In a metropolitan city in North America, a 24 year old woman holds up a sign. She is surrounded by hundreds of other women, all gathered to march in protest through the city’s downtown. They have assembled to protest the continued illegal Israeli blockade of food, water and medical supplies to Palestine. And to to call for a halt to Israel’s bombing of schools, mosques, hospitals, universities and residential buildings.
Uh, Nope.
Okay, These women are assembled to demand that the catholic church answer charges of 30 years of willful complicity and cover-up in the sexual abuse of boys by catholic clergy.
No.
The Hundreds of women gathered in the city center to march in demand of the closure of Guantanamo Bay, and the illegal detainment of hundreds of individuals without trial, and to call for an end to torture through water-boarding by the Obama administration.
Wrong again.
It turns out that thousands of women gathered and marched in downtown Toronto to protest a Toronto police officer’s suggestion during a scheduled talk on safety at York University, that women should not dress like sluts to avoid sexual victimization. The officer has since been publicly flogged, hung, drawn and quartered, and diced before being served, fried in olive oil on rye crackers.
The young slut holds up her sign for a photograph. It reads :
Women DO NOT get raped because they were:
- drinking or taking drugs
- dressed provocatively
- being reckless
WOMEN GET RAPED BECAUSE SOMEONE
RAPED! THEM! *&^%$#!
She smiles cutely for the photo, while a male bystander shouts his encouragement: “I love sluts!”
This young woman is of course, dressed like a slut, as are many of the other slutty protesters.
Clearly, we live in sickening culture which attempts to oppress sluts by forcing personal volition and self-responsibility on them. It is a disgrace that after 50 years of struggle for equality, we are all still so backward in our thinking. That we would force a slut who engaged in drug or alcohol fueled reckless behavior to take the responsibility blame for her choices is a public disgrace.
That a police officer would suggest personal responsibility for the outcome of reckless behavior is a chilling metric of how much work is still left undone by feminists. It truly reflects poorly on all of us, when thousands of sluts have to march in the streets to fight for their right to take no personal responsibility, and we should all be ashamed of ourselves.
I know I am.
Tags: American Beauty, Bullying, Crime, Culture, Female Supremacy, feminine, Feminism, Humor, Manuel Dexter, Normal women, Police, Really Stupid Shit, Sex, Victimhood, Women
125 Posts in Total
donations either one-time or on a monthly subscription basis.
If you don't have paypal, check out the other options.
If you want to get some merchandise and sponsor us at the same time, consider the AVfM store.
Jean Valjean:
Charbroil:
Peegies:
Doug1:
Kimski:
Bravo bravo, sir!
Ironically, given their much sought-after, much-deserved slut-status, Canadian women do not make my libido go through the roof. But at the Vancouver airport, looking at the Korean or Singapore Airlines stewardesses – Yikes!!!
You, sir, have the power to stop rape in your “Yikes!!!”
Oh, dear. Let’s not get back to the Grand Guignol we filled with the “Birthrape!” thread….
On second thought, that was a lot of fun.
These women say they dress like that because it makes them feel good. Crap. They dress like that so that they will be noticed.. and hoping that ‘something’ might come out of it.
How many women wear a top that shows more ‘boob’ and cleavage yet says.. hey but my eyes are up here. They are the ones putting out the advertisement of ‘what they have’.. so of course people will look.. or they wouldnt wear it.
Oh and by looking at the picture .. honestly who would want them anyway. The ‘red haired one’ … oh what a pathetic joke she is. They all look like pathetic loosers who havent gotten laid in such a long time and probably wont.
I have never known any women that has been ‘raped’… but I have known a lot of women who have dressed in such as way as to get lucky. I remember when I was in my late teens and prior to becoming engaged on what I wore… and yes it was to try and entice the other sex… that is why they do it.
You can wear a mini skirt and look respectable… or you can wear a mini skirt and look like a skank.
What the police officer said was so very very true.
They dress like that to get something for nothing.
That’s why I believe there is something SERIOUSLY wrong with women:
Not all, but a VERY significant number of them perpetually consider themselves victims of everythings and therefore have no responsibilities.
How come they have the guts to call themselves the fairer sex?
Women want fried ice – Arab proverb
> They dress like that so that they will be noticed..
Look for the t-shirt to wear to the next parade which says:
“PLEASE Tell Your Tits to Stop Staring at MY Eyes!”
[img]http://avoiceformen.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/drama-queen.jpg[/img]
WOW!!! somebody should have been throwing dollar bills at them to but their clothes back ON. Good lord that’s a scary crowd!
Throwing Canadian “loonies” might be more appropriate. They’d certainly have greater “impact.”
Funny off topic on that.
I have personally been ejected from a stripclub for paying one of teh girls to keep her clothes on and stay away from me.
She was fat, with stretch marks and very insistant that I should pay her. So I did to get what I wanted, peace and not to be visually offended.
That’s so funny!!!! I might have done the same thing in your shoes.
I feel bad for all of them. Not because people are shaming them for being sluts, but because there’s no way anyone would have sex with any of them. They could try a combination of beer goggles and plastic surgery if they really wanted to accomplish their goal of being sluts, but beer only goes so far and plastic surgeons aren’t miracle workers.
I think somebody should call Dr. Frankenstein and tell him he’s missing a few monsters. Yikes.
Lol. I stole Alcuin’s “yikes” for this because I’ve never used that word before.
egads!
What in tarnation?…
What in the wide wide world o sports!?!?!!?
By gum?
What the DEUCE?????????
ZOIKS!?
Coyote ugly.
I think I see a trend here….
Gawd, I wind up channelling Foghorn Leghorn from the Looney Tunes of my youth:
[file]http://avoiceformen.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/fl what-in-the-name.mp3[/file]
I hope it plays!
Actually, “Looney Tunes” would fit this “Take Back The Slut” march, not only for the location (Toronto) but for the fact these grrrrls are looney themselves!
[file]http://avoiceformen.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/fl-wet-mice.mp3[/file]
I call them fugly!!!!!
When will these idiots learn?!
Dressing ‘provocatively’… ‘provokes’ a reaction, hence the verb/adverb relationship!
Getting drunk or off your face on drugs… reduces your ability to protect yourself!
Going to Afgahnistan without a gun and an American flag draped over you with the words F.U Taliban written over it…
You get the idea.
Need to send these bimbos to The Clue Store.
That is so funny.
Next these feminist lessos will attempt to sue thier own babies for making provocative sucking gestures at thier bare nipples.
Idiots.
Have you not heard of “birthrape”? It’s not a far cry from a woman suing a baby, and I can tell you for a fact that if a woman were to sue a baby for a gazillion dollars today, she would receive almost universal support. Anyone pointing out that it is sheer lunacy to sue a baby for anything because they are incapable of telling right from wrong and know absolutely nothing about anything would be shouted down with cries of “Woman-hater!” and “Shut up, you weren’t there, you don’t know what it was like for this poor woman!”.
The lunatics are running the asylum,folks, and it’s open season on sanity.
And … if it were a FEMALE baby?
