(Washington, Feb 23) In what can only be described as a blatant violation of an individuals first amendment rights a Cincinnati court magistrate recently imposed a 6o day jail sentence for a man who posted an angry rant on his Facebook page concerning his divorce and custody battle.
Photographer Mark Byron had a son with his wife in 2010 and soon after the marriage became problematic. She accused him of domestic abuse and “threatening her with his fists.” He was exonerated only later to have a civil restraining order issued against him ordering him to stay away from his wife. Angry about the limited access he had to his son and the bitter divorce proceedings he posted an angry rant on his Facebook page in November of last year.
“…if you are an evil, vindictive woman who wants to ruin your husbands life and take your son’s father away from him completely – all you need to do is say that you’re scared of your husband or domestic partner…” he posted on Facebook.
Even though his wife was blocked from his page she saw it and told court officials she was “embarrassed” by the post. Court Magistrate Paul Myers determined that Mark’s rant on his Facebook page violated the protection order and ordered him to take down the post and put in its place an apology, written by Myers, or face 60 days in jail. Byron also has to pay his wife’s attorneys fees brought about by the Facebook issue if he wishes to avoid jail.
“It’s outlandish,” Mark Byron said. “I’m afraid to do anything. People are even fearful that Facebook can be regulated by a judge.”
The case is next in court March 19.
Sources:
http://news.cincinnati.com/article/20120222/NEWS010702/302210147
40 Posts in Total 
donations either one-time or on a monthly subscription basis.If you don't have paypal, check out the other options. If you want to get some merchandise and sponsor us at the same time, consider the AVfM store. 
quolls:
Jared White:
Codebuster:
napocapo69:
Rper1959:
What I don’t understand is that the original news report says he was exonerated of criminal charges but the forced apology states that he was convicted.
If she wasn’t stalking him on facebook then she would have never read it. This judge is just trying to protect his kingdom from criticism.
Right on. If he blocked her, then obviously he wasn’t stalking her. It looks like she was stalking him. After all, she was finding ways to read his personal messages in spite of the fact he tried to block her. Imagine if a man breached access to his ex-wife’s facebook page, after being blocked, and SHE was charged with stalking and forced to apologize to him or face 60 days in jail…. Yep… Patriarchy. Definitely.
This judge is just trying to protect his kingdom from criticism.
Gender pandering knows no bounds.
Probably thinks he may get a blow job out of the deal.
Chivalrous prick.
I guess freedom of speech was in conflict with a womans feeeeeelings. We saw who won that conflict. And they say this is a patriarchy.
By the way, if all that she could come up with to say was the he “threatened her with his fists,” it means that he should have never had a restraining order placed on him. His facebook message says it all.
“Court Magistrate Paul Myers determined that Mark’s rant on his Facebook page violated the protection order and ordered him to take down the post and put in its place an apology, written by Myers, or face 60 days in jail.”
In my opinion, this is yet another example of unconstitutional judicial tyranny by a hatefully prejudiced, feminist trained, activist judge as shown in “Witch-Hunting Males” at Youtube.
love that video, thanks, will resend it to all the men I know!
Thanks Rper1959. I’m still taking classes (cinema editing and photography), trying to learn how to do it better. The trouble is that learning leaves very little time for doing.
Ray,when it comes to pro-male movies:
You keep making them and we’ll keep promoting them.
Excellent video,Ray. A few members of Congress are aware of it too. If Congress is aware of our plight then maybe we can get rid of institutionalized misandry.
Hopefully the appellate court will have more sense once his appeal is heard. If this stands it would be a huge ruling against free speech. Not only can the government tell you what you can’t say, but they can order you to say what they want you to say. Misandry of the circumstance aside, I really don’t see how this can be permitted in a free society.
TDOM
Another man finds takes the Red Pill the hard way. More like a Red Suppository.
I feel his pain. No man gets married with the hope that someday he will have his child taken from him by a vindictive bitch and a bigoted court.
At the same time it is well established to everyone that these things happen. If you are a man who ignores these risks and fails to take steps to protect yourself then I find it difficult to be sorry for you.
At this point I’d just walk away from everything. I know better than to waste everything I own on a futile attempt to be a real parent. But that’s what family court does to you. It pretends to treat you fairly until it takes everything from you. It keeps dangling that carrot of hope and you keep running after it.
