For many of us the extremist brand of gender feminism that has permeated Swedish culture and politics came acutely into focus last year. The YouTube video of a group of female students murdering a man reading a newspaper and their ecstatic post murder dance celebrations, revealing that exposure to and advocacy of male genderocide, is an accepted part of the Swedish education systems indoctrination of their youth, “do your part.” [1]
Letters to Australian parliamentarians including the then Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd asking for our government to expresses diplomatic alarm at such vilification on the basis of sex, fell on deaf ears. An AVFM commentator provided a link to the Swedish documentary (with English subtitles) “The Gender War” (Könskriget) by journalist Evin Rubar, which is highly recommended viewing for anyone who has not yet seen it and interested in the truth about Swedish feminism. [2]
The most disturbing aspect of this documentary is the confirmation that the central tenants of radical feminism have been accepted in Sweden as core political orthodoxy and all aspects of legislation and government services must adhere to it’s “gender correct” understanding of male dominance and oppression.
Veteran Aussie broadcaster Phillip Adams recently interviewed Oscar Swartz the author of a new book, A Brief History of Swedish Sex: How the Nation That Gave Us Free Love Redefined Rape and Declared War on Julian Assange. [3]
Adam’s introduces the Radio National show with a quote from an expatriate Swede now a professor at the University of Chicago:
From being admired and envied by many as beacons of sexual enlightenment from the 60’s the Scandinavian countries today have some of the most repressive sex laws in the western world, Sweden in the most draconian. The message conveyed by recent laws is clear – your sexuality is the property of the state and the state will claim its right to regulate and punish that sexuality wherever you may be.
Swartz’s book tells in chilling detail how this situation has come about. It presents, as a time line, events that made headlines (from the 1950’s to early 2012), quotes from parliamentary records and the public speeches and writings of the key players. Minimal commentary is offered, as the author believes these items speak for themselves and don’t require embellishment.
In Part 1 Swartz illustrates The Rise of Swedish Sin with pioneering sex liberals arguing for women to have the same sexual freedoms as men (were presumed to have), and that this should also be extended to those often excluded from enjoyment of sex such as the unattractive, physically and intellectually disabled, elderly, ill, infirm and even the imprisoned. The impact of Swedish films, which routinely breached decency laws in other western countries, the growth of the sex club industry, and acceptance of mid teenage sex as healthy normality are all detailed.
Part 2, titled The Fall of Swedish Sin, shows the ideological U-turn initiated by radical feminists that now viewed sex as a tool of power and dominance wielded by men and over women. Sex, they argued, should only be tolerated in committed and loving relationships. Male sexuality was demonized and increasingly criminalized and punished to shame men into behaving in more “relationship oriented” ways. Covered in this part is first the redefining of rape and the introduction of the “Sex Purchase Act,” which criminalizes purchasing of sex from prostitutes but not the selling of sex by prostitutes, who are seen as misguided victims of patriarchal oppression.
Part 3 is called the War on Sex and exposes the absurdity of many of the public arguments and actions of powerful radical feminists. In the ideological but disproven belief that pornography causes sexual violence, regulations are enacted to insist government funded hotel use will only be at “porn free” hotels, that is hotels where adult content is not available for purchase on in-house entertainment systems. Subsequently late night adult content on cable TV is banned.
Despite being acknowledged as one of the most gender equal societies in the world, feminist politicians regularly describe average Swedish men as comparable to the Taliban and Sweden as like Afghanistan so far as its treatment of women is concerned. The outrageous claims regarding sex trafficking and the supposed ramping-up of prostitution in Germany in “preparation” for the FIFA world cup in 2006 highlighted to an international audience the insanity of Sweden’s state delusions. Calls were made for the UN and Amnesty International to intervene and Sweden to withdraw from the EU in protest. This would be comparable to US government acting on the Super-Bowl / DV myth amplified thousands of times.
In the fourth and final part The War on Men, “progressive” strategies in enforcing the Sex Purchase Act are revealed. Hotel staff are trained in how to spot potential sex purchasers and instructed to report suspects immediately to the police, whose special “sex agents” are dispatched to listen outside the hotel rooms and sweep in for an arrest if sounds of sexual activity are heard. Hotel employees are provided with contact cards and posters placed in staff rooms, hotels performing well are more likely to receive government-funded business.
