting a weather report today. Statistically, 0% of the nation’s atmospheric and space scientists are women.

Actually, don’t plan on acquiring pretty much anything today. The workers in the entire production, transportation and material moving occupations are 78.2% men. Not only will no goods be moving on the day men go on strike, they won’t be made, period. 82.4% of all the industrial production managers are men.

Nothing will be built or extracted from the earth in terms of raw materials. 97.5% of that workforce is male.

Nothing will be installed, maintained or repaired. 96.8% of that workforce is male.

If men took a collective day off, we would instantly be without power, without the means to communicate, without protection, without water, without trucks bringing us the food and products we take for granted, because men are the ones who provide all those things.

Where in our culture do we EVER see that acknowledged? If women took the day off, with the sole exception of NURSES, nothing would happen. No one would die. The world would continue to function. The hair salons and primary schools and retail clothing stores would close, and the male management structure would have to find some way to answer their own phones for a day, but essentially, nothing would happen.

You will often hear feminists barking on about male privilege, usually in a well-lit room, comfortably warm, with her iPhone close at hand, buzzing with updates from her latest #mensuck Twitter feed, with zero awareness that every single one of those luxuries is provided by men.

Male privilege is the idea that men have unearned social, economic, and political advantages or rights that are granted to them solely on the basis of their sex, and which are usually denied to women. – from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Male_privilege

Unearned.

UNEARNED?!?

The Department of Labor says otherwise, bitch. It is women who have failed to earn their privileges. We live in a world powered and created and maintained by men, and yet feminists have created a whole philosophy and ideology that insists women and men are equal.

We are not equal.

We do not need to be equal.

http://judgybitch.com/2013/02/05/the-genius-of-women-or-the-capacity-to-love-others-more-than-you-love-yourself/

We can’t be equal.

What we can be is grateful.

And we can pray men never, ever take a day off.

Lots of love,

JB

About Janet Bloomfield (aka JudgyBitch)

Janet Bloomfield has an undergraduate degree in Film Theory and she has read most historical and current feminist theory. No, she doesn't need a dictionary. She was banned from Twitter for creating the hashtag #WomenAgainstFeminism, which continues to flourish without her presence. She has an MBA and a rewarding career as a wife to her husband of 15 years and a mother to their three children. She uses her spare time to bake cookies, blog at www.judgybitch.com and she cares passionately about the well-being of women and girls and men and boys around the world.

Main Website
View All Posts

Support us by becoming a member

AVFM depends on readers like you to help us pay expenses related to operations and activism. If you support our mission, please subscribe today.

Join or donate

Sponsored links

  • Bewildered

    Men have not stopped working because miracle of miracles there are still women like you around,who are genuinely strong [not “EMPOWERED ©”] and SANE.

    You will often hear feminists barking on about male privilege, usually in a well-lit room, comfortably warm, with her iPhone close at hand, buzzing with updates from her latest #mensuck Twitter feed, with zero awareness that every single one of those luxuries is provided by men.

    ROFLMAO ! ROFLMAO! ……………….. ROFLMAO!

  • Shrek6

    Well said JB and thank you for sharing the story about you and your father.

    I would however, like to add just a couple more to the list, which are more along the lines of inventions than what would be lost in one day.

    I wonder if these feminists ever considered who invented and who makes, the bras and knickers they wear, or even the tampons and sanitary napkins they use?

    That is what shits me the most about women today and I mean somewhere between 95 and 100% of women. They all take men for granted and abuse the obvious privilege they have, at being treated so bloody well by men.

    Men have invented, created and produced all that they have, specifically for their women and children. And just a bit for themselves.

    For me, I would love to see men take that day off. In fact, I would love to see men all over the earth, take a whole week off. And it would serve women right, when the whole of humanity falls into chaos and almost annihilation.
    No, I do not seriously espouse annihilation. It’s just a thought.