Stories like this make my blood boil. This judge trampled on a man’s basic rights as well as on his dignity. And for no reason other than to spare some whiney bitch “embarrassment” for something that was essentially none of her business to begin with.
Absolutely infuriating. Nothing says “decline of western civilization” better than bullshit like this.
Mr. Byron – if you ever stumble upon this page just know that you are not alone, and if you need to vent you’ve found the best outlet available.
Well sending him a message on his facebook page to let him know we are thinking of him would help. Which I did by the way. Perhaps a few others would give him a sense that there are more people who support him.
Great idea and I will do that as well. I’m still new to Facebook (late bloomer) so I don’t readily think of these things, ya know.
Not giving you shiat my friend. Just getting the word out there. Hope more take your lead.
What’s his facebook website address?
Typical mangina judge or to be Zubatyesque: The judge in the white hat and black dress.
Time to start creating fund raisers for Men.
I agree. But, if I were to go out there on that campus and try to do a fund raiser for ANY male cause, I would not only leave pennyless, I would face shaming language from female students, be called a chauvanist, etc. Some girl would probably complain and I would get shut down. If I did a fund raiser for animal rights, I would probably have to get an armored truck to store the funds.
Than do a fundraiser for animals. Men are animals, just ask any feminist
I warn men, avoid college. We are working with our Indian MRA and Masculinists Gurus to open the First Masculinists College in History. Male Studies will predominate as well as tech and other courses.
If I was that guy I would be giving that judge the finger and leaving the post up, I would follow up with a post of exactly what the judge is doing.
This demonstrates that judges do not want their rulings made public in family matters because they can not stand up to public scrutiny. Every man should publish every detail of any family court rulings and bigoted discriminatory actions taken by pussy whipped judges. The fact they are so desperate to keep their decisions secret and out of public gaze means they know they stink and their biggest fear is the public being able to see them for what they are.
This is precisely what is going on. Family courts seek to avoid all accountability to the law and currently have carte blanche to do so.
I tried to copy and post this story yesterday afternoon the moment I read it. It wouldn’t take on this site. I apologize for 30 days….
Welcome to the fight, Marc Byron.
What I find most disturbing about the whole ordeal is that the guy didn’t write anything that was wrong or untrue. Heck, he didn’t even mention the name of his ex-wife or that she is the evil one (though that is what will make sense in context to the people who know him personally).
The judge got pissed because the man spoke the truth… and the truth is dangerous to those people. They don’t want people to know about the racket that they are running.
So the man has to write an apology… the judge’s decision, doesn’t say WHAT he has to write exactly. Here’s what I would write:
I would like apologize for a recent comment I made on facebook. I apologize for speaking the truth about the family courts. I apologize for for feeling unjustifiably bitter and angry when my children, my assets, and my very livelihood are being taken away from me. But most of all I apologize for exercising my right to free speech among a social medium that supposedly only contained people who are in friendly terms with me. I am sincerely sorry for even thinking that as divorced father, I am entitled to the same basic human rights as any other human being. I truly wish my wife and the presiding judge of this case the best and I really hope life turns out the way it should for them.
Nothing offensive about it right? I apologized, OK?
Whew!
I’ve been following this story since it first hit Slashdot and was concerned when I saw the article hit my feed reader (more on that later) and the headline made it appear as though he was being slapped with a jail sentence despite having capitulated (albeit while appealing) which would have been insult to injury at this point. Glad that the headline was simply being sensationalist and no additional action has taken place.
Finally I keep having all sorts of issues with the site, is there a place where I should be making a report on these issues? I mean things like the flash plugin for the featured videos constantly trying to overwhelm my CPU and usually crashing after making the browser non-responsive for nearly five minutes. (I am on Linux and using Firefox but do not seem to have these issues anywhere else.)
Also my feed reader which is on my Android phone truncates the articles so I use a full rss text fetcher (WizardRSS) to get the text, half of the time it seems to sputter out and get the headlines and the article is only some generic text from the AVfM in the Mainstream Media page. Is there a way to get the full rss feed from you guys directly which would probably fix the problem?
Sorry for going off topic, but when I saw the headline and had to get my netbook out to see whether this was some new development in the Bryon case I figured I should see if I can fix the issue more permanently.