Meanwhile special sex units tail known and suspected prostitutes to track down men who might illegally pay them for sex. Further, changes to the definition of rape include the addition of “pleading” for sex, now considered a type of “sexual coercion and molestation,” or sex that even years later a women did not feel good about. Everyday sexual encounters between consenting adults can now be turned into legal nightmares, with rape defined not by the intent of the accused or the belief of the supposed victim but by only be trained legal personal who truly understand what is meant by rape under Sweden’s legislation. The increasingly severe penalties for rape are contrasted with the leniency of sentencing for grossly violent assaults.
Naturally the Swedish tourist groups do not detail these repressive laws in their glossy brochures, and many tourists are still under the illusion that Sweden is a sexually liberal country, like it’s neighbor Denmark. Yet the rate of rape in Sweden is reportedly 8 times higher than Denmark and second highest in the world after Lesotho in Africa.
The details of the Assange case also emerge including the probability that part of the motive for it was as a distraction from prolonged unsavory national media focus in the lead up to an election when two Social Democratic Workers Party candidates are caught purchasing sex while staying in a union flat.
One of Assange’s accusers is well known Radfem Anna Ardin who had published on her blog “Rebella”[4] a list of how women could legally take revenge on an unfaithful partner – including sabotage of his new relationship, enticing his new partner to be unfaithful, having “a lunatic” stalk him, and sending letters and photos to make the new partner believe he still has a relationship with the avenger herself.
The sordid details of the Assange case and interference from politicians and bureaucrats in the legal procedures around draconian gendered legislation will have to wait for another article. Assnage’s barrister has, however, correctly stated:
It is not Julian Assange that is on trial here, but Sweden and its reputation as a modern and model country with rules of law.
Not unexpectedly, Assange has received no useful support from Australia’s current feminist labor government, and is now seeking asylum in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London. [5] However, in another recent case of an Australian female solicitor detained in Lybia on suspicion of espionage, the new foreign minister Bob Carr is immediately dispatched to assist. Well, after all she deserves it. She’s a mother. [6]
A Swedish feminist academic from Monash University in Victoria Dr. Johan Lidberg,[7] joined Swartz in the radio national interview to represent the “counter viewpoint.” He believes the Swedish laws are not a war on sex or on men but simply supporting a women’s right to say no to sex at whatever stage of a sex act she determines. He applauds such laws as being beneficial in reducing exploitation of women and human trafficking for sex. He denies the existence of “state feminism”[8] in Sweden and argues that women as still not empowered, citing the usual unequal representation on company boards, gender pay gap, more male professors etc.
Yes, that’s feminist logic for you – convicting more men of rape helps empower women and is necessary to improve numerical equivalence of gender outcomes, Dr. Flood and underling Fisher would be proud of Johan!
There is no doubt that gender ideologues in Australia, who echo their Swedish sisters dogma almost verbatim, covet such a situation existing here and are planning for it.[9]
The unconstitutional, feminist Labor organization EMILYS List (EMILY’s List is an acronym that means Early Money Is Like Yeast “it makes the dough rise”) has, as its core aim, feminist control of the Australian Government and imposition of a feminist agenda on the electorate.[10] Emily’s list has a sex discriminatory constitution allowing full membership only to women.
Whilst the objectives of Emily’s list outlined on their public website might appear relatively tame at first glance, the organization is strongly supported by radical feminists and academics whose true motives and male hatred we have come to know well.
[2] http://www.youtube.com/user/figaropravda
[3] http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/latenightlive/a-history-of-swedish-sex-book-cover/4078076
http://mpegmedia.abc.net.au/rn/podcast/2012/06/lnl_20120618_2205.mp3
http://www.amazon.com/Oscar-Swartz/e/B0087EIVIO/ref=ntt_athr_dp_pel_pop_1
[4] http://rebellabloggen.wordpress.com/author/annaardin/
[5] http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/jun/21/julian-assange-ecuador-decision-asylum
[6] http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/more-news/bob-carr-confident-of-lawyers-libyan-release/story-e6frf7l6-1226403584530
[7] http://arts.monash.edu.au/journalism/staff/johan-lidberg.php
[8] http://prostitution.procon.org/sourcefiles/targeting-the-sex-buyer-the-swedish-example-stopping-prostitution-and-trafficking-where-it-all-begins.pdf
[9] http://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/the-scum-connection/
[10] http://www.emilyslist.org.au/about-us/what-we-believe-in
25 Posts in Total
donations either one-time or on a monthly subscription basis.
