crosses graves at normandy 538

Why I hate the feminists who desecrate my father’s memory

One of the feminist narratives which angers me the most is that men are inherently violent, and that if more women were in charge of countries, we’d see fewer armed conflicts. Given the readiness with which some women manipulate men to assault and even kill men who’ve displeased them – “violence by proxy” – it seems to me a ridiculous claim. The fact that in most cases of unreciprocated domestic violence the perpetrator is a woman surely tells us that women are not inherently less violent than men.

A few months ago my father (Malcolm) died, at the age of 90. He was born just five years after the end of WW1. A gentle, kind and generous man who grew up in the Outer Hebrides, he was a lifelong hero to me, in no small measure because on his 21st birthday, a few days after D-Day, he jumped onto a Normandy beach as part of the unit supporting General Montgomery. Recently the BBC broadcast a remarkable documentary about the men who served in WW1, 2014 of course being the centenary of the start of that conflict. It moved me deeply, because it said so much about the sense of duty men – such as my father – feel to protect the vulnerable, often at terrible personal cost:

I found the documentary very moving. It consists mainly of interviews of men (and a few women) recorded about 50 years after the outset of WW1, in the early 1960s – about 50 years ago. Any man who watches the documentary will surely stand a little taller after watching it. Any woman who watches it – any woman with a heart, anyway – will surely be grateful that men (then, as now, as always) have been prepared to die in order that women and children don’t.

50 years after my father jumped onto that Normandy beach I took him to visit the Normandy beaches, the war cemeteries etc. It was the first time since WW2 he’d been back. We went to one of the British cemeteries in Bayeux, where he politely asked to be left alone as he walked down line after line of graves. It was clear from the crosses on the gravestones that most of the men who’d died on the Normandy beaches were around 20 years of age, as he’d been at the time. Many were only 17 or 18. We later went to the enormous and impressive American war cemetery, with crosses and Stars of David marking the final resting places of huge numbers of similarly young men – all facing the United States – and I recall thinking that any European spouting anti-American sentiments should be required to spend an hour or two walking slowly around that place.

Whilst walking past all those graves my father evidently had tears streaming down his face – the first and only time I ever saw him cry – and he was obviously laying some ghosts to rest. He was to live for another 19 years, and I saw him regularly over those years. It was rarely he didn’t find the time to say how much that trip had meant to him. A wonderful father. A wonderful man.

I wrote a short blog piece when he died, saying I thought he was from the last generation of men who weren’t automatically vilified on account of being men. He never came close to understanding about feminism, maybe the two things were related. It’s been speculated that feminism was enabled and energised by the notion that it was men who’d started two world wars – and other wars – and that men collectively were somehow to blame. The facts that only men were in positions of real power at that time, and 99% of the victims of those wars were men, were of course never considered worthy of mention.

About Mike Buchanan

Mike Buchanan is a British men's human rights advocate who leads the political party he launched in 2013, Justice for men & boys (and the women who love them). He was a business executive for 30 years before taking early retirement in 2010. He's written nine books and is also a publisher. His last three books have been concerned with gender and gender politics, the most recent being 'Feminism: the ugly truth' (2012).
In 2012 he launched The Anti-Feminism League and Campaign for Merit in Business. He runs a blog demonstrating that men and boys suffer far more grievously from sexism than women and girls, The Alternative Sexism Project.

Main Website
View All Posts
  • AVFM seeks app writer volunteer

    Are you an MHRA? Can you write apps for iPhone and Android? Are you willing to do that for AVFM on a special project? Please contact us.

    A Voice for Men seeks a volunteer with solid app writing experience to help us develop an app that will be linked to the AVFM brand. If you have the qualifications and are serious about following through, we would love to hear from you. Your efforts could be of great assistance to this website and to our cause. Please contact Paul Elam at paul@avoiceformen.com for more details...

  • Wikimasters, Editors, Translators, and Writers Wanted *Apply Now*

    Fight Wikipedia censorship! A Voice for Men and WikiMANNia are working to increase knowledge of men's issues through two wikis: the AVfM Reference Wiki for scholarly references, and WikiMANNia for general-interest men's issues. Volunteers needed for writing, proofreading, and organizing. Some knowledge of the German language will be helpful but *not* required.

    Please write to editorial_team@wikimannia.org...

  • Civilisationftw

    The are many causes for violence.
    One of the major ones is ignorance.
    Women have been found in every statistic ever performed on religiosity to be much more religious on average than men. So if women are the sole arbiters of how govenment should look like, we can all say goodbye to the first ammendment and the separation of religion and state.
    A non secular government that many women biologically favor will bring violence on a scale not seen in a long time.
    A matriarchy will be anything but non violent, it will be bigotted, superstitious, parochial and very violent.