    To see women suffer so terribly, that they renounce their feminist beliefs, plus the traditionalists renounce their male disposable attitudes and actually get off their fat arses and start working hard, shoulder to shoulder, with the men.

    And of course none of that will happen, because men will never see women and children suffer like that.

    • John Narayan

      ” They all take men for granted ”

      Yea, and who fault is that?

      95% of men offer themselves as doormats…

      The most important word a man can say to a women is no.

      • Porquemada

        Absolutely. If there’s one thing men seem unable to do nowadays, it’s to “Just Say No”, and stick to it.

        • John Narayan

          No means No!

          Hahahah!

      • Shrek6

        Amen to that John!

  • ComradePrescott

    I should have gone to bed earlier, but I couldn’t stop reading your articles for a bit. You’ve got a good hook in me as a reader. I like your style!

  • Nezumi

    Makes me wonder how the world would survive if feminists realized their dream of a 1% male society. Would there even be enough men to do all these jobs that women obviously don’t want to do? (I don’t see feminists fighting to get women into jobs as sewer workers.. I can’t image why.)

    • http://gloriusbastard.com/ JJ

      God help’em if they ever find a way to succeed in short order. I give their Buddhist crystal drum-humming and drum beating lezbo menagerie short lived, literally a week at best, until they look around and go oh shit…what do we do now?

      I seriously doubt that the human race would not go into extinction!

    • http://www.menbeproud.org Robert Brockway

      I think the feminists vaguely assume that the men will invent all of the devices necessary for their own obsolescence and then quietly get out of the way. The idea that development of new machines makes humans redundant is known as the “Luddite fallacy”. It’s nonsense. New technologies both destroy and create new jobs. Men do the dirty and the dangerous jobs today as they always have. Technological advances have created whole new classes of dirty and dangerous jobs. This will continue as long as the human condition remains substantially the same as it is today.

  • Redfield

    Always enjoy your articles JB, wonderfully written (again). For me having two sisters that still call me when they don’t want to get their hands dirty with uncomfortable decisions, or from my experience with marriage, an ex from the same cohort, talking responsibility for your life and actions, being independent still seems to be out of reach of the many women!

    Of women who seem to progress thru life without the weight of responsibility on their shoulders (as they co-opt it out to a male) is grievous and burdensome to that male! I can remember a time when things weren’t as bat shit crazy as they are now …. But all our walks through life are different! What did Helen Reddy say? “if I have to, I can do anything, I am strong, I am invincible ….” well the defining word there is “IF” and I believe Helen Reddy’s words from the seventies are correct, but the female entitlement that goes hand in hand with modern Western Culture puts the hard tough dangerous work back to men ….

    Men should go on strike just to get the lazy and crazy out of their lives and off their collective backs, and for no other reason! I never see a shortage of older men 60 plus walking past me with brows deeply furrowed, bodies worn out! Time to share the heavy lift as far as I can see, no more “IF” but more “have to” … poney(?) up girls the beauty pageant is over, we want half of what you’ve got, (another seven years of life expectancy), hard work does kill you … and there are things in this world that are not worth dying younger for anymore ……

    • Redfield

      A footnote to my post:

      When I was fifteen I used to “go bush” and visit relatives (mother’s side of the family), on one occasion a school mate and I decided to go for a swim in the local river, my Aunty came screaming down from the homestead in a beat up four wheel drive Land Rover, sat above us on the embankment with a 303 rifle across her lap. When we got out she pointed out two croc’s a hundred metres down the river on a sandbar … my point is, this woman could put a “round” up a gnat’s arse at 100 metres, she could do almost anything her husband could do and was a better shot than my uncle! See the further West you go in this country the more competent the women get, because they have no choice but to do what they have to do!

      I have lived briefly on Aboriginal missions and the women there have become in many instances the community leaders and are something to behold! Their integrity, competence, and outlook on life is vastly different from your average walk by’s in the city.