If you don't have paypal, check out the other options.
If you want to get some merchandise and sponsor us at the same time, consider the AVfM store.
Kimski:
fathers4fairness:
dhanu:
Near Earth Object:
Bewildered:
Hmmmm…
Interesting how Assange’s accuser is suggesting tactics that those of us who are partners to men who have crazy exes have experience of from the ‘sisterhood’…I know for a fact I have been cyber stalked and I have a strong suspicion there was a failed actual attempt on personal intimidation (she ain’t bright – I ain’t being specific on my location)
Being allowed to redefine consensual sex as rape diminishes the suffering of real rape victims. Yep, you can have bad sex and make lousy decisions on who you share bodily fluids with…but there are small matters such as personal responsibility. I’ve made both mistakes above…but I take my share of the responsibility. Rape at the end of it is about coercion and an abuse of power, and (shock horror) some women by definition then can rape men.
OT: Greg, saw your article on the inaccesibility of health services for men on the web, I also work in health would like to discuss and perhaps coauthor something…how best to get in touch?
Hi Kiwihelen, you can reach me at rper1959atgmaildotcom, happy to discuss health issues and a joint article. cheers Greg
The gender pay gap, one incredible myth in the modern days. In Brazil I have asked many feminists, not one showed me a difference in pay for the same work hours and position on the same company, not one!!!
Ironically, that doesn’t stop them from claiming that, it is impossible, pure blindness I say!
OT: State law requires sex offenders to list status on Facebook: http://mashable.com/2012/06/21/facebook-sex-offenders/
Every chance you get grill your elected representatives on why sex offenders are registered and declared everywhere while murderers are not.
When it comes right down to it, given I choice I think most people would prefer to be fucked against their will (as unpleasant as that might be) over being killed.
We should also insist on a distinct separation of rape from the umbrella sexual assault/harassment charges. These have purposefully been grouped in with rape due to both women’s fear and men’s revulsion of rapists/protective attitude towards women. This allows harsh sentences for “crimes” which include crass comments or accidentally bumping into someone in a crowded venue.
Minor inconveniences are being lumped in with a direct assault on a person.
In my opinion, when it is between two adults, nothing less than physically forced sex, sex by threat of violence, or sex by malicious drugging should ever count as rape. Anything less than that removes all agency from the supposed victim.
Stuff that doesn’t fit the traditional definition of rape is being called rape to doctor the statistics. All the while, when people hear these inflated statistics which include people who were orally pleaded into having sex with their partner, they are still imagining every number in these statistics is a violent, physically forced rape. That’s how you utilize people’s emotions for your own gain.
“In my opinion, when it is between two adults, nothing less than physically forced sex, sex by threat of violence, or sex by malicious drugging should ever count as rape. Anything less than that removes all agency from the supposed victim.”
Absolutely correct IMO. According to these femos, men are either ignorant buffoons who don’t understand, or superior psychological beings who have a hold over poor women, depending on what they are arguing. Their hypocrisy is breathtaking.
As breathtaking as it is effective. Don’t forget that.
I think that Sweden’s transformation from sexually liberated nirvana to puritannical tyranny is both frightening and fascinating, and raises important questions about the nature of the human condition. In light of the spread of pornography throughout the west, we are familiar with the argument that pornography is correlated with decrease in rape statistics. But what if something more insidious is taking root? The false idea that men have “needs” that must be met, that our itch is programed into the genes and needs to be scratched. And Euro cultures are now buying into this dimwitted assumption, hook, line and sinker – hence the increasing pedestalization of women and the idolatry of woman-worship.