Then you blame a male doctor
.
Which is exactly what they are doing.
Yeah how dare we suggest that they grow up, stop putting shit on their
faces, beer down their throats and take responsibility for their own disgraceful behaviour! /Sarcasm
I am left speechless yet again, I mean exactly how stupid does a woman
have to be to get a Canadian passport these days anyway?
Do they have to take some kind of anti-aptitude test maybe?
I’ve seen my fair share of idiocy, but these women should be awarded
the cake!
Judging by the women in the photo above I can see why they need the
makeup, though I’d recommend plastic surgery all round as most of ‘em
are just plain butt-fugly.
While my recommendation might leave Canada with a national plastic
shortage for the next few weeks the results may turn out to be well
worth it. LOL!
I think at least half are lesbians, many are “professional” protesters, AND probably most live off of government money somehow.
If someone can post a link to this article somewhere where they will see it, it would be epic. They probably organize via Facebook.
I’d pay to see some of their incoherent rants.
I think at least half are lesbians, many are “professional” protesters, AND probably most live off of government money somehow.
“professional” protesters?, try “professional” horseshitters more
like it.
If they can afford to be out taking to the streets over nothing
why can they not be expected to be at work?
Feminazi rage alert:
How dare the big bad men expect sweet innocent little butterflies like
us to earn our own living? /Sarcasm.
It would pobably cut into their already hectic lifestyles of being
shit parents, sleeping around, butt-fugly, drunk and probably
overweight too.
Cant be having that now can we?
I use the word “professional” loosely. I’m sure you’ll see some of them again at some other poorly thought out event allegedly about social justice.
They are in fact an elite group, because they can fuck with us at will and dictate what we’re allowed to say with our own tax dollars, while we’re sloughing the 9-5.
Yeah, fucking soul destroying ain’t it…
Makes you kind of wonder why you bother getting up in
the morning sometimes.
http://www.facebook.com/SlutWalkToronto?sk=notes
These protesters are the type of people who would tell children that it is all right for them to play on the streets, because pedestrians have the right of way. Maybe they should all be charged with false advertising, as they are making it hard for the public to discern the real “working girls”? Those who admit they are sluts would have the charges dropped.
Please forgive me as I know not what I do.
Now I know this is puerile but what the hell, I’m having a laugh only.
[img]http://avoiceformen.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Sorry.JPG[/img]
…oops !
Correction.
[img]http://avoiceformen.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Sorry-1.JPG[/img]
HELL YES!
Excuse me, Miss, is that a prostitute’s uniform you are wearing?
Hey now, I’m a Canadian, and quite frankly, it shocks me that Canadian women would fail to get the relationship between dressing in a manner that screams “fuck me” and getting fucked.
If you wander out into a blizzard in a bikini because “it makes you feel good” and you “have the right to dress however you like” you will have both pleasure and personal autonomy.
You will also fucking freeze to death. Because you were inappropriately attired.
This doesn’t seem to be a hard relationship to understand. Canadians didn’t get it? Really?
And can I just say two things here: some of those women could walk down the street stark naked and be in no danger of being raped whatsoever. This is because some women are ugly cunts and not all men are rapists. Most men are not rapists.
Secondly, let’s not slag on whores so much, eh? Many professional women wouldn’t dream of being caught dead in those outfits. There is no such thing as a prostitute’s uniform. Check out http://www.thehonestcourtesan.com to learn more.
Canadian here to and I assure you we `get it`. The feminist Canadians on the other hand are about as out of touch with reality as they can get.
and Zerbisias as their poster bitch.
[img]http://avoiceformen.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/615a.jpg[/img]
Another ugly Toronto slut with no redeeming qualities whatsoever.
I admit it, I despise her. She’s a shameless supremacist asshole
She has one redeeming quality: she’s over 1000 miles away from me.
What’s that shit on her chin? Oh,that IS her chin? Gawd damn. This might be why so many men need a little blue pill whose name rhymes with Vye-agra (can’t use the actual word cause of the filter,lol) these days.
Actually, I never slag on real whores. I believe it is an honorable profession as long as they are charging realistic prices for their wares.
On a personal note, I wanted to say that sometimes, your comments hit the bullseye over and over, this is one of those times.
second that (1 AND 2)
They are (in essence) trying to make the point that how you dress does not affect how people treat you. So all those people, usually women, that spend so much time getting all made up and dressed up to go out are wasting their time. The menz are just as likely to go for the fugly frump in the track suit.
grats on the downvotes!
If you walk like a slut, dress like a slut and talk like a slut, chances are you are a slut. You may not like to hear it, but I have every right to say so. In addition to that, you may be stupid too. But hay, you have your freedoms and so do I!!!
It’s false advertising, only a bunch of fugly feminists showed up.
Oh, I get it.
Soldiers do not get killed because they invade a foreign country. They get killed because someone shot them. OK.
Single women do not catch a STD when they have frequent unprotected sex. They catch an STD when someone gave it to them. OK.
Women do not die from lung cancer because they chain smoked. They die from lung cancer because someone grew dangerous tobacco. OK.
In a few hundred years, if anyone is still alive, they will look back on this era and ask themselves how people can be such fools to believe and do the things they do.
Spot on.
Remind me to tell my history teachers they were wrong. We didn’t actually have a renaissance and emerge out of the dark ages, we’re still in the dark ages. Electricity didn’t change a thing, if anything, it brought on the dark age in full force.
Well, what can I say, there are sluts, and there are sluts. What guys have to get through there head is that the women who are dressing to kill, more often then not are advertising something they don’t have. They are saying……I’m hot…..I’m sexy…..but they are just teasers that like to be wanted, but from a distance.
The most sexually outrageous and liberal women I’ve known, and there has been a lot lol, seldom dress like they have something for sale…..because they don’t…..they give it away. Now and then they might dress up sluty, but not in public, and they don’t complain about men hitting on them.
What our society typically calls sluts, are actually whores. They are trying to extract resources via their sexuality. The pseudo slut (whore) has no price tag, and is a pretender who tries to bait men with false advertising. When she does fuck guys, it’s to bait them further, not because she has a high libido, and raunchy sex drive etc.
The true slut, is as innocent as a virgin. She has high sexual desire, and loves to give and receive sexual pleasure. She usually doesn’t dress provocatively, unless the occassion warrents it. She usually looks like any ordinary woman, maybe even plain, but this is the woman thats going to make all your porn star dreams come true lol.
The pseudo slut expects to be able to use her sexually provocative appearance selectively. She expects to be able to spray it around a room full of guys, and for it to only have the affect that she designed it to have……on the guys she is targetting. She actually wants those sexual advances that she calls harrassment when it’s from guys she didn’t want to attract, but she wants them from other guys……the right ones. True sluts are usually attracted to guys for personal reasons…..they are sexy, or charismatic, or lovable, cute, etc. Pseudo sluts, it’s usually materialistic. They can give them a leg up at work, buy them expensive things, support them financially…….the reasons have nothing to do with personal likes, its all business.
