You are no longer men. I don’t mean that in the sense that you lack the bulging muscles and caveman qualities so often claimed as cartoonishly masculine by feminists, simply that you are – to all outward appearances – lacking the will, the volition and the cognitive function to be be seriously considered sentient adult human beings.
You are a collection of limp, broken zombies. You are everything feminists have demanded men become, taken to a logical conclusion, and the result is pathetic, unappealing and unintentionally comic. Whether your weak, pathetic self abasement is sincere or affected in pursuit of feminist praise, we – the unreconstructed neanderthals of the world; thank you. Your purpose may be that of a shipwreck, which serves to warn other vessels of dangerous rocks.
As a man, I should clarify that although I find your limp lap-dog version of consciousness repulsive, you are also repellent to women. Radical feminist propaganda to the contrary, women do not tingle for inert, self-abasing mendicants of the kind you appear to be. No matter how motivated to seek approval was your grotesque self loathing and flagellation.
Your deference to feminine emotion – held by you in esteem higher than reason – signals your abdication of adulthood, enlightenment, and sentience. By your craven, crawling, apology for the masculinity of men who came before you, be assured you speak only for yourselves – assuming a hand doesn’t occupy your back chute like that of a puppeteer, and the words dribbling from your slack jaw aren’t those of your keepers. Your fawning reverence and elevation of mere biological sex to an object of worship degrades not only yourself, but the female human beings you grovel for.
Women, contrary to your mewling and self-serving fawning are, like men, simply humans, and can have no dignity when falsely deified and elevated as if creatures of mythical ether.
You degrade them by your worship, as you degrade yourselves.
In your self abasement, you seek to self-excise all visible trace of masculinity, and you have, along with any worth you might have deserved.
What use are you besides a long, droopy lap dog?
I see clearly, what some might not – and that isn’t your prostrate form, your weakness, or your limber back. That much is obvious the the sightless masses of the general population. What I see clearly is your opportunism, your false piety, and the ethic of a carrion eater. Your false reverence has nothing whatsoever to do with respect for women, it’s and everything to do with posturing for approval. Look at me, I’m a “good” man, not like those other “bad” men. Your simpering sycophancy stinks of benefit seeking.
The women you mewl after have more to fear from you than the most direct pugilist. And you too have much to fear – because you are lacking any ethic except opportunity, and it is plainly visible – painting a well deserved target directly on your yellow backs.
Tags: Academics, Evopsych, Feminist lies, Lying feminist scumbags, Male Feminists, Manginas, Manuel Dexter, Masculinity, Really Stupid Shit, Sex
158 Posts in Total 
donations either one-time or on a monthly subscription basis.If you don't have paypal, check out the other options. If you want to get some merchandise and sponsor us at the same time, consider the AVfM store. 
quolls:
Jared White:
Codebuster:
napocapo69:
Rper1959:
We are all zombies in the sense those above think a one size fits all. All women are at the same level as men when it comes to making zombies.
It’s not feminism that does this to you. The problem is that no-one asked feminists why they thought it was a man’s world. We that did are hated for we found it was a system that feminists became involved in. Psychologists were popular in the 70′s but we moved on since then…. then came innovators and entrepreneurs and women adapted as did men. We have been equally shaping the political, & economy, that’s all. Socially sure, women outlive men 1.8 years on average but men have made huge difference since 2006 and will likely outlive women once robots take over their life threatening jobs. Socially women are starting to go to the doctor earlier as are men. Both need to care about themselves more than their responsibility in the family i.e fiances and nurture.
It’s a joke to think one sex is in power above another.
Ya know what, I’ll gladly be the first to jump on this one. I have indeed asked feminist why they think its a man’s world and their response is, because I have a small dick or I must not get laid or I am only asking because I am a misogynist. I have yet to get a mature or remotely rational response and at this point its unlikely I ever will. I dont know about you but I don’t want to wait around for robots to take my place in the future when the fucking problem is right here right now.
How true! Allow me to add a question I have been asking women for some 5 years now, without an answer. I have asked this question hundreds of times in various places to no avail.
What good has feminism bestowed on our cumulative society to benefit men, women and children equally?
What good has feminism bestowed on our cumulative society to benefit men, women and children equally?
Nothing.
But it broke ground for the MRM….”keep digging”, as my grandfather used to say- “you may reach China”
I offer my shovel, and strong arms.
Izzey
Thank you Izzey for your honest and useful answer.
I will dig with you and others until we reach the root of this problem and remove it from existence!
Wrong..it is feminism that does this.
Pasrasitic feminism propped up by sybiont manginas
…SYMBIONT manginas
I should really be getting more down votes than that. Cummon, “men.”
I know for fact the ratio is too high of guys who’ve been pummelled by the feminazi machinery but somehowwww… still don’t realize that chivalry is at the root, actually the foundation of feminism. Those “men” still nourish chivalry which is the very root of their whole problem. these “men” just keep kicking themselves in the ass over and over (and the rest of us too) because they just don’t get it.
Nor will they ever….until a woman comes along and takes their job, or cuts a program that may benefit their son, brother, father…..
The hypocrites that come here have yet to be affected ‘formally’ by the downward spiral of feminism.