By now, most of us are familiar with woman-worship and the pedestalization of women that is the hallmark of chivalry within the Anglosphere. Furthermore, we’ve all heard about how PUAs categorize men into alpha/beta/omega, which I’ve criticized as contrived and artificial. The sort of woman-worship that we of the Anglosphere are familiar with never really took off in continental Europe… that is, until now. From my own experience, I’ve found the women of the Continent, across the board, a breath of fresh air, and Anglosphere women, for the most part, ceased to be an option for me. The false alpha/beta dichotomy was never really part of mainland Europe for one simple reason… the absence of the obsession with getting laid that characterizes the Anglosphere. But the countries of the European continent are, like Sweden, changing. Even my cousins on the mainland tease me for my anti-feminism, as recently one of them was photographed at a toga party with a bevy of beaus pretending to be her slaves, and my other cousin jokingly warned “don’t show this to cb.” So clearly, the disease is spreading.
Integral to PUA game is the obsession with getting laid. It is the heart and soul of the toxicity of woman-worship in the Anglosphere. Neither Swedish nor other European men were anywhere near as obsessed with getting laid as what we of the Anglosphere are familiar with. It has always been easy to be buds with Euro chicks, sex was always incidental (if it felt right it happened) and the “beta” male, for want of a better word, was never really the curse that he is perceived to be among the Anglosphere’s PUA crowd (and Swedish men might have been among the most beta). But of course that’s changing because of feminism and it’s ugly, conjoined brother, PUA game. I predict that as pornography and the PUA obsession with getting laid continues to entrench itself on mainland Europe, we will see women becoming more suspicious and more guarded and the Euro cultures will, like the Anglosphere, suffer a puritannical backlash, as per Sweden.
Incidentally, there was a time that I found American and English women, even with their dumb obsession with chivalry, to be a breath of fresh air in comparison to Australian women (Australian misandry and its conjoined twin, misogyny, has a long history). But now that the entire Anglosphere is at one with the insanity, it is clear that something grotesque and toxic has taken hold and is spreading. It’s not in the genes. It’s culture and the spread of memes.
Off Topic: Bitches be trying to take away our games!*
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/view/the-big-picture/5950-Tropes-vs-MovieBob
*may include slight exaggeration
Thank you for providing that link, Steve.
A quote from the top comment, which was most likely made by a female (the profile picture may give it away).
“In short: the buff guys are power fantasies for men. The hot women are sexual fantasies for men. That’s why women feel excluded from this hobby.”
Apparently, everything is a fantasy for men. Sounds like someone is delusional. If she doesn’t like any games that feature this type of stuff, than she shouldn’t buy it. But, the feminist mindset is pervasive here. She wants all games that are like this to be banned immediately because it makes girls feel excluded or uncomfortable. She wants the market to cater to her specific needs and desires without thinking about what other people like. Personally, I don’t mind if a game has strong men who are portrayed as powerful warriors. Why? Well, the alternative option of being a thin guy in skinny jeans and a plaid shirt with thick-rimmed glasses whilst wielding a massive weapon seems less believable. It just doesn’t fit the fantasy genre very well.
As for female characters. I don’t mind scantily-clad women casting incantations either. Why? Well, why do I have to look at an overweight woman with no appeal whatsoever in the same game? The product is about appeal and enjoyment. Aren’t I free to choose what I’d like to see in a game based upon what a company provides? They shouldn’t have to conform to the standards of a malevolent and scornful woman.
Here is her reply to a guy who I thought was being reasonable to that quote above, made by the same person:
“It’s not that at all. it’s that gamer culture and the trends that arise and become successful from it are dominated largely by socially lacking, adolescent guys, often with a mix of lust and resentment towards women. And when women see this culture – and the creepy, alienating stuff it often produces – they get the impression that they simply don’t have a place within it. It’s not just that they can’t relate, it’s that they get the implied message loud and clear; that they’re not meant to be able to relate.”
Most of this is bullshit. She makes a general statement or stereotype (I thought feminists hated these?) about all guys who play games. Socially lacking, adolescent guys? So if I buy a game that has female characters with sexual appeal in it than I’m socially lacking I guess. Sounds like typical feminist bullying to me. What a crock. The fact that these comments are some of the highest rated ones gives me little hope for any change to come with hateful attitudes like these. Maybe the public will change for the better one day.
