And All Women are Potential Child Abusers, Too

January 25, 2011 By John Hembling (JtO) 36 Comments

All men are potential rapists. This is an old and well worn chestnut. You don’t often hear men say it. No, it’s women who tend to trot this one out. A principal reason for this is that it is a technically true statement which can be used to shame and silence men, and against which it is hard to argue. Another use for this statement is to inculcate in women a fear and mistrust of men; to separate men and women and prevent them from cooperating as each other’s natural compliments.

“All men are potential rapists” is such a troubling statement for most men who have no desire or urge to commit rape. And its troubling because it is, on it’s surface, true. True, but incomplete. Men do have the capability to rape. Yes, we do. But to just say that without some additional context is misleading. In fact, it’s deceptive.

There are more ways to lie than the simple utterance of incorrect statements of fact. So to make the claim “all men are potential rapists” into a complete, and thus, not a deceptive statement, I’d like to do a little filling in. All men are also potential murderers, all men are potential robbers, all men are potential child molesters, all men are potential chicken fuckers.

There’s undoubtedly other things which I could add to that list. It’s still a true statement, but it’s now more complete. Unfortunately, it is still deceptive. No, to make the statement that all men are potential rapists complete and no longer deceptive, we need to add something else.

All women are also potential rapists.

Did the room just go silent?

Women are also all potential murderers[1], child rapists[2], and robbers. Nobody likes to talk about rape when its committed by a women, though. Some apologists for feminist theory will condescend to explain that women cannot commit rape because they lack the requisite protuberant sexual appendage. This is a nonsense argument, rape is a crime of violence and imposed control, and can, and often does employ foreign objects such as bottles, brush handles and so on. I won’t belabour the fact that women can and do commit assault, robbery, child abuse and other crimes, in some cases at rates of offence exceeding those of men. [3]

All humans are potential rapists[4], but if you’re a radical feminist that won’t give you the warm glow of satisfaction to be had by only accusing males. The “all humans” argument is true, considerably more so than the misleading mention of only men, but even stating all humans are potential rapists is misleading. We know from FBI uniform crime reports [5] that only a very small fraction of humans in civil society participate in violent crimes. This is the great lie of omission used with so little resistance against men in our society.

The statistic that some number of women are subject to a particular violent crime – given by the media, in the absence of context or comparative victimization rates for men is another way to lie to the public. The number most often given for rape against women is 1 in 4. The source for this number is never provided, of course, because it’s a lie fabricated by sloppy advocacy research. [6]

The study which turned up the 1 in 4 number was funded by MS magazine, and conducted by the same Mary Koss who declared the crime of rape to be simply an escalated expression of normal male behavior.

Koss questioned 3000 college women in 1982 – and determined they had been raped if they answered yes to one of the following three questions:

Have you had sexual intercourse when you didn’t want to because a man gave you alcohol or drugs?
Have you had sexual intercourse when you didn’t want to because a man threatened or used some degree of physical force (twisting your arm, holding you down, etc.) to make you?
Have you had sexual acts (anal or oral intercourse or penetration by objects other than the penis) when you didn’t want to because a man threatened or used some degree of physical force (twisting your arm, holding you down, etc.) to make you?

15 percent of the women surveyed answered yes to at least one of those questions. This translates to 1 in 6. Koss added an additional 12 percent to this number for individuals who reported an “attempted rape” as defined by affirmative answer to one of the three questions, the total of 27 percent then translated to a nice, inflammatory claim of 1 in 4.

Interestingly, Koss herself reported that only 27 percent of her “victims” identified their own experience as “rape” even under the influence of her highly questionable methodology. Even accepting Koss’s questionable identification of what constitutes a “rape” a simple calculation indicates the rate of offence to be 1 in 14, not 1 in 4.

How telling is it that some radical feminists are now throwing around the number 1 in 3? That’s an claimed increase of 32% over the previous 1 in 4 number which was false to begin with. Are we expected to not notice these mobile “facts”?

All these numbers are meaningless of course, because they are never given in any context. [7] The UK home office produced advertising reporting that 2 women die each week from injuries sustained in domestic violence incidents. That’s 104 women killed each year, and it is shocking and inflammatory. It’s an emotionally charged number. But it’s meaningless, because what they do not say is how many men die from the same cause. Neither do they give any context by providing the sample size that this 2 per week actually means in terms of deaths within a population.