They are not pushing a grocery cart down the block with all of their worldly possessions in them yet, because they have enabled/taken for granted; the power women have been given to destroy their lives.
I have worked with some vicious women over the years. When I was a waitress years ago, there was a woman that came to work bragging about how she would put on the worst worn out shoes-clothes on her children when ‘daddy’ picked them up for visitation. He thought he was going to have a nice day at the zoo, or the park….instead, he was at the mall buying them all new clothes.
She laughed how she ‘got over’ once again.
I met him a few times….a real nice guy.
Nice guys don’t finish last…they just get finished.
Izzey
It’s not just feminists…it’s pussy power. Traditional gentlemen were no different around women.
@ Julie.
Your comments show true insight and a blessed way of cutting right to the heart of the matter. You see the broader brush strokes that paint the very widest vista of reality.
I love you.
My name is Ilaf Atdaweewees – I live in a large effigy of a kumquat, and in my spare time I like to flop out my wissy dick and whirl it about like an aeroplane propeller.
Doughnuts have another hole but it’s on the outside and is invisible, the earth is hollow and flat at the same time, goats speak in tongues but is inaudible to the human ear and fruit flies type Korean on tiny typewriters with their cocks you silly cunt.
Faaaaark !
“…in my spare time I like to flop out my wissy dick and whirl it about like an aeroplane propeller…”
C’mon guys…you gotta admit that’s funny.
I want some of what you’re smoking
This website is not about fighting women… Paul is a civil rights warrior who is trying to make the world a better place for all people.
Yes, Paul is ALL FOR true equal rights. BUT, it’s more than a joke to think one sex, the “fair sex,” is NOT in power above the other, thanks to the femi-chivalrists.
It’s more than abusred to think otherwise.
Thank goodness for down votes! The ultimate compliment is to be dissed by Satan, herself (Gay and “his” buddies who sound rather Satanic when their supremacist words, er, I mean LIES are compared to Christ’s words of equality). Christ called these Gay-type “men” ravening wolves in sheep’s clothing who would pervert his words and the truth. Isaiah directly addressed Gay in chap 5:20 and again in chap 3:12…
As vile and supremacist as as feminism is, we often don’t see how much more vile chivalry is:
If you attack feminism alone, effectively, it will not stay down but will spring back up due to chivary being the nourishing root of feminism.
BUT, if you attack chivalry (the true root) effectively the war is over and done, for feminism cannot revive dead chivarly nor can feminist supremacy ever stand on it’s own.
yep… racism or sexism if fucking stupid, regardless of its incarnation. All the fucking morons who worship Ayn Rand fail to see that it is just another form of exceptionalism… instead of it being sex, religion or race based it is wealth based.
The rich CEO’s and bankers are the “good ones” and we should all worship them.
Adam Smith, Thomas Jefferson and Rousseau all had it right way back in the 18th century… all men (and women) are created equal….
But when we bash on the rich and create class division, hate and envy (sounds like feminism???) we promote socialism.
Feminism is just a tool of socialism – support either one and you support the other, even if ignorantly. Karl Mark pointed out the necessity of dividing the class warfare and creating chaos and using feminism to destroy and tear down the family to let the socialist state take over and be parent/nanny to all.
Remember, feminism is just a socialist tool. Loving socialism IS loving feminism. Inseparable.
Maybe you should read some of Marx work because the way you have characterized it here is nonsense…
Anybody reading this website is not one of the elite and should not fall for the bullshit socialism vs capitalism line. Oh if we could just go back to the good old days when we had a King, then man would be in charge again… is that what you have been led to believe? Is any law that allocates wealth away from the billionaires to the common man socialism?
Listen to my brother George Carlin http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acLW1vFO-2Q
hang in there, you’ll learn…
I’ll drink ta that. I have seen the comments left on there by men and (mostly) women saying they can’t understand why people don’t feel that video. They don’t get it, I mean they REALLY DON’T GET IT. And whats even more disgusting are the women saying they have been waiting for this apology for years as if its their very birth rite to have one. Seeing that video was a brutal task indeed to watch, but I don’t know what was worse…the video or the hoards of women saying they except their apology with their nose held high and passing their odorless farts.
yeah I misspelled accept my bad : )
Ya beautiful just the same Jedi!
Manginas are often the product of the sexist, brutal, and humiliating upbringing of a feminist mother. Manginas live in a twisted worldview where masculinity is base and vile, and where femininity is divine and pristine. This worldview allows them to believe that the horrifying abuse that they endured at the hands of their mothers was inflicted on them out of love.
Manginas want to belive that their mothers loved them enough to torture and beat the evil masculinity out of them. The only alternative is to realize that feminist hatred of boys quickly snuffed out any love that their feminist mothers felt for her sons.
Totally fucking right on.
Which is why we need to attempt to cure these ‘men’ from their manginocity.
I’ve read a lot of books, and most books were written by manginas. Not all books, but a lot. The self hatred that permeates nearly the entire industry might be one reason boys aren’t reading much nowadays.
Harry Potter for example was utterly misandristic, don’t even get me started.
A few more authors that come to mind are Clive Barker and Robert Heinlein. These aren’t just no names, they are best selling authors who sow hatred. Robert Heinlein is considered to be one of “the big three” along with Arthur C. Clarke and Isaac Asimov. How Heinlein managed to get placed up between those other two talented writers I have no idea.
