Sorry, no tweets could be loaded.
Subscribe to Twitter
Warning

To The University of Toronto Student’s Union

Dear University of Toronto Student’s Union,

My name is Paul Elam. I am the founder and publisher of avoiceformen.com, and the founder of AVFM Radio.

I am here to issue you a promise, or depending on your preference, a warning.

Your recent campaign of lies, hatred and violence in response to Dr. Warren Farrell speaking about problems faced by men and boys is unacceptable in any decent society governed by the rule of law.

It is the intention of A Voice for Men, LLC, an organization promoting the basic rights of all human beings, to make this kind of destructive activity on your part as painful and consequence heavy as possible.

I recently watched the verbal and physical harassment of students who came to Dr. Farrell’s talk to learn about problems like male suicide and male disenfranchisement in education. I watched as they were called scum and rape apologists and incest supporters by shrieking ideologues with spittle flying as they harassed and assaulted these students. Young men harassed for attempting to educate themselves about a very real Boy Crisis in this culture.

I watched as police were assaulted and mocked and ridiculed — called “pigs.” I watched as doors were blocked, hateful slogans chanted and every possible attempt to censor made to prevent Dr. Farrell’s speech and to undermine the freedom of students who wanted to hear him.

Rather than showing concern for this violence and hate, you followed up with more of the same. On your website, you cite avoiceformen.com as “Anti-woman,” and incorrectly claim we editorially labelled one of your hateful ideologues as, “the personification of Princess Cupcake”, “an utterly vile creature”, and “Hitler’s Barbie.”

Seeking this undesirable’s identity

Those statements were cherry-picked from reader’s comments. While angry reactions like this are understandable following your outrageous conduct, they do not reflect the editorial position of AVFM, which is simply that the woman in question is hateful, abusive and a violent ideologue.

She is also the focus of ongoing inquiry, whose identity will be discovered and put on public display. Her conduct will follow her wherever she goes for the foreseeable future.

She is not the only individual earning such inquiry and publication.

Like the early mission of the SPLC in opposition to racism, AVfM’s mandate includes identifying and exposing agents of hate, violence and bigotry, and all who threaten the peaceful and legally protected exchange of ideas.

We are not interested in the peace of mind, or in protecting the public image of offending individuals and organizations.

Since you at the University of Toronto Student’s Union have elected to follow a path of hatred, violence, censorship and sexism, your members and governing staff now demand inclusion in our efforts to address the serious social pathology of sexual hatred.

By operating a hate group under the banner of a Student Union, you present a virulent threat to the free exchange of ideas, and indeed to every student at the University of Toronto.

The time when such activity is conducted without challenge is over.

We are beginning with the activist bullying and piling hatred and lies on a student for attempting to hear Dr. Farrell’s talk. We have her image and know her general location. We will identify her and profile her activity and name for public view.

We will not stop there, or just with her. And while we will not publish our complete intent, we are dogged in our efforts.

I wish we could make allowance, or offer sympathy for your distorted views. We cannot, and will not. We have no more sympathy for your agenda of hatred and exclusion than for a plantation owner’s rationale in the Antebellum South for justified ownership of another human being.

Also, we will never undermine your right to free speech. But when you attempt to silence others, as you did with Dr. Farrell, we will act.

Men and boys are human beings, worthy of rights, worthy of academic investment and interest. They are human beings who deserve ameliorative help when their circumstances dictate that is necessary. They do not need permission or approval from anti-male ideologues. You are not the arbiters of who deserves human rights, or who does not.

We will no longer tolerate the activities of organizations and individuals who undermine these basic truths.

178 Comments

  1. Paul, thanks for this. We need to use shaming tactics in future far more than we have in the past. These women – and their male collaborators – SHOULD be ashamed of what they’re doing.

    Mike Buchanan
    ANTI-FEMINISM LEAGUE
    http://fightingfeminism.wordpress.com

    Thumb up 22 Thumb down 0
    • You’re awesome Mike, thank you for everything you’re doing in the UK. You and Paul Elam are the most noble people on earth, working for equal opportunities for both sexes. Fundamental freedoms and civil liberties are at threat because of mainstream feminism.


      Thumb up 12 Thumb down 0
    • Was just looking at your amazon page and noticed that Erin Pizzey has written a glowing tribute to your book “Feminism The Ugly Truth” . That was enough for me as I think Erin is one of the finest women we have produced in my generation. Within seconds I had the book on my kindle I’m pleased to say. :)


      Thumb up 10 Thumb down 0
      • I agree with you about Erin Pizzey TM.

        However, this statement of hers I totally disagree with and I believe she is deluding herself: “This shouldn’t surprise us, given that the vast majority of women don’t share the radical feminists’ political ideology”


        Thumb up 5 Thumb down 1
        • Shrek6, many thanks. I share Erin Pizzey’s view on how few women share the feminists’ ideology (assuming we’re talking of third wave / gender / militant / radical feminism, the only form of any importance in the developed world for 30+ years). This has interesting implications for the fight against feminism, which I plan to outline in an article for AVfM shortly.

          Mike Buchanan
          FIGHTING FEMINISM
          http://fightingfeminism.wordpress.com


          Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
          • “third wave / gender / militant / radical feminism,”

            I have no idea what the above is supposed to mean.

            And I also do not subscribe to the existence to any wave, 1st, 2nd or 3rd. That all sounds like more bullshit put up by feminist apologists, who try to convince us that there is indeed a type of feminism that exists which is good and completely above board, by saying there are different levels of feminism. Poppy cock!

            In all my many decades, I have not yet come across any numbers of females from the age of 14 through to 70, who is not acting like an over privileged bitch.
            Sure I have met a very few whom I would consider human beings who do not demand privilege over men, but they are as scarce as hen’s teeth.

            So, I don’t really subscribe to this ‘wave’ analogy of feminism, when in fact the WHOLE movement is a religion of hatred where old and young women alike, have adopted its mantra and will espouse the versus held within its bible at any opportunity, right the way down to how to demean any male who they have no respect for.


            Thumb up 9 Thumb down 1
          • Shrek6, many thanks. The existence of ‘waves’ of feminism is a historical fact, and well documented. We need to understand our enemies in order to fight them more successfully. For an understanding of the ‘waves’ of feminism I recommend Cristina Hoff Sommers’ ‘Who Stole Feminism?’ (1996).

            Mike Buchanan
            ANTI-FEMINISM LEAGUE
            http://fightingfeminism.wordpress.com


            Thumb up 7 Thumb down 1
          • @Shrek: “And I also do not subscribe to the existence to any wave, 1st, 2nd or 3rd. That all sounds like more bullshit put up by feminist apologists”

            You are right in an important way Shrek- the focus on waves is employed as a bullshit obfuscation of the fact that each wave is, in essential respects, exactly self-same as the others: ie. the same hysterical tactics, same hatred of men, same reliance on chivalric support, same goal of narcissistic entitlement for women, same grooming of those in power, same appeal to propoganda, same misrepresenting of facts and statistics, same playing at victimhood, and so on. All these things are constants of feminism for at least the last 100 years.
            Each “wave” has overwelmingly more in common than in difference – which I take as your very valid point. How easily we get lost in the waves and forget that its all water.

            In this respect I think Hoff-Sommers has it completely wrong and is resorting to myth-making when she suggests feminism was something wholesome that was later “stolen”. It was always a foul and corrupt product. I say this with a great deal of respect for Hoff-Sommers, but I wonder whether she is trying to justify her earlier involvement in a feminism that she belately came to realize was always a horrid thing – in essence I wonder if she is apologising for her own past by suggesting feminism was something wholesome at a time when she was knee-deep in “it”.

            This is not to deny the existence of novelty and trends within feminism, but in the big picture these nuances really amount putting different kinds of lipstick on the same pig.


            Thumb up 8 Thumb down 1
          • @Tarwil. Thank you Mr. Tarwil. I think you put it better than I was trying to say it. Some times I prattle on too much and miss saying what I mean to say.