      There are still fantastic Aussie women here that would have those snivelling fat arsed, big mouthed femtards (especially in Canada) for breakfast … So Helen Reddy was correct with the “I can do anything” line … I am all for cutting down a woman’s choice in cherry picking an easy lifestyle ….
      Apologies for a few typo’s in the previous post!

  • http://www.genderratic.com/ Jim Doyle

    JB, there has been this meme going around for decades now that men are pretty much superfluous. Fish and a bicycle and that sh*t. This is the first time I have seen anyone actually lay out the numbers on how superfluous we are not. Well done.

  • Kimski

    Imagine that you had a huge scale weight and you placed every book and article on feminist theory, along with all the world’s feminists, on one side of the scales.
    All it would take to get the other side of the scales to go down with a *BOOM!* would be this article printed out on a single piece of paper.

    100 years of feminist theory would be eradicated and loose all meaning instantly, as the world came to a grinding halt.
    All that would be heard, above the roaring silence left behind, would be a united: “WTF just happened?!” from billions upon billions of women.
    I’m sure that somewhere there will be a man humbly raising his voice to answer that question:

    “We’re done and the time has come to put your money where your mouth is, ladies. Have fun with the priviledge.”

  • Tim Legere

    Anyone remember the 1985 movie “Mad Max – Beyond Thunderdome”?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hgq4w4dqKsU

    There is a scene (see below for the exchange) between Auntie Entity (played by Tina Turner) and Master/Blaster (played by Angelo Rossitto – the Master) as to who runs the post apocalyptic Bartertown.

    Auntie Entity is Bartertown’s Administrator/Leader (and staunch feminist) who lives safe in her luxurious “digs” while Master/Blaster (a duo entity of a little person and behemoth but mentally challenged man) runs the dark and unpleasant underground that produces all the energy (i.e. from pig manure).

    Here is my favorite exchange in the movie:

    Auntie Entity: [the Blaster has reduced Bartertown’s power supply] For God’s sake, what now?

    The Master: Who run Bartertown?

    Auntie Entity: Dammit, I told you, no more embargos.

    The Master: More, Blaster.

    [the Blaster puts all power out]

    The Master: Who run Bartertown? Who… run… Bartertown?

    Auntie Entity: …You know who.

    The Master: Say.

    Auntie Entity: Master Blaster.

    The Master: Say loud!

    [the Master turns on the town loudspeakers]

    Auntie Entity: Master Blaster.

    The Master: Master Blaster… what?

    Auntie Entity: Master Blaster runs Bartertown.

    The Master: Louder!

    Auntie Entity: Master Blaster runs Bartertown!

    The Master: Lift embargo.

    [the Blaster turns power back on]

  • Fish Enigma

    THANKS….I MEAN IT…

  • scatmaster

    Read JB everyday.
    Read this article three times.

    • Tim Legere

      Hey Scat!

      How do I get my “ugly mug” image to display with my comments?

      Please let me know.

      Tim

  • donzaloog

    Great work, JB. This article should be held up to all those “men are useless” feminists.

  • David Palmer

    Personally I’m not so sure anymore that it would be such a bad thing if all men took a day or two off on strike. Certainly if the EU ban on speaking out against feminism, which is, after all, a political ideology which should be subject to criticism, is passed, I would argue that a walk out might juts make a solid point.

    And after all…if all men went on strike for a day or two in protest, whose going to respond to enforce the ban on “anti-feminist” actions and speech? The police? Oops, sorry, most of them are men. Call out the military? Oops, sorry, those are mostly men too. S

    o how, exactly, would the feminist tyrants respond? And with what? Tears, shaming tactics and name calling?

    Oh dear, what a horrifying thought….we might be called misogynists….oh the horror, the pain…how will we bear it?

  • http://www.hermitparkclinic.com.au Greg Canning

    Thanks JB the thing that really annoys me is you don’t see feminists trying to correct the gender inequality in all those dirty and dangerous occupations that enable our societies exist , they only cry foul in the relation to the high paid high status occupations. Like in Aus at present the outcry about only one women in the new federal cabinet. It’s as thought being female in and of itself is should be enough to secure more cabinet positions, well that really would be privilege based on sex, and if some had their way enforced by quota’s. To be equal than, Let’s see quota’s for refuse collectors, miners, truckers etc.