The writings of both Heinlein and Barker are brimming with manginas, blatant misandry, female supremacy, distorted views of masculinity, and of course the portrayal of all men managing that dual role of incompetence/oppressor. Here’s a link to something on wikipedia, I’ve read a lot of books, and most books were written by manginas. Not all books, but a lot. The self hatred that permeates nearly the entire industry might be one reason boys aren’t reading much nowadays.
Harry Potter for example was utterly misandristic, don’t even get me started.
A few more authors that come to mind are Clive Barker and Robert Heinlein. These aren’t just no names, they are best selling authors who sow hatred. Robert Heinlein is considered to be one of “the big three” along with Arthur C. Clarke and Isaac Asimov. How Heinlein managed to get placed up between those other two talented writers I have no idea.
The writings of both Heinlein and Barker are brimming with manginas, blatant misandry, female supremacy, distorted views of masculinity, and of course the portrayal of all men managing that dual role of incompetence/oppressor.
Barker is, in my opinion, a good writer despite the themes and views which make his works entirely unenjoyable save for apologetic manginas and casual man-hating women. Heinlein is a talentless hack. His writing is so awful. I’ve no idea how he got placed among the greats like Clarke and Asimov.
Here’s a qoute from the wikipedia page on Heinlein:
‘Gary Westfahl points out that “Heinlein is a problematic case for feminists; on the one hand, his works often feature strong female characters and vigorous statements that women are equal to or even superior to men; but these characters and statements often reflect hopelessly stereotypical attitudes about typical female attributes. It is disconcerting, for example, that in Expanded Universe Heinlein calls for a society where all lawyers and politicians are women, essentially on the grounds that they possess a mysterious feminine practicality that men cannot duplicate.”‘
( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_A._Heinlein )
In one of Barker’s stories(I’ll find the exact story if anyone wants me to), he states outright that men were a mistake that should never have happened and women were the original perfection. But, Barker is heavily into BDSM, so it’s not really surprising, but he just needs to keep it in the bedroom and not propagate the wholesale hatred and social disempowerment of an entire group of people just because that’s what gets him hard. I don’t care if that’s how mommy programmed him.
In case anyone wants me to cite my sources, here’s a list of a few of the books I’ve read by the above authors:
Books of Blood, Barker
Abarat, Barker
The Thief of Always, Barker
Mister B. Gone, Barker
Weaveworld, Barker
The Great and Secret Show, Barker
The Damnation Game, Barker
Stranger in a Strange Land, Heinlein
Red Planet, Heinlein
Grok, Heinlein
And a bunch of others I’ve tried a great deal to forget about. His writing is shit. It makes Stephenie Meyer(Twilight) look like a talented artisan of prose and subtext.
Could the above post be deleted please? I seriously messed up on the editing. Thanks.
You messed up more than the editing. I believe you messed up the facts, at the very least on Robert A. Heinlein.
Did you actually read any of the books you mention, or did you just read the Wikipedia manginafied book reports?
I have to laugh at you – and laugh even harder because of all the First/Second/Third Wave Feminists who were totally pissed off with him through the Sixties, Seventies and Eighties – and still pissed off with his corpse and his corpus of writing after he died in 1988. On page 314 (“Afterword”) of his posthumously-published novel “For Us, The Living,” he was quoted as having said to a bookseller that he would have to change his name and write under a new one – “Because I think I’ve insulted everybody I can as Robert Heinlein!”
OK, I take back 50% of my ire with you, on the grounds that he managed to insult you, too – from the grave.
You say he pissed off people, including feminists. That too was included in my post via the excerpt from Wikipedia.
Please state the facts I messed up on.
Can you provide evidence to your allegations that I have messed up the facts? Specifically which facts I messed up?
Please don’t re-use the argument that feminists were offended. Feminists are always offended about everything. That’s one of their methods of attention getting and emotional manipulation. That feminists were offended is not a counter to my statement, it’s merely another statement.
Please don’t re-use the argument that he said he would have to change his name because he offended people. This is ambiguous at best and also doesn’t counter my statement. So, yes, he offended people, this doesn’t make your argument valid, neither does it nullify mine.
I have the books here on my bookshelf and if it comes to it will cite the examples of misandry, including book edition, page number and paragraph. However, that’s a lot more effort than I want to exert for an emotionally guided character attacker such as yourself.
You accuse me of being a liar. You slander my character with dubious(and currently unproven) allegations. You delight in trying to make me appear stupid or silly. You employ all the tactics of the feminists whom you allegedly oppose.
I’ve read a lot of books, and most books were written by manginas. Not all books, but a lot. The self hatred that permeates nearly the entire industry might be one reason boys aren’t reading much nowadays.
Harry Potter for example was utterly misandristic, don’t even get me started.
A few more authors that come to mind are Clive Barker and Robert Heinlein. These aren’t just no names, they are best selling authors who sow hatred. Robert Heinlein is considered to be one of “the big three” along with Arthur C. Clarke and Isaac Asimov. How Heinlein managed to get placed up between those other two talented writers I have no idea.