Well……..I think I’ve incriminated myself enough for tonight lol
It’s interesting that you would describe such a woman, as I’ve recently come across one. Only an 8, maybe, but she’s got hundreds of orbiters. Guys with (some) game always go to the top of the list, of course. Compared to her, most of the 9-10 beauties I’ve come across are so unreal they’re almost like manikins.
Didn’t know they existed, for real, but then, I’ve lead a “blinkered” existence for most of my life.
Stu, SO TRUE! “She actually wants those sexual advances that she calls harrassment when it’s from guys she didn’t want to attract, but she wants them from other guys……the right ones.”
I’ve claimed this for a long time. What’s going on is criminalization of standard male behavior. Put bluntly: most men end up with the women they have by behaving in ways that could EASILY get them in serious trouble if the woman wasn’t up for it. The message is: please sexually harass me (but you better be damn sure I want it).
I hope the analogy isn’t too much of a stretch but… this is the same reason we have unreasonably low speed limits on interstates and things. The only way to play the game is to break the rules. But you better not get busted. It’s just an easy reason to bring the law down on any man you don’t like.
While 5% of the women are complaining because they don’t like being harassed, the other 95% of women are actively rewarding such behavior. Get your heads out of your asses ladies. Men will do WHATEVER it takes to get women. Men like women. Even if a guy is employing some douchey strategy that succeeds 1/20 times and pisses off the other 19 girls. Those stats still make that strategy the most successful pick-up strategy I’ve ever heard of. And men will do it for that 1/20.
It’s clear: If you want to change male behavior, you have to change female behavior. They are holding the cards and men will do whatever it takes to be with them.
That being said, I’m not into sexually harassing women at all (and that makes me a lonely man).
They always say that rape is about power, not about sexual desire. That’s what they teach on college campuses. That’s what our college women whine and stamp their little feat about at their unthinkably annoying campus sexaul assault awareness rallies. This is probably one of the sinlge most used and abused feminist lies I hear on a regular basis.
(Thanks, Oprah!!!! You are a paragon of wisdom and truth!!!!)
This particular feminist lie was carefully crafted to pathologize single most prevalent success trait — fierce competitiveness with other males — along with sexual violence, by strategically bundling the two together. What a sick thing to do! They have associated powerful men (which is a good thing you femifasist fools) with sexually abusive men. Way to go, you bunch of geniuses. Yeah, you got it. It’s men’s insatiable, psychotic appetite for more power and control that make men do things like, oh say….. become United States Senators, rape women, start fortune 500 companies, put date rape drugs in women’s drinks, defend the nation, plant secret cameras in tanning salons, develop atomic energy, etc, etc…. This widely- held lie infuriates me to no end.
That was supposed to say “pathologize [men's] most prevalent success trait”. The more upset I get, the more my spelling and grammar reveals it! LOL
“Next these feminist lessos will attempt to sue thier own babies for making provocative sucking gestures at thier bare nipples.”
Recently, wasn’t there a lawsuit by a mother against her adult child or maybe some calls by feminists for a new law to hold adult children financially responsible for paying back their mothers?
Are you serious? If this isn’t a joke, I really want to know the details. It sounds like my mother. Sheesh.
Yeah, I’m serious. I have no idea who or how many crazy feminists are advocating this one or if this idea will die on the vine. Sometimes things feminists say simply get reported for sensationalism without any real effort behind the call to action. Sometimes the call is simply a childish cry for attention. Sometimes not. I have no idea what is going to happen with this one. Then again, forty years ago few really saw how dangerous feminism would become so quickly.
It is true Fizzy. Another Canadian story, sigh. A Vancouver woman I believe.
http://communities.canada.com/vancouversun/blogs/lovelife/archive/2010/12/01/mom-suing-kids-on-hold.aspx
The case is on hold as the bitch has been caught in a lie. Who would have figured.
Um,
If that chick holding the sign thinks she is a hot slut I beg to differ.
My penis would be found nowhere near that Hairy Beast with the jelly roll dripping down from her stomach.
Ever notice it’s always the ugly ones who have a problem?
It is also the ugly ones that take advantage of Ontario’s law that women may go topless anywhere men may do so…….
Talk about backfiring laws.
[img]http://avoiceformen.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/funny-picture-hooters-vs-feminists.jpg[/img]
The woman on the right is definitely NOT a decoration. The others? Well, that’s debatable, but my vote is yes!
TDOM
The woman with the sign was offered a position with the “Fun Buns Burger Bar” around back. (Well, no, not really.)
Feminism denies nature in every way, and this is no different. In nature, the female of most species, and especially mammals, attracts mates via visual stimulation and behavior that has the affect of arrousing the male. This is what this behaviour and grooming is for. It’s a non verbal language and it speaks loader then words. Modern women have turned it into a game, and they play this game ignoring the rules of nature, and substituting with their own rules. Their rules are, I can send all these signals to you, telling you that I am available for you. I can then use that affect to manipulate you, and then reject your advances. I can get you to buy me drinks, do chores for me, etc etc. And then reject your advances.
In Islamic societies, this is basically banned. They put in place rules that make it impossible for women to use their sexuality to manipulate men. And if they do, they are held accountable. Rape is very rare in Islamic societies, or so I’m lead to beleive. I think real rape is pretty rare in our society too for that matter, it’s only through the widening of the definition of what rape, and false allegations, that rape stats are inflated. But in any case, it pretty obvious to me that living in a society where females are encouraged to flaunt their sexuality in your face, and send men sexual signals as a way to manipulate male behaviour, and favor, results in more rapes.
Morally I should be able to leave my car out on the street, unlocked, windows down, wallet full of money and mobile phone and laptop on the seat…and all my wifes gold and diamonds sitting on the dashboard and nobody should touch any of it…….in reality…..it’s not that way and never will be. In fact, they have recently passed a law here in Oz. If your are more then 3 meters away from your car in public, it must be locked, and if its not, you can be charged. The way they see it, you are enabling and encouraging a crime. So the law recognises that your behavior can encourage others to commit crimes, and disallows that behavior. Nobody seems to think this is unfair. Other examples are…..your insurance will not pay if you leave your house unlocked, or car, and it gets stolen. They say you must take reasonable steps to limit your risk of becoming a victim of theft….or we will not pay. Nobody seems to think this is unfair.
I’m not saying the if someone steals your car and it’s unlocked with the keys in the ignition, that they should not be charged with theft. I am saying that you deserve less sympathy if you have willfully or carelessly enabled and encouraged that crime, then someone who has not. Morals shmorals, the fact is that there are, and always will be thieves out there, and if you know that, and choose to enable and encourage them, you don’t deserve the label of innocent victim. It doesn’t diminish the thief’s crime, but you are partly responsible.
I once attended a lecture by a police officer – the lecture was about way to avoid being mugged. It included things like looking in the parking lot carefully for any suspicious characters, walking with your keys in your hand etc…
I guess that he too was a pig for “blaming victims”?
A tee-shirt ?
Ok let David & Goliath sue for plagiarism.
Publish and be fucking damned.