–happy one
PS: I could probably install flashblock to correct the flash plugin issues, but I somehow doubt I am the only one having these issues and I’d hate to change the way I browse the net for trouble on one site…
If you’re using Ubuntu, just use the package manager to install chromium. It’s working well for me. Firefox seems a bit bloated and unresponsive at times. If you’re using 64 bit, I don’t know if they made flash for that yet. There is a trick to put in a 32 bit wrapper to run flash in but I just opted to change my system as most software is not written to optimize on the 64 bit processors anyway. Make sure you’re using a PAE (Physical Address Extention) kernel if you have more than 4 GB memory.
For RSS, I use google reader on my Android. I think the reason you get truncated text is because that is what the site is sending as a synopsis to the feeds. Most sites will use the entire article as a synopsis (lazy webdev).
Ubuntu? Gross…..or not
Bloody “Farce Book” more like it. So the deal is we have to shut up there too.
The truth is out there no doubt about it, and we get smacked on the bum for telling of it in public and now in our homes in front of a monitor.
In this case we have bloke who isn’t telling the “truth” as such, he’s telling his opinion about something. It can be argued well that he’s broken no laws – only rules.
Laws and rules are not the same thing. For example:
It’s a rule that when asked you open your bag when exiting a shop, (Australia) but it’s no law and this is why I for example never comply with this rule.
As far as I always knew it to be, you could spout any unpopular opinion anywhere you liked and break rules here and there. In fact these things are necessary from time to time to break dogma and doctrine for example.
Nope, things are different in the land of “Cunts o’ Court” as the sherry soaked, ruddy cheeked king there sits under a powdered crown of curly hair and decrees bad words are bad things.
The stenographer writes frantically:
“Don’t say bad things… Shhhh. furthermore I am going to force you to say good things as good things are the opposite of bad things.”
The stenographer is astounded with the poor English but writes verbatim his words anyway:
“Say good thing Mr Byron and no you go to gaol which is bad thing.”
Footnote:
The threat of gaol is a bad thing but it’s a good thing in this matter because Mark Byron is a man and that’s a bad thing.
Unbelievable. This is much like a dictatorship in which there’s no expression other than what the government allows, to the point where it replaces any personal statement with an official one. Hopefully it won’t stand on appeal.
As the nightmare progresses towards the inevitable conclusion, we are all going to have to recognize a couple of unpleasant realities.
Acts of violence and injustice by the state against its own citizens do not stop because of protest or reasoned discourse, they are only stopped through open, public rebellion.
That rebellion can be violent, or non-violent, but historically non-violent protest has only met with limited success.
Nonetheless, it is time for all men to rebel. Do not attend supervised access. Do not pay child support. Do not accept less than equal status as a parent. Do not pay alimony. Do not pay court-ordered legal and other fees. Do not produce or create wealth or taxes.
Leave the country if possible.
If you accommodate the current madness, it will only grow.
In short; Become as big a source of friction to the machine as possible.
I agree. Unfortunately most men love their kids and will enslave themselves on the hope it will result in some meaningful relationship. Few become educated enough about their own plight until they’ve already been placed on the child support treadmill.
Still, you are right. The only way to beat this system is to break this system. It relies on our submission and the moment we decide not to be slaves is the moment they must devote resources to force us and then explain and justify why they are forcing us.
The more the few resist the harder they make it for the many. The harder they make it for the many the more join the few. Eventually our numbers will reach a critical mass and when that happens the government will decide whether they want rebellion or compromise.
At this point I’m hoping for the rebellion.
Come the Rebellion/Revolution, these tyrants are going to be forced to eat a box of used tampons.
We comin for *you* mutha.
“Do not produce or create wealth or taxes.”
Cash and barter is king, avoid banks and tax, I recommend tax avoidance big time if you can get away with it, FTSU!
I would have taken the 60 days in jail and told the judge to go fuck himself. And I would’ve kept the rant up on Facebook.
We’re already guilty of being male. Let them spend 10 grand incarcerating me for 2 months. When I get out I’ll say I can’t pay child support because I lost my job. Now go fuck yourself.
