Spain European flag

Spanish Gender Stalinism – Part II

Today we continue our tale about the ordeal that Spanish men face under the Gender Stalinist regime of Ley Contra la Violencia de Género (Organic Act of Integrated Protection Measures against Gender Violence) and the radical feminists supporting it. These are the same radical feminists who have quite literally occupied almost all institutions in Spain (both State institutions and private ones – particularly the media).

Part II of the report is about what happened in Spain between 2004 and 2012, a report issued by the Asociación de Víctimas de la Ley de Violencia de Género Madrid (The Association of the Victims of the Gender Violence Law – Madrid) along with another association called Feminist Association for Equality (FEMII).

Part II


On 21 November 2012, Ms. Inmaculada Montalbán, Chairperson of the Observatory against Gender Violence of the CGPJ, presented figures following nearly eight years of implementation of the gender violence law.

In the report, Ms. Montalbán states that the figures raise great cause for alarm. She addresses the work of courts specializing in gender violence and their aim to end impunity of male culprits by achieving an 80% conviction rate. If we analyze the figures carefully, we see a heavy bias in the manner the information is presented.

For example, her report shows the number of reported domestic violence related crimes as 1,034,613 (alleged crimes 963,471 and alleged misdemeanors 71,142). She repeatedly refers to “crimes” rather than “alleged crimes”, assuming that these allegations have all been substantiated. She then provides the number of convictions at 207,997, mixing crimes with misdemeanors, which constitutes just 20.1% of the total cases reported leading to conviction.

So what happened to the remaining 826,616 cases? 706,568 of the cases were dismissed. 120,048 end in acquittal. If we add this to the number of complaints that were retracted, the result is that from all the reported cases, 79,90% of the men reported to the police suffered: arrest (most of them), loss of home, loss of access to children and home, financial ruin, loss of property/pension, as well as having to pay the mortgage on their own home in which they could no longer live, marginalization and social stigma to be called and considered abusers even before judgment, resulting in psychological strain that can result in depression and suicide in some cases. There is no public official way to know how many men have finished with their lives because of this situation. Then these men, after suffering all this terrible chain of events following the report by their ex partner, are found not guilty or innocent, but the damage has already been done, and no compensation is offered, as official, “false complaints” do not exist.

Note that in the Courts of Violence against Women, 100% of the convictions are under compliance, that is to say that the accused is given a choice, for example, 30 days of social work and a course of rehabilitation, or a jail term of between six months and two years, and the accused men have accepted the lesser sentence rather than to continue to defend their innocence. Given this situation, not knowing that their compliance carries a criminal record and a hypothetical new complaint involving a jail sentence, the accused detainee accepted social work with the aim of ending the case.


Given the data issued by Ms. Montalbán, it is noteworthy that nearly 80% are for offences related to Article 153 of the criminal code relating to causing mental suffering, or mistreatment without causing physical injury. This means that a simple argument involving harsh language, even where the man says something like “you’ll find out!”, etc., is reason enough to report a gender crime, but only if the complainant is a woman. Only 5% of complaints are made ​​under Article 148 of the Criminal Code, which provide for severe cases of abuse. What is occurring in Spain is the criminalizing of men for trivial conflicts in the home.

In our association we come across cases where men have been convicted for flatulence during a discussion, or of causing the partner abuse via “telepathic” means, or simple by the man losing patience and reverting to the use of the “f” word. Although it seems utterly ridiculous, we assure you that in the case of gender violence, truth is stranger than fiction. You can find a wide range of these examples at


An analysis of the official Spanish government figures raises two issues: first, in 826,616 cases between 2005 and 2012, the accused, all men, were found to be innocent. And, second, the vast majority of the complaints were based on Article 153 of the Criminal Code, namely that the woman reporting had not suffered any physical harm. For these and other reasons most of the arrests made, almost a million, during these 7 years, could be considered illegal:

Article 104 of Spain’s Constitution requires the Police to act as guarantor of the rights and freedoms of citizens and, in particular, to protect victims of crime, and article 24.2 that guarantees the presumption of innocence. Also, as previously pointed out, international law also guarantees the presumption of innocence, as article 14.2 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and Article 6.2 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