    • Shrek6

      Well Greg, Abbott is a proven misogynist. I mean, he rules the women in his family with an iron fist.
      Yeah right! More like it’s the other way round.

      Abbott has done what he’s done, because there are NO WOMEN elected in his party who are good enough to take up a ministry. And thank goodness for that. Look at what we suffered with the women of the outgoing Labor govt. These women’s only qualification was that they were feminists and almost 100% of them were members of Emily’s List.

      I pray Abbott has the back bone to keep women out of his Cabinet. It’s time we had a govt of men only. I guess we’ll have to deal with his sidekick Julie Bishop. She is a classic example of what I am talking about.

    • Shrek6

      Hi Greg,

      Is there an email address I can use to contact you personally? I wish to make contact with you on another matter.

      Thanks!

    • Maleman

      To introduce such a preferential system is same as introducing an Aristocracy where women are the aristocrats. Men wouldn’t be eligible and would thus be the peasants. But don’t we live in a meritocracy? Have we not decided that meritocracy is the best system? Why don’t people see what a backward step this is? Greg you might remember just a few months ago Julia Gillard, not long before being deposed, touted “we need more tradesmen” and she worked hard on this for a bit until it all fell apart. It was so transparent you could see the wheels spinning. Imagine, women can go to university (2 to 1 even now) and run everything and the men can fix the plumbing. They got so close didn’t they? ….. So close……I wonder what the next step on the list was……….

      • AlexB

        That’s not entirely accurate, to run everything would mean they would have to do majority of the work too, but they are only interested in positions of power and authority, both of which only exist as long as people under them listen to them.I mean, men were fixing plumbing even when there were no women in universities.

  • onca747

    Well said JB. It always amuses me seeing feminist types with those Facebook posters saying, “if a woman takes a day off blah blah blah”. Ok, if women took the day off, the house ends up in a mess with the kids are screaming. If men took the day off, the world would end up a mess with everyone screaming. You only need to see how people bitch and whine when the power goes out for 24 hours.. and you can bet it ain’t no gal going up the pole to repair the lines.

    • http://vilo13.blogspot.com/ Lucian Vâlsan

      „Ok, if women took the day off, the house ends up in a mess with the kids are screaming.” – Not really. Men are highly adaptable. And men adapt quite easy with doing a little more work than they usually do. Sure, they hate it, but they will take care of that too, besides the rest of what a man already does.

      However, in the reverse case, women will not and cannot be adaptable enough to pick up the slack and take the men’s role even for one day – let alone an entire week.
      And it’s not because women can’t adapt. Sure they can. But the huge disproportion of the work men do versus the one done by women is so huge that it’s simply impossible to overcome in a few days.

      In other words, men will change diapers, though in a more sloppier manner if it’s for the first time (though most dads have already done it) and will clean the house. But women won’t woman up to generate power, clean the cities, fix all the machines, etc. etc.
      The overwhelming majority of men can and will pick up the bill left empty by women as a whole if they take a week off. But the overwhelming majority of women cannot and will not pick up the bill left empty by men as a whole if they take a week off.

  • Deucalion

    *Stands to applaud*
    It had to be said, but by the gods, Janet, you have a way of saying it that blows me outta my shoes!

  • Peadair

    “Women hold up half the sky.” Feminist.

    “Umm, No. Gravity.” Me.

    Thanks JB. That was a great article.

    The false arms race that is gender politics needs to end. We are all in this together for the long haul. We may not all be equally able, but we should be equal before the law.

    • Seele

      “Women hold up half the sky” was first said by Mao as a way to butter up women in general, and then get them into the workforce; by workforce it was certainly not limited to the cushy jobs feminists want to get these days, whatever the cost. It is certainly most dishonest to co-opt this slogan and spin it in a way to fit ulterior motives.