The writings of both Heinlein and Barker are brimming with manginas, blatant misandry, female supremacy, distorted views of masculinity, and of course the portrayal of all men managing that dual role of incompetence/oppressor. Here’s a link to something on wikipedia, I’ve read a lot of books, and most books were written by manginas. Not all books, but a lot. The self hatred that permeates nearly the entire industry might be one reason boys aren’t reading much nowadays.
Barker is, in my opinion, a good writer despite the themes and views which make his works entirely unenjoyable save for apologetic manginas and casual man-hating women. Heinlein is a talentless hack. His writing is so awful. I’ve no idea how he got placed among the greats like Clarke and Asimov.
Here’s a qoute from the wikipedia page on Heinlein:
‘Gary Westfahl points out that “Heinlein is a problematic case for feminists; on the one hand, his works often feature strong female characters and vigorous statements that women are equal to or even superior to men; but these characters and statements often reflect hopelessly stereotypical attitudes about typical female attributes. It is disconcerting, for example, that in Expanded Universe Heinlein calls for a society where all lawyers and politicians are women, essentially on the grounds that they possess a mysterious feminine practicality that men cannot duplicate.”‘
( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_A._Heinlein )
In one of Barker’s stories(I’ll find the exact story if anyone wants me to), he states outright that men were a mistake that should never have happened and women were the original perfection. But, Barker is heavily into BDSM, so it’s not really surprising, but he just needs to keep it in the bedroom and not propagate the wholesale hatred and social disempowerment of an entire group of people just because that’s what gets him hard. I don’t care if that’s how mommy programmed him.
In case anyone wants me to cite my sources, here’s a list of a few of the books I’ve read by the above authors:
Books of Blood, Barker
Abarat, Barker
The Thief of Always, Barker
Mister B. Gone, Barker
Weaveworld, Barker
The Great and Secret Show, Barker
The Damnation Game, Barker
Stranger in a Strange Land, Heinlein
Red Planet, Heinlein
Grok, Heinlein
And a bunch of others I’ve tried a great deal to forget about. His writing is shit. It makes Stephenie Meyer(Twilight) look like a talented artisan of prose and subtext.
Don’t forget about Stieg Larsson and his bestselling series of books starting with: “The girl with Drago Tattoo” (original Swedish title: “Men who hate women”
Here in London, UK you can see these books/movies/posters everywhere for last year or so!
Thank MY God….that I am no Good Man!
Self-hatred is particularly odious, because with self-hatred there is no hope of redemption. If you believe that you are morally inferior by nature, you may be able to achieve a sort of usefulness by being subservient to the superior other, but you can never have any intrinsic value apart from that subservience.
Yes. The idea of superiority vs. inferiority has to die.
Dear Mr. Dexter,
Please try to think of us in the Conscious Men movement as your friends and brothers in mutuality. We reach out to you and to all men to accept the challenge of being a new man of the 21st century. A man who loves and worships women and the divine feminine.
Join me on the leading edge of the evolutionary expression of a new masculinity. Participate in the unfolding of the new man; I welcome your inspired participation in co-creating a new world of gender harmony and creativity.
Gay Hendricks.
Dear Mr. Hendricks,
What a pleasure it is for you to visit. Please don’t be dissuaded by a bit of shit talk. Normal humans are like that and it’s all good because at least we’re honest. I hope you’re not just trolling and are prepared to answer some serious questions.
This “divine feminine” appears to be a new belief system. I’m very curious to know who you are and why you hold these beliefs?
What is the purpose of worship and what are your perceived benefits?
Where is the evidence of feminine superiority?
What is your opinion of other religions?
What is your education? What is your profession?
What happened to your father?
What if…it was a belief system that worshiped “asians” or “white people” or “children”?
Gay, your female worship and female supremacy agenda is even more alarming and disgusting than Nazism, slavery and KKK all rolled into one. To put it mildly its like you’re suggesting all blacks kneel, apologize and worship at the feet of the wonderful, benevolent and magnificent KKK in order to move forward together with them into “A Brave New Fahrenheit 1984″ where men should be grateful and appreciative slaves to their gracious and wonderful masters.
Sick, very sick and perverted to the ultimate degree to twist and view outright supremacy in the so very sick way you do.
Gay, you’re proof that a PhD is no proof of intellect or even of sanity.
It looks like Gay was just trolling and can’t answer any questions because his whole ball of supprot for lies and supremacy is contradiction after contradiction. Right, Gay?
Ah, yes, of course – female-worship (IDOL WORSHIP)!!!
Hey Arjuna, why did you choose to leave those little details about name and and approximate location there? trying to direct a little “divine feminine”, wrath into his personal life for advocating belief’s contrary to yours? All nicely wrapped in an ostensibly compassionate premise?
Yep, that’s pretty consistent with the feminist interpretation of enlightened conduct.
Oh, and btw, I’m not implying that the writer John. I actually don’t know. I just saw what you did there. Feminists and other hateful fanatics like to bring threats and harm into people’s personal lives for resisting doctrine. Something you don’t generally see MRA’s doing.
Fascist’s across the ages would be proud of you Arjuna.
Dear Mr. Ardagh,
Please quote where violence is being advocated by “John”? Anger is a natural human emotion, but it is not violence.
