Are the words “boys and girls” social constructs? Well, of course they are. These words were created by people and their meanings spread throughout societies across the globe. There is no doubt that these words, like all words, are societal constructs used to identify certain objects, places, or people.
But are boys and girls social constructs?
Well according to the people behind the creation of a school for small children in Sweden, yes. I wouldn’t put it past feminists to propagate the insane notion that male and female genitalia only grow because of the current societal influence of two parents. But getting the public to accept something like that would be difficult even for the eternally privileged victims that support the feminist hate movement. That won’t stop them from trying though and the first step, as with all social perversion and control schemes, starts with children.
A preschool in Sweden wants to eliminate gender bias by referring to children as “friends,” instead of girls and boys, and avoiding gender-specific pronouns such as “him” or “her.”
For everyone that was wondering how life in Sweden could get any worse thanks to feminist influence, here’s the answer.
The taxpayer-funded preschool which opened last year in the liberal Sodermalm district of Stockholm for kids aged 1 to 6 is among the most radical examples of Sweden’s efforts to engineer equality between the sexes from childhood onward.
Right off the bat anyone that isn’t wearing bigot goggles can see the main flaw with this program. It’s funded by public tax dollars. In my opinion, if a bunch of idiots want to get together in an attempt to destroy all concepts of male and female in the minds of children they can do it without my money. However, as any anti-feminist knows, all hate influenced projects put forth under the feminist ideological banner are always paid for by the people feminists hate. Those people would be men, women who disagree with feminism, and especially, men.
Moving on to the bigotry the school promotes, I’ll start with a question. How exactly do the words boy and girl instigate gender bias? These words were created with the purpose of identifying human beings with penises and vaginas. I suppose the school faculty believes that by not referring to the children as he or she will help…with…?
I lost my train of thought trying to think along the same lines as these wackos. Don’t get me wrong I understand what they say they want to do, which is create an environment where boys and girls aren’t expected to do certain things just because they are boys and girls.
But how the fuck do the words boys and girls prevent that!?
Do they envision a world where everyone is referred to as friend? Do they realize that we already have words with which we can use to describe people in a gender neutral way…like people? One could wonder if the faculty had an ulterior motive, such as eliminating masculine and feminine perspectives. Oh wait that is their fucking motive and they have no problem letting everyone know. Anyway let’s get to the motives that the faculty actually does want to hide.
“Society expects girls to be girlie, nice and pretty and boys to be manly, rough and outgoing,” teacher Jenny Johnsson told the AP. “Egalia gives them a fantastic opportunity to be whoever they want to be.”
Hmm…I really don’t have a problem with this. Maybe I was wrong. Maybe there are no harmful ulterior motives at work here.
Breaking down gender roles is a core mission in the national curriculum for preschools, underpinned by the theory that even in highly egalitarian-minded Sweden, society gives boys an unfair edge.
Ah shit…no wait…no. Ok that last line was a little bigoted…nah ok it was very bigoted but still…these guys want to break down gender roles so that’s a good thing. No more men being expected to run to the aid of random women. No more men having to always ask women out on a date and women never ask men out on a date. No more men having to pay for everything. This is some good stuff here so stupid, untrue theories like society giving men an unfair edge can be looked over in the pursuit of actual fairness between men and women…oops I mean between “friends”.
Director Lotta Rajalin notes that Egalia places a special emphasis on fostering an environment tolerant of gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people. From a bookcase, she pulls out a story about two male giraffes who are sad to be childless — until they come across an abandoned crocodile egg.
Ok…yeah there’s nothing wrong with showing that gay couples can be good parents. A few books that depict this are fine I guess. Seems like they are doing a lot to suggest that everything men and women do has absolutely nothing to do with biology but I might just be a little too overzealous.
Nearly all the children’s books deal with homosexual couples, single parents or adopted children. There are no “Snow White,” “Cinderella” or other classic fairy tales seen as cementing stereotypes.
Oh fuck no! Fuck this shit! What the fuck!?
Ok I take back my assumption that these bigots were trying to do the right thing in a completely idiotic way. These heterophobes don’t want to eliminate gender stereotypes; they want to introduce new ones. But they won’t stop there.