[img]http://avoiceformen.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Misandry 144.JPG[/img]
I’m pretty sure parody falls under fair use. Not to mention that Todd Goldman himself was caught plagiarizing from Dave Kelly.
Now that is a gathering of sluts we can all be proud of!! Ugly sluts at that. Personally sluts are a complete turn off. I like woman who are sharp, well put together and portray a level of class!! On another note, just because a woman dresses provocatively does not mean we men start whooping and hollering like caged lions. Also note, I have been approached by these types of sluts begging for sex and they sure as hell don’t like the response they get which is NO!!! Sluts and all other individuals who display no accountability hate that word but hey, NO MEANS NO SLUT!!!!!
They’re not advertising or presenting themselves to be forced into having sex. They are however, hoping to distinguish themselves from the competition for available males that might give them attention. The more that try, the better her chances of “scoring” that night, with one she’s attracted to. You can look, just don’t touch.
Reminds me of the Die Hard movie with Samuel L.:
“Not to get too personal, but a white man standing in the middle of Harlem wearing a sign that says “I hate niggers” has either got some serious personal issues, or not all his dogs are barking.”
Go downtown late at night dressed like a whore and all your dogs aren’t barking.
OT
A woman at work that was recently elected as a union delegate was sitting at a table during break saying how she is going to push for special uniforms for women. Asked what she meant, she said that women would like something more feminine. So, stand polo tops in high visability colors, standard safefy boots, black trousers is not good enough. She reckons they are designed for men and men only. Actually they are unisex, and designed for physical work and safety. What’s the female version going to consist of. I’m betting, polo tops with lots of clevage, spandex tights instead of trousers. They want to be able to use tits and arse to compensate for low productivity at work.
So the company will have to pay out more money, because women think work is a fashion show. I can’t get over how they think that the company should be out of pocket one single cent to cater for your fashion sense. And whos fashion sense gets to dominate anyway. Just rediculous.
I’ve always thought that female dress and makeup, obviously engineered to broadcast sexuality and fertility far and wide, did just as much to sexualize the work place and make an “uncomfortable work environment” then shitty male ass-grabbing sort of behavior.
If I can’t treat you like a sex object at work, then you shouldn’t be able to treat yourself as a sex object at work. Sorry honey, 9-5 ain’t about your tits.
Yep. That is their precise motive. They are not accustomed to being in a setting where they cannot display sexual prowess, while soaking up the resulting preferrential treatment and lording their sexuality over every man in sight, whereby controlling them. They can’t even turn it off for a few hours per day at work. They feel that they simply must be lusted after 24/7 and must have full use of their sexual fitness indicators at work to contribute to workplace success. They all do it subconsciously, also.
Newly hired where you work will ask “What? All the attention will not be on me at this company because I have to leave my slut-wear at home? I have to get ignored like all the men when I walk into a room? That’s not part of the deal.”
Tell them that you think the men should dress like tarzan and wear loin cloths made of chain mail and all women who oppose are sexists who don’t want men to have their rights to more masculine attire.
I’m going to let that one sink in for the rest of the day and just… enjoy.
Stu-
When I worked on the A-10, I was in the union, wore standard safety gear, including steel tipped boots…paid my union dues, and went to EVERY fucking union meeting. (They were held on Saturdays, out of town, and almost NO women showed up for them.) My grandmother never missed one.
These women should be grateful they even have a job in this day and age.
I had a woman work for me that questioned why she had to wear long pants while working on a boat sanding and waxing in the hot sun. I told her–”Aside from the fact that we are using chemicals that splatter your legs whilst stripping teak decks…the sun will fry your legs in the weirdest places. Knee pads arre required, and no zippers or jewelry allowed.
You scratch the fiberglass of a three million dollar boat carelessly leaning into it while you are waxing it, and moi has to do fiberglass gelcoat repair….MY cost to do it, will be taken out of your check, and whatever’s left of that check……is your severance pay.”
I had a woman say to a boat owner once, (after he came down to check on the work, and noticed this new woman working for me) ask her “how’s it going?”
She replied–”Oh, it’s okay…but she’s such a meticulous bitch…haha”
He said to her–”That is precisely why I hired her, and nobody else touches my boat because of that”
He said to me later–”Lose the broad, she cheapens the shit out of you”
No lie.
I always had men working for me. I tried to give some women a chance.
They will never be this woman.
And yes…I’m very proud, and fucking bragging.
Izzey
Oh, I almost forgot. She made the statement that she is for the women. As far as she is concerned, she is the women’s union rep. I pointed out that she’s supposed to represent all union members. Most of the women at work don’t pay union fees.
Not only do most women avoid paying union fees, they don’t even pay for female specific fund raising such as breast cancer and things. Men make the lion’s share of donations to causes that only help women. I cannot believe that this union official actually said that she is for the women. She is getting paid to help everyone. Men pay her salary, but she is “for the women”. How infuriating.
How do women avoid union fees? I don’t understand.
The women at many companies tend to be placed in the salaried positions, and, thus, do not pay union fees. I know a lot of factories around this area that have almost all women in the office filling roles like human resource managers and sales staff but have almost exclusively men doing the grunt work. Women, by far, do not pay union fees. Unions exist in this country because of working men. That female union official was put there by the sweat of men and then she has the nerve to say “I am here for the women”.
So they want ‘Union’ level protection but they want it free?
Yeah f@&king typical of a woman.
Women are tight-fisted bitches except when they are spending money on themselves, of course there’s no end to the decadence then.
Case in point:
My own elder brother not so long ago was suffering the effects
of mild depression, incredibly his wife was very reluctant to give him the money out of his own wages to pay for the pills he was prescribed by
the doctor!
Apparently she “didn’t believe in depression in men”, how f*%ked up narcissistic can you get?
Seriously I wouldn’t have believed it if I hadn’t been in the other room
when she said it.
I bet if she was depressed she’d have believed in it alright, she’d have
ordered enough pills to last the rest of the year.
I wouldn’t say that this is a case of stupidity. This is just another instance where women simply refuse to even entertain the concept of personal accontability. It’s to be expected since society & the law enables this and all the other forms of fuckwittery that’s become the issue of the day.
When I first started to read the reasons for protest, the first comment about Israel-Palestine conflict caused me to look for picture of Helen Thomas in the crowd, but it was not there.
http://www.freakingnews.com/Helen-Thomas-Flag-Pictures-81918.asp
But Andrea’s analyzis seemed to make sense. As a Canadian if you go dressed in bikini to freezing weather you really can’t complain about frost bites.
If these women worked at a strip club, could they sue the sustomers for not throwing dollar bills at their feet?
I imagine it would be easier to rape a slut, er, a victim wearing a mini-skirt than a victim that was wearing pants, wouldn’t ? I think the sluts that took part in the slut march should take a moment to re-evaluate the police officer’s suggestion on not being so noticibly slutty.
On the flip side, I like the fact that so many sluts are admitting that they are sluts; it allows sex hungry men to identify them easier. Seeing them march in order to affirm their sluttiness is kind of inspiriing in a way. All those noble sluts proudly wearing their uniforms of sluttiness. Maybe one day soon we’ll see a “trailer park trash march.” And why not? We’re living in an era without shame.