Since Mr. Hendricks is obviously just trolling and isn’t receptive to an intelligent conversation, perhaps you can answer these questions:
This “divine feminine” appears to be a new belief system. I’m very curious to know who you are and why you hold these beliefs?
What is the purpose of worship and what are your perceived benefits?
Where is the evidence of feminine superiority?
What is your opinion of other religions?
What is your education? What is your profession?
What happened to your father?
What if…it was a belief system that worshiped “asians” or “white people” or “children”?
@ Arjuna Ardagh and Gay wassit.
The MRA’s and I wish to extend our movement to our fellow men involved with the divine feminine who seek the redemptive power…
…oh fuck it. Just stick a pineapple up your greasy bum hole.
Mr Hendricks, I find it exceedingly difficult to determine if your post and your apparent sentiment are sincere, or parody – since in each case, you are absurd, while in the former, also abhorrent. Assuming you mean what you say – I’ll invite you to seek me out – make yourself known to me, and expect my boot print on your back as I step over you. Alternately, you could avoid that painful and possibly humiliating outcome, and go fuck yourself.
Regards,
Mr. Dexter
Gay, that’s just gay…
You want men to “…worship women and the divine feminine.”???
You want us to “Join (you) on the leading edge of the evolutionary expression of (that) new masculinity … in co-creating a new world of gender harmony and creativity.”??????
What, worshiping women (submitting to being their slaves) is somehow the way to “…co-creating a new world of gender harmony…”????
Are you sane, or just so far gone supremacist that you can’t get your head out of your azzzz far enough to get enough fresh air to think clearly?
“…can’t get your head out of your azzzz far enough to get enough fresh air to think clearly? ”
Guffaw.
[img]http://avoiceformen.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/aaaaaaaa-1.JPG[/img]
Chivalrous manginas also have to be completely spineless to ASSume this standard position to prove their devotion to totalitarian femifascism.
Go fuck yourself!!!
Hey Gay! since your so into pussy worship and did your lame ass video to get just that. Allow me to extend you the official MRA dictionary for womens personal ads. I hope you find the pussy your looking for player.
40ish ………………… 49
Adventurous …………… Slept with all your mates
Athletic ……………… No Tits
Average looking ……….. Has a face like an arse
Beautiful …………….. Pathological liar
Contagious smile ………. Does a lot of pills
Educated ……………… Fucked to death at college
Emotionally secure …….. On medication
Feminist ……………… Fat
Friendship first ………. Former slut/born again virgin
Fun ………………….. Annoying
Gentle ……………….. Dull
Good listener …………. Autistic
New Age ………………. Body hair problems
Old fashioned …………. No blow jobs or anal
Open minded …………… Desperate
Outgoing ……………… Loud and embarrassing
Passionate ……………. Sloppy drunk
Poet …………………. Depressive
Professional ………….. Bitch
Romantic ……………… Frigid
Social ……………….. Fanny like a clowns pocket
Voluptuous ……………. Very fat
Large lady ……………. Hugely Fat
Wants soul-mate………… Stalker
Widow ………………… Murderer
by queslett50
How about “wants to find a man who knows how to treat a lady?’ translation… somebody to pay my bills and credit card debt.
Hey Jedi mate awesome that. : )
I’ll add these:
Romantic ……………… Do stuff for me.
Bubbly ……………… Dribbles when giggling.
Thoughtful ……………… Cunning.
Sensitive ……………… Hysteric.
Young at heart ……………… Coffin Dodger.
Out spoken ……………… Belligerent.
Intelligent ……………… Paddock short of a roo..
Well read ……………… Loves a ton of TV.
Indoorsey ……………… Jealous.
Outdoorsey ……………… Loose cannon.
Quick witted ……………… Quick tempered.
Educated ……………… Had a boyfriend who went to uni.
Interesting ……………… Dull as dishwater.
Proud ……………… Boastful.
Accomplished ……………… Worked in a slaughterhouse.
Focused ……………… Narcissistic.
Observant ……………… Nagging.
Organised ……………… Nagging.
Helpful ……………… Nagging.
Healthy living ……………… Nagging.
Socially connected ……………… Duplicitous.
Presents well ……………… Phoney.
Strong minded ……………… Hateful.
Lateral thinker ……………… Judgmental.
Your equal ……………… Oppressive.
Proactive ……………… Manipulative.
Agreeable ……………… Passive aggressive.
Energetic ……………… Tedious.
Golden Heart ……………… Golden Diggin’.
A keeper ……………… Womb to tomb fuckhead.
BBW-Bring Burgers With
Mr. Hendricks, in your estimation is there also a divine masculinity? If so, is the divine masculinity divine in itself, or must it defer to the divine feminine? Must the divine feminine defer to the divine masculine?
You do realize, that selective worship of one group at the expense of another is a supremacist stance and that there has never been a supremacist organization that didn’t want to cause harm to the “other”.
Finally, why do you worship that which is merely the female gender of a species evolved from primates? There are no inherently divine traits in women, just as there are no inherently divine traits in men. Why do you persist in this? Do the women you associate with, insist on being worshiped? What does that say about them?