            Thumb up 7 Thumb down 1
          • I think you said it just fine Shrek.

            NAWALT (Not all waves are like that) is really in the same ball-park as NAFALT (Not all feminists are like that).


            Thumb up 7 Thumb down 1
          • Tawil, if I thought that there were no ‘waves’ in feminism, and that all the women who term themselves ‘feminists’ are fundamentally the same, I wouldn’t bother to work full-time fighting feminism. There would be no point. But each wave has been progressively more ideological, detached from reality, more misandrous, less representative of women, and more injurious to men, women, children, government, education, business, justice etc. than the previous wave. There’s a world of difference between an equity feminist and a gender feminist, and I fail to see how we might fight gender feminism without an understanding of such distinctions. Again I recommend Cristina Hoff Sommers’ ‘Who Stole Feminism?’

            Mike Buchanan
            ANTI-FEMINISM LEAGUE
            http://fightingfeminism.wordpress.com


            Thumb up 7 Thumb down 1
          • Mike,

            Thanks but i’ve read all Hoff Sommers books, which is why I was able to make the above informed conclusion about her claims.

            As to whether there are or are not waves seems a silly point to argue: a ‘wave’ is a metaphor, a product of imagination and an overplayed one at that. Regarding feminism as it appears over time I would apply a different metaphor – that of a toxic ocean with a few tiny ripples that feminists would have you believe were tsunamis of feminist metamorphosis. I say same shit different decade.

            I stand by the contention that each supposed phase or wave has more in common than in difference, and i can back that up with facts from the historical record. Likewise I see far more in common in the behaviour of gender and equity feminists to the point the distinction between them has no concrete value whatsoever… it’s another decoy for the gullible, intended to suggest that ‘not all feminists are like that,’ when in fact observation tells me that they are usually exactly like that but they just like to hide it a little from view.

            Lets face it, if they were for equity they would call themselves egalitarian, equalitist, humanitarian, or some other name than the very sexist word fem-inist (a word that everyone knows is tied to incidences of misandry).

            Its also untrue IMO that feminism has become more ideological, more detached from reality, and more misandrous – feminism has always been at the far extreme in these areas. However I’m willing to concede with you that the tide of feminism has become increasingly pervasive and as a result it’s effects grow more insideous in today’s world.

            Same old feminism all the way…


            Thumb up 6 Thumb down 1
          • The “waves” and the distinction between radicalgender and equity feminists is clouded I believe by one main factor – that is that many who call themselves feminists don’t know what they are talking about!
            There is a world indeed of difference between a knowing equity feminist and a knowing gender or radical feminist.
            The biggest difference is that in the battle between the two major camps (there are subdivs in each) the genderradicals won.
            They won in the USA and many other western nations including the UK. A side effect of this in the USA was N.O.W. getting rid of Warren Farrell (where he once sat on the board) and in the UK REFUGE which was founded by Erin Pizzey not even acknowledging her as it’s founder.
            As they say about history – the winners get to define it.
            Look at what goes on in Wikipedia where anything to do with fathers and mens rights is a good example on how the dominating zeitgeist works against any who would challenge the current “wisdom”.
            So I would say that there are equity feminists out there who KNOW they are equity feminists (Cathy Young is a well known example who was a journalist for Reason magazine.). The we have the Sheila Jeffreys of the feminist world who KNOW they are Radical feminists. Meanwhile the rest are cherry pickers often not well informed except by a “mainstream feminism” which has done a rather effective job of constructing a new Tower of Babel.
            The good news about Towers of Babel is that they collapse – the bad news is that they don’t right away – we are currently in that gap between dominance and collapse.


            Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1
        • In my experience most women don’t share radfem political ideology. People will accept candy bars and chocolate from a source when it appears to be from an “official” one – it doesn’t mean they understand or accept the strings attached and how that establishment was infiltrated and taken over especially when it was done with no shots fired.


          Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
      • TigerMan, many thanks. Erin Pizzey is a remarkable woman. When people tell me that women can have no place in the fight against feminism, I point them to Erin Pizzey and Girl Writes What?

        Thanks for ordering the book, I hope you enjoy it.

        Mike Buchanan
        ANTI-FEMINISM LEAGUE
        http://fightingfeminism.wordpress.com


        Thumb up 5 Thumb down 1
        • Already enjoying it – love the right to the point style – so refreshing when reading about a themed nexus of socio-political stuff. :)


          Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
          • Thanks TM. I try to have a streak of humour runing through most of my books, and when writing about feminism it saves my sanity at times. I hope you enjoy the quotations section (Appendix 1). I first started included a quotations section in one of my early books – an upbeat critique of marriage, ‘The Fraud of the Rings’ – and got a good response so I’ve put one in all my subsequent books.

            If you could manage to post a review on Amazon at the end that would be great. Thanks again. Positive feedback always raises the morale.

            Mike Buchanan


            Thumb up 6 Thumb down 1
          • Yes I will indeed post a review and unlike a certain review up there it will be from someone who has actually read the book. I am happy that finally more books are beginning to appear that give much needed and long overdue criticism to a very poisonous ideology and the disturbing way it has been embraced by the elite. Lets hope these initial fe are the begginings of an avalanche as people finally wake up. :)


            Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
  2. scatmaster

    Living so close to the self proclaimed “centre of the universe” I may have to swing by the
    U of T and wander around. Just to take in the grounds of course.

    Bet the varsity news does not print your letter.
    Hope you cc’d them.

    Thumb up 16 Thumb down 0
    • They got it.

      Thumb up 18 Thumb down 0
      • I figured you were one step ahead.


        Thumb up 13 Thumb down 0
      • Paul, I just read their statement; man, was that ever “cleverly” worded. Or should I say cowardly?

        Either way, the fact they claimed this female student was “defending human rights” to me shows just how far gone these men and women are. Did they watch the same videos? Or are you showing a different one? Because I would think anyone seeing that would think those yelling and cussing about a man telling other men to take better care of themselves as “rape apologetics” is beyond me.

        As I am familiar with this; I still occasionally struggle to put my head around these creatures. If only they could go back to the “dank swamp” from which they came.


        Thumb up 13 Thumb down 0
        • Another quote from their site:

          “This includes aggressive and violent tactics from the police to shut down a peaceful protest”.

          If that was a “peaceful protest” I would hate to see a non peaceful one.

          Thumb up 15 Thumb down 0
          • Would a group of students outside a presentation by Danielle Sandhu shouting “fuck danielle sandhi” or an individual male protestor accosting a women wanting to enter such a presentation and within inches of her face shouting “fucking scum” fucking misandrist scrum” “fucking false accuser apologist scum” be considered a peaceful protest? Would physically obstructing entry to the event be considered non violent” of course NOT , but the illogic of feminist dogma allows switching events 180% from white to black, without a break in their deceptive rhetoric whilst keeping a straight face.

            Everyone deserves a safe and non violent space to discuss their ideas, especially on the campus of a university where the hard questions must be debated. The failure so far of the universities administration to caution or discipline these bigoted gender ideologues reflects very poorly on UT, currently front and centre on the world stage of gender politics.

            The youtube clip now has close to 80,000 views, and I and others have been aggressively sharing it via social networks. Every student in every university in every country should see this clip, and know the names of those key players who’s hateful behaviour any reasonable person can plainly see.


            Thumb up 12 Thumb down 0
          • They have been in a certain African river for far too long and are beyond resuscitation I fear.


            Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
      • Robert St. Estephe in reply to Paul Elam

        Great work Paul Elam and Dean Esmay. You are paving the way for resistance to organized crime activities. WE are not going to be end up as sitting ducks like the eyeglass-wearers of Cambodia, or the Christian farmers of Ukraine, or the innocent citizens of Rwanda.

        The Toronto brownshirts will be remembered, criticized and exposed to the light of day for a long time to come.


        Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
    • Good man our scatters.


      Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
  3. Not that it is our editorial position that she’s “the personification of Princess Cupcake,” but I have to ask: is that the most outrageous fucking thing you can say about someone? That that’s the worst they could find should tell you just how hard they’re digging for victim status.

    But I have a better suggestion: how about “Violent Abusive Stalinist Thug?” That would be closer to reality in my personal view, and I would like to suggest that be the editorial description of these fuckers. Plus VAST has a nice ring to it as an acronym.

    Thumb up 20 Thumb down 0
    • Dean, while we’re on the subject of acronyms to describe these odious women, may I propose:

      Bullying
      Ideological
      Temperamental
      Clueless
      Harpy

      We’ve been presenting ‘Harpy’ awards for some time, and gave one to Cherie Blair, wife of former prime minister Tony Blair:

      http://fightingfeminism.wordpress.com/2012/06/20/cherie-blair-qc-wins-a-harpy-award/

      Mike Buchanan
      ANTI-FEMINISM LEAGUE
      http://fightingfeminism.wordpress.com


      Thumb up 14 Thumb down 0
      • Fatuous
        Egotistical
        Misanthropic
        Immature
        Narcissistic
        Ignorant
        Selfish
        Thoughtless
        Spiteful

        Thumb up 18 Thumb down 0
        • Oh Damn! This comment is getting recorded in my little pile of sayings. I haven’t seen this one yet.


          Thumb up 9 Thumb down 0
          • Feel free. I have used it for years.
            I honestly do not know who wrote it but I have never been condemned by the author for using it.
            It could have come from Angry Harry who allows people to use everything from his website and even attribute his articles to the person posting them. The other one I have posted often of Harry’s is

            Hermann Goering“The people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.”

            Feminists“The people can always be brought to the bidding of the feminist leaders. All you have to do is tell women and children that they are being attacked (by men) and denounce those who protest as ‘supporters of abuse’ and for exposing women and children to danger. It works the same way in any country.”

            Feminism. Nazism.

            Nazism. Feminism.


            Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
        • Scatters
          On
          A
          Roll


          Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0
      • I have some too but I’m a nothern working class lad at heart and origin so in the interests of not giving ammo to quote mining illiterate racist bigots blind to their own hypocrisy and misandry even as they try to disguise it by wrapping themselves in the flag of egalitarianism I shall stay silent instead. ;)


        Thumb up 9 Thumb down 0
    • I think “Certifiably Unhinged Nasty Thug” would make for a snappier acronym.


      Thumb up 11 Thumb down 0
      • Oh Shit! This one is going in the file, too. I can’t wait to pop them out for full effect.


        Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
    • Roger O Thornhill in reply to Dean Esmay

      Hi Dean,

      “The personification of Princess Cupcake” It was shameful of me to say such a weak thing. I really must try harder!

      PS I’ll try to catch you this week Dean :-)


      Thumb up 10 Thumb down 0
  4. Hear! Hear!

    Thumb up 15 Thumb down 0
  5. Time to “Feminist Up” or, to abbreviate, “FU.”

    Thumb up 20 Thumb down 0
  6. Cultural_Expat

    Paul, great work again. These images, these videos, reveal the hate and the brainwashing that men seeking equality are up against. I think in time, and with hope, that putting the spotlight on these viscous ideologues-as you have done-will, in the long run, inhibit those individuals, from ending up in powerful positions similar to the positions that DA’s Mary Kellet and her boss for govt work-Carletta M. Bassano of Washington County, Maine now hold (Filler Case; DA’s Website-http://www.da7.org/aboutda.htm). They practice their anti-male hate with the law hammer and I’m fairly confident that as undergrads they were very much like the anti-male crowd in that video.
    As more and more feminists are becoming lawyers (what the hell else can they do…productive societal value adding work-I don’t think so), to shuffle papers, redefine words, talk a lot, beg the government for more money, and overall just turn decency, morality and fair treatment on its head, videos such as these can become disqualifiers (at least now…maybe) for the really unrestrained individuals shown in them. They will have to hide their venom until they sneak into their government jobs.
    I hope you screen capture, identify, and highlight on your website. I’d g’damn donate again!


    Thumb up 14 Thumb down 0
    • If we don’t destroy feminism western society will be destroyed in less then 20 years.


      Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
      • Karma, I fear you could well be right. It’s remarkable that in a period in which China is becoming ever more wealthy and powerful as a result of having embraced capitalism in the 1990s, much of the ‘developed world’ continues to embrace feminism, an evil offshoot of Marxism, becoming ever weaker and in debt to China (among others) in the process. Feminism is attacking every pillar of Western civilized societies.You never know, the mass media might report on the matter some time soon…

        Mike Buchanan
        ANTI-FEMINISM LEAGUE
        http://fightingfeminism.wordpress.com


        Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
  7. greg

    I watched video in horror as well.

    I’m new here, and new to the MRM. Cupla things

    1 I’m in Evanston Il, and I have two universities that I would love to plaster AVfM and COTWA stickers all over. Northwestern and Loyola.

    2 I discovered AVfM, just before the Kirk articles. Is it possible to update case?? I’m very concerned about the children, and my feeling is that the new criminal judge put a gag order on the Colonel, as he would define it as in “the best interests of the children.”

    Thanks

    Thumb up 22 Thumb down 0
    • First, welcome! And you will see a posters link on the masthead. Print and paste as you please!

      Also, there is more to come on the Kirk case. We are in a void of action right now, but will be bringing more to the pages here before long.

      Thanks for your concern about the Colonel and his children.

      Thumb up 15 Thumb down 0
    • Greg,

      I would ask you to please sign up in the forum, and contact me. We have already made one foray in the Evanston area, but are planning more. We would love to get together with you.


      Thumb up 10 Thumb down 0
      • Forum will not let me sign in.


        Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
        • Greg, what problem are you having?


          Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
          • I’m computer illiterate. I think I had to make a new acct and password for FORUM. I believe I sent Steve an email, with my email address. Thanks Paul


            Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
      • Emailed you a second time, the day before yesterday, about those activism stickers, Mr. Berkimer.

        Am I getting through, or are the spambots planning a new takeover again?


        Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
      • A 3rd grader knows more about computers, than I do. I’m being honest. My 18 yr old, says “Dad, it’s 2012.” I said “here’s cotwa, welcome to 2012, n campus life.” My 10 yr old, grabbed my iPad, n started talking to it. I was like “Wha the…??????” I am in Evanston, I just don’t know how to contact Steve….


        Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
    • If you have a facebook page please keep us updated on your poster exploits.


      Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  8. by_the_sword

    I recently posted the video footage of the Dr. Farrell picket line with the heading; “This is what a Feminist looks like”, on my Facebook page. I post a lot of articles from AVFM on my page in a hope that people will read them and become aware of our human rights cause. The reaction to my post by a former friend of mine is that I “hate women”.

    I wonder if this pussybegging, fuckwit, mangina even watched the video?

    Thumb up 17 Thumb down 0
    • Pussybegging Fuckwit Mangina: Not necessarily. There are extremists in every cause.
      But are you as outraged by women receiving less pay than men for the same work…? And that discrimination’s just for starters! Just asking…!
      Monday at 5:46pm

      Me: The wage gap myth has been debunked numerous times.

      Discrimination? Please tell me what rights I have as a male that a female does not?
      Monday at 6:08pm · Like

      Pussybegging Fuckwit Mangina: The wage gap “myth” has been debunked numerous times…? By whom, FOX NEWS?
      Have you actually spoken with women in the business world? I have over many years. What do some of your lady friends think of this A VOICE FOR MEN page you seem to endorse?
      And you mention “bias” in reporting…? Haysoos H. Marimba, already…!
      Monday at 6:24pm · Like

      Me: I have already shown you that the dept of labor as recently as 2009 has studies the matter and found that the pay gap (equal pay for equal work) is nonexistent.