A large number of risk assessments conducted after allegations of gender violence resulted in “Undeterminable risk”.  In Instruction 5/2008 of the SES, it says that “in this case the Police will act with the same measures, operational and care, as for any other type of complaint “. So, acting on a complaint without basis or foundation would not be justified and would contravene Instruction 12/2007 of the SES, the technical regulation No. 1/2008 issued by the DAO on Procedures for the Civil Guard units on Gender Violence, which specifies, that to act, there must be a serious risk to the victim.

Complaints must be substantiated by the Protocol for security and Police forces, including coordination with the courts to protect victims of gender violence. Furthermore, the law and the above instructions do require an investigation of the victim, in order to provide accurate and sufficient evidence of the alleged abuse, since the mere word of the complainant, without supporting evidence, is insufficient. Acting with the excuse of protecting the complainant, without signs of abuse or an accompanying risk assessment, is illegal, unfair and unjustified and could lead to accusations of illegal detention under Article 167 of the Penal Code.

Obviously, to this must be added the provisions of the Judicial Police Manual .

We recall that all of this legislation is available on the Police intranet, so that in case of a complaint to the Police, no one can claim ignorance or lack of information.


Some agents acted illegally for several reasons: misinformation and fear of being responsible if the accused later assaulted the alleged victim.

The Secretary of State for Security should issue a Technical Instruction to clarify to agents when it is appropriate, when not to arrest and to clarify the legal foundations of those situations. In addition, officers and NCOs should be trained more rigorously, to ensure that agents know correct procedure.

In an official document of the Ministry of Interior, an Action Protocol for the Coordination of Security Forces, advocates that in reviewing cases relating to the Gender Violence Law 1/2004, Integral Protection Measures against Violence Gender, they did not find a single reference to the word “alleged”, thereby assuming the presumption of guilt on all the men that had been reported. These suspects were often called “criminals” in the absence of conviction or official judgments.

Remembering the statistics given earlier, all the men reported were considered to be guilty first, yet only 10% of cases resulted in criminal convictions.


In the Bibliography section of the report there are so-called professionals listed that should not have been involved in national domestic violence programs. Two of these are recognized Radical feminists Beauvoir and Firestone. This is a duo whose books, far from promoting peace and equality between men and women, support a form of social engineering, promote female superiority and push hatred between men and women. 

We also find listed the author Jorge Corsi, who has supported Spanish radical feminism to implement gender ideology in society, and who has been convicted in his home country, Argentina, for pedophilia. It is inappropriate that this “author” remains as recommended reading for Police agents.

The criminal record as a pederast, and methodology to capture victims of Jorge Corsi is available on Google.

Finally, there is a strong political root to Spain´s Gender Violence law, one based on the pre-election campaign of José Luis Rodriguez Zapatero, who came to power earlier in the same year that law came into force.

There are many reports from the Spanish Press of Mr Zapatero visiting many women´s groups and giving favourable support to their aim of having their “own Court for Women”, and given that in Spain there are more women than men, feminist groups held a special appeal for Zapatero in his aim to raise votes.

Literature recommended:

  • The Dictatorship of Género (Violence against Women). (ex-Judge, Francisco Serrano 2012)
  • I A Social Engineers To Destroy Love (Rafael Palacios 2012)
  • Femicide or Self-Construction of Women (María Stephen Prado and Félix Rodrigo Mora 2012)
  • 400 International Reports Prejudice Against a (J to L Alvarez Deca)
  • All legal/police protocols and instructions referred to in this article.
  • Legislation alluded to in UN and European policy.

Reference sources:

EP article with statements from Immaculate Montalbán, “Balance of seven years after the creation of the Courts of Violence

General Council of the Judiciary, Author: Observatory against Domestic and Gender Violence (Spain), “Balance of seven years after the creation of the Courts of Violence against Women

About Lucian Vâlsan

Polyglot, author and staunch non-feminist. Lucian Vâlsan serves as the European News Director and Multisites Operations Director for AVFM. He is also the founder and publisher of AVFM Romania, the host of AVFM Voice of Europe radio program and operates the video blog Freedom Alternative.