The only males with a similar sense of entitlement are elite men, so, do most women consider themselves to be an elite class? That doesn’t sound like the perfect beings of love and superiority that you worship, or a group in need of special protection, for that matter.
The wword he uses says it all Intro…worship. That’s NEVER good.
Indeed.
What, a joke??? As for all my exposure to enlisting ANY of the GLBT community in supporting true equal rights, all, even gays, would rather suck up to femifascist supremacists for their power to get some trickle-down rights from them rather than fighting alongside men and fathers for true equality.
Gay, your definition of the new male of the 21st century is that of a mangina chivalrist, older than history itself. “HE” is willing to sell out “his” fellow man for some rewards and spoils of society, freebies at the expense and blood of “HIS” fellow man.
you don’t like gays or socialists… I am betting that you have a really long list of people who you don’t like. What do you think about Black people and Muslims?
It doesn’t sound like you want equality, it sounds like you want to regain power so your team can treat everyone else like shit. I got news for you, you do not have a snowballs chance in hell. Shit talking the GLBT community is as insightful and productive as assuming that just because someone is Black or gay or both… that they will be sympathetic to the cause of equal rights.
Lame projection. Stop accusing people of things they didn’t say troll.
name call much? That is exactly what the idiot said…
That’s not what I read. There is reason to be concerned about GLBT ties to radical feminism.
You’re a fucking idiot if you don’t understand that.
Women, people “of color” and now the GLBT “community” are the collective victim class, who thrive off of the supposed oppression of the “white male supremacy”. You’ll never see Gay or gays, oppose feminism…at least openly.
Umm, you do know one of the contributing writers on this site is gay right? And, his work is pretty good.
I can’t believe people are up voting this prejudical horseshit.
BTW, I happen to be straight.
…and he does not worship in the House of Feminism at the feet of chivalry, and does not support the GBLT (supremacists) for just that reason…
Hooray!!!
Raven, oh, you mean Gay Hendricks is a writer incognito for AVfM?
BTW, your last statement kinda sounds similar to chivalry in a way.
BTW, it’s the variations in pure ENTITLED SUPREMACY people here are against, not sexual orientation in and of itself.
No pedestals…
Join Gay Hendricks then – that’s what chivalry is all about… Female-worship and pedestals.
Merrick and Labadie. I love them both. However, they are the exception, not the norm.
My experience thus far has been, for the most part, that gay men quietly living their lives are across the board politically. I have been surpised, however, at how much solidarity many of these men have with men’s issues. Lots of men who decide to follow their gay feelings in mid-life after disastrous marriages, etc.
I agree that some will not, but some and even many will, as our message continues to get out. The GLBT community is not monolithic.
motig, I don’t like socialists or any other totalitarian and I also don’t like supremacists which I find the vast majority of the GBLT to be, as they admit it in the end when prove it by their actions too when they suck onto feminism as their savior and favorite and reject equal rights of the MRM…
motig, most gays ( at least those in with the feminists in the GBLT crap) don’t fight for men’s equality. They are like chivalrists (or are chivalrists) as they latch on to serve the feminists (just like Gay and “his” mangina friends) to get some trickle-down of their spoils of raping and pillaging society. Fighting for equality my arse!?
Most straight men are either white knights or mangina’s?
Your point is?
Show me ANY “special interest group” that is unbiased….. it is right there in the name they want THEIR group to get special treatment, not equality.
Gay Whatshisname is presenting a fake claim if he says he speaks for gays. Based on the pussy worship I’d say he is more than gay and actually wishes he was a woman. That would certainly account for his wanting special treatment for women.
That’s where we separate the true MRM from most other of today’s movements.
Most of today’s entitlement and supremacy movements (like the GBLT) are supremacist special rights movements while the MRM is the polar opposite of feminism, GBLT, chivalry….
IOW, the GBLT and feminism are both supremacist entitlement movements and ARE integrally tied.
The words “supremacy” and “entitled” are key here.
That’s what the truely non-contradictory MRM is all about – true equality – and exposing and defeating all supremacy entitlement movements. They all hold males down – faceplant men and their children in the mud for the entitled to gleefully walk across their backs.
@ Gay wassit.
Your post was way too long, let me paraphrase for you.
—–> Translation: I’m a knob
sounds good to me, but can we also throw in some worshipping of the divine masculine?> you know..the female counterpart? or would that kind if ruin the whole groveling thing?
I drew this a few years ago long before I took a bowl of those red pills.
Looking at it these days it reminds me of the mangina with a cardigan collection all with square wooden buttons. Yep, he’s the guy that got chucked out of the model train club because he got too political.
His wife is mean as mean can be, even her shadow has been scared off.
Now remember this good MRA’s we may despise this chap, but take cold comfort in the knowledge that every time his alarm clock goes off he remains asleep in the nightmare of home abuse.
[img]http://avoiceformen.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Arty Mangina in the wind-2.jpg[/img]
[img]http://avoiceformen.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Arty Mangina in the wind-3.jpg[/img]
Quite talented, you are.
My father was an artist, and I also scribble and paint.
In spite of what you depict this as….
me likes.
I also want to add, that last night I was writing out an estimate, and I had the television on. There is a show called “Jail” on one of the cable channels here. A 73 year old man was arrested for “Domestic Violence”
He bopped his wife on the head with an empty plastic soda bottle.