    • Mike Buchanan

      Agreed. We could reasonably expect states headed by women – and gender feminists in particular – to be MORE militarily aggressive, because where the casualties are overwhelmingly men, what compunction would they have sending vast numbers of men to war? None.

      • Draigo Luther

        Exactly, why do you think there is not a real big push on the feminist side of things for women to be mandated to sign up for selective service like ALL MEN are required to do?, even after the US Department of Defense lifted the ban on women to be included in the Armed Forces Combat Arms career fields. They know when it could come to a armed conflict women will be safe. Unless a women volunteers for the armed forces, and then makes the further choice in serve in the combat arms field Just to be clear: Combat Arms means: Infantry (The most casualites in any war)), Armor, CAV, Field Artillery, Combat Pilots, Attack Helicopter Pilots, Fighter and Bomber Jets Pilots.
        An Ideological Feminist National Leader would have no morale regret to send a male dominated combat arms force into combat with no danger of large amounts of female casualites, and at the same time protect her political power base: The woman’s voter bloc.
        EXCELLENT ARTICLE. Thank you for having a compasssion for men who have served and WILLINGLY do or did the dirty work, and that we are honorable human beings for doing so. I salute you, sir.

        • Mike Buchanan

          Draigo and Partridge, thank you both. I confess the documentary had me in pieces – partly because it made me think of my father, but more than that. Today there was a ceremony at Buckingham Palace with medals for courage going to a number of former solders in Afghanistan. Out of about 20 soldiers two were women – medics, I assume – and of course one or both were in virtually every shot.

      • Mazerolle

        I don’t know Mike. What is the point in engaging in the same behaviour of that of our opposition, you know, the kind of behaviour that makes bold claims that incriminates an entire gender?

        I don’t see how a female leader would be anymore sociopathic than a male leader when it comes to ordering millions of men to their deaths on the battlefield, unless perhaps as you said — she is a radical gender feminist. I believe it’s important to remember that women and feminists are NOT the same.

        • Mike Buchanan

          Thanks, fair points. Maybe I overstated it. But at the very least, I’d say there’s not the slightest reason to believe the claims – of women who are feminists, as well as those who aren’t – that the world would be less prone to engaging in armed conflicts if women were in charge. It’s an untested theory, at best. To my mind it’s a baseless fantasy, to be quite frank. And aren’t the women who are most likely to get in charge of countries gender feminists – Hilary Clinton comes to mind, inevitably – who’d consider a million men dying to prevent one woman twisting her ankle a perfectly acceptable return?

  • Partridge

    And, of course, we must remember (thanks Hilary) that women are the real victims in a war..

  • http://www.avoiceformen.com/ Dean Esmay

    I was really surprised at the documentary revealing that “white feathering” was going on in World War II! Astonishing and appalling.

    • Martin

      The white feathering was organised by the Suffragettes, upper class women who campaigned for the vote. unversal suffrage for men was only AFTER WW1, most men had no say about being sent to the trenches in France and Belgium

  • http://www.avoiceformen.com/ Dean Esmay

    White Feather campaign, right there and unremarked upon. Interesting, eh?

  • http://www.avoiceformen.com/ Dean Esmay

    Hmm, the video seems to have been pulled from YouTube. I wonder if there’s another copy somewhere?

    • http://akseiya.deviantart.com Michał Lech

      I can view it alright embedded on this page from London so it might be localisation issue.

  • Not buying it

    Mr Buchanan , thank you from the bottom of my heart Sir , I appreciate your constant work for justice and fairness for boys , men and the women who care about them , the other half of humanity , but let me say my greatest appreciation and gratitude are for men like your father Sir, the true heroes in the greatest generation that ever lived in my eyes and the eyes of a lot of people (men & women), I ‘ am hoping you are aware that there is still a decent number of people whom shall never forget what they did , who they were and how much they sacrificed , in our hearts and memories, him and his brothers shall forever live , they taught us decency and the courage to fight injustice and idiocy in any form that it may come, Sir a tyrannical regime led by die hard ideology demagogues , that people and nations follow blindly with out questioning their validity , before it takes over completely leading to destruction like Germany back then , or oppressive ideologies laced with so called progressiveness in the present that can lead to a different kind of way to reach destruction, destruction never the less if you know what I mean Sir , thank you and him Mike.