    • Atomsk

      “Women hold up traffic.”

    • Keith Emery

      It may be argued that gravity actually holds the sky down… relative to the earths surface.

  • http://kevin-wayne.blogspot.com Kevin

    Consider this shared around. This is so pertinent to the discussion I’m having with a Tumblr Feminist right now.

    • Victor Zen

      “discussion”?

      • http://kevin-wayne.blogspot.com Kevin

        Okay, well maybe that’s being a little too polite!

  • Aimee McGee

    Here’s a quirky wee story. Recently was traveling along a country road for work with a colleague. Came across a wounded pheasant. Stopped the car, caught the bird, broke its neck (hate seeing any creature suffer), then realised I had really upset the colleague.
    My biggest regret – had to leave the damming bird behind rather than take it home to cook.
    Women also don’t kill things apparently.

  • cuatezon

    Great piece and thank you for supporting men, and for being honest & realistic. The only suggestion I would input is both men and women create life. There wouldn’t be babies without either of us…and apparently feminists don’t understand they wouldn’t exist or have life if there were no men.

    There was a study done in past 2yrs, maybe Dept of Labor(?) that showed women average higher salaries than men in 5 of the 7 major job categories. Men only averaged higher pay in 2 of the 7; transporation and construction, i.e., train engineers, plumbers, and construction workers – mostly ‘blue collar’ jobs. Women are averaging higher pay than men in ALL of the white collar positions. Yet I keep seeing these skewed stats saying women only earn $0.70 to every $1.00 a man earns. Tired of the propaganda war.

    It all boils down to this. Technology. Or reducing it even further: Electricity. If there were no electricity (generators, engines, etc.) that produced power, women would have substantially less opportunity in life b/c they cannot/will not do the harder, dirtier, tougher jobs. Electricity powers the computers and machines, technology, that allows them to work in more comfy positions. Basically, feminism depends on the electricity (and the inventions) that men have provided them. Kind of an interesting irony.

  • http://www.genderratic.com/ Jim Doyle

    “And in the same breath, women have historically had the privileges they have because they CREATE LIFE.”

    Got to take issue with this one. Women don’t create life any more than men do. If you want to see how sperm can count for more than eggs, go back and watch Raise the Red Lantern. (Gong Li is always worth watching anyway. Genius) And it wasn’t just China. There used to be laws all over the West guaranteeing women sex from their husbands and not so they could put a smile on thier face, but so they could concieve.

    Anyway, if oyu didn’t have a woman of your own people, you could always just find one who wanted to marry up. That’s the root meaning of hypergamy. A smart women would always “bestow her afections” elsewhere pretty fast during a raid on her home village.

    But where women earned thier place indoors was with the skills they had. These didn’t have to be unique to women, boys could learn them too, but either they wouldn’t have time to learn both the female and male skills, or they faced shame for doing what was considered easier work. Easier or not, that work was essential. Raw grain is not food, raw fleeces are not clothing. Spinning yarn is fiendishly tricky and at best it takes a whole childhood to learn how. And those foreign women you married would probably never learn how to do it the “right” way. That was what women brought to the table. Remember, it was women who invented beer.

    • Atomsk

      Women invented beer to make men weaker and more tolerant of their bullshit, and to lower their standards. Muslims are forbidden to drink alcohol and you sure dont see them putting up with much female foolishness.

    • Keyser Soze

      Women also invented beer so that the ugly ones could still get laid.

  • HeraclesM

    What did you create, which you think got destroyed?
    Your body, your mind, your knowledge, every skill, every material and immaterial property, everything has been “gifted”.
    Creation is merely the putting into form of what already exists.
    You did not bring anything – whatever you have, you received from here. Whatever you have given, you have given only here.
    Whatever you took, you took from here. You came empty handed, you will leave empty handed.
    What is yours today, belonged to someone else yesterday, and will belong to someone else the day after tomorrow. You are mistakenly enjoying the thought that this is yours.