‘
I mentioned this in the comment thread for another article, I think. There was an episode of the American verions of “What Not to Wear” that featured a gorgeous young blonde woman who dressed slutty. The queenish male host actually told her one of her outfits looked like “Santa’s Little Hooker.”
They told her that sexy is revealing one part of the body while covering the rest, which made sense to me, but not to her. They showed her video they took of her out on a first date with a guy who, when they were walking, put his hand on her bare back, and she responded as if it made her uncomfortable.
THEY TRIED TO POINT OUT TO HER THAT IF YOU’RE GOING TO GO AROUND SHOWING BARE MIDRIFF WITH SHORTS ON, MEN ARE GOING TO THINK YOU WANT TO BE TOUCHED. IF SHE DOESN’T WANT IT, SHE NEEDS TO DRESS DIFFERENTLY.
They gave this ungrateful little person $5,000 to shop for new clothes, all of which were beautiful and sexy, but in the final interview (and, boy, did this girl have attitude), she refused to change a thing about her attire.
Tough luck, honey.
Italian Prime Minister on trial for alleged sex with underage nightclub dancer. Who checks the age of the dancers?
http://af.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idAFLDE7341PK20110406?sp=true Quote
‘
“Crowds of critics and supporters sparred verbally outside the court over whether the 74-year-old should go to prison over his connection with Moroccan-born teen-ager Karima El Mahroug, a nightclub dancer with the stage name of Ruby.”
Methinks the women who are complaining about Berlusconi are jealous that they aren’t part of the bunga bunga parties and his personal harem.
– Good one. (Laughing. Some, if not all, couldn’t be sluts if they tried. Yep, they managed to do it again – misrepresent themselves).
But they’re doing it for their luckier in looks sisters who misrepresent or falsely advertise themselves by provocatively dressing as sexually available when they are not. And that’s their point.
They simply are protesting on behalf/ of that young gal who dressed sexually provocative who later claimed she was ‘raped’, and against the police officer who made the responsible dress code comment.
These girls gathered in public to announce to the world that all gals, including them, should be able to dress as (sexually provocative as) they please without repercussion, without being ‘raped’.
Well, freedom and all that. Under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, they have a right to peaceful assembly and to free speech. As would be the same from the Constitution in the U.S.
But, it’s what they say.
Basis their track record, feminists have got it wrong on a number of things – the wage/gender gap; domestic and other violence rates; “glass ceilings”; ‘inequitable’ college sports programming; “our bodies, our choice”, and on and on and on, etc. They shouldn’t be trusted with this issue – “slut” attire, as well.
Sure, in a liberal free society people, they really only mean themselves – ‘women’, should be able to dress as they please, (their “right”), without being ‘raped’. Well, yes. Agreed.
But, in effect, what these these girls are truly saying is that they want to have the “right” to provoke sexual attention from and lust in men by dressing or appearing to be “sluts” – sexually available. ( “You nasty men have to control your sexual urges but we don’t have to control our sexually opportunistic exhibitionist desires. And we want to control your lust even more when we don’t like how our plans don’t work out in our favour”. ) “We” want to rub our sexual power even more over you in your face without us having any responsibility for any outcome or consequence.
Girls, sure, go ahead, announce from 100 feet that you are appearing sexually available, when in fact you are not. Men should believe that you are sexually available when? When you verbally say so? How can, or why should, young men trust your word, when your very appearance of easy availability contradicts your intent of denial and when there are so many false claims of rape? Because you decide you don’t want sex now based on when you did the night before? If you girls don’t know yourselves then you can not be trusted with too much else.
And was this incident a real “rape”? Was the young gal “having forcible sexual intercourse without her consent”? Did she say “yes” when she then meant no or now, days later, says “no”? Why all these “choices”, without being responsible for them? This arbitrary sliding of standards to suit the obviously insatiable is madness and socially suicidal.
Was this ‘rape’ a “he said/she said”, a “she said/she said” , a “I changed my mind after the fact” , turn of events or a real old-fashioned, make no mistake, it really happened ‘rape’? Or is this just another photo-op for more future social and political repression?
What’s the young man’s version of events? Are they even considered at all? There are so many incomplete one-sided feminist publicly funded monologues about mostly anything, to which the MSM gleefully reports on, that it is difficult to know what really and truly is happening.
And what of ‘rape’, itself? The ‘feminist’ theory of it is incomplete, solipsistic and consequentially not trustworthy.
It looks like we have to contend with status quo madness until, quite possibly, “male studies” provides further clues to understanding the real menace of “having sexual intercourse with a woman or girl forcibly and without her consent”.
The rest looks like a circus side-show.
I believe that female self-sexualization amounts to sexual harassment of men.
We all know that men are visually stimulated by sexual imagery. When women dress in a histrionic fashion, exposing their bodies and drawing attention to their sex organs it is an attempt to visually stimulate and attract the attention of men.
While the desire is to attract the attention of males that are desirable to the individual female it is in fact a broadcast of sexuality that attracts the attention of many men.
Sexual harassment is unwanted advance and I can tell you when I go about my day trying to make a living or learn in school, I find this kind of “slutty dress” to be unwanted.
I compare this to dangling a piece of meat above the tiger cage. Society says women can tease and taunt us with their sexuality all they want and if we do anything wrong then it is ALL our fault. This is neither fair nor “equal”.
If men are expected to behave in a gentlemanly fashion then so should women.
Last summer I took a statistics class that was very demanding. There was a very attractive women in her mid to late twenties who was very histrionic in her dress. Low rise pants and shorts, thongs exposed, push up bras, bangles on the wrists and ankles, perfumes and body sprays all worked to distract me from the lecture being given. I’m forty now, and when I was younger this kind of thing was even harder to deal with. It did affect my grade in this class.
I think that we should begin to look at female self-sexualization (slutty dress) and immodest dress as sexual harassment and call it what it is.
Oh, good old Toronto….
This is almost as hilarious as the ‘slutpocalypse’ that occurs during Halloween. I’ve asked a few girls : why do you feel it necessary to dress like sluts on Halloween?. Their answer is usually : because it’s the one day of the year where we can get away with it.
My retort? So the rest of the year you’re all just covert hoe’s?
This demonstration in Toronto is simply an extension of Halloween; most women are whores. Not whores in the sense that they are sexually healthy and enjoy intercourse just as much as men do, but rather in the sense that they are using their body to extort men.
Matthew Fitzgerald wrote a decent book on the subject : Sexploytation.
Montreal is even worse; il is, in my opinion, the slut capital of Canada as well as the centre of feminism in Canada. Coincidence?
Let them be whores. At the same time, remember to ignore it, ignore it, ignore it. But whatever you do, don’t touch them… STD are communicable lol
Nature has a funny way of balancing things out in the end. STD’s are natures way of saying “hey, you guy’s are messing around with balance here.” The STD’s kill their hosts eventually, thus, in the words or Ebenezer Scrooge, “Decreasing the surplus population!” I support Slutism! Just don’t come near me wenche. And for God’s sakes, stop scratching
The protestors were right in saying “they got raped because they got raped.”