Main Website
View All Posts
  • Feminist_Nullificationist

    It appears that the days of the Spanish Inquisition never ended, but instead just changed focus to make male gender identity its new target.

    Apparently we are just seeing the Spanish version of “Witch-Hunting Males” – a feminist contrived, international epidemic. :-/

  • David

    Spanish feminazis destroyed the lives of 826,616 men. We need new Nueremberg trials to stop them forever. Otherwise they might end up hanged like fascists in Italy.

    • El Bastardo

      I almost prefer the latter honestly. Let’s be real. They inhabit over 80% of the offices of administration. As much as I hate violence, the fact is that since they own the power of the government for the most part, it will be almost impossible to hold momentum before the citizen’s of Spain most likely forget, and women vote another Jose Zapatero.

      I wish it was different, I really do. However, as much as we go after women’s radical feminist groups, we still seem to forget about our own victim’s pain and suffering. I guarantee they will not. If the society of Spain stubbornly refuses to make some sort of concession or major legal overhaul where they can properly address their collective grievances; I don’t see anything good for Spanish women if Spain’s economy truly goes under.

      I am not saying their men will viciously attack them, but it will be a cold day in hell before they care about a woman; or they die of natural causes. Whichever comes first.

      Some people just never get it, until they are forced to. Then it is usually far too little, far too late.

  • Near Earth Object

    Part II, no less excellent than Part I, and equally as sick.

    Thanks for the report, Lucian.

  • dhanu

    Breathtaking cruelty and injustice! Looks like any nation in the grip of feminism would have to reach a similar situation before its people wake up to the reality, and even then it would take long to correct the wrong that has been done.

    The link provided in the article seems to have gone.

    • Lucian Vâlsan

      It’s probably a temporary server issue. Yesterday it worked. But I’ll ask my Spanish liaisons if something happened.

      Maybe the feminazists have taken it down (I wish I was kidding).

    • Rick Westlake

      21:41 GMT, 24 May 2013 – I got “The domain is listed for sale. Click here to inquire about this domain name.”

  • Lucian Vâlsan


    • scatmaster

      Afraid not and when I type into my browser it says the domain is for sale.

      • Michael

        I’m having the same problem.

      • Lucian Vâlsan

        The comment reading „Solved!” was for NEO who was complaining of his comment not appearing. As for projusticia, I am awaiting for an answer from Antonia Carrasco. Depending on her answer, I will see how to edit the article in order to reflect the same idea and be free of broken links.

  • Bewildered

    This means that a simple argument involving harsh language, even where the man says something like “you’ll find out!”, etc., is reason enough to report a gender crime, but only if the complainant is a woman. Only 5% of complaints are made ​​under Article 148 of the Criminal Code, which provide for severe cases of abuse. What is occurring in Spain is the criminalizing of men for trivial conflicts in the home.

    In our association we come across cases where men have been convicted for flatulence during a discussion, or of causing the partner abuse via “telepathic” means, or simple by the man losing patience and reverting to the use of the “f” word. Although it seems utterly ridiculous, we assure you that in the case of gender violence, truth is stranger than fiction.


  • Near Earth Object


    I find it just a little bizarre that you phrased that as a question, rather than a statement.

    It would/could imply some remaining doubt on your part. :)

    • Bewildered

      I prefer to be an optimist most of the time but I agree it’s a herculean task these days. Every thing has become so surrealistic — Right is wrong,top is bottom, moral is immoral etc. How the fuck do you reason with zombies?

      • Near Earth Object

        “How the fuck do you reason with zombies?”

        Lead in the head.

        But since this isn’t the movies and we’re talking about feminists…

        One At A Time.