      As for what women might think of my internet habits, I don’t care a whit for thier opinion, All my life I have been hearing how “bad” men and boys are from our feminized culture. It’s time that men and boys started hearing some truth, maybe then, they won’t have to hate themselves to placate some sick woman’s feelings.Monday at 7:38pm via mobile · Like

      Me:
      (link to Warren Farrel’s book)

      Why Men Earn More: The Startling Truth Behind the Pay Gap — and What Women Can Do About It
      http://www.amazon.com
      Controversial and exhaustively researched, gender expert Warren Farrell’s latest…
      See More
      Monday at 7:42pm via mobile · Like · Remove Preview

      [Here's where quote mining and ad hominem attacks begin...]
      Pussybegging, Fuckwit Mangina: So you “don’t care a whit” about the opinions of women… I’ve never felt “bad” or “hate” myself “to placate some sick woman’s feelings.” I care very much what women think. Perhaps that is why, despite all my health & finacial issues, I seem to be happier with life than you.
      By recent facebook postings you seem to have some disturbing anger issues going on out there… [me]! And I seem to recall your research being somewhat flawed. Or do you believe a government agency under Barack Obama only when it suits your ends?
      This is not the place to discuss your very personal rage. People can read it and perhaps your words can come back to bite you in your stern at a later time. The phone might be more suitable.
      Monday at 8:28pm · LikeMonday at 8:28pm · Like

      Me: Oh my.. I must have “issues” because I’m “angry” because my society hates males… oh yes that’s clearly the problem.
      23 hours ago · Like

      Me: You are asleep. Go watch some more Oprah reruns. When you are ready to wake up and give a shit about the other half of the human race… the male half… you let me know okay?
      23 hours ago · Like

      P-F-M: Oprah my ass! Sounds like some woman has been giving you some of the crap you’ve been giving women for so many years. Yeah, “(my name),” I remember a lot of what you’ve done as well as said.
      I wonder if you’d talk to (another friend) the way you’ve just addressed me…?
      23 hours ago · Like

      William Franz “Quanto por la mujere,” eh…? Yeah, that’s probably the best way for you to have a relationship with women. And that’s truly sad.
      23 hours ago · Like

      Me: Do you have an actual counter-argument to make, or are you just going to lob ad-hominem attacks at me?
      about an hour ago · Like

      P-F-M: I don’t know what your issues are with women! Honest-to-frigging-Christ! Your society hates males? (Hey, Right-Wing Fundamentalists don’t want medical insurance to pay for birth control or morning after pills but are fine with free Viagra!) This crap reminds me of the supposed “War on Christmas” here in NYC where you can’t turn around without bumping into some Christian transformation of the old pagan seasonal celebrations!
      What society do you live in? Have you actually spoken with women about their working environment over the years or the recent surge in attempted Right-Wing control over their bodies or do you just read about it from some member of the He-Man Woman-Haters Club? I have known many women screwed over by men just as men screwed over by women! Laws differ in just about every state to see that this is so, it seems.
      But I will not waste my time & energy in a counter-argument to BULLSHIT!
      I am more interested in what has made you so personally obsessed & bitter. Why haven’t I heard anything about your fencing? Your music? Your ship? Where is all this anger coming from and why? Principle…? I don’t think so.
      56 minutes ago · Like

      Me: My issues are with the law and our government, and how men are abused by a society that they work to uphold. My problem is with an educational system that marginalizes male students. My problem is with a legal system that denies men and boys due process of law and gives males harsher sentencing and lets females off the hook more often than not.

      What have I said or posted, would imply that I have a problem with women?
      31 minutes ago · Like

      Me: Unless you are confusing my opposition of “feminism” with hatred of women? In that case I will remind you that women are people and feminism is an ideology, a hate movement that preaches that women are victims and men are vile oppressors.
      16 minutes ago · Like


      Thumb up 14 Thumb down 0
      • this is basically an exact copy of most of the conversations i have had with non close relatives for the last few years HA! and when you confront them on feminism vs women and do they know the difference they almost always get very quiet very fast, tho some white knights have continued on saying i should throw myself on the sword for some reason or another, and some havent spoken since.


        Thumb up 14 Thumb down 0
      • Last time I expressed criticism of feminism on facebook, I was told to educate myself about what feminism actually means, and to learn about the patriarchy.

        The person’s cognitive dissonance was obvious (“Men don’t need a support group on campus, they have earth 24/7″ but “Male victims of domestic violence is something society needs to be more aware of.”) I stopped trying to talk with her about this when she said that criticism of feminism made her feel sick to her stomach.

        She isn’t a bad person. Intellectually, she knows that men have problems. However, she’s stuck in that victim mentality, and unwilling to even consider that just maybe men might be more in need of help than women in some cases.


        Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
        • Always the classic dodge right? The response I’d make would be “I have, have you?”

          I’ll still grant that there are NAFALTs. They’re mostly people who’ve done little reading and little research. But you know, they’re out there. I know a few. Though the longer time goes on the more most of them seem to start hedging.


          Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
          • OneHundredPercentCotton in reply to Dean Esmay

            I’ve already posted this today, and know I shouldn’t again…but it bears repeating, so I will, until someone tells me to shut up:

            So…. It’s Boyz against Gurlz, and boyz need to get their OWN thing going, because women certainly cant expect to give up THEIR exclusive privileges to help men.

            Men’s organizations….hmmmmm. Isn’t that what they used to call “Boy’s Clubs”? “Men Only”?

            We don’t even let the Boy Scouts be just for boys, men’s “Good Old Boy” male exclusive ANYTHING have been MADE ILLEGAL and wiped from the face of the earth…

            …and now you’re making out like men are just stupid or remiss for not having their OWN exclusive “awareness” organizations?

            Please, oh please enlighten me with your lovely logic yet some more.

            I just. can’t. wait.


            Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
        • Stop trying to engage her, let her rot in her own filth. I refuse to engage with feminists and manginas, I address the ‘fence-sitters’ who don’t know better and show genuine interest only. I’ve been attacked by manginas and I swiftly put them in their place, without trying to convince them about anything, they’re doomed.


          Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
    • He watched it, and could not handle the reality. Therefore, he just had to accuse you of hating women.

      Same shit, different day.

      Thumb up 19 Thumb down 0
  9. Booyah

    I see my quote didnt make it into the quote mining. Must have been too close to the truth.

    Great letter Paul.


    Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
  10. Paul Elam – you fucking rock!
    IT’S OFFICIAL.


    Thumb up 14 Thumb down 0
  11. 4thtroika

    Bravo!


    Thumb up 9 Thumb down 0
  12. silzbo

    Our leader has spoken.


    Thumb up 9 Thumb down 0
  13. Ben

    I have no doubt that this situation will continue to get worse until there is some real campus protests, such as what happened in the 60s when President Kennedy put James Merideth through the front door to the admissions building at Ole Miss, the Weather Underground was hurling Molatov cocktails at Berkley, and the police were rippling the Black student dorm with bullets at Jackson State University. When enough men get kicked out of college because of a false accusation from a member of the politically correct gender, and then those men look around realistically and see how badly they are hated with all the campus hate rallies, while they are left destitute with a hundred thousand dollars in student loan debt and no way to get a job due to the false accusations, REAL protests WILL occur. I am sure of it. I am in no way advocating any of this and hope that I am wrong, but academic buildings will likely burn this decade.


    Thumb up 10 Thumb down 0
  14. mra2012

    Bravo. Don’t stop until you out her.


    Thumb up 10 Thumb down 0
  15. Robert St. Estephe

    Is the University of Toronto attempting to host a new version of Lady Mao’s “cultural revolution?” It is well known that authoritarian ideologues obsessed with genocidial ideations frequently trick their way into tenured professorships. And it well-known that Pol Pot developed his Khymer Rough genocide plans while a student at the University of Paris. There needs to be a public disclosure of the anti-social cultism on campus that is demonstrated in the shocking videos — which have now created an international scandal that could tarnish the university’s reputation for decades into the future. The images in these Toronto videos reveal a patently sociopathic fanaticism that is disturbingly reminiscent of the early years of National Socialism, Fascism and Bolshevism that seemed to many to be no big deal in their early stages but which grew into cancerous power blocks that ruined the lives of tens of millions.