She called the police, he was arrested.
He was smiling ear to ear to be spending a night away from her.
I wonder how many times she slapped him, or berated him, and he just took it until he was so fed up, that he ‘snapped’.
Is that not the woman’s defense for beating a man…killing, a man?
Your post and drawing just made me think of that.
Izzey
“A 73 year old man was arrested for “Domestic Violence.” He bopped his wife on the head with an empty plastic soda bottle. She called the police, he was arrested. He was smiling ear to ear to be spending a night away from her.”
When I was growing up and watching The Three Stooges on afternoon after-school TV, they used to call that “slapstick!”
Ta, : )
That is a simply beautiful picture. Quite powerful. If I had encountered this in a museum, I’d still be staring at it.
Ta Merrick sir.
I tell you I have decided to chuck more up on an ongoing basis.
For anyone who’s read any of my other posts it should be pretty clear what side of the fence of this issue I stand on.
And, as I’m always looking for additional healthy outlets of what appears to be a bottomless inferno of rage inside me, this was suggested to me by a friend:
http://toughmudder.com/results-photos/tough-mudder-hall-of-fame/
Allow me to dissect the comedy:
The very first picture in the hall of fame is of a smiling woman jogging. She has no dirt on her. She has no blood or sweat on her. She seems to be leisurely jogging at a moderate pace after just coming from a shower and a pedicure. This is a symbol of strength? With rage building, I read on.
“On January 13th, 2010, Carrie Richey lost her husband, Paul Richey, a Pennsylvania State Police Officer. After responding to a case of domestic abuse, Officer Richey was murdered by the assailant. A dedicated mother and wife, Carrie is also a triathlon and marathon runner. Since then, Carrie has encouraged new runners and organized a race to benefit the Domestic Violence Cases.
Carrie will once again be rallying the troops to participate in Tough Mudder PA. We admire her courage, initiative, and strength.”
What a cunt.
So, let me get this straight, she didn’t actually DO anything? She simply spread her legs for someone who actually was a warrior, someone who actually risked his life and gave it, and somehow SHE is in the hall of fame? What the fuck kind of world do we live in? Has the whole world lost it’s goddamned mind? Oh wait, it gets better.
DV is involved.
It’s like this isn’t even an attempt at a short biography but rather just a collection of hate inciting feminist buzzwords. One paragraph somehow portrays a woman(who did nothing) as a hero but at the same time as a victim(like all women, who are all raped/DV’d/oppressed at every moment of every day simultaneously by every man).
This is such a disrespectful clusterfuck of lies it’s mind boggling. I’ll try to untangle this.
Statement: “…Carrie Richey lost her husband…”
Response: No, she didn’t lose him as she never owned him in the first place. Slavery was outlawed a few years back last I recall. Secondly, it was HE who lost his life. Not everything has to be explained in a way which implies that everything is, at all times, revolving around women and only important as it relates to the emotional state of women.
Statement: “…Paul Richey, a Pennsylvania State Police Officer…”
Response: Yes, her husband was a cop, not her. She is not a hero by proxy. Fucking a person who performs heroism doesn’t make a person heroic, it makes them a person who is sexually attracted to power, i.e. a coward.
Statement: “…Officer Richey was murdered by the assailant…”
Response: Yes, her husband was murdered, not her. So she can sit down and shut the fuck up until she actually does something.
Statement: “Carrie will once again be rallying the troops to participate…”
Response: This isn’t Braveheart, and she ain’t William Wallace. People sign up to this thing(of their own accord) because they want to test themselves, as opposed to manipulating data and emotions to get sympathetic attention from hoards of strangers.
Statement: “…We admire her courage, initiative, and strength.”
Response: Please provide evidence for this statement so that I may form a response.
Scroll down further to see ACTUAL heroes, such as people who are ACTUALLY overcoming REAL obstacles. Such as the Vietnam vet with prostate cancer, the guy who was IN A COMA AFTER GETTING THE SHIT KICKED OUT OF HIM.
Well nailed.
We read this and feel exactly the same way. Believe it, you are absolutely not alone.
Hmmm, every person on that page other that the one that used to screw the dead cop…………. is a man.
Point being when the chips are down it is a man that is going to DO something about. It may not even always be the right thing but dammit, doing something counts for alot more than talking about doing something.
Nowadays when I see stuff like this; photos of stuff like this I don’t even LOOK at the women. Especially if it has to do with soldiers.
Women are “heroes” if they do anything not normally associated with being a woman. They’re also heroes if they survived being a victim of something. And if they’re a “single mom”, they’re a hero by default.
Saying a woman is a hero for overcoming or accomplishing the simplest act or event, is associating her with men who are REAL heroes. If the feminist media exclaims it enough times, it’ll give people the illusion of female equality or even superiority. Women are heroes for simply being women, and don’t you dare disagree buster!
NOW you’re talking!
Carrie Richey is a “Heroic Victim” (sarcasm intended) in the same moldy mold as Hitlery Clinton’s pronunciamento that “women are the real victims of war, they lose their (men)…”
By comparison, I lost my mother to cancer some years ago. She had eighty-six good years of life, and a few bad months fighting the cancer. Does that make me “the real victim (of cancer)”? – Are you fuckin’ well kidding?