That is straightforward, tautological and unarguable.
And my response would be: “Your point, please?”
Well, clearly, the point is that they got raped because they got raped, and there is no other reason why they got raped.
Being raped is an effect without a preceding cause.
Rape occurs ex nihilo.
My response is, yeah, you were raped because you were raped. You were drunk and dressed like a hooker in a crowd of drunk men because you are fucking stupid.
This protest is doing more than it appears: it is serving as a warning to all others who dare criticize the Cult of Feminism. Long gone are the days when a man like the Police Officer is simply explained the error of his ways. No, now he’s subject to brainwashing by the thought police, sensitivity seminars for all other police officers, a special woman’s ombudsman set up etc etc. Big business.
When our current Prime Minister was elected (around 4 years ago), he went over wasteful spending and set his sights (via Woman’s Minister Bev Oda) on The Ministry for the Status of Women and found out this:
that roughly 75% of every tax dollar given to this agency that is spent by various women’s shelters is allocated to Administration. Far from helping the frontline women who need it. The cuts (reasonable and fair) that resulted in women’s groups acting as though ‘the Patriarchy’ just instituted witch hunts on the Salem scale.
Feminism is a racket, that requires lowering the bar or moving the goal posts to ensure relevance and funding, to the point where these morons in Toronto have to make such fools of themselves.
I think that what the Officer said is being misinterpreted by these women. When a girl/woman dresses slutty she attracts ALL sorts of attention, be it from nice gentlemen to impulsive horndogs, that being said, his directions to not dress slutty was fair. I mean, if i want to i can go out in high heels a mini and a halter top but in doing so, i know good and well that I am giving off the signal that I want to get fucked, whether it’s by a nice man or a horndog who wont take no for an answer. Would I really be raped though? If you dress up its because you WANT people, esp. men to NOTICE. I think this goes back to what Camille Paglia said about rape, she stated that basically women who get shit faced and go to frat parties have noone to blame for being raped but themselves, as they should have known better.
She doesnt so muchy blame the men or boys for raping a passed out skanky girl, she doesnt excuse them either but she says that the responsiibility rests with these “potential” victims..the girls. I agree… Now I wouldnt want my daughter to get raped or anything, but if she was to tell me that she had 10 shots and 5 beers and was wearing a bikini, i would have to sigh and roll my eyes and tell her that she’s going to be just fine….. SOME rapes are about control, i do believe that but alot of them arent, theyre just opportunistic rapists, they’d rape anybody if they got the chance..but theyre not really predators.
as for the two ladies in the main picture up top look like muppets, they dont even have facial features…its like a muppet or a potato face…like who the hell would want to rape them anyway?
Do mean like rape as in, he-was-just-as-drunk-as-her and she (and he) can’t remember what happened and regrets it “rape”? Or do you mean forcible “rape” as in held her down, beat her and/or threatened her?
That drifting definition is a big problem.
That’s one big reason why it’s hard to just “have fun” (like from your next comment).
Big brother is standing by with an itchy trigger finger to destroy the rest of your life (or worse) on her say so.
@Poester99, Hi, Rape to me means Rape. REAL RAPE/ ANYTHING sexual done to a child, like under 13 is Rape. Being scared to death and being force fucked is rape…being retarded or incapacitated and unable to give consent is rape, being held down against your will and violated is rape. But getting drunk and being reckless and waking up with a stranger or trying to find your panties is NOT rape. Cock teasing a man endlessly as if you were going to fuck him and then leaving or attempting to leave him with a terrible case of blue balls and getting shoved down on a couch and taken is NOT rape…its what you deserve….
That’s even more liberal in some respects than my definition of rape.
The way I define rape is forcing a woman, through brute strength or the threat of harm, to have sex. Or walking up to a woman you don’t know who’s passed out and having sex with her while she’s unconscious.
I’ve had extremely drunk girls that I knew beg me (it was literally begging,lol, it still makes me laugh) to fuck them, but I didn’t do it, not because I felt it would be rape but because the law might interpret it in such a way.
As far as I’m concerned, if I’m drunk, and she’s drunk, and she begs me to fuck her, it ain’t rape. But that ain’t what the feminists or their lackeys in government say.
I wouldn’t force a woman who gave me blue balls unless I knew she liked it like that, and even then, I probably wouldn’t risk the jail time to please her.
Sorry about that ladies,but feminists hysterics ruined it for the good girls too.
There is no compulsory union membership in Australia. It’s illegal for a company, or industry to insist, or coerce people to be in a union. We have pretty good conditions overall in Australia. But I think it will all go down the drain in time because I hear so many young people that have grown up in an era where annual leave and paid public holidays and collective bargained min pay rates for certain types of work is the norm. You hear them say, why should I pay union fees, what have they ever done for me. They don’t seem to realize that all the conditions they enjoy were won by overworked abused workers rioting in the streets and breaking heads, being arrested, killed, assassinated etc. Nobody gave those conditions to them out of love and fairness. When something happens at work to one of them that they think is unfair, suddenly they pay their union fees to access the services and get the union rep to fight their battles for them. Once the issue is resolved, they cancel their fees deduction again. Women just don’t get it, most of them anyway. Most have never had to work in environments where they risk life and limb, are exposed to toxins, etc. They come into industries after all the battles for fair conditions and pay and safety have been fought and won, and start co-opting the collective entities that men have set up, funded and supported, for the very good reasons of safety, decent conditions, fair pay for fair work etc….and expect to use those unions and services to further their feminist bullshit.
I dare say that in the future, once the MRM has taken over the world and restored men’s rights that generations of men that grow up in that environment will begin to take those rights for granted and cease to support the MRM. For this reason, I propose that we develop and legal system that forces all men to undergo indocrina……..I mean education and training in mens rights and to swear to uphold the laws of the ruling Male Chauvinist Pigs Party, the only party in the world…..or suffer the death penalty. It’s the only way to keep the manginas and white knights away.
@Izzey
The thing with feminists is that they all want to be seen as being as capable as you are Izzey. They want the benefits of what you can do, without doing it. They want to “be seen” as being women like you, when they never could be. Equal opportunity is fine for women like you, because your willing to do the hard yards. Equal outcomes is the only system that will work for feminists, and the majority of women. Women like you will be bled dry by feminism too, as will anybody that can produce more then they consume. That’s pretty much what feminism is all about, women who can’t cut the mustard and don’t want to give those that can something in return for providing for them, not even recognition.
I figure you know this, because you’re here.
I can’t add anything else to that, except–
Yes, you are right.
And, thank you.
when the hell did this all become so damned complicated…ive gotten dressed up, and drunk a few too many beers, run around like a lunatic laughing and flirting, made out with the bartender and then literally run out of the bar to my next adventure…why is this so serious? cant we just have fun anymore?