Being reasonable people, we might assume that no men die violent deaths at the hands of their spouses. According to Erin Pizzey, founder of the women’s shelter movement in the UK, in reality, for every 2 women who die, so does 1 man [8]. Bearing in mind men’s normal size and strength when compared to women – this fits neatly with stats showing coequal rates of offence between women and men in issues of domestic violence [9].

It is unacceptable to publicly declare all members of an ethnic demographic as criminal, or evil. In fact doing so is defined in some countries as a hate crime. All Germans are not nazis, all Jews are not greedy, all Muslims are not terrorists.

Where it applies in law, hate speech is any speech, writing, or display calculated to incite violence or prejudicial action against members of a group based on identity such as sexual orientation, religious affiliation, sexual identity or ethnicity.

It seems that this applies unless the group targeted happens to be the 48% of the population of this planet who are male. The term to describe this sexism has become unfortunately misunderstood to mean only a negative attitude towards women, and in western societies, that negative attitude generally doesn’t lead to state-sponsored murder – almost all victims of the death penalty in the United States being male.

Nor is sexism understood to lead to our society’s endemic male suicide rate, 4 times higher for men than women in Canada[10], and the United States[11] . Sexism also isn’t understood as a factor in the overwhelming majority of work related deaths belonging to only one sex, 93% of which are male[12]. So calling the hateful lie “that all men are potential rapists” simply sexist lacks the impact it should have. It is a phenomena so ugly, antihuman, and inexcusable that it deserves to be called that ugliest of words; racism – the hatred of one group, by another.

[1] http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/homicide/gender.cfm
[2] http://www.child-abuse-effects.com/female-sex-offenders.html
[3] ~page 68 http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm08/cm08.pdf
[4] http://www.canadiancrc.com/Female_Sex_Offenders-Female_Sexual_Predators_awareness.aspx
[5] http://www2.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2009/offenses/violent_crime/index.html
[6] http://www.leaderu.com/real/ri9502/sommers.html
[7] http://rds.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs04/dpr30.pdf
[8] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wG12QLmWow
[9] http://www.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assault.htm
[10] http://www.suicideinfo.ca/csp/assets/alert30.pdf
[11] http://fathersforlife.org/health/who_suicide_rates.htm
[12] ~page 10 http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/cfoi/cfch0008.pdf

http://equalitythroughtruth.blogspot.com/ Jean Valjean

In responding to the more recent 1 in 4 study done in 2000 I wrote this piece for Yahoo! Answers.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AoLP82AP2YEhw4525N_u1ePsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20101227163247AAofDke

I crunched the numbers from FBI statistics and compared them to the city of Louisville and compared that to our multiple universities here.

The numbers don’t even come close.
typhonblue

This is a nonsense argument, rape is a crime of violence and imposed control, and can, and often does employ foreign objects such as bottles, brush handles and so on.

And vaginas.
- AntZ
  
  I was wondering when someone would point this out.
  
  My brothers and I were all raped by vaginas when we were 11,12, and 13 years old. As an instrument of force, it was no less effective due to being an “inee” instead of an “outee”. As an instrument of power, it may have been fare more effective, seeing as I spent 40 years as a female serving robot as a result of this, and other, abuse.
  
  I have never heard of a woman who, after being raped, turned into a “man serving robot.”
  
  Feminist ideology + feminist violence is the nuclear option in the world of mind control.
  - typhonblue
    
    I have never heard of a woman who, after being raped, turned into a “man serving robot.”
    
    It might happen. But then I don’t think women have quite the same pressure to see their abusers as morally flawless.
    
    That, in itself, is a huge mind-fuck.
B.R. Merrick

We know from FBI uniform crime reports that only a very small fraction of humans in civil society participate in violent crimes.

And yet so many millions on this landmass are insistent that we need government to protect us from each other. The more men I meet, the less I could ever buy that argument again.

Well done.
http://thedamnedoldeman.com TDOM

Nicely done. The lack of balance when discussing sexual assault is dishonesty at its finest. The word “potential” makes it impossible to refute such statements but can, as you say, be used to expand the claim to all humans, including women. Everyone, man and woman alike, has the “potential” to do enormous good or to commit enormous harm. Women tend to get left out when discussing harm, but are forcebly injected when discussing good. For instance, “all men are potential rapists” is common, so is “the men and women who have died defending their country” when clearly all women are also potential rapists and almost all of the war causualties are men.