I’ve already decided this society is not worth supporting anymore. I consider the government my enemy. This year in July, the start of the new financial year in Australia, the tax free threshold for income tax is rising to $18000, up from $6000. This is part of the compensation package to make up for the carbon tax that is being introduced. I actually fully support this, I support anything that lowers income tax and places those taxes onto consumption in some way, after all, you can control…..lower your consumption…..the only way you have to lower your income tax is to earn less, or piss your money away on deductable items……earn less in other words.
This new tax scale will bod well with me. It coincides nicely with the period of time I wanted to be winding my work life right back to a min. It shall not be long until this parasite society never receives another cent from me in income tax, because I was going to be winding right back soon anyway. My consumption will……as always, be kept low…..so they won’t get a hell of a lot of tax from me that way either.
The reason I’m bringing this up, is that this is one of the best forms of protest. Just stop feeding the beast. Stop struggling to accumulated wealth and assets, and just lower your consumption down to a low level by removing all the rubbish from your life. A double blow for society…..you buy less, use less, thus support the economy less, you earn less so you pay less tax. Add to that, by being an activist, and a pain in the ass, and as much of a drain on society as possible.
Yes, this guy should just leave the post up….follow up with more detailed posts, naming the judge, and just say screw you, make them pay to support him, and quit being a productive member of society…..be a parasite and trouble maker instead. His life is going to made miserable for the next god knows how many years anyway, so make them pay for it.
I reckon this would be a great operation for our hero with the video camera Daddy Justice or an associate
http://www.shrink4men.com/2011/12/08/now-lawyer-and-vawa-defender-lisalyn-r-jacobs-charged-with-assaulting-ben-vonderheide-aka-daddy-justice/
to FTSU by exposing this ‘court’ and the ‘judge’ for what they are – lowlife misandric idiots.
Now Cincinnati, try sticking an injunction on me for that.
Bring it on bigots.
Why look, a list of judges and magistrates for that county: http://www.hamiltoncountyrepublicanparty.org/judges What are you going to do with it?
Yay, my link!
Now how about this one…
http://www.colorlines.com/archives/2012/02/georgia_rep_fights_anti-abortion_bill_with_anti-vasectomy_act.html
“Georgia State Rep. Yasmin Neal has introduced House Bill 1116 that proposes limiting vasectomies for men, except in cases where not getting one would result in death or “impairment of a major bodily function.”
The anti-vasectomy bill was a response to a bill that would punish abortions performed after the 20th week of pregnancy with prison sentences between one and 10 years.
“The day has come where men should feel the same pressure and invasion of privacy that women have faced for years,” Yasmin said a statement.”
http://jacksonville.com/news/georgia/2012-02-22/story/georgia-house-democrats-make-light-republicans-abortion-bill-vasectomy
Of course the problem with this is that men curtailing their fertility doesn’t involve a decision about the reproductive rights of women, as abortion does of men, nor does it involve the destruction of a fetus.
More feminist ‘logic.’
I would do the time, fuck the legal system, about time MRA’s gave the legal system a kick to the curb.
I am yet to be charged with any thing when ir comes to my sticker and poster run’s.I suspect that day might come, my middle finger is also at the ready.
We could copy the facebook page and make it go viral.
MRA’s need to give western legal system the middle finger, if we don’t we are screwed.MRA’s need to become the law.
Do jail time, or put a message on your facebook page for a few days?
I gotta say, doing the time would really just be cutting off the nose to spite the face. But the face is a cunt, so the nose has got to go.
Wonder if anyone would take notice if court houses started mysteriously burning down? I’m not advocating it, but that may be what is required to stop this circus.
They will hopefully just collapse due to so many men going MGTOW/Zeta ZMGTOW.
Sign on the front door
Due to millions of males not paying tax we apologise for this court house closure.
“…about time MRA’s gave the legal system a kick to the curb.”
The last time I was sworn in to a jury duty panel, 30 people stood and said “yes,” me among them, then 29 people sat down. I remained standing and added “under duress” in a loud, clear voice. The judge turned beet red with rage and gave me a small lecture and said, “We’ll get to you later.”
I said nothing, but thought, “No problem judge, but I will still have nothing to do with your vile, corrupt system and I do declare my independence from it, because of vile, unconstitutional, feminist ideology corruptly influencing every facet of it.”