    I constantly hear I hate god for this, for that… blah, blah.
    It is highly irrational to conceive this opinion.
    Its the same as saying, that a murder is the gun’s fault.
    What today is, is the consequence of our own actions. We have in fact infinitesimally low or no control on the situations we would actually fall in. But we have considerable control on our own actions.
    If I let myself consume alcohol when I knew it would dampen my intelligence and conscious, then I cannot and must not blame alcohol for the stupid actions done when intoxicated.
    When a massive earthquake hits, people cry and endlessly blame God.
    Consider a fact – An earthquake occurs due to the shift in tectonic plates, the shifts occurs due to the intense pressure and heat inside the Earth. IF earthquakes don’t occur, then it is highly probable that the Earth would explode, like a completely sealed Pressure cooker.
    I would like to point out another fact –
    Whatever happened, happened for the good; whatever is happening, is happening for the good; whatever will happen, will also happen for the good only.
    At any given moment in time, we are what we are; and we have to accept the ‘consequences’ of being ourselves.
    Only through this acceptance can we begin to evolve further.

  • Victor Zen

    I will bet any of you any amount of money that the feminist argument will one day shift to accuse men of being in power because men could hold society hostage with a strike. Imagine that: Men would be blamed for being at the foundation of the pyramid after years of being blamed for being at the top of the pyramid. Damned if you do, damned if you don’t.

    There’s a lesson here. No matter where you are in a social hierarchy, you can be an engine of change by withholding what is expected of you. I’d be totally happy with letting the grid flicker and die for a few days if it means men are recognized as human beings deserving of gratitude and respect.

    • OldGeezer

      Well, please do consider us guys living here in the Great White North when you schedule that few days of grid death. It can get damned chilly in mid-winter for those of us without unpowered heating backups.

      On the other hand, with the latest remote metering, some selective targetting should be possible. :)

  • graham strouse

    Janet,

    Are these stats for the US or Canada? And can you link me up to the original sources? I could use this data for a little something I’ve been working on. Thanks, -Graham

  • kelly64

    All things considered, although sending a powerful message, the mens day off would be harder than going to work… “The house is cold, do something!” “The water’s off… do something!” etc. WAIT! Aren’t most pub owners men? let’s meet up and enjoy a pint!

    • http://www.menbeproud.org Robert Brockway

      When considering a short widespread strike by men recently I asked myself what the men would do with that time off. The answer I think is “whatever they want”. They could spend time with the kids, go fishing, meet up with friends, etc.

  • Keith Emery

    Article was rather traditionalist; I find that rather disconcerting.

    • driversuz

      Perhaps because it discusses the “traditional” male roles men choose? Maybe we should restrict men’s choices, and not allow them to do the sort of work we all rely on. I’ll go unplug my computer now. You too?

      • Keith Emery

        “Maybe we should restrict men’s choices”

        Rather damn absurd suggestion. I don’t have the power to enforce such an idea, nor would I desire such power. I just dont think the continuation of male servitude is particularly compatible with something that calls itself men’s rights.

        I would merely argue that what we should be encouraging men in their day to day lives to ask. Is this situation equitable? In which case this article would be a bad example.

        • driversuz

          We publish a lot of articles describing inequitable situations. Some are by “traditionalists” and some are not. Should we stop?

          • Keith Emery

            I would prefer not. :)

    • http://www.avoiceformen.com/ Paul Elam

      I trust you will survive the trauma. Or do you need a hug?

      • Keith Emery

        Twas strictly a curiosity paul. Your principal fashion has been to call a spade a spade. I’m just of the view that one should also call a traditionalist a traditionalist not an MRA.

        • http://www.avoiceformen.com/ Paul Elam

          Seriously, how do I tell those on AVFM staff with more or less “traditional” values that they are not MRAs, particularly given all the Men’s Right Activism they do?