I forgot "pleading-for-sex" rape in my listing "Rape is rape is rape" is a lie, Joe Biden! 20 different types of rape!
Thanks for correcting me …..
Thanks human stupidity for the list, bookmarked!
From Swartz’s book
2003 “Pleading Sex: that is when a partner begs and pleads so insistently that the woman agrees to sex just to end the nagging” Radical and Anarcha-feminist in Malmo and Gotherburg.
“women are subject to vast numbers of rape, and that an enormous number of guys are guilty of rape- by obtaining sex through insistently pleading their parters for it ” Joel Malmqvist Social Democratic students of Sweden.
2007 Pleading sex part of school education campaign designed to teach girls to say NO to sex and report their lovers to the authorities.
2008 Eva Diesen “demands that police take pleading sex seriously and work harder to imprison men who have acheived sexual intercourse through pleading and ‘persuading.’”
2010 #prataomdet (talkaboutit) twitter campaign turns viral with reports of “bad sex” it was
initiated by feminist and leftist columnists to campaign in support of the women in the Assange case “all would testify about sexual molestation and abuse suffered by them that they did not understand properly until later in life.”
Jan 2011 “praise for the #parataomdet is almost hegemonic in the Swedish media”"women testify of sexual abuse but also strong feelings of shame over fairly regular sex, rampant anxiety over incidental sleeping with someone fifteen years ago when drunk – as if the spinal reflex should be always say no. And if one doesn’t, one has been abused. ”
2011 The #parataomdet campaign receives media and women’s groups awards “the great journalist award” and ROKS “the years women’s achievement” and RFSU award
No wonder more and more men are simply staying inside now, with their doors locked and their blinds pulled down.
Thanks to feminastyism and all its wonders, it now truly is a dangerous business, walking out your front door, if you are male that is.
I wonder when the “fear-of-commitment” version of rape will appear in this lexicon, aka: “He ran away from me, screaming like his ass was on fire” rape…
It’s a very short leap from feminism’s existing insanity to for example, the concept of restaurant rape> “I ordered a salad and this patriarchal bastard of a waiter brought me a hamburger!!! RAPE!!!”
Seems the grrrls have managed to thoroughly and completely rape the very word ‘rape’ and the irony of their epic fail, absolutely escapes them.
Good job grrrls!
We are there already. Refusal to have sex with a woman – “denial of affection” – is considered to be domestic violence in some parts. Recent DV laws in Mexico and, I understand, India have criminalised the exercise of consent on the part of men. During the past year a Frenchman was successfully sued by his ex for refusal of sex.
It’s why I frequently encourage other men to really learn to say “NO”. It isn’t inconceivable that it’s a right they could lose.
Another great effort Greg
I came across another review involving “Swedish Sin” at http://wlcentral.org/node/2657 – a few excerpts of which might be of interest with particular regard to the parallels of what is happening in Australia.
Radical feminists have achieved the legislative holy grail of politics by controlling both Houses of Parliament. In effect, we live in a social engineering dictatorship with all legislations being passed unilaterally without scrutiny via guillotine motions. It’s a miracle Gillard hasn’t declared us a communist state.
“Take a look at Sweden [Australia] because your country could be next!”
…A political coup by a group of radical feminists at the highest levels of government caused the sexual liberalism of Sweden to give way to a wave of anti-sex and anti-male hysteria that vilified heterosexual sex and villainized men. [Gillard deposed the elected PM in a factional coup, failed to win the subsequent election but retained power by bribing the Greens & independents; twice selected but never elected.. and who would vote for the abolition of gender?]
How did the free love culture of Sweden [Australia] devolve into a War on Men?
An irony of the sexual liberation is that its very openness and egalitarianism affirmative-actioned women into the upper echelons of politics ultimately permitting governance to be dominated by a bloc of female political actors who spearheaded a backlash: by claiming the moral high ground and casting women invariably as victims in any sexual encounter, they swung the country’s moral fulcrum and almost unilaterally imposed their own agenda on this small nation.