Because feminists have made rape THIS complicated I am not even interested in it anymore as a subject. I actually don’t care. If I watch the news and a rape is reported…”what else is on?” **clicking the channel**
That is the social cancer that is feminism. What is natural and fun -hence good feelings- is not condoned by the fembots.
On an interesting sidenote, I’ve yet to see a smiling lady in the wymins studies building of my University…. they always look either sad, angry or depressed.
Flirting with girls used to be fun. It was harmless, a bit of a game and made both sexes feel good. Flirting is now illegal, men shy away fro it and prescriptions for anti-depressents are on the rise for women…
That’s what feminism does. Eats the human soul from the inside out…
See, now a days, it’s hard to seperate the woman who is out to have a good time and the one who is sizing you up to extract maximum resources from you using the ‘rape and abuse’ industry to her advantage.
Sad state of affairs, but kudos to you for recognizing the harmless fun that is flirting
I think maybe if I met a woman and she told me she was raped by a man I’d ask where. If she said “Florida.” I’d say “So how was the weather there? Was it all hot and humid? I hate that. Like to visit a place like that but not live there.”
“No, I was raped!”
“Yeah but that hot and humid weather, that’s all year round. That’s one thing I like about living in L.A. not too humid.”
“I was raped in L.A. too.”
“Oh, then you know.”
It’s not you that is banned from having fun Giselle. It’s men. But you will be affectively banned in the end, because feminist hysteria knows no limits. In the end if you flirt with a guy, he will run screaming, and go home and lock himself in and hope the police are not coming for him. One gender can not have sexual freedom of the other gender is persecuted for the same.
If you like to dress up, go out, get laid, and you want the right to do that to continue, then you have to oppose feminism. Because feminism dictates that you are a victim no matter how much you like a good reaming out. They will continue to make things more dangerous for men until men are to afraid to have sex with them. Then you will have to beg and grovel for a fuck….maybe even pay.
i used to know a woman who was (is) still married to one of the richest men in Florida, he’s a lawyer..anyhoo, she married him when she was like 19 and he was 40 or so…one day while at her house in pensacola she asked me quite curtly when i was going to go back to school to do something with my life….i told her that i neveer even considered going to college and then turned the question on her, to which she replied: oh, i dunno, maybe when “james” is in preschool…..fucking liar! This same woman eventually complained to her husband that their 7 bedroom mansion was too small and confining…she dropped 8000 bucks on back to school clothing for her kids in ONE day and she had the nerve to ask me when i was gonna get MY shit straight? Please! f^^k you!
Hey Giselle, you could fuck the husband and cry rape.
Think about it for a sec, you’d be getting gobs of money and choke the pipeline of coin to her purse and at the same time lose a corrupt friend.
Hmmm, mad I know but tell me something, you think it hasn’t been done before ?
Hells bells mate if I had a muff I’d be wheeling it out for a surgical strike like that.
lol….i did fuck the husband…but it was good.
besides this was when I was 19, and she dint really care for me cause she was no longer the center of attention in the family as i was now the youngest one…lol
Yay ! I got to three thumbs down… yay !
If I was a mangina I’d say sowwy and I’d look like this.
[img]http://avoiceformen.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Dog.jpg[/img]
Is Italy’s Prime Miniter going to be gored by own ox?
Huffington Post
“In Italy, prostitution is not a crime, but paying for sex with someone under 17 is, since Berlusconi’s own government toughened the law to raise the age of child prostitution from 16. Ruby was 17 during the period prosecutors allege she frequented Berlusconi’s villa in Arcole, outside Milan, accepting cash and gifts in exchange for sexual favors. She has since turned 18.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/06/berlusconi-sex-trial-adjourned_n_845502.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARXKvVeVtXg&feature=related
First two minutes are relevant .
amd as for paying for sex…never happen…all we need to do is beat down the feminists and i can keep playing humpt dumpty all night long!
Lol.
That’s what I like about the women in the MRM,they’re feisty. Feisty women are pleasant as all hell to be around.Most of the women I run into in daily life are bland and clinical.
People call us misogynists, I’ll be honest, I love women,women like these make me smile.
I just wish there weren’t so damned few of them in the world.
not too few i hope…i do have two sisters!! every little bit helps!
Giselle you have a feminist monkey on your back holding a red crayon.
I have noticed that every single time you post something, anything at all you get a red tick.
For an experiment how about you post something entirely neutral and let’s see if the grumpy crayola tetra-pod about your neck will vent it’s impotent rage with a wicked tick ?
Anything, talk about the weather or something. : )
P.S. You have a challenge from me, let’s see who gets to three thumbs down first… you or me.
Well we have to beat down the feminists first. And that will take some beating down. Every now and then I read an article that makes me smile, and makes me think……yes……a victory for men…..but it isn’t long before I’ve read another dozen articles that show feminism is advancing and gaining power exponetially.
For instance, I remember reading the Myth of Male Power…..god knows how long ago. I was with my second wife……a few years into the relationship….so it must have been at least 15 years ago, maybe longer. I remember thinking this high up top brass of NOW……turning against feminism and exposing it. This is going to put the breaks on feminism. Now here I am…..all this time later…..and I cant count the modifications to laws that have been made since to make it easier and easier for women to screw men over. Some of the laws are so rediculous that any sane person could only come to the conclusion that they were written by somebody that had a pathalogical hatred of men. And the feminists are still not happy, and never will be, they are screaming victim even loader then they were back then. It’s logical when you think about it……if telling lies, crying victim, hate mongering etc works and gets you more benefits, then that’s what they will keep doing, in increasing numbers.
My prediction for 15 years from now if the MRM does not succeed in making headway against feminism, is that what’s going down in Maine will be the norm…..in every western country. You will be like a sitting duck for any woman to profit from once they establish any sort of intimate relationship with you, and that will be easier and easier for them to do. One date, then a false accusation, and your toast and everything you own is theirs. That’s how it will be in the end.
@ Stu,
Your prediction or diagnosis of the future is what men are on the road to perdition. There will be feminist collaborators and men who feed from the feminist through who might survive.
But you and I likely will be in better place when the “Fourth Reich” will be in full power.
This is off topic but what the hell, it made me gasp.
Sued a restaurant after she slipped on a spilled drink
In May 2000, a Philadelphia restaurant was ordered to pay Amber Carson of Lancaster, Pennsylvania $113,500.00 after she slipped on a spilled soft drink and broke her coccyx. The beverage was on the floor because Ms. Carson threw it at her boyfriend 30 seconds earlier during an argument.
Ok, now read it again and swap the genders.
Yeah that’s even more insane isn’t it ?
Women who dress in a sexually enticing manner need to realize that if they portray themselves as sex objects, then they will be treated like sex objects.
Such is life….
[img]http://avoiceformen.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Pole dancer.JPG[/img]
Shouldn’t the rapist take responsibility for raping her? Why is the victim being put on trial here? I don’t think it matters if she’s dressed slutty, matronly, or like a banana – no one deserves to be raped!