While your criticism of the Koss study is valid, it is not entirely accurate. I see that you relied on Dr. Sommers for your information. While she does a good job debunking the study, her analysis contains some errors. For several months I have been working on an in-depth article debunking Koss (a little at a time) by completely deconstructing her research. I’ll be posting it to my site when it’s done.

The Ms Foundation conceived of the study and chose Koss to lead it based on her work published in 1982 that was conducted prior to any involvement with Ms. Koss was chosen because her 1982 study determined that rape was under-reported and more prevalent on college campuses than previously thought. The initial Koss study was not funded by Ms Magazine, nor was the famous “1 in 4″ study. The Ms Foundation assisted Koss in obtaining funding and provided some office space and administrative assistance. This indicates that the magazine definitely had influence over the study’s design while maintaining the appearance of conducting an “unbiased” study because they didn’t actually provide the funding. The “1 in 4″ study was published several years later (I’d have to double check, but I think it was 1986).

Koss also confuses “want” (desire) with consent in her questions dealing with rape and attempted rape. Simply because a person does not want something does not mean that consent has been withheld. Therefore there is considerable question as to whether her questions meet the legal definition of rape as she claims (she later admitted that the question about drugs and alcohol did not). Later studies claiming to have “confirmed” her results often have the same problem.

There are many other problems with Koss that arefar too numerous to mention here.

TDOM
- http://www.falserapesociety.blogspot.com E. Steven Berkimer
  
  TDOM,
  
  The biggest problem with the KOSS “study” was that the majority of those that Koss classified as raped, didn’t classify themselves as raped. That kind of presumption in a study, is bias of the worst kind. She decided what the situation was, not the participants.
  
  I find it funny as well, how much of her research relied on Kanin’s early work, but as soon as his false rape studies came out, he was a hack who didn’t know what he was doing.
http://gynotheory.blogspot.com Adam Kostakis

“All men are potential rapists. This is an old and well worn chestnut. You don’t often hear men say it. No, it’s women who tend to trot this one out. A principal reason for this is that it is a technically true statement which can be used to shame and silence men”

I agree with the thrust of this article, though I have to disagree on this; I do not consider myself a ‘potential rapist.’ That is, I do not believe that I have the potential to commit rape.
Peter Charnley

‘All men are potential transmitters of leprosy’ – true, if they had the disease, which most don’t.

All political causes are potential transmitters of grotesque negative reflection – true, if they had the disease of hateful fanaticism backed by real power, which most don’t (except………..?).

(Second part would make a good clue on a crossword !).
- B.R. Merrick
  
  Yeah, but nobody would be able to finish the crossword:
  
  “Hmmm… Eight letters, starts with an F and the third letter from 41 Down is an M… ‘A political cause of hateful fanaticism backed by real power…’ … I think this is a misprint… Maybe 41 Down isn’t ‘MANBOOBS’ after all.”
  - Poester99
    
    It doesn’t fit cause you spelled it wrong.
    It’s spelled: F.U.T.R.E.L.L.E
mongo

All men are potential:
-Nobel Prize winners
-Chess grandmasters
-Great composers
-Winners of the Fields Medal
-Great artists
etc.
etc.
etc.
Alan

I think in the UK the simplest response to a woman asserting this old, well-worn chestnut is: “Yes Dear.”

And what about psychological rape? I finally felt like I’d been shot in the head with all the viciousness and invective thrown at me. I remember making a formal complaint about an advert on the back cover of a London tourist magazine that suggested a woman kneeing her male partner in the groin after she got back from a hard day at the office was a funny thing to behold. The complaint was rejected. DV cuts both ways. Best avoided.

Anyway, thanks for the article. This site certainly has a lot to say for itself.
Chris

Well done overall . Actually , this provides a pretty well-rounded source for future arguments/debates with doubters. From here they can follow the links if they still aren’t convinced .

I will take exception with one point made in the blog though : I’m not sure where and when we all got it into our heads that rape is all about control (although I am pretty sure of the source for that little nugget) but I have always questioned the validity of such a statement .
It’s always been rather obvious to me that it has nothing to do with control of another person but with a serious lack of self-control on the part of the rapist .
In other words , outside of perhaps the small fraction of psychotics who genuinely view rape as a tool for control , is it not more likely that rapists are simply just high-on-horny/low-on-impulse-control ? Does the average rapist strike anybody as being astute enough to fathom such a complex and far-reaching concept as control through sexual intimidation ?