  • GQuan

    “Right is wrong, top is bottom, moral is immoral etc”

    Oh, if only it were that simple! The truth of the matter is, top might be bottom, or it might be top. Or it was bottom a minute ago but now it’s top again. Because I said so. Because it’s now to my benefit for it to be top. In an hour or so it might be bottom again. Or it may not. I expect you to know and act accordingly, however, or else I will be angry with you. And what’s this you’re claiming about my having said top is bottom? No. Top is top. I never said it wasn’t, and you’re a hateful bigot who can’t get laid for saying I did.

    • Bewildered

      Great elaboration ! LOL!

  • Stu

    I heard about radical feminism taking over in spain years ago, although I didn’t think it was as bad as this, and of course, that is because information is scarce, because the msm, even in Spain where it is happening, doesn’t talk about it. I predicted that economic collapse would follow not far behind the Radfem measures. I am very happy to report, yes, happy, that I was right. Spain’s economy is in tatters. You will hear nothing of feminist innovations or implementation of draconian laws as the reasons for this though. It’s bad economic management, or excess borrowing, or speculation, or this, or that, but never a word of the anti-male environment. These things go under the radar as the reasons for collapsing economic conditions, either deliberately covered up, or just a blind spot that the ignorant never even attempt to see.

    I have known many, many men, who were hard workers. Men who worked long hours, or two jobs, and served as a river of money to their families and paid lots of lots of taxes, who were reduced to dole bludging couch potatoes who couldn’t give a shit about anything after losing their homes and assets from divorce. I have seen woman after women over the years, obtain sole custody, the entire house, most of the other assets, and then go about making life hard for the ex husband like it was a hobby. I’ve watched them squander away assets that it took many years of hard work to build up. One particular women that comes to mind obtained an entire house, all of the contents, a car, and child support, as well as spousal maintenance for three years, after only two years with a man, not working, and having one child. She got the house completely in her name, free from debt, and ran up so much debt against it that it was sold out from under by the bank a few years later. She then squandered the remaining money away, and ended up broke, and living in a gov house. I heard that the child, pissed off from her and went and found his father when he was 16yo, apparently the mother ended up living in a caravan in a small country town, on the dole, fat, ugly, grey, and miserable, after squandering away her money, and her youth, partying and spending everything she could get from men and the state.

    I have known of so many women that have been enriched by divorce and separation, only to spend it away on garbage, holidays, fashion, partying, and an endless array of trinkets.

    I am betting that Spain’s economy underwent a major uptick after these laws were brought into force. The transfer of money and assets from men to women, would have sparked a spending spree. The massive amount of money spent creating jobs in women’s supportive services and programs would have went towards the same thing. But it is a spending spree based on spending the accumulated golden eggs, while killing off the goose that lays them. The golden eggs are all gone, and the spending continues by racking up the debt.

    Now we can watch as Spain descends into third world shit hole status, without a word mentioned as to the real reason. Men have no incentive to do as they have done before. In fact, they have incentive to see society burn to the ground.

  • napocapo69 (@napocapo69)

    Excellent research work.
    Considering the demographic of Spain roughly 6% of adult males have been subject to these crimes…

  • baronvonaqua

    This article is a good confirmation for me after having watched a video on youtube called false accusations in Spain.
    This disturbing video was to me an indicator of end game Feminism
    Guilty based solely on a womans word or whim – (irrelevant that the courts may find you innocent as the damage has been done)
    Also i recall watching a doco about the plea bargain situation in the US and the “impressive conviction rates” and it would appear that the same situation occurs in Spain giving rise to more false statistics.
    So if you cant AFFORD to be innocent take the lesser sentence

  • Carlos Geijo (@carlosgeijo)
    • Bewildered

      The English version?

      • Brian

        Load it into Google Chrome. A “Translate” bar will appear at the top of the page. It does a pretty good job, readable enough.

        • Bewildered

          Thanks !

  • re-construct

    . Break and divide the majority of working class families to keep them broken / and divided… it makes their sons easier to harvest.

    Karen (Girl writes what) spoke recently about the province in China, where the leaders kept the working class (broken, dumb, and down). Only the leaders get a patriarchal education.for their children….its matriarchal chaos for the serfs!!

  • Rebus