    • Mike Buchanan

      Thank you. Men’s natures and women’s natures change over time. Because of the war declared on men and boys by feminists, men and boys have become regarded by states as sub-human, and we need to fight a war to end that. That war has been declared. It’s going to get vicious, and as in most human rights struggles many men (and a few women) will die… but we WILL win, have no doubt about that. The alternative is a world in which very few men (and few women) would wish to live. Feminism contains the seeds of its own destruction.

    • Mike Buchanan

      Just added the word “don’t” to the second sentence in my note below, so it now reads, ‘Men’s and women’s natures don’t change over time’. Doh!

  • JinnBottle

    Thanx, Mike. Men our age & up are pretty much guaranteed to have (had) fathers who were veterans of I or II. My own father was transported onto the beaches of Saipan. Iwo Jima and Guam get all the glory, but from what I understand now, Saipan was possibly the worst scene in the whole island hopping campaign. Put it this way, it baptized him from being a Roman Catholic into a militant Atheist. One of the few descriptions of the war I got out of him was “War is insanity normalized”. For you literary freaks, Herman Wouk’s “The Caine Mutiny” contains a horrific description of the Saipan landings.

    Britain was unarguably fighting for her life during WWII, a older Brit penpal I had said, in an of-course manner, that “naturally” the whole island had to get involved. “There was no option.” Even here (US), it’s starting to just come out that the Axis hit a little closer to home than the propaganda of the time wanted US to know: e.g. a fraction of incendiary balloons lifted off from Japan or Japanese possessions *did* make it over into (at least) Oregon and Vancouver. Right here, a German UBoat slid thru Cape Cod Canal!

    But it’s precisely in contrast to those vets of WWII being duly honored that my sympathies go out to the vets of Vietnam here. The older generation called them “whiny” and wondered why they didn’t “just get on with life” the way they did after their wars.

    Well, that was precisely in the indifference-at-best coming from their civilian peers (my gen) when they got home. I was of the “indifferent” hippie contingency. And, of course, the Media: by 1972, Women’s Lib was the news, not Vietnam and its residue.

    In fairness, I never in my heart personally disliked or hated the Nam vets, for the same reason I don’t hate anybody, including individual, embodied feminists even now: They’re simply fellow human beings, one; and two, hate is worse than useless. Always. (Also, with the vets, my circumstances were draft-by-lottery – derived from the peacetime automatic conscription that had been in place since 1946: The first year the lottery came out, 70, my birthday came up #1. Uno. Which meant conscription for sure, and implied going overseas and even into-the-bush – unless you could pull strings. There but for Fortune, as the late Phil Ochs sings, I was subject to the active draft the *next* year, 71. So any vet could have been me. And how long would I have lasted, with my nearsightedness and my what’s now known to be ADHD?)

    It’s hard to convey to a younger generation of men – and hopeless with the women – how we boys, especially boys from the lower half of the socioeconomic sphere, were deliberately oriented, enculturated, trained and brainwashed to exaggerate the probably natural hunting-and-protecting instincts into a willingness to kill – Vietnamese at the time, but really anybody. I carry some of that upbringing indelibly in my old-dog soul to this day.

  • mark mooroolbark

    Great article Michael. I love to read tributes from sons to their fathers. My dad never fought in any war but he was and still is my hero even though he died 12 years ago. I thought you may be interested to read an article I wrote for the Australian AVFM site. It touches on many of the issues you address here. If you have time -here’s a link.
    Thanks for your wonderful working in providing a voice for men.

    http://au.avoiceformen.com/males/lest-we-forget/

    • Mike Buchanan

      Thanks Mark. Great piece – I don’t know how I missed it first time round. I don’t always have the time to read all the excellent output from AVfM, much as I’d like to. Just posted a link on http://j4mb.org.uk pointing to the article.

  • michaelsavell

    I was lucky (or unlucky) to have been born just before ww2 started.I remember seeing the men come home,shattered,arms, legs, eyes missing.There was no real aftercare
    and I consequently saw them selling papers and matches on the main roads,their stumps (as they were then)plainly visible to all.Some were put in asylums for shell shock.To say the women of GB had a great time dancing and having affairs with the
    yanks would not be entirely unfair and they certainly didn’t want the shells of men who crept back damaged beyond recognition.
    Yet,if there were to be the threat of a new european war today,those silly boys wouild be the main part of the suicidal vanguard,that’s why I feel a little sceptical of your prospects ,Mike,not many men get any wiser for the humiliation they are receiving
    for even perceived slights.