Why can’t they just be really horny with no self-control ? I mean , isn’t it rather obvious that that’s the real reason for rape ?
- http://www.johntheother.com John H
  
  I have never bought into the idea that an adult can, out of anger “lose control” In cases of extreme terror, this makes sense, not, IMO in cases of anger. What actually happens is that in a state of heightened anger, somebody makes a decision about whether consequences matter. It’s the : “I’m so angry I don’t care” moment. And while I don’t think attempted imposition of control through violence is a rational response, I do think this is what’s going on when a situation escalates to violence, or sexual violence.
- Carlos
  
  In “The Myth of Male Power” Farrell spends a lot of time making the case that violence (not limited to rape) is not an act of power but of powerlessness. The more poor, disenfranchised, marginalized and voiceless you are the more likely you are to be violent. Hence, it is often not an act of power and control, but an act of powerlessness and a lack of control.
  
  While violence can be a form of abusing power and exerting control, the politically correct feminist line that it’s always about power and control is just another rhetorical gimmick to call everything a man does to assert himself in a relationship a form of domestic violence or sexual harassment. “Power and control” as the primary cause of violence is a complimentary claim to “all men are rapists” that has just about as much truth and good faith to it, and is just one example, of many, where feminists have committed the logical fallacy of generalizing from the exception.
  
  The real causes for violence and rape are far more complex than feminists are willing to acknowledge because they can’t view the problem through any lens other than the one that shows man = abuser, woman = victim.
  
  In any case, as we all know, all women have the potential to murder children.
Bob O’Hara

The “All Men are Potential Rapists”, “Rape is a crime of opportunity”, and “only men can stop rape” memes are one of the cornerstones of feminist hate and bigotry. I, like most men, am NOT capable of putting a knife to a woman’s throat and demanding that she perform oral sex on me or forcing her to have intercourse. Rapists rape not because they are men, but because they are criminals.

I used to live in Baltimore, a violent city with a HUGE heroin problem. People got mugged and robbed all the time. One time around the holiday season I pulled up to the place where I lived and ran up stairs to change for a party I was to attend that evening. I had left an expensive gift in the back seat of my car in plain view thinking that it would only be a little while before I was back on the road.
Sure enough when I came back there was a man just finishing up breaking into my car and I took chase. I followed him into an ally and sure enough the man produced a knife and that is when I got hold of my senses and broke off the chase.
I called the police and upon taking my statement the officer said: “Mr. O’Hara you have been living in this town long enough to know not to leave valuables in your vehicle where everyone can see them. You know how these junkies are around here what’s wrong with you?” He then proceeded to write me a $35 dollar ticket for the infarction and told me to forget about ever seeing the parcel ever again as it has by this time been liquefied and was now being injected up the perpetrators arm.
The man happened to be black, so did the police officer. If I had said to the officer “listen buddy if only you -insert plural form of N word racial slur here” would get your – insert fecal reference explicative here- we would not have this problem” I would have been in serious trouble and rightfully so because that would have made me a reprehensible bigot.
Yet feminists are totally excused from this and given a free pass for their bigotry when they proclaim that rape is something essential to being male.
- B.R. Merrick
  
  He then proceeded to write me a $35 dollar ticket…
  
  For Pete’s sake! Why?
  - Bob O’Hara
    
    There is a law in many municipalities where this form of theft is common that penalizes people for leaving valuables in plain site in order to discourage crime in troubled neighborhoods. It sounds messed up I know but if you live in Mid Town Baltimore for a litte while you would see how much sense it makes.
    - B.R. Merrick
      
      That makes no sense to me at all. Why would anyone report a crime to the police? Not only did one thief steal from you, but another thief takes your money for being the victim. That is asinine.
      - Bob O’Hara
        
        The theory is that if you discourage law abiding citizens from making available items that encourage petty theft then the police can spend more time chasing murderers and the like.
        I havent seen any data about it’s effectiveness but one thing is for sure: it’s another great way for the police department to make money.
      - Dusty
        
        That sounds like expanding the definition of crime to create police-state funding.
      - Bob O’Hara
        
        As long as the article is on the topic of rape let us also ponder what kind of reaction the police would get from the local feminist group if they said to a rape victim: “what the hell were you wearing those go go boots and that mini skirt with the fishnets for? Show less skin next time! Here is a $35 dollar ticket.”?
      - John A
        
        I think it’s to discourage reporting to police. Sounds more like a fee than a fine to me.
http://www.versifier59.wordpress.com Capt. DaPoet