Why is the responsibility on her? Women are taught to do everything from dressing not provocatively to never leaving your drink, to walking in groups- all common sense – but if we fail to do these things, we’re punished by rape? And should take responsibility for OUR actions? That doesn’t make any sense.
Oh fucking please.
@ Sasha
Oh, you just caught me on the right fucking day. Let’s take a good look at this, shall we?
When prostitutes dress up to go to work to sell their ‘wares’…do they not wear revealing, skin tight, short, cleavage-push-up, tacky, ‘this-is-what-I’ve-got-for-you-baby’ clothing?
And then there’s the normal self-respecting woman……………..wearing the same shit, but does not understand why she appears to be viewed as the same person?
Give ME a fucking break. When a woman looks in the mirror, she knows what the fuck she looks like going out the door.
And let’s go back to RAPE.
It’s okay for a man to raped of all of his worldy possessions, his paycheck, his children, his self-esteem… by women who are in bed with the ultimate rapists….the family court system.
AND let’s not forget the women that ACCUSE men of rape, and their lives are stolen from them, as they are put into jail…only to be truly, and viciously RAPED over and over again…FOR REAL because some skanky bitch decided to punish him, or ‘cover her ass’ from a mistake SHE made the night before.
“No one deserves to be raped” Yup….that’s right, so stop raping this fucking website with your bullshit.
Now I’m really pissed off.
You don’t even know why you are here….do ya?
Izzey
Nice to know we can have a friendly debate without resorting to personal attacks…..jeez.
Sasha, if that is all you read from my fervor, then maybe I am in the wrong place.
…..jeez
@ Izzey,
She deserved every single syllable of that serving from you.
Your comments were extraordinarily to the point. When you focused on the content and ignored the process of it’s delivery you showed the volume and insight of your thoughts on the matter.
Thank you.
Its very simple point Sasha, to use the phrase that my father used with my sister in her teens:
“Don’t go flashing what you are not prepared to sell and expect the punters to take no for an answer”.
You wouldn’t flash your own cash-stuffed wallet in a public place and then reasonably expect credibility or sympathy for having it stolen, its exactly the same principle here.
Another example, you wouldn’t (as a man anyway) run your mouth to some guy and expect not to get an ass whooping
for your trouble.
The general concensus in both cases will be “you were asking
for it because of your own stupidity”.
To put it another way, this is the “real world” and in the
“real world” you can’t just act like an idiot and not expect to
be on the receiving end of the often very unpleasant consequences.
Hope that clears things up for you.
@ Sasha,
You deserved every single syllable of that serving from Izzey.
Your comments were extraordinarily dull-witted. When you focused on the way it was delivered and ignored the content you exposed the vapidity of your thoughts on the matter.
‘Women are taught to do everything from dressing not provocatively to never leaving your drink, to walking in groups- all common sense’
Women have always been taught, and yet never learn.
“If you go out into the Canadian winter in a bikini, you will get frostbite.”
Yes. And you will deserve it. Because that’s just stupid.
But cold doesn’t have a choice about whether it gives you frostbite or not. The last time I checked, men (even men who are incredibly aroused by a woman’s choice of clothing) had a choice about whether they raped a woman or not.
If I wear something provocative on a date with my husband, and he whispers something raunchy in my ear, I’m going to be thrilled with his reaction. If a total stranger does exactly the same thing, I’m going to be pissed. Now, I can understand a man being turned on by my outfit and asking if I’m available and that’s fine. I’ll politely tell him no, but thanks for the compliment. But you’re telling me I can’t dress seductively on a date with my husband if I don’t want total strangers propositioning me?
Just because I let one person do something doesn’t mean I will let everyone do it. Do you let your doctor give you a prostate exam? What about any random doctor? Would you let any random person do it? Would you let your doctor do it in public? You’ve let your doctor do it once before, why not this time? If you didn’t want your prostate examined, you shouldn’t have come to the doctor’s office. You went to the doctor’s office, you must have been asking to have your prostate examined. You got what you deserved.
Why does these arguments suddenly seem so acceptable when we stop talking about doctors and prostate exams and start talking about sex?
Huh?
(Izzey slaps her own face, and tells herself to focus and read this one more time)
Nope……it still doesn’t register…..need more coffee….need more coffee.
But you’re telling me I can’t dress seductively on a date with my husband if I don’t want total strangers propositioning me?
I don’t think these women are on a date with their husbands. And honestly, if they were….hubby wouldn’t like being seen in public with ‘ghetto trash fashion’
Your prostate analogy is just plain silly.
Something else to think about– (and there is truth in both statements)
1. You are what you eat. (scientific research has proven that for our health)
2. You only get ONE chance to make a first impression.
Soooooo…..
I treat my body very well.
And always wear it in good taste. Because in the real world, every single time I leave my house, I am going to give ‘someone’ out there….a first impression.
Izzey
I did not reply off of your post, so in case this gets ‘separated’ it is in reply to “moxie”
Dear All:
For the Seig Heil Feminazi gender criminal children out there who state anything to the effect that, “Women get told to do…and not do…” Well, childhood does need to be restrained with moral and other education. “Pilots get told to do…and not to do…” Pilots don’t complain: they’re generally adults (and men).
Yes, women, men, boys, girls, male babies, female babies, various professions…without end NEED TRAINING. The childhood/incompetence in ALL PEOPLE requires restraint: it’s just the women/girls who object to the process of growing up (overwhelmingly).
These feminazi’s already have the right to be sluts and do whatever they want no matter how disgusting it might be to their parents. But now they also want the right not to be blamed and labelled for it. Too bad bitches, you made your bed, now lie in it and get screwed. It’s all good though, we love screwing you. At least until you lose your looks. After that, there are always younger, hotter sluts and you will be one of those beer-drinking pot-bellied nasty sluts with HPV who no man will touch with a ten-foot pole.
and btw, none of these girls even got raped. They are living in Canada where the rate of violent crime and specifically rape is among the lowest on the planet. They should go to Newark or Detroit and try dressing like sluts there and walk around late at night. I would like to see what kind of public support they get after actually getting raped on the streets.
@John The Other
“They have assembled to protest the continued illegal Israeli blockade of food, water and medical supplies to Palestine. And to to call for a halt to Israel’s bombing of schools, mosques, hospitals, universities and residential buildings.”
Wow, how the lack of knowledge about that topic enrages me. Some people are incredibly brainwashed by the media.
I’m assuming you haven’t been in Israel, let apart talk about Kerem Shalom, Israel.
Claim something as truth from a one sided point of view is plain stupidity and you my friend are blind as hell.
I want to answer you about this because I’ve seen this kind of “info” in your other articles, writing this shit as if it was the ultimate truth.
Man you don’t know nothing. I guess it occurred to you in some point in life that life itself isn’t plain black or white. The topic of middle east with Israel and the PA isn’t different!! There’s no right and wrong here, both sides at some points are to blame for all the shit that is going on. BOTH ISRAEL AND THE PA ARE WRONG AND RIGHT!!!
Believe me I know, I’ve seen it on both sides.
About what you wrote, visit Kerem Shalom and then I want to see you write another dumb biased shit like this again.