Egalia doesn’t deny the biological differences between boys and girls — the dolls the children play with are anatomically correct.
What matters is that children understand that their biological differences “don’t mean boys and girls have different interests and abilities,” Rajalin says. “This is about democracy. About human equality.”
And there it is. Not only does the faculty of this school wish to place the idea that only same sex couples are normal in the minds of children. They also wish to put forth the lie that men and women do not have differences beyond their genitalia.
I think most boys and girls, if they haven’t already, realize the difference in ability they have as opposed to their opposite sex by the time they are fourteen. The obvious physical advantage men have over women is too big of a difference to deny, yet these “teachers” wish to lie to children in order to push their ideological view, born from feminism, which proclaims women can do anything men can. Well I’m not sorry to say that no, women cannot do anything men can do.
What people like this fail to realize is that the advantages men have over women do not make men better human beings. Instead of accepting the fact that men and women are different, these ideologues would rather poison the minds of children with lies and try to force thousands upon thousands of years of evolution out of preadolescent humans in order to create a population that appeases their inferiority complexes.
In their minds, the fact that an average male police officer is more capable of apprehending a criminal than an average female police officer is an affront to a woman’s humanity.
In their minds, a male firefighter able to carry a 200+ pound man from a burning building is an insult to female firefighters that cannot.
In their minds, a man and a woman happily married, a rarity these days, is some form of female oppression and in some way a discrimination against homosexuals.
In their minds, a heterosexual couple is a stereotype.
I have some news for the bigoted feminists in Sweden and feminists around the globe. Heterosexual couples are not a stereotype; they are a FUCKING BIOLOGICAL NECCESSITY. Without all of those men inserting their nasty socially constructed patriarchal penises into eternally oppressed and victimized female vaginas none of you bigoted bra burners would exist. Each and every feminist moron knows this. That is, unless they went to preschools like “Egalia” where they would learn that babies come from fucking crocodile eggs.
One could wonder what the “teachers” at Egalia would do if one of the children put forth a few questions, a few important questions that the majority of children around the globe would ask when only homosexual couples are put forth as the norm in their school.
Teacher, does everyone have two mommies?
Why no, Billy. Some children have two daddies.
But, teacher, I have a mommy and a daddy.
Well, Billy, some children have a mommy and a daddy.
Then why are there almost no stories here with children who have a mommy and a daddy?
The faculty doesn’t just openly admit, they proudly admit that they have virtually no stories which feature heterosexual couples. Now I won’t presume to know what is going on in a facility I’ve never been to but I wouldn’t consider it too farfetched to suspect that the faculty at Egalia only discourages masculine behavior…in boys. I also don’t find the suspicion that they encourage young boys to do things seen as feminine, like painting their nails, too farfetched either.
I don’t feel that boys should be discouraged from doing masculine or feminine things. However, I feel that encouraging one side of things over the other under the premise of “letting children be who they want” is more than being dishonest. It’s downright appalling. Teaching children that there is nothing evil about homosexuality is not a bad thing, however, not having an equal balance of heterosexual material reveals the bias of the school faculty.
Destroying gender is a bad thing. Men and women are not the same. You cannot claim to recognize the differences between men and women and at the same time eliminate all references to gender in your school. Well actually you can because the Egalia faculty has done just that but that doesn’t change the fact that it’s a bad idea. The knowledge we have about men and women didn’t just spring up overnight. It didn’t just pop into some patriarchal oppressor’s head and he forced everyone to accept his ideas.
The characteristics associated with men and women are universal. They are seen everywhere on the planet in every culture and every society. Yes there are drastic differences between western and eastern cultures. There are differences between western cultures. Hell, there are differences in cultures between eastern and western America. The point is that male and female characteristics have remained almost identical since and most likely before recorded history even when one civilization didn’t know of the existence of the other. These characteristics weren’t just created out of nothing, and in the beginning when there were no governments there were no societal constructors to impose them on anyone.
Now if you were to believe psycho feminists like Marly Daly you would come to the conclusion that evil patriarchal men invaded a feminist matriarchal utopia and forced everyone to conform to male and female roles.
That didn’t happen in case you were wondering.