Now John all you need to do is to turn the statement: All men are [potential] rapists back onto the feminists by stating that: All women are potential financial rapists; which is an absolute true statement and will remain so as long as the laws regarding marriage, divorce, child support and domestic violence continue to give women the advantage over men. Not because all women will do so but because all women can if they but decide to do so.
Alphabeta Supe

“All men are potential rapists. This is an old and well worn chestnut. You don’t often hear men say it. No, it’s women who tend to trot this one out. A principal reason for this is that it is a technically true statement which can be used to shame and silence men”

While this is as pointless as saying all sand is potentially glass, both statements are technically true. It must also be true that all women are potential baby-killers and all people are potential cannibals. Doesn’t mean it’s going to happen.

The missing link here is that little thing civilised people like to call ‘restraint’. Why is this profoundly important virtue given such short shrift whenever rape is mentioned in public discourse?

I’ll say that word again…RESTRAINT.

As a man, I could rape but I don’t, because I exercise restraint.

Most women don’t kill their unwanted babies (yet), because they exercise restraint.

Most starving people don’t murder their neighbours and BBQ their buttocks, because they exercise restraint.

As a car driver, I don’t run over feminists at pedestrian crossings, because I exercise restraint.

As a user of hydrofluoric acid, I don’t choose to daub my ex-wife in the face when mopping the sweat off her brow, thereby dissolving her skull inside her skin for being an annoying b*tch, because I exercise restraint.

As an engineer, I don’t build booby traps into the electrical systems I design to give lethal electric shocks to unqualified and ill-equipped personnel who tamper with dangerous components that can kill innocent bystanders, because I exercise restraint.

And so on…

The fact is, men exercise restraint over rape because after six million years of trial and error, at about the time of Moses, our Jewish friends decided that because it was INFINITELY more productive and pleasurable when your dearly beloved helpmeet and mother of your children voluntarily gave herself to you, it was worth engraving with a few other pearls of wisdom on a piece of stone.

Alexander Pope reminds us of restraint beautifully in EPISTLE II of his heartwarming “Essay on Man”:

http://www.blupete.com/Literature/Poetry/PopeMan.htm

Two Principles in human nature reign;
Self-love, to urge, and Reason, to restrain;
…
Self-love still stronger, as its objects nigh;
Reason’s at distance, and in prospect lie:

Attention, habit and experience gains;
Each strengthens Reason, and Self-love restrains.
…
Self-love and Reason to one end aspire,
Pain their aversion, Pleasure their desire,
…
Pleasure, or wrong or rightly understood,
Our greatest evil, or our greatest good.
…
Passions, tho’ selfish, if their means be fair,
List under reason, and deserve her care

The vast majority of men are reasonable, and the vast majority of reasonable men show restraint, especially when it comes to women and sex. Feminists woul dhave us believe that men walk around with perpetually erect ‘outees’ (thanks to Antz for this term) ready to plug the ‘inees’ of all and sundry.

The uncivilised man who rapes is no better than the average attractive woman, who coerces sex from men almost daily with impunity. We cannot have equality, it seems, unless all men are deemed as likely to engage in coercive sex as the average narcissitic woman.

I wonder if the only way to save society from consuming itself is the ending of rape prohibition.
Kratch

“There are more ways to lie than the simple utterance of incorrect statements of fact. So to make the claim “all men are potential rapists” into a complete, and thus, not a deceptive statement, I’d like to do a little filling in. All men are also potential murderers, all men are potential robbers, all men are potential child molesters, all men are potential chicken fuckers.”

I like to answer that accusation a different way;

All men may be potential rapists, true, but they can also be potential lovers, fathers and husbands. They can all be potential protectors, champions and heroes. And these are all far more likely to occur… why focus only on the negative?

as to women rapists, I tend to hold the movie 40 days and 40 nights up as a perfect example of both female rapists, and how it’s viewed by society. A women who has been openly rejected by the man, sneaks into his home and has sex with him while he sleeps (rape by any definition), and in turn, she is rewarded with winnings, he, the victim, is deemed a failure (in his bet) and his new girlfriend deems him a cheater in need of forgiveness… Yes, he was raped and needs to beg for forgiveness… hows that for victim blaming
http://spiritofnature99@blogspot.com Dulantha

I agree…..

All of these stupid laws, rules and regulations are only against the natural straight sex drive of men.