    Thumb up 12 Thumb down 0
  16. My alter ego thinks he should “share” this article with a large number of Toronto residents. I think so too.


    Thumb up 12 Thumb down 0
    • Roger O Thornhill in reply to Suz

      Hi Suz,

      Do you mean a leaflet run?

      BTW, Nice bike.


      Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
      • More like a leaflet run in cyberspace. Email me if you’re interested. driversuz44@gmail.com

        That’s my dad on the bike when he was a cop – 1957
        Yes, my Manly-Man father is my avatar, although no I was never Daddy’s Little Girl. It’s for love and respect, not a symbol of a fairy-tale childhood.


        Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0
        • Roger O Thornhill in reply to Suz

          It’s for love and respect, and that’s the best reason of all Suz!
          I’ve sent you an email too.


          Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
        • OneHundredPercentCotton in reply to Suz

          S: ” my Manly-Man father is my avatar, although no I was never Daddy’s Little Girl. It’s for love and respect, not a symbol of a fairy-tale childhood.”

          One more thing I see we have in common.


          Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0
  17. malcolm

    “Women hold up half the sky” is a Chairman Mao quote, so you don’t have to think too hard about where their inspiration comes from.
    It will be interesting when some of these thugs names surface on the internet, especially that hatefull young woman and that slack-jawed, greasy string haired, wispy bearded, noodle armed excuse for a man who was there with his “woman studies” class. In a couple of years I’ll have the pleasure of ordering Big Macs from both of them.


    Thumb up 12 Thumb down 0
    • That guy is from the union, I spammed his unions facebook page with the video a few nights back.


      Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
    • “Women hold up half the sky”

      Sounds too much like actual work to me. Pics or it didn’t happen.


      Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0
      • ‘Women hold up half the sky’ has to be one of the most vacuous statements ever made by a prominent human being. I know of a dozen more intelligent quotations by Marx. Groucho, that is, not Karl.

        My favourite quotation with relevance to our fight against feminism comes from Mahatma Gandhi:

        First they ignore you,
        then they ridicule you,
        then they fight you,
        then you win.

        Mike Buchanan
        ANTI-FEMINISM LEAGUE
        http://fightingfeminism.wordpress.com


        Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
        • I dislike Gandhi. Actually, that’s not true. I dislike pacifism, I don’t know much about Gandhi other than that he was a pacifist. As far as I’m concerned, pacifism is an open invitation to be stepped on.

          Jack Donovan’s article “Violence is Golden” (http://www.jack-donovan.com/axis/2011/03/violence-is-golden/) is one piece of thought provoking literature that I think everyone should read, not because it advocates violence, but because it provides food for thought.

          The road to hell is paved with good intentions after all.


          Thumb up 1 Thumb down 3
        • Women held up half the sky until they discovered the sky has no money to buy them shoes. So, they decided to rob men instead.


          Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
  18. Mateusz

    “Men and boys are human beings, worthy of rights,”

    Woah, woah, woah… That sounds like hate speech right there, saying males are people, and that males have human rights. It’s, like, totally supporting rape culture. You are literally raping every woman in the world. Literally. And incesting our children’s families. Probably with rape.

    Thumb up 16 Thumb down 0
  19. TheUnknown

    Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

    Thumb up 4 Thumb down 9
    • She made herself a public figure.
      I am doing everything in my power to find out who this demagogue is and I will plaster her picture and quotes for all to see if I do. She is a bully and we all know bullies are cowards. Let’s see her out herself to us in a moderated debate. I would pay for Paul’s, JTO’s, or GWW’s airfare to see that but she doesn’t have the guts.


      Thumb up 11 Thumb down 0
    • scatmaster is correct. She stepped in front of a camera and opened her mouth. Why should she not suffer the consequences? Because she’s a fragile little girl who has never been held accountable for anything in her life?

      If she didn’t want to draw attention to herself, she didn’t have to. Grrrla have choices, you know.


      Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0
      • OneHundredPercentCotton in reply to Suz

        She was “brave” enough to step in someone’s face, she’s “brave” enough to stand by her actions.

        It’s like calling Jenna Kardiswhatchamacallit out on HER “brave” stance.

        Don’t do the crime if you can’t do the time, gurlz.

        I’d hate to deprive her of her feminist bragging rights.


        Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
      • TheUnknown in reply to Suz

        Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

        Thumb up 0 Thumb down 7
        • umm.. it seems you “like” her, and have jumped on your white horse.

          This is an important life lesson, when you publicly fuck with people, especially those who are innocent of wrongdoing, you deserve and should expect the same in return.


          Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
          • Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

            Thumb up 0 Thumb down 5
          • @Unknown:
            ” I believe that expectation of privacy is an important right, even if someone’s face appears in front of a camera…”

            Really? Let’s see. She’s out in public. She’s attending a protest which was held for the express purpose of publicizing a complaint. Camera’s were present and her group was playing to them. She either stepped in front of a camera or she stayed in front of a camera, while screaming vile incendiary insults at an innocent party.

            1.) No. She does NOT have any expectation of privacy under such circumstances.
            2.) She behaved very much like a person who was actively seeking publicity, not shunning it.

            To call her naive is ludicrous. We’re simply offering her the publicity she apparently wanted quite badly that night.


            Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
    • “It does us no good to make her known to the internet as the woman who said that one thing that night.”

      I disagree entirely. Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We need to make it clear to all feminists that they will be held accountable for their behavior in the public eye. And while TV networks and major news sources will sweep feminist’s misdeeds under the rug, we will remind the world again and again about the hate these women express towards men. Letters should be written to the university until she is fired. She should be shamed for years to come. This should follow her for her entire life.


      Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
      • OneHundredPercentCotton in reply to Otter

        I also think it’s appropriate to expose the person (not sure the of gender) who said the guy seeking suicide answers should have sought info from feminist’s sources instead of Dr. Farrell.


        Thumb up 10 Thumb down 0
        • Yeah I was also appalled at her (pretty sure it was a she – just!) breathtaking arrogance. It is not even the case that men are seeking special treatment or privileges – just equal treatment and to be recognised as full human beings despite our sex. If feminism was offering that to men most mra’s would be feminists but it isn’t so we aren’t.


          Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0
        • Absolutely. I think that by not exposing these people we allow them to continue to operate. Everyone, public or private, should be held accountable for the things they say and do.


          Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
  20. TheUnknown

    Also I’d like to add, for the UT students reading, “The UTSU is calling on members of the University of Toronto and the University of Toronto administration not to tolerate free speech of any kind on our campus.”


    Thumb up 10 Thumb down 0
  21. TigerMan

    Hashtag for University of Toronto = #UofT
    There is no effective hashtag for students union there so best to use “@” which is @UTSU98
    The current president of University Of Toronto Students Union is Shaun Shepherd @shaunshep
    Just some helpful tips when tweeting re this article if you weren’t already aware of them :)


    Thumb up 9 Thumb down 0
  22. Merlin

    I saw the clip on YouTube and was disgusted by what I saw.

    Why wasn’t this out of control female not apprehended? Could you imagine a male getting away with such a display? I don’t think so. She was goading the man, and I’m convinced her intention was to try and get him to strike out.

    That way, the headline would have read, “Man assaults female protester outside the Warren Farrell conference.”

    Just as well that this excuse for a woman was caught on camera for all to see.

    Nice one, Paul.


    Thumb up 13 Thumb down 0
    • Yes and I see this all the time on twitter too – where some repugnant radfem will goad and provoke obviously hoping you will respond with an insult they can quote in their appeal to get you banned. I don’t fall for that but then again I’m not a guy that has a lot to lose. What is really galling is when I see these feminist ***** picking on a guy who is already in a lot of pain from being fucked over by a corrupt and biased family justice system. The eager cruelty of such oxygen thieves is not a pretty sight.


      Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
    • Actually, Merlin, the headline would read, “Man at Farrell rally assaults female student.” The press would never refer to her using a term like “protestor” which would invite the reader to speculate that mischief on her part was a likely factor. Remember: Man bad woman good.

      Also, it would not be a “conference” according to the newspaper; it would be a “rally”. Femi-normative tone shaping is the way.


      Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0
  23. Cumbria

    You tell ‘em!!


    Thumb up 10 Thumb down 0
  24. Everybody should grab a copy of this video by the way. YouTube is threatening to pull it for “violating privacy.” Bullshit. It’s news reporting. But if they pull it it needs to be mirrored everywhere.


    Thumb up 11 Thumb down 0
    • A great video just showing the normal behavior of the modern college feminist.

      “No hate speech on campus!”

      I agree. Throw the feminists out!


      Thumb up 9 Thumb down 0
    • It’s done, Dean, I am thinking translate to portuguese, and upload in my Youtube channel, by the way, I am thinking to do the same thing with more videos that I appreciate, about men’s issues.


      Thumb up 10 Thumb down 0
    • We have a copy of it. If YT pulls it, which they might well do, I will be happy to host it here with the owners approval.


      Thumb up 9 Thumb down 0
      • I have it as well.
        The author I believe is here in Ottawa on Friday at a local film fest. Wish I could make it. Damn It!!!!!!


        Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
    • I’ve got a copy, as I imagine many do. This video is going to stay on the internet forever.

      There is of course another aspect in regards to the organizers; that I mentioned in my response to the video on Youtube, that needs to be considered. I’ll just repeat the comment here, if I may:

      “For CUPE to have organized this travesty of free speech suppression; demonstrating the will to use government funds, to engage in violent actions against those who were merely trying to undo the imbalance and hatred, that feminists have inculcated towards boys, is an atrocity in itself. This union no longer has any merit to exist as far as I’m concerned; they have become tyrants and have invalidated themselves.”


      Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0
    • Exchange ‘Mens Rights’ with ‘Jehova’, and you pretty much end up with this scenario. I just knew I had seen this before somewhere:


      Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
  25. Lovekraft

    The thought “their parents must be so proud” (sarcastically) comes to mind. But then, since these Marxists likely come from broken homes, they are simply abandoned, broken people who find succor in false family.

    Looking at this video with the sound off confirms this. Their faces are full of mischief and hate.


    Thumb up 10 Thumb down 0
  26. I spammed over 200 UNI, union and high school facebook pages a few nights back, with the original AvFM article and the original video.

    I wish I could raise a small army as I have a plan to introduce AvFM to every high school in the US, I have the list of all U.S high schools, I have a well thought out plan but I need troops and lots of them.

    Sigh….

    Let’s inform the next generation of parents and students of the truth, I believe if used correctly this one video plus website we could destroy feminism in a few short years.


    Thumb up 8 Thumb down 1
    • Karma: Question.

      If we are spamming all of these facebook pages, blogs, etc. How come no one has shown up here. I think we know the answer to that.


      Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
      • So true.

        With the high school facebook pages I hope to get the young ones reading AvFM, they might not get it off the bat, but it does plant the meme that it is ok to question the current paradigm. Hopefully we can also prevent them from enrolling in gender studies.


        Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0
  27. I spammed the UFT facebook pages a few nights back.


    Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
  28. Shrek6

    To the cretins at the UTSU, see the picture at the top of this article. Well, the storm is coming so prepare yourselves!

    Thank you Paul for speaking on our behalf, because in this instance when evil has tried advance, “Good men have done something!”


    Thumb up 9 Thumb down 0
  29. Tim Legere

    My e-mail to a Canadian Television Program:

    Dear Fifth Estate,

    On November 16th 2012 Dr Warren Farrell was invited to speak at the University of Toronto concerning issues faced by Boys and Men.

    Just prior to the lecture protestors blocked the entry to the auditorium and also characterized Farrell, the author of various books on human rights and former member of the New York chapter of the National Organization of Women, as a “Rape Apologist”. These accusations contradict all of Farrell’s writings.

    The following is a link to a video of the demonstration.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iARHCxAMAO0

    Based on this video it seems that Canadians will not be allowed to freely attend or commence a discussion on this topic.

    Sincerely,
    Tim Legere


    Thumb up 14 Thumb down 0
    • Good going Tim!!!

      Perhaps W5 as well.

      Of course you know what side of the political spectrum those journalistic “institutions” are on.


      Thumb up 9 Thumb down 0
      • Thanks Scat man. I also contacted Barbara Kay (same e-mail). I’ll sent it to W5 too. Yes, I’m aware of the Journalistic “slant” of those media institutions … but, we might get lucky.


        Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0
  30. John A

    The quote sources for the University of Toronto Students’ Union article;

    Quotation sources:

    http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/w/warren_farrell.html

    http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=901762

    http://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/88805.Warren_Farrell

    What are they studying there? Do they reference brainyquote.com in their papers?

    Their quote (out of context);

    “before we began calling this date rape, we called it exciting”

    In the original context of “female romantic literature”

    We have forgotten that before we began calling this date rape and date fraud, we called it exciting. Somehow, women’s romance novels are not titled He Stopped When I Said “No.” They are, though, titled Sweet Savage Love, in which the woman rejects the hand of her gentler lover who saves her from the rapist and marries the man who repeatedly and savagely rapes her. It is this “marry the rapist” theme that not only turned Sweet Savage Love into a best-seller but also into one of the most enduring of women’s romance novels. And it is Rhett Butler, carrying the kicking and screaming Scarlett O’Hara to bed, who is a hero to females-not to males- in Gone with the Wind (the best-selling romance novel of all time- to women). It is important that woman’s “noes” be respected and that her “yeses” be respected. And it is also important when nonverbal “yeses” (tongues still touching) conflict with those verbal “noes” that the man not be put in jail for choosing the “yes” over the “no.” He might just be trying to become her fantasy. The danger is in the fine line between fantasy and nightmare.

    So the “we” is not men, but actually the way many women perceive rough, aggressive sexual fantasies.

    It took me 10 mins on Google to find this, so much for their research skills…


    Thumb up 13 Thumb down 0
    • OneHundredPercentCotton in reply to John A

      Anyone around in the ’70′s can attest that was a transitory time in our sexual history, and what passed for “exciting” or “liberating” (sounds like such a silly word now) then, is considered “sexual molestation” and “rape” by today’s different “enlightenment”.’

      I worked with a girl who was absent til Thursday because the “Mr. Goodbar” biker guy (they were scary dangerous guys back then) she went home with on Saturday night barricaded the bedroom door with a rifle and wouldn’t let her leave for four days.

      She told and retold this “thrilling” story like it was a True Romance Novel while I gagged on the barf coming up in my mouth. She LOVED it.

      Years later, I guess after someone “enlightened” her, she was still retelling the story, only now sobbing “I was raaaped” about the encounter. Apparently she forgot I remembered the same story when it was “exciting”.

      The ’70′s were strange times. Just as strange as the “Vagina Monologues” removing the child encounter “monologue” after it transitioned from being “exciting” to being child molestation.

      Dr. Farrell is absolutely correct in recounting the moral standards of the time. This is shooting the messenger, pure and simple.


      Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
      • OneHundredPercentCotton in reply to OneHundredPercentCotton

        THIS represents the quintessential ’70′s, complete with “crazed” Vietnam vets:

        Looking For Mr. Goodbar -

        “Theresa (Diane Keaton) enters the sexual revolution of the 1970s feeling confused, as she is simultaneously repelled and attracted to the sexual experimentation she witnesses going on around her. Although she continues to teach by day, at night she goes clubbing at a series of increasingly seedy bars, picking up men for one-night stands. The recreational sexual encounters slowly become an addiction, as Theresa begins pursuing more dangerous men with violent sexual proclivities to enhance her “high”. She views her one night stands with shady low-lifes as a way to provide excitement and adventure to her otherwise boring and ordinary existence.