The rise of radical feminists
A major actor in this drama was former Swedish Deputy Prime Minister Margareta Winberg [childless lesbian Julia Gillard]. Winberg also chaired the militant National Federation of Social Democratic Women [Gillard founded Emily’s List in Australia]; she surrounded herself with radical feminists [the Australian cabinet is dominated by Emily’s Listers] and routinely unleashed virulent anti-male diatribes in public. [The govt funded DV campaign on TV - "men behave to make your family safe" – is sickening]
The kind of hateful radical feminism, that a mentally unstable Valerie Solanas developed, is internationally regarded as marginal extremism, but in the 2010s of Sweden [Australia] it has become normal feminism.
Male hatred codified
This anti-male, anti-heterosexual-sex agenda was reinforced by legislation. In 1982 the Swedish government introduced an anti-prostitution bill that “proposed that all of society join in the goal of changing men’s sexuality: boys must learn that sex should only occur in conjunction with emotional relationships.”
The proposal included “propaganda activities” that would reinforce this message. Bans on live-sex clubs and sauna clubs soon followed.
“Rape” was drastically redefined, and now included acts that did not involve sexual penetration. Radical feminists even insisted that “pleading sex” — i.e., “when a partner begs and pleads for sex so insistently that the woman agrees to sex just to end the nagging” — is rape. This position later served as the basis for a government propaganda campaign encouraging females to report their lovers to the authorities.
Prostitution, according to the radical feminists, is always rape; therefore only the [mostly male] purchasers of sex, and not the prostitutes themselves, are subject to legal punishment. In tourist-industry businesses like hotels and taxi operators are subject to prosecution if they fail to report the sexual activity of their customers to the police; and in which a woman dressed in a “provocative” manner or receiving males guests is assumed to be a prostitute.
Sexual offenses are more harshly prosecuted. Swedes could now be punished for sexual violations they committed while outside the country. Not surprisingly, this state of affairs has led to a false rape figure reportedly as high as 80%.
[All of this is incorporated in "The National Plan to Reduce Violence Against Women [but not men]” – Qanan where are you?
Ultimately, however, the true goal is state control of all aspects of the lives of citizens.
It examines the Assange rape accusers significant involvement with the Social Democrats’ radical feminist wing — and the later manipulation of evidence following the first prosecutor’s initial assessment that, in regard to the women’s rape allegation, “the content of the interrogation does not support any claim that a crime has been committed”.
And he asked Gillard for help…
thanks Howard, good article at wikileaks central and as you show the similarities to what is happing in Aus are undeniable.
Ehh…Allow me to clarify a couple of things:
First of all:
The idea of free love did not originate from Sweden. It came from Denmark, where I live, along with the ‘Porn-Wave’ in the 60′s. Actually, in Denmark Sweden is mostly known by its other name ‘Forbuds-Sverige’, which roughly translates into ‘Prohibition-Sweden’. The brand originates from a book by journalist Mogens Berendt back in the 80′s, and is based on the fact that the swedes basically has laws against everything. Think 1930′s America during the prohibition-era, and extend it to gender related issues and sex.
The swedes may have gone along with the idea of free sex in the beginning in the 60′s, but they were also the first Scandinavian country to pass laws that made prostitution illegal in 1999. It’s perfectly legal to be a prostitute, but it’s not legal to buy sex(??!)
More recently a swedish man was sentenced for child pornography, based on pictures on his hard drive containing japanese x-rated Manga comics. He turned out to be a comic book translator, and the verdict was later overturned.
http://www.comicmix.com/news/2012/06/15/manga-translator-acquitted-child-pornography-charges-in-swedish-supreme-court-ruling/
Secondly, the high numbers in rapes can be somewhat explained by the fact that Sweden never made any restrictions on immigrants from muslim countries .The number of muslims living in Sweden are therefore very high today, compared to the other Scandinavian countries, so the high rate of rapes may very likely be seen as a consequence of the clash of two cultures.
So what you got here is a country that loves to pass laws on everything possible, mixed up with radical feminism in its worst form. The outcome of that blend is obvious to everyone not living in Sweden.
But noone dares speak out against it, and the unfairness of the whole deal for the swedish men, is largely just hinted at in the medias in other countries, if it is even mentioned at all.