Other thing is women who are following an abnormal masculine way of life are also involving abnormal sexual harassment.
Johnny Blank

I’ve known a lot of women who’ve cried rape, and, much like unicorns, none have been real. They used it as a tool to escape the consequences of infidelity(as if there is any for women anyhow), or simply because the woman had “buyers remorse”. I realize that sometimes women get raped by men, but I’ve never seen it. I don’t know of any woman who has REALLY been raped.

“…but jonny ,you pig,, what the hell do u meen REEL rape ? ur awful” (female grammar imitated for effect)

Well, here’s but one example from my own personal experience:

The girlfriend of my then roommate allegedly got raped by his co-worker. He was livid. He began threatening to kill his co-worker over the phone and threatening all other manner of crazy things. She seemed rather bored. I then began to question her about what happened. Here’s what was said:

Me: So, what happened exactly?

Her: We were out dancing, then we went back to his place…

Me: Wait…you were out dancing with [alleged rapist]?

Her: Yeah. So we were dancing and drinking, then we went back to his place and started making out on his couch. Then we went to his bedroom and started having sex…

Me: With [the alleged rapist]?

Her: Yeah, so we were having sex, then, like, I started saying, like, “no, no” but he wouldn’t stop, you know?

Me: No, actually, I don’t follow. You’re story is rather confusing. Sounds like you went out on a date with this guy, went back to his place, made out, “started” having sex, whatever the fuck that means, then you supposedly told him to stop. Wait, did you actually tell him to stop having sex with you? Or did you just incoherently mumble something that in your mind sounded like “no no”.

Her: [getting angry] Look, I was raped.

Me: Uh huh.

I turn to my then roommate and try to explain to him that he should probably get tested for diseases and begin damage control with his job. He didn’t take it well.

Him: Fuck you, man. Don’t you talk that way about her!

Me: Dude, wake up, she clearly just cheated on you.

Him: [to me, while still on the phone with his supervisor] Shut the fuck up, she wouldn’t do that!

Her: [to my roommate] Hey, can you hurry up? I wanna eat soon.

Me: [to my roommate, about his girlfriend] She’s clearly very distraught about all this.

They then both told me many colorful ways I could get fucked. So I left them to their business, opting going for a walk rather than remain in the madness. Later it was revealed she had spent the night at the house of the alleged rapist, after the alleged rape, and that he gave her a ride home the next day. What a considerate rapist.

*

Regarding a woman’s rape of a man: I was physically, emotionally, and sexually abused by my mother. My MOTHER. As if that weren’t enough, nobody believed me. A “mothers love” and all that. I’ve not talked to her in over a decade. Every day when I wake up I make the conscious decision to not drive across the state and shoot her in the head. The only thing that stops me is that she could only die once, then her suffering would stop. She deserves far, far worse. And yet she CONTINUES to go on living a life free of consequence, fleeing to the arms of a new man when she has destroyed her current one. My mother is a parasite. Yet she is sadly not much different than the majority of women this country produces.

How exactly did she molest me? Do you really want to know? I can get very graphic if you like. It was nothing as simple as being pushed up against a cupboard once on a Sunday. She abused me nearly every day of my youth until I became physically mature and she became aware that I could now overpower her(around 13), and that’s just the physical sexual abuse. The other abuse continued until I left at 18. My mother deserves to be thrown in jail and beaten every fucking day until she’s an old woman, then kept alive on life support just so her torture can continue. I will not apologize for saying that. I will never apologize for hating my mother. I will never apologize for my rage, or for my opinions. Anyone who tells me I need to respect my mother gets a fucking punch in the mouth, free of charge, with a shit-on-your-face bonus.

The mere thought of my mother can drive me into a near berserk like rage. And I’ve barely avoided incarceration when some shit eating fuckwad gives me unsolicited advice about how I need to respect a MONSTER he never had to deal with. I HATE my mother. I set my jaw and bite my tongue every time someone has the audacity to tell me that my good qualities are because my mother raised me right, or because my skills have been inherited and not earned on my own.

Example: “Oh you’re such a good draw-er(translation: illustrator), you must have got that from your folks.”

I never met my father. Although I’ve heard many stories of him, all bad, from my mother. I like to think he was smart, and got out quick after realizing what a harpy my mother truly is. I wish I could have done the same, but she moved us to the middle of nowhere when I was very young. I considered running away, but I realized it would be difficult for an 8 year old to live on their own. I realized I could probably be a prostitute if I made it to a big city, but that wouldn’t be likely as the authorities would probably find and return me to my mother, and the wrath I’d have to endure from that would be too great.
Stu

A typical western mother

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/national/8203340/dead-babys-mother-seeks-legal-advice
Nergal

“All men are potential rapists.”