Later during voir dire, I lectured the judge that the constitution does not say “We the judges,” but instead, “We the people,” and that it is not just my right, it is my duty to oppose corrupt feminist influenced legal systems like that in place in L.A. County and California as per my founding fathers’ instructions in the Declaration of Independence.
“Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”
I also mentioned that I was a jury nullificationist and would sit in judgment of the law as well as the facts in evidence in the case.
I will be doing the exact same thing the next time I’m called to jury duty. It is not just my right – IT’S MY DUTY!
I think a better way to do it is to just keep your mouth shut, and vote not guilty, and tie the whole jury up for months in lockdown until they vote your way in order to go home.
If you haven’t done so already you may want to check out the movie ’12 angry men’.
> “I really don’t see how this can be permitted in a free society.”
And that does exactly WHAT?
Where is the pro-male fund to hire lawyers to defend him?
Guys eternally “wonder” why they are reamed. It’s simple: feminists attack…and men “ponder.”
Men make feminists pay no penalties.
Mewling online changes nothing. Feminism grew because men never opposed it.
If men don’t unite and fight, we’ll be saying the same ineffectual shite 40 years from now: “How could they do that”
Easy. We let them.
Spot on, the problem is 99% male inaction.
He should fight it. The EFF may take it since this is one of those areas which directly effect the freedom of people to express themselves. This needs to go to the Supreme Court since it goes directly to Freedom of Expression and seems to be First Amendment material. Of course that is my opinion, but it would be worth a shot.
Fucking disgusting, piece of shit ‘judges’. How the fuck do we bring to justice, en masse, the rank filth occupying the benches? These PsOS are given the easiet and most respected jobs in ‘society’, simply sit on your fat fucking ass all day and listen to people tell stories, iron clad job security, all these privileges, and what the fuck do they do in return? They can’t even muster a molecule of decency, a fucking fiber of justice from their entire bodies. Instead, in all of their good fortune and bestowed power, they can only rain down hellfire and corruption on the citizens that provide them their privileged lives. It’s only recently that I’m learning how deeply fucked and corrupt the bench is. Their is nothing, nothing in this world more disgusting than a corrupt judge, using the faith and privilege society has granted him to annihilate and just completely terrorize people’s lives. The scum of the earth. Our problems are deeply rooted in the cockroaches playing judges, they must be targeted for any realistic hope of gains.
If this judge gets away with this without opposition, what will come next? How far will they go? The only outlet that this man had left was to try to talk to someone who would listen about what had happened. Our judicial system even wants to take that right away from men. Then what? Men will have no outlet at all whatsoever. It will be take whatever punishment the women and their white knight judges dish out and don’t even think about even complaining about it; suck it up and be a real man and just say nothing; we don’t want to hear your “whining”. It’s criminal.
This is a perfect example of judges ruling by reproductive instinct.
I am not convinced that it will stop here. What if a man merely verbally expresses what this man expressed in writing? Could he also be sent to prison for six months? Could a judge force him to verbally apologize or face prison? Will men who overhear other men disrespecting women soon be able to turn those men in? Will judges force those reported men to apologize to the women they disrespect? Notice the total silence out of women on this issue. There are practically NO women drawing attention to this.
Yes Ben, The things you are saying are like prophecies, and it’s similar to things I used to say when I was your age about the future of feminist governance and misandry, and much of it has come true.
At least now there are many more men fighting against it than there was then, and I believe it is growing. Also, there are many many men who are closet anti feminists.
We have to reject white knights, manginas in our lives, and do what we can to make them pay for their shit. I’ll give you one example of many. Many years ago, I was at a party at a friend’s house. A woman there, a very attractive woman, took offence to something I was saying in a conversation with somebody else, and butted in and got very aggressive, she verbally abused me, making a real scene, and even threatened to punch my head in. This woman was only a friend of someone who attended the party, my friend, the owner of the house, didn’t even know her, where as I was a regular at his house, and had helped him paint and renovate, and was currently helping him recarpet……but he done nothing….and when push came to shove….actually took sides with her.
Our friendship ceased at that point, and I made him pay a high price for his manginaism. And I made sure he knew exactly why.
Men need to take stock of their friends. If you have friends that sell you out in exchange for having some piece of fluff approve of them, they are not your friends, and don’t deserve anything from you anymore, except a punch in the mouth if you’re up to it.