  • Martin

    In Britain during the 80s there was the evil witch herself Thatcher who sent many men to their deaths in Falklands, which, i agree was a just war, unlike WW1.

    After that she disposed of a few million male orientated jobs with her spiteful policies and sent male police from London to the mining areas because she knew the local police would sympathise with the mines and rendered whole regions useless and enriched London banksters.

    She always said she hated feminism, but she was, by far, the most evil woman, i have ever seen

  • ray24

    I was watching a documentary on WWI a while back, and at one point the narrator said that approximately 500,000 men died for the UK without the right to vote.

    I believe you had to own land to be a voter in the UK in WWI.

  • ray24

    American young men under 21 years of age were being killed and mutilated in World War I without the right to vote, when suffragettes in the U.S. were picketing in front of the Wilson White House for women’s right to vote. Women suffered no such oppression as those young men. Then as now, feminism was not about equality between the sexes, instead it’s about sexist pigs seeking to further their own self interests. :-/

  • ray24

    Yep, my Dad is still the greatest human I ever knew on this earth and I am insulted to high heaven to hear the vile trash that comes out of dumb a$$ feminist mouths, denigrating all men as a group. Feminism is a hate movement and should be brought up on RICO (racketeering) charges.

  • ogre12

    then there was eve who led man astray.

  • Michał Lech

    There is a hauntingly nightmarish feel about that shame-into-dying song at the beginning.
    It’s like Gilbert & Sullivan’s “Go ye heroes” come ever so horribly real.

    What’s even more frightening is that some of that magic still works to degree, or it used to work not so long ago as to change drastically.
    I was doing my compulsory military duty back in 2001. Nationwide service in Poland by that time was essentially on its way out and possibly at the peak of pathology and pointlessness. I don’t believe me or most other “soldiers” stationed in the same base had any military value whatsoever, but when we watched the footage of planes hitting WTC and the towers going down, the sense of abstract weirdness and unreality of what we just saw was quickly replaced with a feverish… readiness? Those boys felt there was a war brewing, that we might get pulled into it, and were actually willing to go without a tiniest clue of how to survive the first engagement. And, yes, back at the time it included the 24yo myself.

    You might need white feathered harpies to herd men into conscription, but once the role is taken to any degree, it actually goes all the way.

  • Andrew Ahimsa Ward

    I think many feminists would agree with you that men are not inherently violent. We are locked into socialised condition to like violence and war, but we’re used as tools of governments and cowardly positions.

    Also if you look a back in history I suspect you’ll find a link between rescission, unemployment and war.

    • jbantifem

      Really? I’ve never met a feminist who didn’t state that men are inherently violent. In fact, 99% of women I’ve met who don’t even claim to be feminists have said it.

      So I don’t know world you live in, but it’s not the same as mine. And I’m talking about women from all walks of life, all generations currently alive today.

      • Andrew Ahimsa Ward

        That’s a huge assumption,that I the myself for being a male,where did that come from?
        It’s also very disingenuous to assume I can to my current world view and train of thought because someone brainwashed me,when really I’m at it because I thought for myself, not that you didn’t or anything, but there it is.

        • Guest

          Feminists can’t think for themselves, or, from the way they behave, think period. Especially the male variety. Women are making their decisions for them. It’s why White Knights attack anti-feminist men on the streets, believe utter bullshit and give their souls over so easily to those who mean to oppress them. And yes, men are oppressed. There are 100s of stories on this site proving that beyond a reasonable doubt.

          And if you’re doing it to gain approval from women – you will never attain genuine approval or respect from feminist women. They’ve been taught to disrespect ALL men. One day you will realize that, I hope.

          Call what I think assumptions, that’s fine. But I see what I see and at almost 50 years old I’ve seen it all when it comes to radical feminism in Canada.

          You have your views, I have mine. But don’t expect very many people to agree with you on this site. We are fighting feminist tyranny. We will not side with your ilk.

  • jbantifem

    Great article. I had tears in my eyes reading it. My Great Grandfather died in France in WWI, my Grandfather fought and returned home to Canada from WWII.

    I can certainly relate to your feelings. In a big, big way. All the best to you and yours Mike and thank you for a wonderful story.

  • Alastair Haines

    Thank you. My dad too. Very helpful.

  • http://www.avoiceformen.com/ Paul Elam

    Thank you Mike. My father served in two wars. It left him with lifetime scars, both physical and emotional, chronic pain and in the grave at 62.

    I often disagree with governments and their reasons for war, but my father and all other soldiers deserve our honor and deepest appreciation. Thank you for giving them that.