They say that,and yet, it couldn’t be farther from the truth. In order to rape, a man would need 3 things. A moderate amount of upper body strength,this automatically rules out some men. A midget would have a very hard time restraining a struggling woman, even though he’s a man. Ditto for the “90 pound weakling” a man who is underweight or not muscularly-developed.

The next thing he would need would be a sociopathic personality, or the ability to see other people as mere tools to be used for his purposes. This rules out the vast majority of men. Men created ethics and law. If we were sociopaths, the endless challenges for dominance would never cease. That is why every society has a form of the Golden Rule, and it was almost always dreamed up by a man. Many women, on the other hand, are quite comfortable stabbing their mate, their friend or even their own children in the back to get ahead. They are natural born sociopaths. Nobody’s feelings matter in their minds except their own, and they will ridicule a man who admits to having been emotionally hurt by them. A sociopath,too, believes that others are “pathetic” or weak, when displaying their emotions.

Of course, the final thing a man would need to rape is a cylindrical object of some kind,like a penis. And it is this that feminists focus obsessively on. Feminists are more concerned with our penises than we are. They mythologize our penises as symbols of power to the point that most women will now not think twice about mutilating a man’s genitals, viewing it as “taking away his power”, rather than what it is, taking away his reproductive capacity, the only thing many men have in this world, in an act of grievous bodily harm.

Most men lack the kind of psychopathic disregard for the feelings of others that many women and all feminists have. Even Josef Mengele, as far as I know, did not remove the ovaries or vulvas of jewish females.Part of the rape hysteria,I think, is the general lack of knowledge most women have about men. They assume we are capable of doing to them, the same kinds of things they do or fantasize about doing to us. Add to this the mythologized-penis-as-weapon-of power construct and you get the statement “All men are potential rapists.”.

You’ll notice I said nothing about female rapists here,this was in the interest of brevity. I have been raped about 3 times by women, according to the expanded feminist definition, and raped by two women according to the old legal definition. Those who claim women can’t or don’t rape or aren’t capable of it are fools,I know better.
Stu

boo hoo. Nobody upvoted my last post.

The latest from the fair sex

http://ninemsn.com.au/?ocid=hmlogout
dan

Every single person on earth has been raped…..by their mother. I was forced out of her sexual orifice at birth and according to the feminists that should be rape!
Kris

Livermore mom sentenced for sex with teen boys –
http://www.contracostatimes.com/ci_17701905
Robert

“Have you had sexual intercourse when you didn’t want to because a man gave you alcohol or drugs?”

At what point did any & all self-responsibility disappear? Did a man force you to ingest either drug? Did you become unconscious? OR Did you regret your own choices after the fact & claim rape to exonerate yourself from your own self-esteem / mental health issues?

This is typical of all women. The exact same twisted logic is applicable to claims of “psychological abuse”. In this day & age, simply disagreeing with a woman is psychologically abusive. Unfortunately the legal system is broken.

It is time to recognize that a good majority of women have severe psychological problems (ADHD, BP, ODD, BPD). Education is required for our sons so that they can recognize & avoid this subset of the female gender entirely. This fugly bunch of females needs to be tattooed on the forehead & relegated to their proper place, hoarding cats.
Robert

Along the same note.. Last year (2010) here in Toronto, a young woman protester who had been detained during the G20 Summit claimed on the news that she had been “sexually assaulted” by the Police. I personally did not like what our cops were doing during that time, but “sexually assaulted”???

1) The detention center was a fenced in field at Lakeshore / Eastern Avenue.
2) Hundreds of protesters were held there for a few hours to stop their disruptive behavior. They were later released without charges.

So, If I am to believe this girl.. A Police Officer dropped his drawers & gave her the old rumpy-pumpy in front of hundreds of people in a fenced in field in broad daylight.

Again, Why didn’t this girl receive a tattoo on the forehead & a custom fitted sleeveless jacket? She was fugly to boot.

They walk amongst us.

A Voice for Men

Humanist Counter-Theory in the Age of Misandry

And All Women are Potential Child Abusers, Too

Blogroll

Videoroll

Suggested Reading

Share this:

Blogroll

Videoroll

Suggested Reading