I even told my father, who butted into an argument between a man and a woman at a night club many years ago, and got a massive black eye for his trouble, that he deserved it.
Guys who run around sticking their noses in, running to the rescue of any woman who is demonstrating the slightest displeasure with any man, are just pussy begging fucking maggots who don’t have a male friend in the world that they won’t flush down the toilet for a smile and a bit of a flirt from an attractive woman.
What a load of horse shyte.
I agree with what Denis and Ben said about the ex-harpy stalking Marc.
If she was so afraid of him then why go snooping around his facebook page?
I know what my choice of action would be and some of you have already made mention of it, the middle finger salute with a side dish of phuck u.
I wouldn’t give that bitch dime one and this brings me to another topic I heard of. I do not know the legality of it, but here it is.
You are ordered to pay support for the child, does that mean the support has to come in the form of money?
Could the father not just go out and buy the child food clothing etc and hand the wife the bill and say support provided so choke on it, your ass aint living off of my pay-cheque.
Again I am not sure of the legality of it but if it can be done then I say beautiful and choke on it ugly sisters.
If I was in the situation I might even take it a step further and figure out just how much the childs portion of the roof over their head is worth and pay only that amount, not one dime more.
Watch the ugly sisters cry bloody murder over that one, but hey you femies are saying your equal in all things so get off your va-paychecks and prove it.
You have to pay support in the manner that the court says. Here in Australia, the child support agency sends you invoices, just like utility bills, and you pay them. If you are frequently late, or get to far behind, the ex can tell the child support agency to deduct the payments out of your pay. The child support agency has the authority to force employers to withhold the calculated percentage of your pay, and remit it to the Tax office, along with your tax, which is withheld from each pay check anyway, and remitted to the ATO every three months.
If you are providing other things, like food, paying for school, etc etc, you can ask the CSA to modify your payments, and they will look at it…..and usually give you the finger. If you manage to get things modified, it will usually take about a year of fighting with them.
Looks like the femie cuntroled court here in Ont. closed that door as well. I just took a quick look through the law and noticed the wording demands payment in money. The conversation I had with the individual was years ago, so it is no longer applicable. Bummer
However could a father not make a request for the reciepts proving the money was actually spent on the child(ren) ?
The next step would be to claim unjust enrichment on behalf of your child if the ex couldn’t prove the money was used to provide for the child.
See here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unjust_enrichment
Just a few things I am aware of and am pointing them out to those caught in the family law trap.
I am no expert in this area. I have never been through it but have talked with more than a few dad’s over the years always empathetic to their plight but not knowledgeable enough to make some solid suggestions.
Ot but I found it on the Daily and think since it might be good news feel it is worth mentioning:
Mother-of-three facing extradition from Britain and a trial in U.S. for kidnapping her children – FIFTEEN years after fleeing an unhappy marriage
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2104932/Mother-kidnapped-children-14-years-ago-return-US-face-charges.html
Lets hope this kidnapper gets what she deserves
Family Courts are no different at all from the “show trials” that occurred under Stalin and Hitler. As with those courts, before the trial begins the decision has already been made by the judge. The show trial’s only intent is to make the masses believe that justice has been deliberated and applied. When a man goes into Family Court on Day 1, the decison has already been made. The Family Courts do not want what goes on to be exposed, thus court orders to enforce silence. This is something Stalin, Hitler, also did. Our Founding Fathers would correctly identify what is going on as tyranny. They impose injustice, and also make it illegal to speak freely about it. If THAT is not tyranny than what is? If injustice is imposed by the government, and the Constitution is ignored, and no outlet exists for a so-called free people to make changes and correct an unjust system, what is left? Anybody remember the Darren Mack divorce case? That’s the case where a man fought back in Family Court by shooting and almost killing a Family Court judge. That is what tyrany leads to. This case is what prompted AB52 in the Nevada state legislature. It passed. Family Court cases in NV are now under review. That is, judges are monitored as to how they make alimony and other decisons in divorce cases. My guess is such a law would never had been considered and passed all the while the judicial abuses were imposed and the men were prevented from speaking out. Injustice in the end eventually results in violence when no other avenue for redress is allowed. I sure hope Family Court judges are reading this.
