Exposure to children vs. genital mutilation: “it is probably not a good idea to have the newborn baby undergoing the ceremony exposed so early in its life to so many young children.”
Steve Brulé wants to attend and document events around ICMI’16 in London. It is up to us to get him there. Please help.
Circumcision or Freedom – You Can’t Have Both!
The unethical practice of allowing parents to consent for their infant boy to MGM is illegal and immoral, and something parents should think about.
The doctor is wrong about the baby having no memory of the event; he has no idea what effect this unneeded assault on a newborn has on the baby’s mental and physical development as no studies have been done in these areas.
America seems divided three ways. Those who hate Trump, those who hate Clinton, and those who hate men.
The doctor says “you must carefully consider the benefits and risks,” except no one gave parents a right by proxy to force elective permanent surgery on an infant. It’s like saying “he’s a Democrat” or “he’s a Republican” – stupid, right? Except here it’s mutilation.
No, there is no “best age” to be genitally mutilated without your permission, and it would be safe to say 100% of infants strapped into the “Circumstraint” would agree.
So, people of all ages and sexes, if anyone wants to touch your junk without permission (especially if holding a scalpel):
– run away
– kick he/she in the crotch
– call police
The best time for a boy’s circumcision is the same as for a girl – never.
Flattering imitation and lying are two different things.
So, it’s a religious and a cosmetic procedure, two things that should be decided by the person concerned, no matter the age or sex.