          • Keith Emery

            I do see your point. I’m just a bit nervous about the direction in which we may be headed. I just dont like seeing people turned off the MRM or feeling that there is no place for them. I see this happening at the moment to those who regard traditionalism as a roadblock somewhat akin to feminist ideology.

          • http://www.avoiceformen.com/ Paul Elam

            I can only suggest you look in the right sidebar for the largest graphic image we have there. It is showing an upcoming book I assisted Peter Wright with, on MGTOW, and it is all pro going your own way.

            There is the direction we “may be” headed, and the direction we are actually headed. The direction we may be headed I can’t speak to. Our actual path I can.

            If MGTOWs, who we have always openly supported, feel threatened because of the occasional different opinion that may be expressed around here, I can only suggest that my experience is that those who can’t tolerate other views usually don’t feel so secure about their own.

            MGTOWs will always have solid reason to feel morally supported by AVFM, but we are not intellectual babysitters.

          • Keith Emery

            “those who can’t tolerate other views usually don’t feel so secure about their own.”

            I can tollerate other views paul, my concern was strictly about wheather things should be filed under A or H.

          • Astrokid

            You or any others bitching about ‘traditionalist’ Janet Bloomfield could perhaps try to reach her level of awareness-raising of mens issues.
            She’s managed to get on BBC Radio, debated feminazis Julie Bindel, Soraya Chemaly on UK Voice Of Russia, Thought Catalog, plenty on #WomenAgainstFeminism.

            AVFM is not the only place in the MRM.. people can build their own, but instead they would rather come here and bitch that they have no place to turn to.

          • driversuz

            “She’s managed to get on BBC Radio, debated feminazis ….

            Quite unlike many of her critics.

          • http://www.myspace.com/kevinwayne Kevin Wayne

            This article for as long as it has been up, has been balm to hundreds of people who read it. I even posted a link recently to the HBR Facebook group & it received rave reviews from MRA’s & MGTOW’s alike. Now all of the sudden, there’s this thing in the air that says “JB is a traditionalist.”

            So tell me, are their certain Youtube channels you’ve been hanging around lately? :)

          • Keith Emery

            It does smell of a divide and conquer campaign.
            However the certain youtube channels I’ve been hanging around latley have no distain towards the MRM.

            I sense the author of said channels has perhaps been arguing with certain people. Certain people who I have been arguing with. Said peoples techniques dont seem to change, regardless of with whom they are argueing.

          • http://www.myspace.com/kevinwayne Kevin Wayne

            Interesting… Good perception.

    • http://www.myspace.com/kevinwayne Kevin Wayne

      I for one am getting tired of hearing the “Gynocentrism/Feminism/Tradtionalism” canard that’s being bandied about on MRM-related forums. There are several reasons why this doesn’t wash, but I can sum it all up by saying “basic human selfishness” on the part of both genders is the root cause. Now several of us are starting to speak up, so you can expect to see the tide turning further. Sorry, but that’s the long & short of it.

      • Keith Emery

        I’m not so sure I agree in so much as “on the part of both genders”.
        My sense is that this has been rather off-kilter for some time. But I’m probably some sort of angry misogynist.

        • http://www.myspace.com/kevinwayne Kevin Wayne

          Well I’m fairly certain that women weren’t singularly the cause of:

          *Zionism

          *The Fed

          *The NSA

          *The budget deficit

          *US Military adventurism in the Middle East

          *The Military-Industrial Complex

          …so I think you can safely say both genders caused the bulk of the major problems faced today.

          • Keith Emery

            I would have to agree.
            I am getting the feeling that people are taking my comments in a very defensive manner. I should probbably clarify that there was no such offence intended. some concerns nothing more.

          • http://www.myspace.com/kevinwayne Kevin Wayne

            Cool.

          • Keyser Soze

            Feminism isnt singularly the cause of Zionism. But Zionism IS singularly the cause of Feminism.

  • TruGentMuldun

    from dark to dark men let us take a day off and rest