Dennis, you are stamped-in-steel right about it, all of it. The fact that AVfM and MRAs generally, and to their credit, refuse to consider violence an “alternative”, does not weaken the fact that the moment protest degenerates to violence in any widespread or intensive form, then – and sometimes only then – do the pols, the lawyers, the judges, the whole establishment, look up from their agenda of tyranny, and take notice.
This is an outrage. The judge should be disbarred for penalizing free speech and the judgement should be vacated.
This kind of stuff against men AND BOYS is what happens now mainly because men of yesteryear didn’t fight back. (Men of today aren’t either, not really). All men really knew better than to just let radical feminism have an unbridled free for all and a playing field left only to feminists. If we MRA’s want to make a real difference, we are doing to have to piss a lot of women off, hurt their feelings, unite, and fight back. The longer we refrain from manning up, the worse things will get. It is great to see so many opinions, just like what is on this site, but if we really want to make a difference, we are going to have to do something besides just complain. Organize, protest, march, raise money, donate, videos, marriage strikes, write books, make websites, being brave enough to tell the truth to women no matter what it cost us, and a slew of other ways men can really make a difference and send a clear message to women that we love them but enough is enough. If men are going to act like men again, they are going to have to sacrifice things they would rather not. The time is drawing near and when it does, be man enough to join the fight—yes PUBLICLY. Else, how do you expect to win anything while clinging to the very things that are kicking your ass—uncomfortable, but the truth! Love you all, but things really need to change and it is up to men to change it. Now do you really want change or not? Complaining is not enough! Remember, our hardwiring can be overcome if we will fight the conditioning and socialization imposed upon males. Think…and do!
You are so right on. Activism is the way to go and if we piss off women that the way it is. Women had no problem pissing off men so I say fuck them.
The court needs money to operate. It will not do what I might think it “should” do. The entire government is long-infected by anti-Constitutionalism. A public that does not want freedom will not organize to take back OUR freedoms by means of bottom-up county-by county political organization. On the other hand, a public that does want freedom is already busy working on it. Sex bias is of course an issue the case discussed here, yet the government has no legitimacy in oppressing any citizen, regardless of sex, and the corrupt and violent bureaucracy will do its best to harm the females once they are done crushing the males. Destroy the family by getting the father out and the children are vulnerable to the incedible abuses perpetuated by the Dept. of Education’s Pavlovian dog-training designed to crush character and intellect. And what happens to the narcisstic women’s fatherless boys? Only the lucky ones avoid dangerous legal or illegal drugs. Only the lucky young men ever even see the first child they conceive (usually sacrificed on the altar of the cult of Gaia, better known as eugenic Planned Parenthood). — Take away the money from the parasite government and things will change. In the present financial crisis there is a real opportunity to strangle tyranny, but not without planning and organization. — Nullify now!
Aww did the princess get her oh so precious feelings hurt?… after stalking someone on the internet??
Princess needs to wake up and realize that we live in a “grown up” society that consists of (mostly) mature adults.
But look at me… suggesting that she doesnt act like a child and hold her feelings above another individuals First Amendment Right… thatd be out right misogynistic!
I have experienced similar events from my vindictive ex-wife. Her campaign to alienate my children combined with a system full of gender and racial profiling has lead me to give up my fight for my kids. I gave her custody hoping it would stop the cycle of fighting for the sake of my kids. However, it never really stops when your up against a vindictive bitch who’s mission it is to destroy you and your relationship with your children. Staying away from her was my only solution with a system so anti-man/father that we men have little chance against such women. All they need to do is “say” they are afraid and you are automatically and immediately considered an abuser regardless of any facts. Men are being considered guilty purely from this accusation alone, which can also have you thrown in jail until you pay a lawyer thousands to prove your innocent. All this based on fact-less accusations from a nasty vindictive woman on a campaign to remove you from your children’s life. This emasculation is causing a tremendous amount of mental health problems in men. Many disorders including depression and PTSD are surfacing as men struggle with this inequality. What the courts and political system have been ignoring due to this extreme feminism is that woman can be more abusive than men and that gender alone doesn’t tell the whole truth behind a story. Research is needed to support this, but ask most psychotherapists today how many more men’s support groups exist today compared to the past due to this phenomenon. It can’t be ignored forever.