        An encounter with an Italian thug named Tony (Richard Gere) develops into a nascent relationship, and the two begin regularly meeting for increasingly rough and dangerous sex, culminating in Tony’s introduction of a switchblade knife into their sex play. Meanwhile, Theresa attempts to date a welfare case worker named James, whom her family holds up as the paragon of Irish-American youth. The relationship quickly falters, as James turns out to be just as shallow and emotionally manipulative as Tony.

        Theresa ultimately breaks up with Tony, who then stalks her, including harassing her outside the school where she works until the older brother of one of her students beats him up. With the new year approaching, Theresa resolves to leave her clubbing behind and take control of her life. Seeking one final hookup on New Year’s Eve, Theresa picks up a man named Gary, who turns out to be a sexually confused war veteran. At Theresa’s apartment, Gary finds himself unable to attain an erection. Misreading Theresa’s frustration as her questioning his sexuality, Gary attacks her and begins beating and raping her. After Theresa screams “Do it!” Gary stabs her to death. Theresa’s dead face drifts farther away from the screen and into a black void as the film ends.”

        THIS was the era Dr. Farrell made those statements about.


        Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
        • OHPC,

          What the hell is it with you women MRA’s?

          It seems that every bloody last one of you are lovely looking sheilas I swear it. Izzey, Aimee McGee, Typhon, GWW, Tara etc, and now you. The hootin’ jabbering baboons in the femmo camps see this also and do not like it.

          All lovely you lot, and I sexist-ly upvoted you before I even read your comment. I’ll read it now and maybe even upvote it again a few times for a *hoot.

          * A non-monkey hoot. Just the normal type.


          Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
        • Yeah ok mate,

          Read them both and they’re grand.


          Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
      • “Vagina Monologues” removing the child encounter “monologue” after it transitioned from being “exciting” to being child molestation.

        I assume you mean “The Little Coochie Snorcher That Could”? For all I know, they just removed the “good rape” line and bumped the child’s age from 13 to 16, but the monologue is still performed.


        Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  31. Imdefender

    May I post this on The University of Toronto Student’s Union’s facebook page.I really want to it could be fun


    Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0
  32. Robert St. Estephe

    The loonies psychopath control-freak “progressives” took over in Bavaria. The did it in Cambodia. They did it in North Korea. They did it in Rwanda. Is Toronto to be entered into the history books on the same list? Sure, the Toronto psychopaths are only in their “warming up” phase, yet Mein Kampf was the product of the early — openly Stalin-praising — “warming up” phase of the German social engineers as well. And what happened after 1945? Stasi, the blueprint for present-day feminism.

    (PS, anybody who is not familiar with the history of the great American Indian activist, Russell Means, who died recently, I strongly recommend you get to know his story on Youtube. There is an amazing documentary on “Wounded Knee” and great interviews from recent years.) Russel Means was a real man, and every boy should be taught his life story.


    Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
  33. scatmaster

    How about this one pinetree:

    he he he

    http://i.imgur.com/V9kRM.jpg


    Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
    • Roger O Thornhill in reply to scatmaster

      Hi Scatmaster,

      Has someone done some Photoshop work on her pic?

      The reason I ask is that I’m sure I can see evidence of the “Ugly as Sin Filter” and the “Heinous Bitch Brush”.


      Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
  34. Zarathos022

    Typical Feminist Bullshit.

    When you call them out for it, they keep making more of it.

    Hitler Barbie? LOL! Isn’t that what somebody called Femitheist?


    Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
  35. Zarathos022

    I do wonder, though, when they were cherry picking comment on our site if they ever came across MY comment.

    I hope they did and I hope it STUNG their asses something fierce.

    (to protesters)

    Oh and btw, shitheads, if you even bothered to really pay attention to this site you’d know that we have male AND FEMALE readers and contributors. So that blows your whole “anti-woman” argument out of the fucking water.

    Have fun having this little stunt haunt you where you go from now on.

    You deserve no less.


    Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
  36. IAmA_WhiteMale_AMA

    I could be wrong, but I found a U of T video of a woman that looks and sounds similar to her. It also shows a name. I won’t copy the name here in case I’m wrong, but go to 1:18 in the following video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1wh5BsFHD4U


    Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
  37. the Tired Low Social

    if we could get a hold of the college’s yearbook we’d be able to find her


    Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0
  38. Kimski

    Perhaps a closer inspection of Danielle Sandhu’s friend list might be worthwhile?


    Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
    • Spent 2 hours searching Toronto feminist groups, the Student union website and Sandhu’s FB. So far no luck.


      Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
      • Maybe offering a reward for information would help draw this harpy into the spotlight? I would put some money into the pot for that, for sure. The pure unmasked hatred of this woman got right under my skin.


        Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0
      • Did a little searching myself, and came up with nothing, too.
        Worth a try, though. With these grrlz the herd usually comes first.


        Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
  39. JFinn

    In the meantime, checking the amount of comments on anti-MRA site manboobz(where logical fallacies dominate,) it seems he’s suddenly lost 1/2 to 2/3 of his traffic.

    History will eventually tilt towards us. The passion to suppress others’ rights is ultimately weaker than the passion to be liberated.


    Thumb up 10 Thumb down 0
    • ‘Manboobz-Where Logic Fails.’

      I like it. Catchy, short, and very very appropriate.
      Now we just need to sell him the concept.
      ;)


      Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0
  40. Bev

    Violence by women is on the increase:

    Number of women in prison rapidly rising
    Date December 6, 2012 – 4:41PM

    The number of women in Australia’s prisons has surged in the past 10 years, and jumped more than eight per cent in the past 12 months according to new figures from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS).In an alarming trend, the numbers of women locked up for criminal offences grew more than 20 times faster than the increase in men in prison last year, according to the annual ‘Prisoners in Australia’ report. The ABS said the number of women behind bars increased by 8.4 per cent over the past 12 months, and by 48 per cent since 2002.
    This compares to a 0.4 per cent increase in the number of male prisoners over the past 12 months, and a 29 per cent rise in the past decade.

    http://www.theage.com.au/national/number-of-women-in-prison-rapidly-rising-20121206-2axq6.html#ixzz2EFhAuJCb

    If you take into account that women receive lesser sentences and are more often put on diversion programs these figures are probably an under estimate of the true rise in female crime.

    Question: How do feminists spin this?

    Answer: They will say that these women are being harshly treated because the justice system is harder/unfair to women. The justice system needs to be revamped to keep these poor women out of jail.


    Thumb up 10 Thumb down 0
    • The numbers look the same for the northern part of europe.

      The reasons for this are obvious. The sentences are not harsh enough, ’cause crime sure as hell pays off for some.
      Including murdering your children.
      If you’re really lucky you might even get a spot on Oprah, where you can blame someone else for your own actions, and get away with that too.

      The fastest way to becoming a feminist must be taking a board, drive a 7-inch nail through it, and continously hammer it against your head, until you eventually lobotomize yourself.
      Go, grrlz, go.


      Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
    • They may have stats to say they are putting more women in prison, but they don’t say that they are still giving them huge discounts purely because they are women.
      However, I would like to know where they get these stats from, because they all seem like bullshit to me. We see on the news all the time where women are given spent convictions for crimes ranging from petty theft to murder of not only adults, but children also.

      Personally I think the stats are bullshit!


      Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
      • The stats are from the ABS so I would trust them.

        You are however right crime by women is up and the percentage receiving light sentences will have increased by the same or a greater percentage (probably the later).


        Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
  41. tallwheel

    I think another quote from Dr. Farrell up on brainyquote.com is quite fitting with UoTSU’s protest.
    “Throughout my life I have always been amazed that people couldn’t listen to other people, that they couldn’t hear their best intent, that there seemed to be an enormous need to demonize.”


    Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0
  42. Laddition

    Documentary about US Prison Rape from the BBC World Service – download should work overseas

    don’t get too excited, this is on Al JaBeeb-a, the bias should be very familiar

    Docs: US Prison Rape Dec 2012
    Thu, 6 Dec 12

    Duration:
    24 mins
    Linda Pressly investigates why rape and sexual abuse is so common in America’s huge prison system – and asks if new measures to fight it will succeed.

    http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/podcasts/worldservice/docarchive/docarchive_20121206-0100a.mp3

    Starts by talking about a woman prisoner, ‘Monica Washington’ in Tutwiler prison, being raped and then says 10% of America’s 2 million prisoners have reported problems

    i.e. no mention of men specifically – I’m shocked! shocked I tell you!

    I’m only a third of the way through, maybe it gets more balanced…bwahahaha (I feel silly just saying that)


    Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
  43. If you want to hear the vile machinations of this ‘so-called’ Doctor Farrell in full, you can catch his Toronto presentation here.


    Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
    • I watched it beggining to end and am even more impressed by Dr Farrell . His sheeer humanity wit and compassion even for his enemies is truly humbling to witness. His understanding of the social dynamics at play in our lifetimes and perhaps beyond not just in the USA but worldwide made it a fascinating talkj where you felt you were learning so much at once on many levels. He ends his talk the way he started it with an unabashed promotion of real love and understanding between men and women of the same species we call the human race. What a great man :)


      Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
  44. I reckon that if the wimminz find Farrell perturbing, we should set JTO on them….

    **snicker**


    Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1
  45. Eye in the Sky

    Check out this essay on the École Polytechnique Massacre of December 6, 1989:

    http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2012/12/05/jonathan-kay-for-the-23rd-anniversary-of-the-ecole-polytechnique-massacre-amish-lessons-in-mourning/

    Feminists have been using the opportunity of an anniversary day to “commemorate” their hate propaganda triumph ever since.


    Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
    • They promote division between the sexes and hostility towards men and act surprised when some nuts crack. Feminists are not good @ science!
      I’m sure it galls them that this wasn’t backed by any mens rights group not that I think it would stop them from asserting that no matter the truth.


      Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
  46. Robert St. Estephe

    A new thought. I haven’t seen any discussion of this yet (though I may have missed it). I seems that not a single “rape culture” feminist has bothered to criticize the sexual assault (often-times involving penetration) of women at airports by female TSA functionaries. In some reported cases it is particularly attractive young women who are targeted by women who are thought by their victims to have been sexually excited by the assaults they perpetrate on them.

    If there is anything in the US that deserves to be called a “rape culture” it would have to be TSA (plus CPS (child protective services)).

    Where’s the outrage?

    (I have no time to develop an article on this topic but perhaps some other MRA might give it a go.)


    Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0
    • I’m due to travel soon and I must say I’ve felt pretty uncomfortable on a pat down from a female airport security officer in the past. I’m travelling with a blind friend and have huge concern if she is patted down she will be well displeased if groped – and she’s a hell of a lot more perceptive of touch than most sighted folks.
      Give me a male officer any day, once had a huge laugh with two on an early flight from Scotland to London, I was travelling with a christening cake and it was put through x-ray 3 times before I realised they were taking the piss. I asked ‘Can you tell me if it is cooked all the way through?’ One looked the other and said ‘Damn, I guess we won’t be confiscating this one for morning tea’


      Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0
      • Aimee, nothing to do with feminism etc., but as someone of Scottish and French Canadian extraction, I just wanted to say how much I enjoyed this example of Scottish humour, and your riposte. I was a business consultant for some years and my time working in the Scotch Whisky industry remains a golden (if blurred) memory.

        Mike Buchanan


        Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0
    • So true Robert, but women compartmentalize well. Big Sis, “employee” of da master…whoremaster…himself, el hefe, Huggy-bear, snoop-doggy dog pimpmaster Obama only bitch-slaps them for their own good. Pathetic what they will allow…their robatrons..they allow it because the pimpmastah is big daddy and he knows whats best for them.


      Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
  47. Hyperanthropos

    I thought I recognized the tactic of blocking entrance-ways from somewhere, and remembered it was employed by the striking students in Quebec this year. Their leaders did a tour of Ontario schools like UofT where they shared some of their tactics in the hopes they would be emulated. Also, CUPE had given the Quebec student unions thousands of dollars to aide them in their conflict with the province. These tactics may soon be seen in other cities in North America, as the Quebec students have shared them with students elsewhere such as in New York. I have no doubt that if their numbers were greater, the protesters would have invaded the space of the talk and made lots of noise in order to prevent any discussion from taking place, much like the bleating sheep in Animal Farm who Napolean used to silence Snowball.


    Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
  48. rper1959

    The video clip now has over 140,000 views and 2,500 comment, please everyone keep spreading this clip via you networks , everyone should see it!


    Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
  49. malcolm

    I guess the biggest lesson in this for me is how easily some hysterical women can call a man a rapist without having any evidence to support it and how they feel no shame in doing so.

    I would like to thank the Canadian Union of Public Employees and the University of Toronto Student Union for letting this truth be shown to the world.


    Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
  50. UKMan

    As distasteful and disturbing as the ‘protest’ was, be honest, it was an absolute GIFT.

    Reminds me of the movie title, “How to Lose Friends and Alienate People”, or good old clichés like “shooting yourself in the foot” or “cutting off your nose to spite your face” etc.

    At best, the feminists come across as creepy deranged lunatics, whereas the “f*****g scum, rape apologists and incest supporters” come across as calm, normal people trying to get into a lecture hall.

    Some of the comments around the web are golden – people who wondered why there was a protest against the actor Will Ferrell, realizing their mistake and reading up on Warren Farrell. Others checking out Farrell’s work for the first time and liking what they read.

    Perhaps shrieking, spitting, nose-pierced loony girl can become a poster girl for the MRM, thanks to her solid work in promoting the cause?


    Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
  51. This front-line incident staged by members of the TSU is likely demonstrative of what goes on behind the greater public bureaucratic scenes in Ottawa (the capital city of Canada, for those not aware of this nation’s politics). You know, “civil servants”, entrusted to the well being of all citizens, holding the same ideology as those ‘students’ while maintaining all the one-sided “equality” measures mostly paid for in taxes by men.
    One need not be an alimony paying ex-spouse to have their resourses stolen from them. (Progressive taxation that funds feminism takes care of this).


    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Fathers

News Release: DV is not “men only”

The most comprehensive review of the scholarly domestic violence research literature ever conducted concludes, among other things, that women perpetrate physical and emotional abuse, as well as engage in control behaviors, at comparable rates to men. Says a recent news release.

Remember, misandry does not exist

A Russian video that you may not actually want to watch, but which you may want to send to the next dipshit who utters the words "misandry doesn't exist" to you.

arid forest ground

Who are you, man?

John the other searches though the burned down remains of a Jake Pentland article on masculinity and feminism, looking for meaning. He found some of sorts, though not the kind that was intended when Pentland wrote the article. No clues, though. You have to read it for yourself.

clown suicide

Male suicide is funny! Marketing gone wrong

There's no question when writing comedy, there's always a danger that you'll offend someone. Nevertheless, sometimes what a culture thinks is funny, or not funny, says far more about that culture itself than it does about the nature of humor. It can tell us what we choose to see, and also what we choose not to see.

Sex-Slave

Study Reveals Female Rape Victims Enjoyed the Experience

It also calls into question whether the concept of “consent,” where it relates to sexual activity, is antiquated. Indeed it calls into question whether the concept of “rape,” in the literal definition, is just a cultural misconception for a male tendency to fulfill women’s desire for sexual excitement and thrills and women’s collective desire to see this accomplished.

Radio-Update1122

Jake Pentland on AVFM Radio

Recently Paul Elam appeared on the Jake Pentland Radio Show on Blog Talk Radio. It was a bit of a chaotic interview, punctuated by dumb questions...not from Jake Pentland but from some of the women associated with his show. Now he comes to AVFM, sans the shrills, for a real talk.