As a swedish man, you’re more likely to end up in jail for reading japanese x-rated manga porn, or paying for a prostitute, than a lesbian couple that delibately tortures their boy, by trying to make him into a girl.
Feminist sexism and discrimination has spread all accross the Western world. We have our work cut out for us. These bigots will never stop.
Once they lost The Dolph Lundgren, everything went to hell.
It’s no accident that Feminism is such a powerful force in a “Socialist Democracy”.
Feminists in the USA (and liberals in general) fantasize about Sweden as the model for what our country should look like.
60% average tax rate, “free” healthcare, wholly passive or neutral stance on global military matters, government subsidized industry and government enforced social “justice” and economic “balance”.
Swedish men are not proud of their once proud country.
But somehow they still have acceptable productivity, or at least enough productivity to keep up their social welfare state. I would think from this that that most of their men are on board with all this.
OT, but when will we be seeing Agent Orange’s files that prove that Manboobz is behind r/beatingwomen?
I really do feel for Swedish men. If there is anyone who should be sick of misandric, holy female legislation, it is the Swedes. Great article, Dr. Canning.
Shameful, really. Overzealous lawmakers and feminists working together results in disaster most of the time. The loss of freedoms and removal of important rights may seem like a good choice at first glance, but it only pushes more men into communities such as this to solve their problems and unite. I hope to see the day when the cause is overwhelmingly supported, but some men have to go through a horrible divorce, a false accusation in courts influenced by feminists, or a missed opportunity due to a quota before they realize what’s become of our educational and legal systems.
Involving yourself with a woman today is like asking for a lengthy prison sentence. When the ceremony is over, you might as well walk down to your local constabulary and lock yourself in a jail cell. This idea of youthful romance is fine in theory, but it is highly deceptive. Marriage changes the whole environment. Things most likely will turn sour (50% divorce rate, and I’m sure it may increase in the near future) and you will get screwed over.
But, that is an old story.
Strange that the professor would invite a feminist scholar on his program for an interview. Isn’t it already obvious by now what they’ll say? Is it even necessary to hear what the other side is? It’s been the same for a very long time regardless if it’s true or not. Society has changed, but they haven’t. Their old and repressive institution still exists and continues to hunt for blasphemers just like the Inquisition back in the day. It’s too bad they haven’t heard of freedom of speech and expression.
This is terrible news for Sweden, but the Anglosphere is heading in the same direction.
Odious, I simply don’t know where to begin. God help Australia.
Mopping up the puke…
OT:
I would like to nominate this brilliant work for the featured videos catalog:
I don’t understand why these Swedish feminists are so angry. I also don’t understand the Swedish “White guilt”. I mean, from what I know they’ve never really had slavery nor a colonial history(except vikings but they were bad ass and didnt even colonize that much), or some super FEMALE OPPRESHUN!1!11!! Like the feminists want you to think, so it really makes no sense to me.
I’m really starting to think it’s genetic. It’s as if these Swedes are born with some super-paranoia or anxiety disorders. Doesn’t matter though, if Sweden becomes an Islamic state(or so I’ve heard) I’d love to see how long feminism lasts in that.
Get a drink and a snack, sit back and enjoy, fellas!
I had some business dealings with Sweden a few years ago, and stayed in the country on numerous occasions. I found Swedish men to be oddly passive and uptight – I was expecting Vikings. They could only seem to relax when drunk. The Swedish women seemed outspoken, and from what I could see, had an eye for the dark-haired immigrants. Lots of young single mothers too. Just my observations, make of them what you will.
Yep you tell me, i was went there for a conference and bloody wow, there were more women then men, Guess EQUALITY is working
yep More Women Empowerment needed put more MEN BODIES INSIDE THE HOT STEAM OF FEMINISM so the wheel of “EQUALITY” turns well.
Also of interest :
http://justice4assange.com/
This is pure hypocrisy from sweden (the country of mangina’s and feminist) to accuse a man of sexual offences while there are no charges, pure evil of feminism in full public view.
But nobody is paying attention because the said “suspect” or “criminal” is a man accused of (false accusation) rape by womyn who are the prime example of feminism (men/boy haters). I think assange is the one man army against misandry from sweden (fuck i hate to state its name).