Any running event “led” by her should have been named the “Tough Titty Snivel-Bitch Jog-A-Thon!”
No more apologies for being a hairy, ball swinging, white heterosexual man.
You’re white?
I wouldn’t even try and save those men. They are too far gone. It’s like, if you get bitten by a zombi, there is only one thing to do.
Thank you for writing this. I am involved in personal development and this appears to be very popular. And it bothers the hell out of me. I have been meaning to write “An apology to the the divine masculine.” I also question how women are referred to as “Goddess” then are not men, “God”?
“We’re all God in drag!”
Ram Das
Preferably no pedestals on either side. Just true equality.
Exactly.
According to white, heterosexual man Adam Smith, in his book An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, government policies that favor one group over another will result in less wealth for all people.
The people who run the world want us distracted with stupid little fights… white vs non-white, gay vs straight, women vs men, pro-choice vs anti-abortion, religion a vs religion b… guess what… the powerful are white, non-white, Jews, Christians, Muslims, women, gays, etc… the only color that they care about is GREEN. They count on us all being too stupid to figure out the deck is stacked against us.
Very good writing. Manginas do degrade women by their worship of them, but women are demanding to be worshipped, so women are also degrading themselves.
Manginas are actually going to further our cause. They are going to further our cause by doing everything that feminists and women want, and show them how useless it is to do so.
Well, wasn’t it Eve that wanted to be like God.
Joke of the year.
Two women were sitting quietly together, minding their own business.
Sounds like a perfectly lovely fantasy….
Truth
Yeah…
…and then another one walks in and says ” Who wants to join me and gang up on the other one ? “
Here’s a link you might find interesting:
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/billion-wicked-thoughts/201104/why-feminism-is-the-anti-viagra
The basic argument is that women are hard-wired to find submission erotic and since most women are heterosexual, they find submission to MEN erotic.
Men who act submissive are actually very unappealing, sexually. They may have SOCIAL appeal for dominating women, but the resulting lack of sexual satisfaction seems pretty predictable. Acting submissive to get laid is not a very effective strategy.
You’re the anti-viagara. You’re fugly inside and out. Go away fugly.
For once she is stating a well know truth.
I fail to see any harm in telling the mangina’s how their theories are so flawed. It comes down to the fact that men and women are different in more ways than just plumbing.
Mangina’s never get tail or only low caliber. And, always whine about “why do good guys never get the girl”. Meanwhile, alphas and MGTOW that are also “good guys” never seem to be wanting in the sexual arena.
the only drawback to mangina’s finally getting a clue is my harem might get smaller as more men acting less like women could create a supply/demand issue balance. There is a reason 30% of the guys get 90% of the women………. they act like guys.
That’s right, Paul wrote and talked on his radio program about many (not all) women being turned on by men who are bad boys, murderers etc… But, does that Psychology Today article mention that those women are often a match – unstable, manipulative and abusive, as we observe in the real world???
The study only indicates the fairly obvious, that with more women working they have less time for intimacy. Yet it is still just a correlation and may also be influenced by other factors, like porn.
Just like before, Andrea is selling sex in exchange for a beta provider. I don’t believe her husband is dominant at all. It’s all lies and deception to maintain her feminine privilege.
Agreed on those points Denis. Otherwise, she’d have let him wear the pants for a day and put in his own 2 cents.
If he wasn’t a beta he’d have demanded and gotten those pants long ago……. or been served divorce papers since we all know who really has the power in that relationship.
If the outcome of any serious attempt to get peoples attention, is that you actually become a parody of yourself…
…the “Conscious Men” have succeeded at this much.
I think anyone with a “conscious” would agree with that.
Nothing much to add besides this- Fuck your kind of “consciousness”. It’ll be a cold day in hell before I apologize for a damn thing,but especially, ESPECIALLY not being a man,or enjoying the naked female body,or “starting wars” (Kinda surprised the hell outta me, I’d always thought only Congress and the President could “start wars”, turns out everybody with a dick can start them).
Fuck your sackless, simpering, whiny apology,and fuck you.
I used to feel sorry for guys like these “conscious men” but they are standing there digging all of our graves, one whiny, woman-worshiping diatribe at a time. Fuck ‘em.
I’ve had my ear to the ground lately and I am disgusted by what I see, these “conscious men” represent the last, concerted push to completely derail society’s sense of justice re men and officially move us down to the ranks of “subhuman”. Look at the way they word their mission statement, they want to “help men become fully human”.
Jesus goddamn Christ.
@Andrea
Damn right Andrea. It’s something I’ve been aware of since I was very young. The man who is grovelling for sex is doing it because he gets very little, and he gets very little because he’s grovelling.
Women are sexually attracted to men that don’t take crap from them, and will walk away from their pussy before they submit to it. They might hate you for not being their doormat, but hating you isn’t going to stop them wanting to fuck you
LOL. How true!
This article by Manuel Dexter should be framed. It speaks for itself. I’ve read it a couple of times now, and for no reason other than to express my appreciation for an expressive, powerful statement… Good one, Manuel!
Okay, skip control alt…..just delete
Good stuff…