People with common sense can deduce that humans fell into their roles because of the human instinct for survival. Evolution or god, whatever you want to believe, gave men and women natural biological abilities and instincts with which to use these abilities. This is why when men were building and leading a medieval society in England, men were also building and leading a society in feudal Japan. Simply put, men were given the natural physical strength, ability, and aggressive nature needed to do these things. Were there weak, lazy, unmotivated men in these times? Yes no one denies that but if you can show me a civilization built primarily by female labor, defended primarily by female warriors, and technologically advanced primarily by female inventions then I’ll buy your poorly written comic book for a dollar.
The point here is that men don’t act “manly” only because of societal influence. The point is the majority of men and women act the way they do because men and women have been acting this way since the human race started. Yes society is more influential in the lives of men and women today but that is, in my opinion, only because of humanity’s technological advances over the past two centuries. Survival for everyone no longer depends on whether or not the next crop will be good or if a rival tribe decides not to invade. The skills and abilities given to us by nature are no longer a necessity so we have shun them and taken up new identities. This is not a bad thing but proclaiming that men and women who act the way our ancestors did are only doing so because of social constructs or stereotypes is, for lack of a better word, bullshit. It is easy to see where someone can be genuinely confused when considering this concept though. You see, men buying women dinner and drinks in order to get into their pants is both a societal construct and a product of biology.
Women aren’t going to give it up unless they feel they are getting something in return. That something used to be determined by biology, the ensured survival of herself and her offspring. Now it’s alcohol, diamonds, and money. Because of the technological advancements made by men, women no longer need men to have a roof put over their heads, they just need money. So while buying women things is a societal construct, a woman giving it up after a man provides her with something, the biological element remains the same. I don’t have any problem being freed from these biological chains but at the same time I would have a problem with some “teacher” telling my son that the reason he exhibits masculine traits is because society tells him to. Not every man that is assertive and hates being lead acts that way because society told him to.
Believe whatever you want about gender and society but I believe this school is an insult to humanity because it seeks to destroy gender altogether. And if they can’t destroy gender the faculties of schools like this will do whatever they can to erase any form of masculine identity boys might develop.
Feminists claim that it shouldn’t matter whether or not a boy wants to do masculine or feminine things yet in every instance I have ever seen where feminist groups claim they are trying to free people from gender roles there is only ever talk of changing men. There is only ever talk of having men be more feminine. There is only ever talk about how inhuman masculinity is. Feminists claim that things men do are seen as more valuable in societies.
Well that’s because they are.
Without the things men do society wouldn’t exist. Humanity would have been wiped out by wild animals. If not the animals then nature as no one would have constructed shelters with their bare hands and advanced technology with which to repel the elements. The only argument feminists ever bring up in opposition of this fact is the fact that women give birth to men.
The faculty at Egalia has made it clear that “the hierarchy where everything that boys do is given higher value” must be eliminated. The only reason idiots like this are even able to argue for such a system is because male contributions to society were the most valued in the past. If women didn’t value the hard work and sacrifice men put forth all those centuries ago men would have just said fuck it and went to sleep. At least that’s what I believe.
But finally, if there was any doubt that these people were bigots I give you all one last piece of information about the program at Egalia.
Rajalin, 52, says the staff also try to help the children discover new ideas when they play.
“A concrete example could be when they’re playing ‘house’ and the role of the mom already is taken and they start to squabble,” she says. “Then we suggest two moms or three moms and so on.”
Now if it isn’t obvious to readers that these people wish to indoctrinate children into believing heterosexuality is abnormal it damn well better be now. Teaching children that there is nothing wrong with being homosexual is one thing but these people wish to encourage children to be homosexual. There is nothing equal about this program and the faculty in no way encourages children to be who they want. Encouraging children to have two moms when they clearly set up a game where there is only one is not encouraging them to be who they want. It is forcing your ideological view on children.
A simple remedy to girls arguing over who gets to be the mom in a game is to pair them with another group or maybe teach them patience, a concept that is apparently unheard of at Egalia.
All I can say is there are going to be a lot of confused children wandering around Sweden.
Blog: File 13
Youtube: Channel Freedom